Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:18:48.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nitrous oxide emission factors for urine and dung from sheep fed either fresh forage rape (Brassica napus L.) or fresh perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2014

J. Luo ,
X. Z. Sun ,
D. Pacheco ,
S. F. Ledgard ,
S. B. Lindsey ,
C. J. Hoogendoorn ,
B. Wise  and
N. L. Watkins
J. Luo*
Affiliation:
Ruakura Research Centre, AgResearch Limited, Bisley Road, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
X. Z. Sun
Affiliation:
Grasslands Research Centre, AgResearch Limited, Tennent Drive, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
D. Pacheco
Affiliation:
Grasslands Research Centre, AgResearch Limited, Tennent Drive, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
S. F. Ledgard
Affiliation:
Ruakura Research Centre, AgResearch Limited, Bisley Road, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
S. B. Lindsey
Affiliation:
Ruakura Research Centre, AgResearch Limited, Bisley Road, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
C. J. Hoogendoorn
Affiliation:
Grasslands Research Centre, AgResearch Limited, Tennent Drive, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
B. Wise
Affiliation:
Ruakura Research Centre, AgResearch Limited, Bisley Road, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
N. L. Watkins
Affiliation:
Ruakura Research Centre, AgResearch Limited, Bisley Road, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In New Zealand, agriculture is predominantly based on pastoral grazing systems and animal excreta deposited on soil during grazing have been identified as a major source of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. Forage brassicas (Brassica spp.) have been increasingly used to improve lamb performance. Compared with conventional forage perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), a common forage in New Zealand, forage brassicas have faster growth rates, higher dry matter production and higher nutritive value. The aim of this study was to determine the partitioning of dietary nitrogen (N) between urine and dung in the excreta from sheep fed forage brassica rape (B. napus subsp. oleifera L.) or ryegrass, and then to measure N2O emissions when the excreta from the two different feed sources were applied to a pasture soil. A sheep metabolism study was conducted to determine urine and dung-N outputs from sheep fed forage rape or ryegrass, and N partitioning between urine and dung. Urine and dung were collected and then used in a field plot experiment for measuring N2O emissions. The experimental site contained a perennial ryegrass/white clover pasture on a poorly drained silt-loam soil. The treatments included urine from sheep fed forage rape or ryegrass, dung from sheep fed forage rape or ryegrass, and a control without dung or urine applied. N2O emission measurements were carried out using a static chamber technique. For each excreta type, the total N2O emissions and emission factor (EF3; N2O–N emitted during the 3- or 8-month measurement period as a per cent of animal urine or dung-N applied, respectively) were calculated. Our results indicate that, in terms of per unit of N intake, a similar amount of N was excreted in urine from sheep fed either forage rape or ryegrass, but less dung N was excreted from sheep fed forage rape than ryegrass. The EF3 for urine from sheep fed forage rape was lower compared with urine from sheep fed ryegrass. This may have been because of plant secondary metabolites, such as glucosinolates in forage rape and their degradation products, are transferred to urine and affect soil N transformation processes. However, the difference in the EF3 for dung from sheep fed ryegrass and forage rape was not significant.

Keywords

ExcretaN partitioningsheepbrassicasnitrous oxide
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , March 2015 , pp. 534 - 543
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

The first two authors contribute equally to this work.

References

Australian Agricultural Council 1990. Feeding standards for Australian livestock – ruminants Australian Agricultural Council. CSIRO Publications, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Belesky, DP, Koch, DW and Walker, J 2007. Forbs and browse species. In Forage: the science of grassland agriculture (ed. RF Barnes, CJ Nelson, KJ Moore and M Collins), pp. 257–273. Blackwell Publishing Professional, Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
Bending, GD and Lincoln, SD 2000. Inhibition of soil nitrifying bacteria communities and their activities by glucosinolate hydrolysis products. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32, 1261–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, LC, Searle, PL and Daley, BK 1987. Methods for chemical analysis of soils. New Zealand Soil Bureau Scientific Report No. 80, New Zealand Soil Bureau, Wellington.Google Scholar
de Klein, CAM and Harvey, M 2012. Nitrous oxide chamber methodology guidelines. Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
de Klein, CAM, Barton, L, Sherlock, RR, Li, Z and Littlejohn, RP 2003. Estimating a nitrous oxide emission factor for animal urine from some New Zealand pastoral soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 41, 381–399.Google Scholar
de Klein, CAM, Luo, J, Woodward, KB, Styles, T, Wise, B, Lindsey, S and Cox, N 2014. The effect of nitrogen concentration in synthetic cattle urine on nitrous oxide emissions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 188, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estell, RE 2010. Coping with shrub secondary metabolites by ruminants. Small Ruminant Research 94, 1–9.Google Scholar
Haynes, RJ and Williams, PH 1993. Nutrient cycling and soil fertility in the grazed pasture ecosystem. Advances in Agronomy 49, 119–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, AE 1998. New Zealand soil classification – Landcare Research Science Series No. 1. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand. pp. 1–133.Google Scholar
Kelliher, F, Li, Z and Nobel, ADL 2014. Nitrogen application rate and the nitrous oxide flux from a pastoral soil. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, doi:10.1080/00288233.2014.927772.Google Scholar
Kelliher, F, Cox, N, van der Weerden, T, de Klein, C, Luo, J, Cameron, K, Di, H, Giltrap, D and Rys, G 2013. Statistical analysis of nitrous oxide emission factors from pastoral agriculture field trials conducted in New Zealand. Environmental Pollution 186, 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, GA, Fraser, K, Cao, M, Koulman, A, Cosgrove, GP and Death, A 2006. Urinary biomarkers of forage feeding from ESI-MS/MS fingerprinting: exploratory studies. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 66, 230–235.Google Scholar
Linn, DM and Doran, JW 1984. Effect of water-filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and non-tilled soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal 48, 1267–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, J, Ledgard, SF and Lindsey, SB 2008a. A test of a winter farm management option for mitigating nitrous oxide emissions from a dairy farm. Soil Use and Management 24, 121–130.Google Scholar
Luo, J, Lindsey, SB and Ledgard, SF 2008b. Nitrous oxide emissions from animal urine application on a New Zealand pasture. Biology and Fertility of Soils 44, 463–470.Google Scholar
Luo, J, Saggar, S, Bhandral, R, Bolan, N, Ledgard, S, Lindsey, S and Sun, W 2008c. Effects of irrigating dairy-grazed grassland with farm dairy effluent on nitrous oxide emissions. Plant and Soil 309, 119–130.Google Scholar
Luo, J, Hoogendoorn, C, van der Weerden, T, Saggar, S, de Klein, C, Giltrap, D, Rollo, M and Rys, G 2013. Nitrous oxide emissions from grazed hill land. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 181, 58–68.Google Scholar
McTaggart, IP, Parker, J, Swan, L, Clayton, H and Smith, KA 1997. Nitrous oxide emissions from grassland and spring barley, following N fertiliser application with and without nitrification inhibitors. Biology and Fertility of Soils 25, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry for the Environment 2011. New Zealand’s greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2009. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Pacheco, D and Waghorn, GC 2008. Dietary nitrogen – definitions, digestion, excretion and consequences of excess for grazing ruminants. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 70, 107–116.Google Scholar
Payne, RW, Harding, SA, Murray, DA, Soutar, DM, Baird, DB, Glaser, AI, Channing, IC, Welham, SJ, Gilmour, AR, Thompson, R and Webster, R 2010. GenStat® Release 13 Reference Manual. Part 1: summary. VSN International. 467pp.Google Scholar
Saggar, S, Andrew, RM, Tate, KR, Hedley, CB, Rodda, NJ and Townsend, JA 2004. Modelling nitrous oxide emissions from New Zealand dairy grazed pastures. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 68, 243–255.Google Scholar
Schils, RLM, Eriksen, J, Ledgard, SF, ThV, Vellinga, Kuikman, PJ, Luo, J, Petersen, SO and Velthof, GL 2013. Strategies to mitigate nitrous oxide emissions from herbivore production systems. Animal 7 (suppl. 1), 29–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, KA, Ball, T, Conen, F, Dobbie, KE, Massheder, J and Rey, A 2003. Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes. European Journal of Soil Science 54, 779–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, AJ, Johnson-Maynard, JL and Morra, MJ 2010. Nitrogen mineralization in soil incubated with 15N-labeled brassicaceae seed meals. Applied Soil Ecology 46, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, XZ, Waghorn, GC and Clark, H 2010. Cultivar and age of regrowth effects on physical, chemical and in sacco degradation kinetics of vegetative perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Animal Feed Science and Technology 155, 172–185.Google Scholar
Sun, XZ, Hoskin, SO, Muetzel, S, Molano, G and Clark, H 2011. Effects of forage chicory (Cichorium intybus) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) on methane emissions in vitro and from sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, XZ, Waghorn, GC, Hoskin, SO, Harrison, SJ, Muetzel, S and Pacheco, D 2012. Methane emissions from sheep fed fresh brassicas (Brassica spp.) compared to perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Animal Feed Science and Technology 176, 107–116.Google Scholar
van der Weerden, TJ, Clough, TJ and Styles, TM 2013. Using near-continuous measurements of N2O emission from urine-affected soil to guide manual gas sampling regimes. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 60–76.Google Scholar
van Groenigen, JW, Kuikman, PJ, de Groot, WJM and Velthof, GL 2005. Nitrous oxide emissions from urine-treated soil as influenced by urine composition and soil physical conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37, 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, DC 1995. Grassland nitrogen. CAB International, Guildford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar