Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:00:10.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiologic and innate immunity responses to bacterial lipopolysaccharide administration in beef heifers supplemented with OmniGen-AF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2018

A. P. Brandão ,
R. F. Cooke Open the ORCID record for R. F. Cooke [Opens in a new window] ,
K. M. Schubach  and
R. S. Marques
A. P. Brandão
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Burns, OR 97720, USA
R. F. Cooke*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA
K. M. Schubach
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Burns, OR 97720, USA
R. S. Marques
Affiliation:
Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Burns, OR 97720, USA
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Nutritional alternatives to strengthen animal immunocompetence are critical for welfare and productivity in livestock systems, such as beef cattle operations. This experiment evaluated physiological and innate immunity effects of supplementing an immunomodulatory feed ingredient (Omnigen-AF; Phibro Animal Health, Teaneck, NJ, USA) to beef heifers administered bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In total, 8 non-pregnant, non-lactating nulliparous Angus×Hereford heifers (676±4 days of age) were ranked by BW (473±8 kg), and assigned to crossover design containing two periods of 34 days each. Heifers were housed in individual pens and had ad libitum access to meadow foxtail (Alopecurus pratensis L.) hay, water and a granulated commercial vitamin+mineral mix. Within each period, heifers received (as-fed basis) 227 g/day of dried distillers grains including (OMN) or not (CON) 56 g of Omnigen-AF for 34 days. On day 28 of each period (0800 h), heifers received an intravenous bolus dose (0.5 μg/kg of BW, diluted in 5 ml of 0.9% sterile saline) of bacterial LPS (Escherichia coli 0111:B4). Hay DM intake was recorded daily from day 0 to 34. Blood was collected at −1, 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 and 144 h relative to LPS administration. Heifer intravaginal temperature was recorded every 10 min from −0.5 to 10 h relative to LPS administration. No treatment effect was detected (P=0.35) for hay DM intake during the experiment. No treatment effects were detected (P⩾0.64) for intravaginal temperature and plasma concentrations of tumor necrosis-α, cortisol and haptoglobin, which increased (time effect, P<0.01) for OMN and CON heifers and peaked at 4.5, 2, 4 and 48 h, respectively, after LPS administration. No treatment effects were detected (P⩾0.35) for whole blood mRNA expression of chemokine ligand 5, tumor necrosis-α, cyclooxygenase 2 and interleukin 8, which also increased (time effect, P<0.01) for OMN and CON heifers and peaked at 0.5, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 h, respectively, after LPS administration. Whole blood mRNA expression of interleukin 8 receptor and L-selectin were also similar (P⩾0.61) between OMN and CON heifers, and decreased (time effect, P<0.01) for both treatments reaching nadir levels at 1 and 2.5 h, respectively, after LPS administration. Collectively, OMN supplementation did not modulate the physiological and innate immunity responses of beef heifers to bacterial LPS administration.

Keywords

beef cattledietary supplementinnate immune systemphysiology
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 153 - 160
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbas, AK and Lichtman, AH 2007. Cellular and molecular immunology, 6th edition. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Bagglioni, M and Clark-Lewis, I 1992. Interleukin-8, a chemotactic and inflammatory cytokine. FEBS Letters 307, 97–101.Google Scholar
Brandão, AP, Cooke, RF, Corrá, FN, Piccolo, MB, Gennari, R, Leiva, T and Vasconcelos, JLM 2016. Physiologic, health, and production responses of dairy cows supplemented with an immunostimulant feed ingredient during the transition period. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 5562–5572.Google Scholar
Broadway, PR, Carroll, JA and Burdick Sanchez, NC 2015. Live yeast and yeast cell wall supplements enhance immune function and performance in food-producing livestock: a review. Microorganisms 3, 417–427.Google Scholar
Burton, JL, Kehrli, ME Jr, Kapil, S and Horst, RL 1995. Regulation of L-selectin and CD18 on bovine neutrophils by glucocorticoids: effects of cortisol and dexamethasone. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 57, 317–325.Google Scholar
Carroll, JA and Forsberg, NE 2007. Influence of stress and nutrition on cattle immunity. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 23, 105–149.Google Scholar
Carroll, JA, Reuter, RR, Chase, CC Jr, Coleman, SW, Riley, DG, Spiers, DE, Arthington, JD and Galyean, ML 2009. Profile of the bovine acute-phase response following an intravenous lipopolysaccharide challenge. Innate Immunity 15, 81–89.Google Scholar
Cooke, RF 2017. Nutritional and management considerations for beef cattle experiencing stress-induced inflammation. The Professional Animal Scientist 33, 1–11.Google Scholar
Cooke, RF and Arthington, JD 2013. Concentrations of haptoglobin in bovine plasma determined by ELISA or a colorimetric method based on peroxidase activity: methods to determine haptoglobin in bovine plasma. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 97, 531–536.Google Scholar
Drackley, JK 1999. Biology of dairy cows during the transition period: the final frontier? Journal of Dairy Science 82, 2259–2273.Google Scholar
Düvel, A, Maaß, J, Heppelmann, M, Hussen, J, Koy, M, Piechotta, M, Sandra, O, Smith, DGE, Sheldon, IM, Dieuzy-Labaye, I, Zieger, P and Schuberth, HJ 2014. Peripheral blood leukocytes of cows with subclinical endometritis show an altered cellular composition and gene expression. Theriogenology 81, 906–917.Google Scholar
Fleige, S and Pfaffl, MW 2006. RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR performance. Molecular Aspects of Medicine 27, 126–139.Google Scholar
Heine, H and Ulmer, AJ 2005. Recognition of bacteria products by toll-like receptors. Chemical Immunology and Allergy 86, 99–119.Google Scholar
Klasing, KC and Korver, DR 1997. Leukocytic cytokines regulate growth rate and composition following activation of the immune system. Journal of Animal Science 75, 58–67.Google Scholar
Lawrence MB and Springer TA 1991. Leukocytes roll on a selection at physiologic flow rates: distinction from and prerequisite for adhesion through integrins. Cell 65, 859–873. Google Scholar
Lippolis, KD, Cooke, RF, Schubach, KM, Marques, RS and Bohnert, DW 2017a. Effects of intravenous lipopolysaccharide administration on feed intake, ruminal forage degradability and liquid parameters, and physiological responses in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 95, 2859–2870.Google Scholar
Lippolis, KD, Cooke, RF, Schumaher, T, Brandão, AP, Silva, LGT, Schubach, KM, Marques, RS and Bohnert, DW 2017b. Physiologic, health, and performance responses of beef steers supplemented with an immunomodulatory feed ingredient during feedlot receiving. Journal of Animal Science 95, 4945–4957.Google Scholar
Maghazachi, AA, Al-Aoukaty, A and Schall, TJ 1996. CC chemokines induce the generation of killer cells from CD56+ cells. European Journal of Immunology 26, 315–319.Google Scholar
Mallard, BA, Dekkers, JC, Ireland, MJ, Leslie, KE, Sharif, S, Lacey Vankampen, C, Wagter, L and Wilkie, BN 1998. Alteration in immune responsiveness during the peripartum period and its ramification on dairy cow and calf health. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 585–595.Google Scholar
Merck and Co., Inc. 1997. The Merck Veterinary manual, 8th edition. Merck and Co., Inc., Whitehouse, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
Nace, EL, Nickerson, SC, Kautz, FM, Breidling, S, Wochele, D, Ely, LO and Hurley, DJ 2014. Modulation of innate immune function and phenotype in bred dairy heifers during the periparturient period induced by feeding an immunostimulant for 60 days prior to delivery. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 161, 240–250.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) 2016. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 8th edition. The National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Ocón-Grove, OM, Cooke, FNT, Alvarez, IM, Johnson, SE, Ott, TL and Ealy, AD 2008. Ovine endometrial expression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 2 and conceptus expression of FGF receptors during early pregnancy. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 34, 135–145.Google Scholar
Perdew, GH, Vanden Heuvel, JP and Peters, JM 2006. Regulation of gene expression: molecular mechanisms. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, MC, Cooke, RF, Marques, RS, Arispe, SA, Keisler, D and Bohnert, DW 2015. Effects of oral meloxicam administration to beef cattle receiving lipopolysaccharide administration or vaccination against respiratory pathogens. Journal of Animal Science 93, 5018–5027.Google Scholar
Ryman, VE, Nickerson, SC, Kautz, FM, Hurley, DJ, Ely, LO, Wang, YQ and Forsberg, NE 2013. Effect of dietary supplementation on the antimicrobial activity of blood leukocytes isolated from Holstein heifers. Research in Veterinary Science 95, 969–974.Google Scholar
Silva, E, Gaivão, M, Leitão, S, Amaro, A, Lopes da Costa, L and Mateus, L 2008. Blood COX-2 and PGES gene transcription during the peripartum period of dairy cows with normal puerperium or with uterine infection. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 35, 314–323.Google Scholar
Vandesompele, J, de Preter, K, Pattyn, F, Poppe, B, Van Roy, N, de Paepe, A and Speleman, F 2002. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biology 3, 1.Google Scholar
Wang, YQ, Puntenney, SB, Burton, JL and Forsberg, NE 2009. Use of gene profiling to evaluate the effects of a feed additive on immune function in periparturient dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 93, 66–75.Google Scholar
Weber, PS, Madsen, SA, Smith, GW, Ireland, JJ and Burton, JL 2001. Pre-translational regulation of neutrophil L-selectin in glucocorticoid-challenged cattle. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 83, 213–240.Google Scholar