Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:58:38.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of water intake and excretion flows in Holstein dairy cows under thermoneutral conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2012

H. Khelil-Arfa ,
A. Boudon ,
G. Maxin  and
P. Faverdin
H. Khelil-Arfa
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 Pegase, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 Pegase, F-35000 Rennes, France
A. Boudon*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 Pegase, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 Pegase, F-35000 Rennes, France
G. Maxin
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 Pegase, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 Pegase, F-35000 Rennes, France
P. Faverdin
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 Pegase, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 Pegase, F-35000 Rennes, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The increase in the worldwide demand for dairy products, associated with global warming, will emphasize the issue of water use efficiency in dairy systems. The evaluation of environmental issues related to the management of animal dejections will also require precise biotechnical models that can predict effluent management in farms. In this study, equations were developed and evaluated for predicting the main water flows at the dairy cow level, based on parameters related to cow productive performance and diet under thermoneutral conditions. Two datasets were gathered. The first one comprised 342 individual measurements of water balance in dairy cows obtained during 18 trials at the experimental farm of Méjussaume (INRA, France). Predictive equations of water intake, urine and fecal water excretion were developed by multiple regression using a stepwise selection of regressors from a list of seven candidate parameters, which were milk yield, dry matter intake (DMI), body weight, diet dry matter content (DM), proportion of concentrate (CONC) and content of crude protein (CP) ingested with forage and concentrate (CPf and CPc, g/kg DM). The second dataset was used for external validation of the developed equations and comprised 196 water flow measurements on experimental lots obtained from 43 published papers related to water balance or digestibility measurements in dairy cows. Although DMI was the first predictor of the total water intake (TWI), with a partial r2 of 0.51, DM was the first predictive parameter of free water intake (FWI), with a partial r2 of 0.57, likely due to the large variability of DM in the first dataset (from 11.5 to 91.4 g/100 g). This confirmed the compensation between water drunk and ingested with diet when DM changes. The variability of urine volume was explained mainly by the CPf associated with DMI (r.s.d. 5.4 kg/day for an average flow of 24.0 kg/day) and that of fecal water was explained by the proportion of CONC in the diet and DMI. External validation showed that predictive equations excluding DMI as predictive parameters could be used for FWI, urine and fecal water predictions if cows were fed a well-known total mixed ration. It also appeared that TWI and FWI were underestimated when ambient temperature increased above 25°C and possible means of including climatic parameters in future predictive equations were proposed.

Keywords

water intakewater excretionmodelingdairy cows
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 10 , October 2012 , pp. 1662 - 1676
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannink, A, Valk, H, Van Vuuren, AM 1999. Intake and excretion of sodium, potassium, and nitrogen and the effects on urine production by lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 1008–1018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beede, DK 1991. Dairy nutrition management: Mineral and water nutrition. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 7, 373–390.Google Scholar
Bibby, J, Toutenburg, H 1977. Prediction and improved estimation in linear models. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Boudon, A 1997. Effect of type of starch and forage particle size on the ruminal digestion of dairy cows. Master «Sciences et Techniques des Productions Animales». Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, France.Google Scholar
Brown, H, Wagner-Riddle, C, Thurtell, G 2000. Nitrous oxide flux from solid dairy manure in storage as affected by water content and redox potential. Journal of Environmental Quality 29, 630–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardot, V, Le Roux, Y, Jurjanz, S 2008. Drinking behavior of lactating dairy cows and prediction of their water intake. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2257–2264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castle, ME, Thomas, TP 1970. The water intake of British Friesian cows on ration containing various forages. Animal Production 20, 181–189.Google Scholar
Centraal Veevoederbureau (CVB) 2007. CVB Table Ruminants. Series no 32. CVB, The Hague, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Chapagain, AK, Hoekstra, AY 2003. Virtual water trade: a quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international trade of livestock and livestock products. Value of Water Research Report Series no. 13, pp. 21–45. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Commission International du Genie Rural (CIGR) 1984. Report of working group on climatization of animal houses. The Scottish Farm Building Investigation Unit, Craibstone, Bucksburn, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Dahlborn, K, Akerlind, M, Gustafson, G 1998. Water intake by dairy cows selected for high or low milk-fat percentage when two forage to concentrate ratios with hay or silage. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 167–176.Google Scholar
de Boer, IJM, Smits, MCJ, Mollenhorst, H, van Duinkerken, G, Monteny, GJ 2002. Prediction of ammonia emission from dairy barns using feed characteristics part I: Relation between feed characteristics and urinary urea concentration. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 3382–3388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delagarde, R, Peyraud, JL 1995. Influence of wheat supplementation on intake and digestibility in dairy cows fed autumn grass ad libitum indoors. Annales de Zootechnie 44, 210–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delagarde, R, Peyraud, JL 1998. Effect of the nature of the concentrate on the digestibility of a dried grass based diet on lactating dairy cow. Rencontres Recherches Ruminants 5, 264.Google Scholar
Delagarde, R, Perez-Ramirez, E, Peyraud, JL 2010. Ytterbium oxide has the same accuracy as chromic oxide for estimating variations of fecal dry matter output in dairy cows fed a total mixed ration at two feeding levels. Animal Feed Science and Technology 161, 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlemark, A 1988. Calculation of sensible heat and moisture loss from housed cattle using heat balance model. Report 60, Department of Farm Buildings, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 2006. Livestock long shadow. Environmental issues and options. Animal production and health division, FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Fox, DG, Tedeschi, LO, Tylutki, TP, Russell, JB, Van Amburgh, ME, Chase, LE, Pell, AN, Overton, TR 2004. The cornell net carbohydrate and protein system model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112, 29–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, M 1995. Effect of extended rumen fill on intake in lactating and dry dairy cows fed ration based on hay. Master Biologie et Productions Animales, Rennes 1 Univ., France.Google Scholar
Holter, JB, Urban, WE 1992. Water partitioning and intake prediction in dry and lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 1472–1479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) 2007. Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. Besoins de animaux, valeurs des aliments, Tables INRA 2007. Editions QUAE, Versailles, France.Google Scholar
Johnson, KG 1970. Sweating rate and the electrolyte content of skin secretions of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cross-bred cows. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 75, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, AJ, St Pierre, NR 2001. The relationship of milk urea nitrogen to urine nitrogen excretion in Holstein and Jersey cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 2284–2294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kume, S, Nonaka, K, Oshita, T, Kozakai, T 2010. Evaluation of drinking water intake, feed water intake and total water intake in dry and lactating cows fed silages. Livestock Science 128, 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kume, S, Nonaka, K, Oshita, T, Kozakai, T, Hirooka, H 2008. Effects of urinary excretion of nitrogen, potassium and sodium on urine volume in dairy cows. Livestock Science 115, 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurihara, M, Shibata, M, Mukai, A 1984. The effect of environmental temperature on water economy of dry and lactating Holstein cows given high concentrate ration. Japanese Journal of Livestock Management 20, 61–67.Google Scholar
Langhans, W, Rossi, R, Scharrer, E 1995. Relationships between feed and water intake in ruminants. In ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism, growth and reproduction (ed. WV Engelhardt, S Leonhard-Marek, G Breves and D Giesecke). Proceeding of the 8th International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology, pp. 199–216. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
Le Liboux, S, Peyraud, JL 1998. Effect of forage particle size and intake level on fermentation patterns and sites and extent of digestion in dairy cows fed mixed diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 73, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Liboux, S, Peyraud, JL 1999. Effect of forage particle size and feeding frequency on fermentation patterns and sites and extent of digestion in dairy cows fed mixed diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 76, 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, W, Shaw, SR 1978. A note on the individuality of the intake of drinking water by dairy cows. Animal Production 26, 225–227.Google Scholar
Little, W, Sansom, BF, Manston, R, Allen, WM 1976. Effects of restricting the water intake of dairy cows upon their milk yield, body weight and blood composition. Animal Science 22, 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maia, ASC, daSilva, RG, Battiston Loureiro, CM 2005. Sensible and latent heat loss from the body surface of Holstein cows in a tropical environment. International Journal of Biometeorology 50, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltz, E, Silanikove, N 1996. Kidney function and nitrogen balance of high yielding dairy cows at the onset of lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 1621–1626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDowell, RE, Moody, EG, Van Soest, PJ, Lehmann, RP, Ford, GL 1969. Effect of heat stress on energy and water utilization of lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 52, 188–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, U, Everinghoff, M, Gödeken, D, Flachowsky, G 2004. Investigations on the water intake of lactating dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 90, 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Hamed, D 1997. Effect of extended rumen fill on intake in lactating and dry dairy cows fed ration based on hay. Master Biologie et Productions Animales, Rennes 1 Univ., France.Google Scholar
Murphy, MR, Davis, CL, McCoy, GC 1983. Factors affecting water consumption by Holstein cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 66, 35–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (NRC) 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Nennich, TD, Harrison, JH, VanWieringen, LM, St Pierre, NR, Kincaid, RL, Wattiaux, MA, Davidson, DL, Block, E 2006. Prediction and evaluation of urine and urinary nitrogen and mineral excretion from dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 353–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordic feed evaluation system (NorFor) 2011. EAAP Scientific series, vol. 130 (ed. H Volden). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Paquay, R, De Baere, R, Lousse, A 1970. Statistical research on the fate of water in adult cow. II. The lactating cow. Journal of Agriculture Science (Cambridge) 75, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyraud, JL, Astigarraga, L, Faverdin, P 1997. Digestion of fresh perennial ryegrass fertilized at two levels of nitrogen by lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 64, 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, JI 1985. Milk production of Friesian cows subjected to high daytime temperatures when allowed food either ad lib or at night-time only. Tropical Animal Health and Production 17, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roseler, DK, Fox, DG, Chase, LE, Pell, AN, Stone, WC 1997. Development and evaluation of equations for prediction of feed intake for lactating Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 878–893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sannes, RA, Messman, MA, Vagnoni, DB 2002. Form of rumen-degradable carbohydrate and nitrogen on microbial protein synthesis and protein efficiency of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 900–908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc. (SAS) 2009. SAS user's guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Silanikove, N 1989. Role of rumen and saliva in the homeostatic response to rehydration in cattle. AJP – Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 256, 816–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stockdale, CR, King, KR 1983. A note on some of the factors that affect the water consumption of lactating dairy cows at pasture. Animal Production 36, 303–306.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Roberson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 2215–2225.Google Scholar
Widyobroto, BP, Peyraud, JL 1993. Effect of varying the proportion of concentrate with the same starch content in the diet on passage rate and on ruminal digestion in dairy cows. Annales de Zootechnie 42, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Khelil-Arfa Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Khelil-Arfa Supplementary Material(File)
File 8.5 MB