Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T04:22:44.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of the net energy value of broiler diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2014

B. Carré ,
M. Lessire  and
H. Juin
B. Carré*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR83 Recherches Avicoles, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
M. Lessire
Affiliation:
INRA, UR83 Recherches Avicoles, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
H. Juin
Affiliation:
INRA, UE1206 EASM, F-17700 Surgères, France
*
† E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Thirty pelleted diets were given to broiler chickens (eight birds per diet; 21 to 35 days of age) for individual in vivo measurements of dietary net energy (NE) value, using three trials with 10 diets/trial. Amino acid formulation of diets was done on the basis of ratios to CP. NE was measured according to the body analysis method. The basal metabolism component of NE values was calculated on the basis of mean metabolic weight using a coefficient obtained in a previous experiment. Information about apparent metabolisable energy (AME) value of diets, AME corrected to zero nitrogen retention (AMEn) and digestibilities of proteins, lipids, starch and sugars was available from a previous publication. In each trial, mean NE/AME ratios of diets varied by about 6%. From the multiple regressions (n=30) expressing NE and AMEn values as functions of digestible component contents, it was deduced that the NE/AMEn ratios assigned to dietary components were 0.760, 0.862, 0.806, 0.690 and 0.602 for CP, lipids, starch, (sucrose+glucose) and fermentable sugars (α-galacto-oligosaccharides and lactose), respectively. The NE/AME ratio of CP was 0.680. Regression calculations showed that the NE values assigned to individual birds (n=240) could also be predicted with diet AMEn values (NE=0.80 AMEn; R 2=0.770) or with an equation combining AMEn value and CP/AMEn ratio (R 2=0.773). The latter ratio was found to be the only additional parameter that was significant when added in the NE regression scheme based on AMEn.

Keywords

chickendietary energyNEMEAME
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 9 , September 2014 , pp. 1395 - 1401
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carré, B 2002. Carbohydrate chemistry of the feedstuffs used for poultry. In Poultry feedstuffs: supply, composition and nutritive value, poultry science symposium series, vol. 26 (ed. J McNab and N Boorman), pp. 39–56. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carré, B, Derouet, L and Leclercq, B 1990. The digestibility of cell wall polysaccharides from wheat (bran or whole grain) soyabean meal and white lupin meal in cockerels, Muscovy ducks and rats. Poultry Science 69, 623–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carré, B, Lessire, M and Juin, H 2013. Prediction of metabolisable energy value of broiler diets and water excretion, from dietary chemical analyses. Animal 7, 1246–1258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Groote, G 1974. Utilisation of metabolisable energy. In Energy requirements of poultry (ed. TR Morris and BM Freeman), pp. 113–133. British Poultry Science Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Farrell, DJ 1974. General principles and assumptions of calorimetry. In Energy requirements of poultry (ed. TR Morris and BM Freeman), pp. 1–24. British Poultry Science Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Farrell, DJ 1976. The influence of protein and amino acid balance in the diet of chickens on efficiency of utilization of dietary energy. In Energy metabolism of farm animals (ed. M Vermorel), pp. 97–100. European Association for Animal Production (EAAP), Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Geraert, PA, MacLeod, MG, Larbier, M and Leclercq, B 1990. Nitrogen metabolism in genetically fat and lean chickens. Poultry Science 69, 1911–1921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagely, KB, Palmquist, D and Bilyeu, KD 2013. Classification of distinct seed carbohydrate profiles in soybean. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 61, 1105–1111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, FW and Anderson, DL 1958. Comparison of metabolisable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks. Journal of Nutrition 64, 587–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INRA 1984. L’alimentation des animaux monogastriques: porc, lapin, volailles. INRA, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Jarrige, R 1980. Alimentation des Ruminants. INRA, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Just, A, Fernandez, JA and Jorgensen, H 1983. The net energy value of diets for growth in pigs in relation to the fermentative processes in the digestive tract and the site of absorption of the nutrients. Livestock Production Science 10, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larbier, M and Leclercq, B 1992. Nutrition et alimentation des volailles. INRA, Paris, France.Google Scholar
MacLeod, MG 1997. Effects of amino acid balance and energy:protein ratio on energy and nitrogen metabolism in male broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 38, 405–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Fortune, H, Shi, XS and Dubois, S 1994. Prediction of net energy value of feeds for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 344–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Dubois, S, Labussière, E, Carré, B and van Milgen, J 2010. Metabolic utilization of energy in monogastric animals and its implementation in net energy systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd EAAP International Symposium on Energy and Protein Metabolism and Nutrition (ed. GM Crovetto), pp. 573–582. Wageningen Academic Publisher, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Pirgozliev, V and Rose, SP 1999. Net energy systems for poultry feeds: a quantitative review. World’s Poultry Science Journal 55, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swennen, Q, Janssens, GPJ, Decuypere, E and Buyse, J 2004. Effects of substitution between fat and protein on feed intake and its regulatory mechanisms in broiler chickens: energy and protein metabolism and diet-induced thermogenesis. Poultry Science 83, 1997–2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Milgen, J, Noblet, J, Dubois, S, Carré, B and Juin, H 2001. Utilization of metabolizable energy in broiler chickens. In International Animal Agriculture and Food Science Conference; Indianapolis (USA); 2001/07/24-28. Poultry Science 80 (suppl. 1), 170.Google Scholar
Yang, Y, Iji, PA, Kocher, A, Thomson, E, Mikkelsen, LL and Choct, M 2008. Effects of mannanoligosaccharide in broiler chicken diets on growth performance, energy utilisation, nutrient digestibility and intestinal microflora. British Poultry Science 49, 186–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Znaniecka, G 1967. Calorific value of protein and fat of the chicken’s body. In Fourth Symposium on Energy Metabolism (ed. KL Blaxter, J Kielanowski and G Thorbeck), pp. 407–408. European Association of Animal Production (EAAP), Oriel Press, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar