Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T05:33:30.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review: Feeding conserved forage to horses: recent advances and recommendations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

P. A. Harris ,
A. D. Ellis ,
M. J. Fradinho ,
A. Jansson ,
V. Julliand ,
N. Luthersson ,
A. S. Santos  and
I. Vervuert
P. A. Harris*
Affiliation:
Equine Studies Group, WALTHAM Centre for Pet Nutrition, Leics LE14 4RT, UK
A. D. Ellis
Affiliation:
UNEQUI, Research Education Innovation, Southwell, Nottinghamshire, NG25 0DS, UK
M. J. Fradinho
Affiliation:
CIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
A. Jansson
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
V. Julliand
Affiliation:
AgroSup Dijon, 21079 Dijon Cedex, France
N. Luthersson
Affiliation:
Hestedoktoren I/S, Bukkerupvej 195, 4360 Kr. Eskilstrup, Denmark
A. S. Santos
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Escola Universitária Vasco da Gama, 3020-210 Coimbra, Portugal CITAB-UTAD – Center for Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, Vila Real, PO Box 1013, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
I. Vervuert
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Nutrition, Nutrition Diseases and Dietetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 9, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The horse is a non-ruminant herbivore adapted to eating plant-fibre or forage-based diets. Some horses are stabled for most or the majority of the day with limited or no access to fresh pasture and are fed preserved forage typically as hay or haylage and sometimes silage. This raises questions with respect to the quality and suitability of these preserved forages (considering production, nutritional content, digestibility as well as hygiene) and required quantities. Especially for performance horses, forage is often replaced with energy dense feedstuffs which can result in a reduction in the proportion of the diet that is forage based. This may adversely affect the health, welfare, behaviour and even performance of the horse. In the past 20 years a large body of research work has contributed to a better and deeper understanding of equine forage needs and the physiological and behavioural consequences if these are not met. Recent nutrient requirement systems have incorporated some, but not all, of this new knowledge into their recommendations. This review paper amalgamates recommendations based on the latest understanding in forage feeding for horses, defining forage types and preservation methods, hygienic quality, feed intake behaviour, typical nutrient composition, digestion and digestibility as well as health and performance implications. Based on this, consensual applied recommendations for feeding preserved forages are provided.

Keywords

foragehealthhygienebehaviourrequirements
Type
Review Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , June 2017 , pp. 958 - 967
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References from 2010 onwards (The list of references from 2009 and before is given in Supplementary Material S1).Google Scholar
Andrews, FM, Larson, C and Harris, P 2016. Nutritional management of gastric ulceration. Equine Veterinary Education, doi:10.1111/eve.12495.Google Scholar
Bergero, D and Peiretti, PG 2011. Intake and apparent digestibility of permanent meadow hay and haylage in ponies. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 31, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berny, P, Caloni, F, Croubels, S, Sachana, M, Vandenbroucke, V, Davanzo, F and Guitart, R 2010. Animal poisoning in Europe. Part 2: companion animals. Veterinary Journal 183, 255–259.Google Scholar
Bockisch, F, Aboling, S, Coenen, M and Vervuert, I 2015. Yellow oat grass intoxication in horses: pitfalls by producing hay from extensive landscapes? A case report. Tierarztliche Praxis Grosstiere Nutztiere 43, 296–304.Google Scholar
Borgia, L, Valberg, S, McCue, M, Watts, K. and Pagan, J 2011. Glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to feeding hay with different non‐structural carbohydrate content in control and polysaccharide storage myopathy‐affected horses. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 95, 798–807.Google Scholar
Connysson, M, Essén-Gustavsson, B, Lindberg, JE and Jansson, A 2010. Effects of feed deprivation on Standardbred horses in training fed a forage-only diet and a 50:50 forage-oats diet. Equine Veterinary Journal Suppl 38, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, G, Barfoot, C, Dugdale, A, Harris, P and Argo, C 2011. Voluntary ingestion of wood shavings by obese horses under dietary restriction. British Journal of Nutrition 106, S178–S182.Google Scholar
Dougal, K, de la Fuente, G, Harris, PA, Girdwood, SE, Pinloche, E and Newbold, CJ 2013. Identification of a core bacterial community within the large intestine of the horse. PLoS One 8, e77660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dougal, K, de la Fuente, G, Harris, PA, Girdwood, SE, Pinloche, E, Geor, RJ, Nielsen, BD, Schott, HC II, Elzinga, S and Newbold, CJ 2014. Characterisation of the faecal bacterial community in adult and elderly horses fed a high fibre, high oil or high starch diet using 454 pyrosequencing. PLoS One 9, e87424.Google Scholar
Dugdale, AHA, Curtis, GC, Cripps, P, Harris, PA and Argo, C 2010. Effect of dietary restriction on body condition, composition and welfare of overweight and obese pony mares. Equine Veterinary Journal 42, 600–610.Google Scholar
Durham, A 2013. Intestinal disease. In Equine clinical and applied nutrition (ed. RJ Geor, PA Harris and M Coenen), pp. 568–581. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Earing, JE, Lawrence, LM, Hayes, SH, Brummer, M and Vanzant, E 2013. Digestive capacity in weanling and mature horses. Journal of Animal Science 91, 2151–2157.Google Scholar
Elia, JB, Hollis, N and Houpt, KA 2010. Motivation for hay: effects of a pelleted diet on behavior and physiology of horses. Physiology and Behavior 101, 623–627.Google Scholar
Ellis, AD 2010. Biological basis of behaviour and feed intake in horses. In The impact of Nutrition on the Health and Welfare of Horses (ed. AD Ellis, A Longland, M Coenen and N Miraglia), pp. 53–74. EAAP Publication No. 128. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ellis, AD, Redgate, S, Zinchenko, S, Owen, H, Barfoot, C and Harris, P 2015. The effect of presenting forage in multi-layered haynets and at multiple sites on night time budgets of stabled horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 171, 108–116.Google Scholar
Essén-Gustavsson, B, Connysson, M and Jansson, A 2010. Effects of crude protein intake from forage-only diets on muscle amino acids and glycogen levels in horses in training. Equine Veterinary Journal 42, 341–346.Google Scholar
Faubladier, C, Julliand, V, Danel, J and Philippeau, C 2013. Bacterial carbohydrate-degrading capacity in foal faeces: changes from birth to pre-weaning and the impact of maternal supplementation with fermented feed products. British Journal of Nutrition 110, 1040–1052.Google Scholar
Fedtke, A, Pfaff, M, Volquardsen, J, Venner, M and Vervuert, I 2015. Effects of alfalfa chaff on gastric mucosa in weanling foals. Pferdeheilkunde 31, 596.Google Scholar
Geor, RJ and Harris, PA 2013. Laminitis. In Equine applied and clinical nutrition, health, welfare and performance (ed. RJ Geor, PA Harris and M Coenen), pp. 469–486. Saunders, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hallam, S, Campbell, EP, Qazamel, M, Owen, H and Ellis, AD 2012. Effects of traditional versus novel feeding management on 24 hour time budget of stabled horses. In Forages and grazing in horse nutrition (ed. M Saastamoinen, MJ Fradinho, AS Santos and N Miraglia), pp. 319–321. EAAP Publication No. 132. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Harris, PA, Coenen, M and Geor, RJ 2013. Controversial areas in equine nutrition and feeding management: the editors’ views. In Equine clinical and applied nutrition (ed. RJ Geor, PA Harris and M Coenen), pp. 455–468. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Jansson, A and Harris, P 2013. A bibliometric review on nutrition of the exercising horse from 1970 to 2010. Comparative Exercise Physiology 9, 169–180.Google Scholar
Jansson, A and Lindberg, JE 2012. A forage-only diet alters the metabolic response of horses in training. Animal 6, 1939–1946.Google Scholar
Jansson, A, Saastamoinen, M and Lindberg, JE 2012. Forage feeding systems. In Forages and grazing in horse nutrition (ed. MT Saastamoinen, MJ Fradinho, AS Santos and N Miraglia), pp. 289–304. EAAP publication No. 132. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Jensen, RB, Austbø, D and Tauson, AH 2012. Feeding forage before or after oats affects caecum pH profiles in the horse. In Forages and grazing in horse nutrition (ed. MT Saastamoinen, MJ Fradinho, AS Santos and N Miraglia), pp. 327–330. EAAP Publication No. 132. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, AL, McAdams, SC and Whitlock, RH 2010. Type A botulism in horses in the United States: a review of the past ten years (1998–2008). Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 22, 165–173.Google Scholar
Kamphues, J 2013. Feed hygiene and related disorders in horses. In Equine applied and clinical nutrition (ed. RJ Geor, PA Harris and M Coenen), pp. 367–380. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Lindberg, JE 2013. Feedstuffs for horses. In Equine applied and clinical nutrition (ed. RJ Geor, PA Harris and M Coenen), pp. 319–331. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Martinson, K, Coblentz, W and Sheaffer, C 2011. The effect of harvest moisture and bale wrapping on forage quality, temperature, and mold in orchardgrass hay. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 31, 711–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEniry, J, Forristal, PD and O’Kiely, P 2011. Factors influencing the conservation characteristics of baled and precision-chop grass silages. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 50, 175–188.Google Scholar
Merritt, AM and Julliand, V 2013. Gastrointestinal physiology. In Equine clinical and applied nutrition (ed. RJ Geor, PA Harris and M Coenen), pp. 3–32. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Müller, CE 2012. Equine digestion of diets based on haylage harvested at different plant maturities. Animal Feed Science and Technology 177, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, CE, Hultén, C and Gröndahl, G 2011. Assessment of hygienic quality of haylage fed to healthy horses. Grass and Forage Science 66, 453–463.Google Scholar
Müller, CE, Johansson, M, Salomonsson, AC and Albihn, A 2013. Effect of anaerobic digestion residue vs. livestock manure and inorganic fertilizer on the hygienic quality of silage and haylage in bales. Grass and Forage Science 69, 74–89.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, J, Schrödl, W, Shehata, AA and Krüger, M 2015. Detection of Clostridium botulinum in liquid manure and biogas plant wastes. Folia Microbiologica 60, 451–456.Google Scholar
Potts, L, Hinkson, J, Graham, B, Löest, C and Turner, J 2010. Nitrogen retention and nutrient digestibility in geldings fed grass hay, alfalfa hay, or alfalfa cubes. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 30, 330–334.Google Scholar
Ragnarsson, S and Jansson, A 2011. A comparison of grass haylage digestibility and metabolic plasma profile in Icelandic and Standardbred horses. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 95, 273–279.Google Scholar
Ragnarsson, S and Lindberg, JE 2010. Nutritional value of mixed grass haylage in Icelandic horses. Livestock Science 131, 83–87.Google Scholar
Riet-Correa, F, Rivero, R, Odriozola, E, Adrien Mde, L, Medeiros, RM and Schild, AL 2013. Mycotoxicoses of ruminants and horses. Journal Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 25, 692–708.Google Scholar
Ringmark, S 2014. A forage-only diet and reduced high intensity training distance in Standardbred horses. PhD, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Ringmark, S and Jansson, A 2013. Insulin response to feeding forage with varying crude protein and amino acid content in horses at rest and after exercise. Comparative Exercise Physiology 9, 209–217.Google Scholar
Ringmark, S, Lindholm, A, Hedenstrom, U, Lindinger, M, Dahlborn, K, Kvart, C and Jansson, A 2015. Reduced high intensity training distance had no effect on VLa4 but attenuated heart rate response in 2-3-year-old Standardbred horses. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 57, 1.Google Scholar
Ringmark, S, Roepstorff, L, Essén-Gustavsson, B, Revold, T, Lindholm, A, Hedenström, U, Rundgren, M, Ögren, G and Jansson, A 2012. Growth, training response and health in Standardbred yearlings fed a forage-only diet. Animal 7, 746–753.Google Scholar
Särkijärvi, S, Sormunen-Cristian, R, Heikkila, T, Rinne, M and Saastamoinen, M 2012. Effect of grass species and cutting time on in vivo digestibility of silage by horses and sheep. Livestock Science 144, 230–239.Google Scholar
Séguin, V, Lemauviel-Lavenant, S, Garon, D, Bouchart, V, Gallard, Y, Blanchet, B, Diquelou, S, Personeni, E, Gauduchon, P and Ourry, A 2010. Effect of agricultural and environmental factors on the hay characteristics involved in equine respiratory disease. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 135, 206–215.Google Scholar
Virkajärvi, P, Saarijärvi, K, Rinne, M and Saastamoinen, M 2012. Grass physiology and its relation to nutritive value in feeding horses. In Forages and grazing in horse nutrition (ed. MT Saastamoinen, MJ Fradinho, AS Santos and N Miraglia), pp. 17–43. EAAP Publication No. 132. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Williams, S, Horner, J, Orton, E, Green, M, McMullen, S, Mobasheri, A and Freeman, SL 2015. Water intake, faecal output and intestinal motility in horses moved from pasture to a stabled management regime with controlled exercise. Equine Veterinary Journal 47, 96–100.Google Scholar
Williams, S, Tucker, CA, Green, MJ. and Freeman, SL 2011. Investigation of the effect of pasture and stable management on large intestinal motility in the horse, measured using transcutaneous ultrasonography. Equine Veterinary Journal 43, 93–97.Google Scholar
Wolf, P, Siesenop, U, Verspohl, J and Kamphues, J 2014. Hygienic quality of feedstuffs for small mammals sent to the consultation service. Tierärztliche Praxis Kleintiere 42, 101–106.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Harris supplementary material

Harris supplementary material 1

Download Harris supplementary material(File)
File 55.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Harris supplementary material

Harris supplementary material 2

Download Harris supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 53.1 KB