Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:08:58.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pasture intake and milk production of dairy cows rotationally grazing on multi-species swards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2016

A. I. Roca-Fernández
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l’Animal et les Systèmes d’Elevage, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l’Animal et les Systèmes d’Elevage, F-35000 Rennes, France
J. L. Peyraud
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l’Animal et les Systèmes d’Elevage, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l’Animal et les Systèmes d’Elevage, F-35000 Rennes, France
L. Delaby
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l’Animal et les Systèmes d’Elevage, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l’Animal et les Systèmes d’Elevage, F-35000 Rennes, France
R. Delagarde*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l’Animal et les Systèmes d’Elevage, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l’Animal et les Systèmes d’Elevage, F-35000 Rennes, France
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Increasing plant species diversity has been proposed as a means for enhancing annual pasture productivity and decreasing seasonal variability of pasture production facing more frequent drought scenarios due to climate change. Few studies have examined how botanical complexity of sown swards affects cow performance. A 2-year experiment was conducted to determine how sward botanical complexity, from a monoculture of ryegrass to multi-species swards (MSS) (grasses-legumes-forb), affect pasture chemical composition and nutritive value, pasture dry matter (DM) intake, milk production and milk solids production of grazing dairy cows. Five sward species: perennial ryegrass (L as Lolium), white clover and red clover (both referred to as T as Trifolium because they were always sown together), chicory (C as Cichorium) and tall fescue (F as Festuca) were assigned to four grazing treatments by combining one (L), three (LT), four (LTC) or five (LTCF) species. Hereafter, the LT swards are called mixed swards as a single combination of ryegrass and clovers, whereas LTC and LTCF swards are called MSS as a combination of at least four species from three botanical families. The experimental area (8.7 ha) was divided into four block replicates with a mineral nitrogen fertilisation of 75 kg N/ha per year for each treatment. In total, 13 grazing rotations were carried out by applying the same grazing calendar and the same pasture allowance of 19 kg DM/cow per day above 4 cm for all treatments. Clover represented 20% of DM for mixed and MSS swards; chicory represented 30% of DM for MSS and tall fescue represented 10% of DM for LTCF swards. Higher milk production (+1.1 kg/day) and milk solids production (+0.08 kg/day) were observed for mixed swards than for ryegrass swards. Pasture nutritive value and pasture DM intake were unaffected by the inclusion of clover. Pasture DM, organic matter and NDF concentrations were lower for MSS than for mixed swards. Higher milk production (+0.8 kg/day), milk solids production (+0.04 kg/day) and pasture DM intake (+1.5 kg DM/day) were observed for MSS than for mixed swards. These positive effects of MSS were observed for all seasons, but particularly during summer where chicory proportion was the highest. In conclusion, advantages of grazing MSS on cow performance were due to the cumulative effect of improved pasture nutritive value and increased pasture DM intake that raised milk production and milk solids production.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aufrère, J and Michalet-Doreau, B 1988. Comparison of methods for predicting digestibility of feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20, 203218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, TN 1998. The feeding value of chicory (Cichorium intybus) for ruminant livestock. Journal of Agricultural Science 131, 251257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera-Estrada, JI, Delagarde, R, Faverdin, P and Peyraud, JL 2004. Dry matter intake and eating rate of grass by dairy cows is restricted by internal, but not external water. Animal Feed Science and Technology 114, 5974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, DF, Tharmaraj, J and Nie, ZN 2008. Milk-production potential of different sward types in a temperate southern Australian environment. Grass and Forage Science 63, 221233.Google Scholar
Deak, A, Hall, MH and Sanderson, MA 2009. Grazing schedule effect on forage production and nutritive value of diverse forage mixtures. Agronomy Journal 101, 408414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewhurst, RJ, Delaby, L, Moloney, A, Boland, T and Lewis, E 2009. Nutritive value of forage legumes used for grazing and silage. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 48, 167187.Google Scholar
Harris, SL, Auldist, MJ, Clark, DA and Jansen, EBL 1998. Effect of white clover content in the diet on herbage intake, milk production and milk composition of New Zealand dairy cows housed indoors. Journal of Dairy Research 65, 389400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, SL, Clark, DA, Auldist, MJ, Waugh, CD and Laboyrie, PG 1997. Optimum white clover content for dairy pastures. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 59, 2933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Høgh-Jensen, H, Nielsen, B and Milan-Thamsborg, S 2006. Productivity and quality, competition and facilitation of chicory in ryegrass/legume-based pastures under various nitrogen supply levels. European Journal of Agronomy 24, 247256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) 2007. Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. Besoins des animaux, valeur des aliments, Tables INRA 2007. Editions QUAE, Versailles, France.Google Scholar
Li, G and Kemp, PD 2005. Forage chicory (Cichorium intybus L.): a review of its agronomy and animal production. Advances in Agronomy 88, 187222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, KF, Bowdler, TM, Casey, ND and Moss, RJ 1999. Performance of temperate perennial pastures in the Australian subtropics. 2. Milk production. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 677683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüscher, A, Mueller-Harvey, I, Soussana, JF, Rees, RM and Peyraud, JL 2014. Potential of legume-based grassland-livestock systems in Europe: a review. Grass and Forage Science 69, 206228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marley, CL, Fychan, R, Scott, MB, Davies, JW and Sanderson, R 2013. Yield, nitrogen and mineral content of chicory compared with perennial ryegrass, red clover and white clover over two harvest years. Grassland Science in Europe 18, 249251.Google Scholar
Minnee, EMK, Clark, CEF, McAllister, TB, Hutchinson, KJ and Lee, JM 2012. Chicory and plantain as feeds for dairy cows in late lactation. Proceedings of the 5th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 426–428.Google Scholar
Morel, I, Schmid, E, Soney, C, Aragon, A and Dufey, PA 2014. Influence of ryegrass alone or blended with clover and chicory on feed intake and growth performance of steers. Grassland Science in Europe 19, 731733.Google Scholar
Muir, SK, Ward, GN and Jacobs, JL 2014. Milk production and composition of mid-lactation cows consuming perennial ryegrass- and chicory-based diets. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 10051015.Google Scholar
Niderkorn, V, Martin, C and Baumont, R 2014. Associative effects between forage species on intake and digestive efficiency in sheep. Grassland Science in Europe 19, 734736.Google Scholar
Pérez-Prieto, LA and Delagarde, R 2013. Meta-analysis of the effect of pasture allowance on pasture intake, milk production, and grazing behaviour of dairy cows grazing temperate grasslands. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 66716689.Google Scholar
Pérez-Ramírez, E, Peyraud, JL and Delagarde, R 2012. N-alkanes vs. ytterbium/faecal index as two methods for estimating herbage intake of dairy cows fed on diets differing in the herbage: maize silage ratio and feeding level. Animal 6, 232244.Google Scholar
Peyraud, JL 1993. Comparaison de la digestion du trèfle blanc et des graminées prairiales chez la vache laitière. Fourrages 135, 465473.Google Scholar
Phillips, CJC and James, NL 1998. The effects of including white clover in perennial ryegrass swards and the height of mixed swards on the milk production, sward selection and ingestive behaviour of dairy cows. Animal Science 67, 195202.Google Scholar
Ribeiro-Filho, HMN, Delagarde, R and Peyraud, JL 2003. Inclusion of white clover in strip-grazed perennial ryegrass pastures: herbage intake and milk yield of dairy cows at different ages of pasture regrowth. Animal Science 77, 499510.Google Scholar
Ribeiro-Filho, HMN, Delagarde, R and Peyraud, JL 2005. Herbage intake and milk yield of dairy cows grazing perennial ryegrass swards or white clover/perennial ryegrass swards at low- and medium-herbage allowances. Animal Feed Science and Technology 119, 1327.Google Scholar
Sanderson, MA 2010. Nutritive value and herbage accumulation rates of pastures sown to grass, legume and chicory mixtures. Agronomy Journal 102, 728733.Google Scholar
Sanderson, MA, Soder, KJ, Muller, LD, Klement, KD, Skinner, RH and Goslee, SC 2005. Forage mixture productivity and botanical composition in pastures grazed by dairy cattle. Agronomy Journal 97, 14651471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, RH 2008. Yield, root growth, and soil water content in drought-stressed pasture mixtures containing chicory. Crop Science 48, 380388.Google Scholar
Soder, KJ, Sanderson, MA, Stack, JL and Muller, LD 2006. Intake and performance of lactating cows grazing diverse forage mixtures. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 21582167.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System Institute (SAS) 1999. User’s guide, version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 3884 pp.Google Scholar
Totty, VK, Greenwood, SL, Bryant, RH and Edwards, GR 2013. Nitrogen partitioning and milk production of dairy cows grazing simple and diverse pastures. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 141149.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Roca-Fernández Supplementary Material

Roca-Fernández Supplementary Material

Download Roca-Fernández Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 168.7 KB