Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:08:28.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rate of feed passage in Japanese quail

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2020

I. P. T. Nóbrega Open the ORCID record for I. P. T. Nóbrega [Opens in a new window] ,
H. S. Nogueira ,
M. B. Lima ,
N. K. Sakomura ,
N. J. Peruzzi ,
S. M. B. Artoni ,
R. M. Suzuki  and
E. P. Silva
I. P. T. Nóbrega
Affiliation:
Departament of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal14883-900, Brazil
H. S. Nogueira
Affiliation:
Departament of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal14883-900, Brazil
M. B. Lima
Affiliation:
Departament of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal14883-900, Brazil
N. K. Sakomura
Affiliation:
Departament of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal14883-900, Brazil
N. J. Peruzzi
Affiliation:
Departament of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal14883-900, Brazil
S. M. B. Artoni
Affiliation:
Departament of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal14883-900, Brazil
R. M. Suzuki
Affiliation:
Departament of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal14883-900, Brazil
E. P. Silva*
Affiliation:
Departament of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal14883-900, Brazil
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The rate of passage (ROP) in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) influences the exposure time of food to the digestion and absorption processes. Consequently, ROP affects the efficiency of nutrient utilization and energy from the diet. This study aimed to determine the physiological parameters that characterize the digestive response, such as first appearance time (FAT), ROP, mean retention time (MRT) and transit time (TT) in adult Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica), and to evaluate the effects of sex, apparent metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen balance (AMEn) content in the diet and different types of markers on these parameters. In the first trial, we investigated the effects of sex and AMEn level (high- and low-energy diet) on the FAT parameter. Thirty-two male and 32 female Japanese quail were randomly allocated to 8 battery cages and assigned to 4 treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial design with 4 replicates of 4 birds for each treatment. To determine the FAT, ferric oxide (1%) was added to the diet, and the excreta of the quail was monitored until the first appearance of the marker. The results indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) in the FAT between males (100 min) and females (56 min), regardless of the AMEn content. In the second trial, thirty-two 32-week-old female Japanese quail in the laying phase were assigned to four treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial design, in which the main independent variables were type of marker (Cr or Ti) and AMEn level (high- and low-energy diets). In order to determine ROP (ET1%), MRT and TT (ET100%), the markers (0.5%: Cr2O3 and 0.5%: TiO2) were added to the diets, and the excreta were collected for 750 min. The excretion times for 1% (ET1%), 25% (ET25%), 50% (ET50%), 75% (ET75%) and 100% (ET100%) were estimated using cumulative excretion curves. No effect was detected for the AMEn level (P > 0.05); however, the effect of different marker types was significant (P < 0.05). This difference increased with time and ET100% was estimated to occur at 59 min. The ROP was estimated to be 68 min. The TT was estimated to be 540 min using Cr and 599 min using Ti, with an average MRT value of 0930 h. Taken together, our findings support the hypothesis that Japanese quail digestion through the GIT can be dynamic and differ based on sex or marker type.

Keywords

coturnix quailmean retention timemarkersmetabolizable energypassage rate
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue S2: 9th Workshop on Modelling Nutrient Digestion and Utilization in Farm Animals (MODNUT) , August 2020 , pp. s267 - s274
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Animal Consortium

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almirall, M and Esteve-Garcia, E 1994. Rate of passage of barley diets with chromium oxide: influence of age and poultry strain and effect of β-glucanase supplementation. Poultry Science 73, 1433–1440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarenga, IC, Aldrich, CG and Ou, Z 2019. Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs. Journal of Animal Science 97, 1036–1041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 2004. Official Methods of Analysis, volume 2, 18th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Borella, LE and Lippmann, W 1980. A simple non-radioactive method for the simultaneous quantitative determination of stomach emptying and intestinal propulsion in the intact conscious rat. Digestion 20, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coombe, JB and Kay, RNB 1965. Passage of digesta through the intestines of the sheep. Retentions times in the small and large intestines. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa-Castiblanco, DM 2017. Responses of quails in production at different levels of energy in the meta. PhD thesis, University Estadual Paulista, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, Jaboticabal, Brazil.Google Scholar
Didio, LJA 1986. Variação anatômica, In: Anatomia dos Animais Domésticos (ed. Getty, R), pp. 14–18. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2019. Retrieved on 28 December 2019, from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#homeGoogle Scholar
Ferrando, C, Vergara, P, Jimenez, M and Gonalons, E 1987. Study of the rate of food with Cr in mordanted plant cells in chickens (Gallus gallus). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 72, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gompertz, B 1825. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality and on a new method of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 115, 513–585.Google Scholar
Hunt, JN and Macdonald, I 1954. The influence of volume on gastric emptying. Journal Physiology 126, 459–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IBGE, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística 2017. Retrieved on 5 January 2020 from http://www.ibge.gov.brGoogle Scholar
Jordão Filho, J, Silva, JHV, Costa, FGP, Kazue, SN, Silva, CT and Chagas, NA 2011. Prediction equations to estimate the demand of energy and crude protein for maintenance, gain and egg production for laying Japanese quails. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 2423–2430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaupp, BF and Ivey, JE 1923. Digestive coefficients of poultry feeds and rapidity of digestion and fate of grit in the fowl. North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Kolakshyapati, M, Bailey, C, Zimazile Sibanda, T, Morgan, N and Ruhnke, I 2019. Determination of gastrointestinal passage rate using three different markers in laying hens. Journal Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 103, 1427–1436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mateos, GG and Sell, JL 1981. Influence of graded levels of fat on utilization of pure carbohydrate by the laying hen. The Journal of Nutrition 110, 1894–1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateos, GG, Sell, JL and Eastwood, J 1982. Rate of food passage (transit time) as influenced by level of supplemental fat. Poultry Science 61, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, WD, Ludden, PA, Nayigihugu, V and Hess, BW 2004. Technical note: a procedure for the preparation and quantitative analysis of samples for titanium dioxide. Journal of Animal Science 82, 179–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nóbrega, IPT, Nogueira, HS, Lima, MB, Sakomura, NK, Peruzzi, NJ, Artoni, SMB, Suzuki, RM and Silva, EP 2019. Modeling the rate of feed passage in Japanese quails. Advances in Animal Biosciences 10, 326.Google Scholar
Olukosi, OA, Bolarinwa, OA, Cowieson, AJ and Adeola, O 2012. Marker type but not concentration influenced apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in phytase-supplemented diets for broiler chickens and pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90, 4414–4420. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palander, S, Nasi, M and Palander, P 2010. Digestibility and energy value of cereal-based diets in relation to digesta viscosity and retention time in turkeys and chickens at different ages estimated with different markers. Archives of Animal Nutrition 64, 238–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rezaei, M, Karimi Torshizi, MA and Shariatmadari, F 2014. Inclusion of processed rice hulls as insoluble fiber in the diet on performance and digestive traits of Japanese quails. Journal of Animal Science Advances 4, 962–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, C, Maiorka, A and Félix, AP 2017. Motilidade gastrointestinal. In Fisiologia das aves comerciais (ed. Macari, M and Maiorka, A), pp.172–186. Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa, Ensino e Extensão, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.Google Scholar
Rochell, SJ, Applegate, TJ, Kim, EJ and Dozier, III WA 2012. Effects of diet type and ingredient composition on rate of passage and apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in broiler chicks. Poultry Science 91, 1647–1653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakomura, NK, Basaglia, R, Sá-Fontes, CML, Cristina, ML and Fernandes, JBK 2005. Modelo para estimar as exigências de energia metabolizável para poedeiras. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 34, 575–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savory, CJ 1987. How closely do circulation blood glucose levels reflect feeding state in fowls? Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 88A, 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savory, CJ and Gentle, MJ 1976. Effects of dietary dilution with fibre on the food intake and gut dimensions of Japanese quail. British Poultry Science 17, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, TA and Boldaji, F 1997. Comparison of inert markers [chromic oxide or insoluble ash (Celite)] for determining apparent metabolizable energy of wheat- or barley-based broiler diets with or without enzymes. Poultry Science 76, 594–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shires, A, Thompson, JR, Turner, BV, Kennedy, PM and Goh, YK 1987. Rate of passage of corn-canola meal and corn-soybean meal diets through the gastrointestinal tract of broiler and White Leghorn chickens. Poultry Science 66, 289–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibbald, IR 1979. Passage of feed through the adult rooster. Poultry Science 58, 446–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, JHV and Costa, FGP 2009. Tabela para codornas japonesas e européias, 2th edition. Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa, Ensino e Extensão, Jaboticabal, Brazil.Google Scholar
Tuckey, R, March, BE and Biely, J 1958. Diet and the rate of food passage in the growing chick. Poultry Science 37, 786–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieira, DVG, Costa, FGP, Lima, MR, Júnior, JGV, Bonaparte, TP, Cavalcante, DT, Pinheiro, SG, Souza, MS, Conti, ACM and Figueireido, EM 2017. Amino acid for Japanese quails: methodologies and nutritional requirements. In Amino acid: new insights and roles in plant and animal (ed. Asao, T), pp. 989–1686. IntechOpen, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, T, Ragland, D and Adeola, O 2017. Combination of digestibility marker and fiber affect energy and nitrogen digestibility in growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 230, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherbee, BM and Gruber, SH 1990. The effects of ration level on food retention time in juvenile lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris. Environmental Biology of Fishes 29, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar