Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:11:59.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physiological adaptations and ovarian cyclicity of Holstein and Montbéliarde cows under two low-input production systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2015

J. A. A. Pires*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France Université de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France
Y. Chilliard
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France Université de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France
C. Delavaud
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France Université de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France
J. Rouel
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France Université de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France
D. Pomiès
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France Université de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France
F. Blanc
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France Université de Lyon, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-69280 Marcy l'Etoile, France
*
Get access

Abstract

The objective was to study milk production, body reserve mobilization, metabolic and hormonal profiles, and ovarian cyclicity of Holstein-Friesian (HOLS) and Montbéliarde (MONT) cows under two low-input dairy production systems with seasonal spring calving: an extensive (EXT; 12 HOLS and 12 MONT) based on permanent diversified grasslands and zero concentrate, and a semi-extensive (SEMI; 12 HOLS and 10 MONT) based on established temporary grasslands and up to 4 kg/day of concentrate. Individual measurements were performed between −4 and 12 weeks of lactation. Cows in EXT secreted less milk (22.1 v. 24.4 kg/day), protein (660 v. 755 g/day) and energy (67.7 v. 74.4 MJ/day), had greater plasma β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) (0.97 v. 0.69 mM), lower glucose (59.0 v. 62.0 mg/dl) and IGF-1 (62 v. 71 ng/ml), lower milk fat concentration in fatty acids originating from de novo synthesis (e.g. ∑ 10:0 to 15:0) and greater concentration of those derived in part from mobilization of fat reserves (e.g. 18:0 and ∑>C16), and showed greater frequency of abnormal ovarian cycles compared with SEMI. Across production systems, HOLS produced more milk (24.7 v. 21.8 kg/day), protein (738 v. 674 g/day) and fat (939 v. 819 g/day), secreted more energy (75.1 v. 67.0 MJ/day), lost more body condition score (BCS) (1.41 v. 1.03) and reached a lower BCS nadir (1.12 v. 1.43), had greater plasma BHBA (0.91 v. 0.75 mM), lower insulin (15.9 v. 17.2 µIU/ml) and tended to have lower glucose (59.6 v. 61.4 mg/dl), had lower milk fat concentration in ∑ 10:0 to 15:0, tended to have higher ∑>C16 and tended to show more abnormal estrous cycles compared with MONT. Ultrasound measurements did not differentiate fat mobilization and were confounded by breed differences of skin thickness. The greater nutrient allowance in SEMI improved indicators of physiological status and ovarian function during early lactation compared with EXT, but did not attenuate body reserve mobilization because cows prioritized milk secretion. HOLS secreted more nutrients than MONT but lost more BCS, which negatively affected nutritional balance and tended to affect ovarian cyclicity during early lactation. Breed by system interactions were not observed except for a few variables.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bazin, S, Augeard, P, Carteau, M, Champion, H, Chilliard, Y, Cuylle, G, Disenhaus, C, Durand, G, Espinasse, R, Gascoin, A, Godineau, M, Jouanne, D, Ollivier, O and Remond, B 1984. Grille de notation de l'état d'engraissement des vaches pie-noires. Inst. Tech. l’Elevage Bovin, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Brickner, AE, Rastani, RR and Grummer, RR 2007. Technical note: effect of sampling protocol on plasma nonesterified fatty acid concentration in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 22192222.Google Scholar
Butler, WR 2003. Energy balance relationships with follicular development, ovulation and fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 83, 211218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chagas, LM, Bass, JJ, Blache, D, Burke, CR, Kay, JK, Lindsay, DR, Lucy, MC, Martin, GB, Meier, S, Rhodes, FM, Roche, JR, Thatcher, WW and Webb, R 2007. Invited review: new perspectives on the roles of nutrition and metabolic priorities in the subfertility of high-producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 40224032.Google Scholar
Chagas, LM, Lucy, MC, Back, PJ, Blache, D, Lee, JM, Gore, PJS, Sheahan, AJ and Roche, JR 2009. Insulin resistance in divergent strains of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows offered fresh pasture and increasing amounts of concentrate in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 216222.Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y 1999. Metabolic adaptations and nutrient partitioning in the lactating animal. In Biology of lactation (ed. J Martinet, LM Houdebine and HH Head), pp. 503552. INRA Éditions, Paris.Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y, Delavaud, C and Bonnet, M 2005. Leptin expression in ruminants: nutritional and physiological regulations in relation with energy metabolism. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 29, 322.Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y, Glasser, F, Ferlay, A, Bernard, L, Rouel, J and Doreau, M 2007. Diet, rumen biohydrogenation and nutritional quality of cow and goat milk fat. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 109, 828855.Google Scholar
Cleveland, WS, Grosse, E and Shyu, WM 1993. Local regression models. In Statistical models in S (ed. JM Chambers and TJ Hastie), pp. 309376. Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
Coulon, JB and Rémond, B 1991. Variations in milk output and milk protein content in response to the level of energy supply to the dairy cow: a review. Livestock Production Science 29, 3147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutullic, E, Delaby, L, Gallard, Y and Disenhaus, C 2011. Dairy cows’ reproductive response to feeding level differs according to the reproductive stage and the breed. Animal 5, 731740.Google Scholar
DePeters, EJ and Cant, JP 1992. Nutritional factors influencing the nitrogen composition of bovine milk: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 20432070.Google Scholar
Dillon, P, Buckley, F, O’Connor, P, Hegarty, D and Rath, M 2003a. A comparison of different dairy cow breeds on a seasonal grass-based system of milk production: 1. Milk production, live weight, body condition score and DM intake. Livestock Production Science 83, 2133.Google Scholar
Dillon, P, Snijders, S, Buckley, F, Harris, B, O’Connor, P and Mee, JF 2003b. A comparison of different dairy cow breeds on a seasonal grass-based system of milk production: 2. Reproduction and survival. Livestock Production Science 83, 3542.Google Scholar
Disenhaus, C, Cutullic, E, Blanc, F, Gatien, J, Agabriel, J, Hetreau, T, Michel, G, Paccard, P, Badinand, F, Egal, D and Ponsart, C 2008. Caractéristiques comparées de la cyclicité après vêlage de différentes races bovines. In 15. Rencontres autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants, Institut de l'Elevage, Paris, 3–4 December 2008, pp. 383–386.Google Scholar
Grala, TM, Lucy, MC, Phyn, CVC, Sheahan, AJ, Lee, JM and Roche, JR 2011. Somatotropic axis and concentrate supplementation in grazing dairy cows of genetically diverse origin. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 303315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammon, HM, Sturmer, G, Schneider, F, Tuchscherer, A, Blum, H, Engelhard, T, Genzel, A, Staufenbiel, R and Kanitz, W 2009. Performance and metabolic and endocrine changes with emphasis on glucose metabolism in high-yielding dairy cows with high and low fat content in liver after calving. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 15541566.Google Scholar
Hazel, AR, Heins, BJ, Seykora, AJ and Hansen, LB 2013. Montbéliarde-sired crossbreds compared with pure Holsteins for dry matter intake, production, and body traits during the first 150 days of first lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 19151923.Google Scholar
Horan, B, Dillon, P, Faverdin, P, Delaby, L, Buckley, F and Rath, M 2005b. The interaction of strain of Holstein-Friesian cows and pasture-based feed systems on milk yield, body weight, and body condition score. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 12311243.Google Scholar
Horan, B, Mee, JF, O’Connor, P, Rath, A and Dillon, P 2005a. The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian cow and feeding system on postpartum ovarian function, animal production and conception rate to first service. Theriogenology 63, 950971.Google Scholar
Horn, M, Steinwidder, A, Gasteiner, J, Podstatzky, L, Haiger, A and Zollitsch, W 2013. Suitability of different dairy cow types for an Alpine organic and low-input milk production system. Livestock Science 153, 135146.Google Scholar
Horn, M, Steinwidder, A, Starz, W, Pfister, R and Zollitsch, W 2014. Interactions between calving season and cattle breed in a seasonal Alpine organic and low-input dairy system. Livestock Science 160, 141150.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) 2007. Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. Besoins des animaux – valeur des aliments. Editions Quae, Versailles, France.Google Scholar
Lerch, S, Ferlay, A, Pomies, D, Martin, B, Pires, JAA and Chilliard, Y 2012. Rapeseed or linseed supplements in grass-based diets: effects on dairy performance of Holstein cows over 2 consecutive lactations. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 19561970.Google Scholar
Leroy, JLMR, Bossaert, P, Opsomer, G and Bols, PEJ 2011. The effect of animal handling procedures on the blood non-esterified fatty acid and glucose concentrations of lactating dairy cows. The Veterinary Journal 187, 8184.Google Scholar
Leroy, J, Opsomer, G, Van Soom, A, Goovaerts, IGF and Bols, P 2008. Reduced fertility in high-yielding dairy cows: are the oocyte and embryo in danger? Part i – the importance of negative energy balance and altered corpus luteum function to the reduction of oocyte and embryo quality in high-yielding dairy cows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 43, 612622.Google Scholar
Lucy, MC, Butler, ST and Garverick, HA 2014. Endocrine and metabolic mechanisms linking postpartum glucose with early embryonic and foetal development in dairy cows. Animal 8, 8290.Google Scholar
Lucy, MC, Jiang, H and Kobayashi, Y 2001. Changes in the somatotrophic axis associated with the initiation of lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 84, E113E119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, MC, Verkerk, GA, Whyte, BE, Macdonald, KA, Burton, L, Cursons, RT, Roche, JR and Holmes, CW 2009. Somatotropic axis components and nutrient partitioning in genetically diverse dairy cows managed under different feed allowances in a pasture system. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 526539.Google Scholar
Macdonald, KA, Verkerk, GA, Thorrold, BS, Pryce, JE, Penno, JW, McNaughton, LR, Burton, LJ, Lancaster, JAS, Williamson, JH and Holmes, CW 2008. A comparison of three strains of Holstein-Friesian grazed on pasture and managed under different feed allowances. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 16931707.Google Scholar
Mendonça, LGD, Litherland, NB, Lucy, MC, Keisler, DH, Ballou, MA, Hansen, LB and Chebel, RC 2013. Comparison of innate immune responses and somatotropic axis components of Holstein and Montbéliarde-sired crossbred dairy cows during the transition period. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 35883598.Google Scholar
Piccand, V, Cutullic, E, Meier, S, Schori, F, Kunz, PL, Roche, JR and Thomet, P 2013. Production and reproduction of Fleckvieh, Brown Swiss, and 2 strains of Holstein-Friesian cows in a pasture-based, seasonal-calving dairy system. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 53525363.Google Scholar
Pires, JAA, Bany, D, Rouel, J, Giraud, J-M and Chilliard, Y 2012. Mesures échographiques pour étudier la mobilisation des tissus sous-cutanés et du muscle chez la vache laitière peripartum. In 19. Rencontres autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants, Institut de l'Elevage, Paris, 5–6 December, p. 193.Google Scholar
Pires, JAA, Delavaud, C, Faulconnier, Y, Pomies, D and Chilliard, Y 2013. Effects of body condition score at calving on indicators of fat and protein mobilization of periparturient Holstein-Friesian cows. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 64236439.Google Scholar
Pomies, D, Martin, B, Pradel, P, Verdier-Metz, I, Constant, I, Delbès-Paus, C, Trocquier, O, Fournier, F, Montel, MC and Farrugia, A 2013. Design of low-input dairy farming systems in mountain areas: animal performances and cheese sensory properties. In 17th Meeting of the FAO-CIHEAM Mountain Pasture Network, Pastoralism and Ecosystem Conservation, Trivero, Italy, 5–7 June 2013, pp. 228–230.Google Scholar
Schroder, UJ and Staufenbiel, R 2006. Invited review: methods to determine body fat reserves in the dairy cow with special regard to ultrasonographic measurement of backfat thickness. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 114.Google Scholar
Weber, C, Hametner, C, Tuchscherer, A, Losand, B, Kanitz, E, Otten, W, Singh, SP, Bruckmaier, RM, Becker, F, Kanitz, W and Hammon, HM 2013. Variation in fat mobilization during early lactation differently affects feed intake, body condition, and lipid and glucose metabolism in high-yielding dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 165180.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pires supplementary material

Table S1

Download Pires supplementary material(File)
File 31 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pires supplementary material

Table S2

Download Pires supplementary material(File)
File 43.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pires supplementary material

Table S3

Download Pires supplementary material(File)
File 66.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pires supplementary material

Table S4

Download Pires supplementary material(File)
File 53 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pires supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Pires supplementary material(File)
File 64.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pires supplementary material

Figure S2

Download Pires supplementary material(File)
File 46.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pires supplementary material

Figure S3

Download Pires supplementary material(File)
File 60.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pires supplementary material

Figure S4

Download Pires supplementary material(File)
File 98.8 KB