Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:07:01.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2009

C. Martin ,
D. P. Morgavi  and
M. Doreau
C. Martin*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR 1213, Herbivores Research Unit, Research Centre of Clermont-Ferrand-Theix, F-63122 St Genès Champanelle, France
D. P. Morgavi
Affiliation:
INRA, UR 1213, Herbivores Research Unit, Research Centre of Clermont-Ferrand-Theix, F-63122 St Genès Champanelle, France
M. Doreau
Affiliation:
INRA, UR 1213, Herbivores Research Unit, Research Centre of Clermont-Ferrand-Theix, F-63122 St Genès Champanelle, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Decreasing enteric methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants without altering animal production is desirable both as a strategy to reduce global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and as a means of improving feed conversion efficiency. The aim of this paper is to provide an update on a selection of proved and potential strategies to mitigate enteric CH4 production by ruminants. Various biotechnologies are currently being explored with mixed results. Approaches to control methanogens through vaccination or the use of bacteriocins highlight the difficulty to modulate the rumen microbial ecosystem durably. The use of probiotics, i.e. acetogens and live yeasts, remains a potentially interesting approach, but results have been either unsatisfactory, not conclusive, or have yet to be confirmed in vivo. Elimination of the rumen protozoa to mitigate methanogenesis is promising, but this option should be carefully evaluated in terms of livestock performances. In addition, on-farm defaunation techniques are not available up to now. Several feed additives such as ionophores, organic acids and plant extracts have also been assayed. The potential use of plant extracts to reduce CH4 is receiving a renewed interest as they are seen as a natural alternative to chemical additives and are well perceived by consumers. The response to tannin- and saponin-containing plant extracts is highly variable and more research is needed to assess the effectiveness and eventual presence of undesirable residues in animal products. Nutritional strategies to mitigate CH4 emissions from ruminants are, without doubt, the most developed and ready to be applied in the field. Approaches presented in this paper involve interventions on the nature and amount of energy-based concentrates and forages, which constitute the main component of diets as well as the use of lipid supplements. The possible selection of animals based on low CH4 production and more likely on their high efficiency of digestive processes is also addressed. Whatever the approach proposed, however, before practical solutions are applied in the field, the sustainability of CH4 suppressing strategies is an important issue that has to be considered. The evaluation of different strategies, in terms of total GHG emissions for a given production system, is discussed.

Keywords

methanegreenhouse gasesruminantmitigation strategies
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , March 2010 , pp. 351 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allard, V, Soussana, JF, Falcimagne, R, Berbigier, P, Bonnefond, JM, Ceschia, E, D’hour, P, Hénault, C, Laville, P, Martin, C, Pinares-Patiño, CS 2007. The role of grazing management for the net biome productivity and greenhouse gas budget (CO2, N2O and CH4) of semi-natural grassland. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 121, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attwood, G, McSweeney, C 2008. Methanogen genomics to discover targets for methane mitigation technologies and options for alternative H2 utilisation in the rumen. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basset-Mens, C, Ledgard, S, Boyes, M 2009. Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in New Zealand. Ecological Economics 68, 1615–1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, McGinn, SM 2005. Methane emissions from feedlot cattle fed barley or corn diets. Journal of Animal Science 83, 653–661.Google Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, McGinn, SM 2006. Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1489–1496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchemin, KA, McGinn, SM, Petit, HV 2007a. Methane abatement strategies for cattle: lipid supplementation of diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 87, 431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, McGinn, SM, Martinez, TF, McAllister, TA 2007b. Use of condensed tannin extract from quebracho trees to reduce methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1990–1996.Google Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, Kreuzer, M, O’Mara, F, McAllister, TA 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, McGinn, SM, Benchaar, C, Holtshausen, L 2009. Crushed sunflower, flax, or canola seeds in lactating dairy cows diets: effects on methane production, rumen fermentation, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2118–2127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beever, DE, Thomson, DJ, Ulyatt, MJ, Cammell, SB, Spooner, MC 1985. The digestion of fresh perennial (Lolium perenne L. cv. Melle) and white clover (Trifolium repens L. cv. Blanca) by growing cattle fed indoors. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 763–775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beever, DE, Cammell, SB, Sutto, JD, Spooner, MC, Haines, MJ, Harland, JI 1989. Effects of concentrate type on energy utilization in lactating dairy cows. In Energy metabolism of farm animals (ed. Y Van der Honing and WH Close), EAAP Publication no. 43, pp. 33–36. Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Benchaar, C, Pomar, C, Chiquette, J 2001. Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: a modelling approach. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81, 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boadi, D, Benchaar, C, Chiquette, J, Masse, D 2004. Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: update review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84, 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brossard, L, Martin, C, Chaucheyras-Durand, F, Michalet-Doreau, B 2004. Protozoa at the origin of butyric and non-lactic latent acidosis in sheep. Reproduction Nutrition Development 44, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busquet, M, Calsamiglia, S, Ferret, A, Carro, MD, Kamel, C 2005. Effect of garlic oil and four of its compounds on rumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 4393–4404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callaway, TR, Carneiro De Melo, AM, Russell, JB 1997. The effect of nisin and monensin on ruminal fermentations in vitro. Current Microbiology 35, 90–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calsamiglia, S, Busquet, M, Cardazo, PW, Castillejos, L, Ferret, A 2007. Invited review: essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 2580–2595.Google Scholar
Capper, JL, Cataneda-Guttierez, E, Cady, RA, Bauman, DE 2008. The environmental impact of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST) use in dairy production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 9668–9673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carulla, JE, Kreuzer, M, Machmüller, A, Hess, HD 2005. Supplementation of Acacia mearnsii tannins decreases methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage-fed sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural research 56, 961–970.Google Scholar
Casey, JW, Holden, NM 2005. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system. Agricultural Systems 86, 97–114.Google Scholar
Casey, JW, Holden, NM 2006a. Quantification of GHG emissions from suckler-beef production in Ireland. Agricultural Systems 90, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, JW, Holden, NM 2006b. Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional, agri-environmental scheme, and organic Irish suckler-beef units. Journal of Environmental Quality 35, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cederberg, C, Mattsson, B 2000. Life cycle assessment of milk production – a comparison of conventional and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 8, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederberg, C, Flysjo, A 2004. Life cycle inventory of 23 dairy farms in south-western Sweden. SIK-report no. 728. The Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden.Google Scholar
Chaucheyras, F, Fonty, G, Bertin, G, Gouet, P 1995. In vitro H2 utilization by a ruminal acetogenic bacterium cultivated alone or in association with an archaea methanogen is stimulated by a probiotic strain of saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 3466–3467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaucheyras-Durand, F, Walker, ND, Bach, A 2008. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: past, present and future. Animal Feed Science and Technology 145, 5–26.Google Scholar
Chen, M, Wolin, MJ 1979. Effect of monensin and lasalocid-sodium on the growth of methanogenic and rumen saccharolytic bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 38, 72–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosgrove, GP, Waghorn, GC, Anderson, CB, Peters, JS, Smith, A, Molano, G, Deighton, M 2008. The effect of oils fed to sheep on methane production and digestion of ryegrass pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 189–192.Google Scholar
Cook, SR, Maiti, PK, Chaves, AV, Benchaar, C, Beauchemin, KA, McAllister, TA 2008. Avian (IgY) anti-methanogen antibodies for reducing ruminal methane production: in vitro assessment of their effects. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 260–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czerkawski, JW 1966. The effect on digestion in the rumen of a gradual increase in the content of fatty acids in the diet of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 833–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czerkawski, JW, Blaxter, KL, Wainman, FW 1966. The effect of linseed oil and of linseed oil fatty acids incorporated in the diet on the metabolism of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 485–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, IJM 2003. Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production. Livestock Production Science 80, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Oliveira, SG, Berchielli, TT, Pedreira, MD, Primavesi, O, Frighetto, R, Lima, MA 2007. Effect of tannin levels in sorghum silage and concentrate supplementation on apparent digestibility and methane emission in beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135, 236–248.Google Scholar
Demeyer, D, Fievez, V 2000. Ruminants et environnement: la méthanogenèse. Annales de Zootechnie 49, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeyer, DI, Fiedler, D, DeGraeve, KG 1996. Attempted induction of reductive acetogenesis into the rumen fermentation in vitro. Reproduction Nutrition Development 36, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, J, Bannink, A, France, J, Kebreab, E 2007. Nutritional control to reduce environmental impacts of intensive dairy cattle systems. In Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores (ed. QX Meng, LP Ren and ZJ Cao), pp. 411–435. China Agricultural University Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Dohme, F, Machmüller, A, Wasserfallen, A, Kreuzer, M 2001. Ruminal methanogenesis as influenced by individual fatty acids supplemented to complete ruminant diets. Letters in Applied Microbiology 32, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, Y, Bae, HD, McAllister, TA, Mathison, GW, Cheng, KJ 1997. Lipid-induced depression of methane production and digestibility in the artificial rumen system (RUSITEC). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doreau, M, Ferlay, A 1995. Effect of dietary lipids on nitrogen metabolism in the rumen: a review. Livestock Production Science 43, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doreau, M, Jouany, JP 1998. Effect of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on nutrient digestion in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 3214–3221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eugène, M, Massé, D, Chiquette, J, Benchaar, C 2008. Meta-analysis on the effects of lipid supplementation on methane production in lactating dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 88, 331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, JA, Kortekaas, S, Lettinga, G 1989. The tannin theory of methanogenic toxicity. Biological Wastes 29, 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fievez, V, Dohme, F, Danneels, M, Raes, K, Demeyer, D 2003. Fish oils as potent rumen methane inhibitors and associated effects on rumen fermentation in vitro and in vivo. Animal Feed Science and Technology 104, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fievez, V, Boeckaert, C, Vlaeminck, B, Mestdagh, J, Demeyer, D 2007. In vitro examination of DHA-edible micro-algae: 2. Effect on rumen methane production and apparent degradability of hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 136, 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, BJ, Esteban, G, Clarke, KJ, Williams, AG, Embley, TM, Hirt, RP 1994. Some rumen ciliates have endosymbiotic methanogens. FEMS Microbiology Letters 117, 157–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foley, PA, Kenny, DA, Callan, JJ, Boland, TM, O’mara, FP 2009. Effect of DL-malic acid supplementation on feed intake, methane emission, and rumen fermentation in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1048–1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnsworthy, PC 2004. The environmental impact of fertility in dairy cows: a modelling approach to predict methane and ammonia emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112, 211–223.Google Scholar
Giger-Reverdin, S, Morand-Fehr, P, Tran, G 2003. Literature survey of the influence of dietary fat composition on methane production in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 82, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M, Smith, P, Wilkinson, JM 2009. Mitigating climate change: the role of domestic livestock. Animal (in press); doi:10.1017/S1751731109004662.Google Scholar
Goel, G, Makkar, HPS, Becker, K 2008. Changes in microbial community structure, methanogenesis and rumen fermentation in response to saponin-rich fractions from different plant materials. Journal of Applied Microbiology 105, 770–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goopy, JP, Hegarty, RS 2004. Repeatability of methane production in cattle fed concentrate and forage diets. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 13, 75–78.Google Scholar
Grainger, C, Clarke, T, Beauchemin, KA, McGinn, MS, Eckard, RJ 2008. Supplementation with whole cottonseed reduces methane emissions and can profitably increase milk production of dairy cows offered a forage and cereal grain diet. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 73–76.Google Scholar
Guan, H, Wittenberg, KM, Ominski, KH, Krause, DO 2006. Efficacy of ionophores in cattle diets for mitigation of enteric methane. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1896–1906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guan, LL, Nkrumah, JD, Basarab, JA, Moore, SS 2008. Linkage of microbial linkage of microbial ecology to phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle’s feed efficiency. FEMS Microbiology Letters 288, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, YQ, Liu, JX, Lu, Y, Zhu, WY, Denman, SE, McSweeney, CS 2008. Effect of tea saponin on methanogenesis, microbial community structure and expression of mcrA gene, in cultures of rumen micro-organisms. Letters in Applied Microbiology 47, 421–426.Google Scholar
Haas, G, Wetterich, F, Köpke, U 2001. Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 83, 43–53.Google Scholar
Hacala, S, Réseaux, d’Elevage, Le Gall, A 2006. Evaluation des émissions de gaz à effet de serre en élevage bovin et perspectives d’atténuation. Fourrages 186, 215–227.Google Scholar
Hegarty, RS 1999. Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1321–1327.Google Scholar
Hegarty, RS, Goopy, JP, Herd, RM, McCorkell, B 2007. Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1479–1486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hegarty, RS, Bird, SH, Vanselow, BA, Woodgate, R 2008. Effects of the absence of protozoa from birth or from weaning on the growth and methane production of lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 100, 1220–1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, HD, Beuret, RA, Lotscher, M, Hindrichsen, IK, Machmüller, A, Carulla, JE, Lascano, CE, Kreuzer, M 2004. Ruminal fermentation, methanogenesis and nitrogen utilization of sheep receiving tropical grass hay-concentrate diets offered with Sapindus saponaria fruits and Cratylia argentea foliage. Animal Science 79, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holter, JB, Hayes, HH, Urban, WE 1992. Energy balance and lactation response in Holstein cows supplemented with cottonseed with or without calcium soap. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 1480–1494.Google Scholar
Jentsch, W, Wittenburg, H, Schiemann, R 1972. Die Verwertung der Futterenergie für die Milchproduktion. Archiv Tierernährung 10, 697–720.Google Scholar
Joblin, KN 1999. Ruminal acetogens and their potential to lower ruminant methane emissions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1307–1313.Google Scholar
Johnson, KA, Johnson, DE 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2483–2492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, DE, Phetteplace, HW, Ulyatt, MJ 2000. Variations in the proportion of methane of total greenhouse gas emissions from US and NZ dairy production systems. In Proceedings of the Second International Methane Mitigation Conference, Novosibirsk, Russia, pp. 249–254.Google Scholar
Johnson, KA, Kincaid, RL, Westberg, HH, Gaskins, CT, Lamb, BK, Cronrath, JD 2002. The effect of oilseeds in diets of lactating cows on milk production and methane emissions. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 1509–1515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jilg, T, Susenbeth, A, Ehrensvärd, U, Menke, KH 1985. Effect of treatment of soya beans on energy and protein metabolism of lactating dairy cows. In Energy metabolism of farm animals (ed. PW Moe, HF Tyrrell and PJ Reynolds), EAAP publication no. 32, pp. 354–357. Rowman and Littlefield, Airlie, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
Jordan, E, Kenny, D, Hawkins, M, Malone, R, Lovett, DK, O’Mara, FP 2006a. Effect of refined soy oil or whole soybeans on intake, methane output, and performance of young bulls. Journal of Animal Science 84, 2418–2425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, E, Lovett, DK, Hawkins, M, Callan, JJ, O’Mara, FP 2006b. The effect of varying levels of coconut oil on intake, digestibility and methane output from continental cross beef heifers. Animal Science 82, 859–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, E, Lovett, DK, Monahan, FJ, Callan, J, Flynn, B, O’Mara, FP 2006c. Effect of refined coconut oil or copra meal on methane output and on intake and performance of beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 84, 162–170.Google Scholar
Jouany, JP, Morgavi, DP 2007. Use of ‘natural’ products as alternatives to antibiotic feed additives in ruminant production. Animal 1, 1443–1466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jouany, JP, Papon, Y, Morgavi, DP, Doreau, M 2008. Linseed oil and a combination of sunflower oil and malic acid decrease rumen methane emissions in vitro. In Livestock and global climate change (ed. P Rowlinson, M Steele and A Nefzaoui), pp. 140–143. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Kanyarushoki, C, Van der Werf, H, Roger, F, Corson, M 2008. Eden: un outil opérationnel pour l’évaluation environnementale des systèmes de productions laitiers. In Proceedings of the Ecotechs 08 Symposium, 21–22 October 2008, Montoldre, France, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Kirchgessner, M, Windisch, W, Muller, HL 1994. Methane release in dairy cows and pigs. In Energy metabolism of farm animals (ed. J Aguilera), EAAP publication no. 79, pp. 399–402. Wageningen Press, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Klieve, AV, Hegarty, RS 1999. Opportunities for biological control of ruminal methanogenesis. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1315–1319.Google Scholar
Klieve, AV, Joblin, K 2007. Comparison in hydrogen utilisation of ruminal and marsupial reductive acetogens. In 5 year research progress report 2002–2007 (ed. R Kennedy), pp. 34–35. The Pastoral Greenhouse Gas Research Consortium, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Koenig, KM, Ivan, M, Teferedegne, BT, Morgavi, DP, Rode, LM, Ibrahim, IM, Newbold, CJ 2007. Effect of dietary Enterolobium cyclocarpum on microbial protein flow and nutrient digestibility in sheep maintained fauna-free, with total mixed fauna or with Entodinium caudatum monofauna. British Journal of Nutrition 98, 504–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lassey, KR, Ulyatt, MJ, Martin, RJ, Walker, CF, Shelton, ID 1997. Methane emissions measured directly from grazing livestock in New Zealand. Atmospheric Environment 31, 2905–2914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, SS, Hsu, JT, Mantovani, HC, Russell, JB 2002. The effect of bovicin hc5, a bacteriocin from Streptococcus bovis hc5, on ruminal methane production in vitro. FEMS Microbiology Letters 217, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, S, McIntosh, FM, Wallace, RJ, Newbold, CJ 1999. Effect of adding acetogenic bacteria on methane production by mixed rumen microorganisms. Animal Feed Science and Technology 78, 1–9.Google Scholar
Lovett, DK, Lovell, S, Stack, L, Callan, J, Finlay, M, Conolly, J, O’Mara, FP 2003. Effect of forage/concentrate ratio and dietary coconut oil level on methane output and performance of finishing beef heifers. Livestock Production Science 84, 135–146.Google Scholar
Lovett, DK, Stack, LJ, Lovell, S, Callan, J, Flynn, B, Hawkins, M, O’Mara, FP 2005. Manipulating enteric methane emissions and animal performance of late-lactation dairy cows through concentrate supplementation at pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2836–2842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovett, DK, Shalloo, L, Dillon, P, O’Mara, FP 2006. A systems approach to quantify greenhouse gas fluxes from pastoral dairy production as affected by management regime. Agricultural Systems 88, 156–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, DK, Shalloo, L, Dillon, P, O’Mara, FP 2008. Greenhouse gas emissions from pastoral based dairying systems: the effect of uncertainty and management change under two contrasting production systems. Livestock Science 116, 260–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macheboeuf, D, Lassalas, B, Ranilla, MJ, Carro, MD, Morgavi, DP 2006. Dose-response effect of diallyl disulfide on ruminal fermentation and methane production in vitro. Reproduction Nutrition Development 46, S103.Google Scholar
Machmüller, A, Kreuzer, M 1999. Methane suppression by coconut oil and associated effects on nutrient and energy balance in sheep. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79, 65–72.Google Scholar
Machmüller, A, Ossowski, DA, Kreuzer, M 2000. Comparative evaluation of the effects of coconut oil, oilseeds and crystalline fat on methane release, digestion and energy balance in lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 85, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machmüller, A, Ossowski, DA, Wanner, M, Kreuzer, M 1998. Potential of various fatty feeds to reduce methane release from rumen fermentation in vitro (Rusitec). Animal Feed Science and Technology 71, 117–130.Google Scholar
Machmüller, A, Soliva, CR, Kreuzer, M 2003. Methane-suppressing effect of myristic acid in sheep as affected by dietary calcium and forage proportion. British Journal of Nutrition 90, 529–540.Google Scholar
Maia, MRG, Chaudhary, LC, Figueres, L, Wallace, RJ 2007. Metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids and their toxicity to the microflora of the rumen. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 91, 303–314.Google Scholar
Makkar, HPS, Becker, K 1996. Effect of pH, temperature, and time on inactivation of tannins and possible implications in detannification studies. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44, 1291–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, SA 1998. Manipulation of ruminal fermentation with organic acids: a review. Journal of Animal Science 76, 3123–3132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, C, Dubroeucq, H, Micol, D, Agabriel, J, Doreau, M 2007a. Methane output from beef cattle fed different high-concentrate diets. In Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 2–4 April 2007, Southport, UK, p. 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C, Ferlay, A, Chilliard, Y, Doreau, M 2007b. Rumen methanogenesis of dairy cows in response to increasing levels of dietary extruded linseeds. In Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition (ed. I Ortigues-Marty, N Miraux and W Brand-Williams), EAAP publication no. 124, pp. 609–610. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Martin, C, Rouel, J, Jouany, JP, Doreau, M, Chilliard, Y 2008. Methane output and diet digestibility in response to feeding dairy cows crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2642–2650.Google Scholar
Martin, C, Ferlay, A, Chilliard, Y, Doreau, M 2009. Decrease in methane emissions in dairy cows with increase in dietary linseed content. In Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 30 March–1 April 2009, Southport, UK, p. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, TA, Newbold, CJ 2008. Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 7–13.Google Scholar
McCaughey, WP, Wittenberg, K, Corrigan, D 1999. Impact of pasture type on methane production by lactating beef cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCourt, AR, Yan, T, Mayne, S, Wallace, J 2008. Effect of dietary inclusion of encapsulated fumaric acid on methane production from grazing dairy cows. In Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 31 March–2 April 2008, Scarborough, UK, p. 64.Google Scholar
McGinn, SM, Beauchemin, KA, Coates, T, Colombatto, D 2004. Methane emissions from beef cattle: effect of monensin, sunflower oil, enzymes, yeast and fumaric acid. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3346–3356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McSweeney, CS, Palmer, B, McNeill, DM, Krause, DO 2001. Microbial interactions with tannins: nutritional consequences for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 91, 83–93.Google Scholar
Morgavi, DP, Jouany, JP, Martin, C 2008. Changes in methane emission and rumen fermentation parameters induced by refaunation in sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morvan, B, Bonnemoy, F, Fonty, G, Gouet, P 1996. Quantitative determination of H2-utilizing acetogenic and sulphate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archae from digestive tract of different mammals. Current Microbiology 32, 129–133.Google Scholar
Mosoni, P, Rochette, Y, Graviou, D, Martin, C, Forano, E, Morgavi, DP 2008a. Influence of protozoa on the number of cellulolytic bacteria and methanogens in the rumen of sheep evaluated by qPCR. In Proceedings of 6th INRA-RRI Symposium on the gut microbiome, 18–20 June 2008, Clermont-Ferrand, France, p. 46.Google Scholar
Mosoni, P, Rochette, Y, Doreau, M, Morgavi, DP, Forano, E, Ferlay, A, Chilliard, Y, Martin, C , 2008b. Effect of increasing levels of extruded linseed in the diet of dairy cows on the number of protozoa, cellulolytic bacteria and methanogenic archaea. In Proceedings of 6th INRA-RRI Symposium on the gut microbiome, 18–20 June 2008, Clermont-Ferrand, France, p. 84.Google Scholar
Moss, AR, Jouany, JP, Newbold, J 2000. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Annales de Zootechnie 49, 231–253.Google Scholar
Münger, A, Kreuzer, M 2008. Absence of persistent methane emission differences in three breeds of dairy cows. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, RM, Bryant, AM, Leng, RA 1976. Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestines of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 36, 1–14.Google Scholar
Nagaraja, TG, Newbold, CJ, Van Nevel, CJ, Demeyer, DI 1997. Manipulation of ruminal fermentation. In The rumen microbial ecosystem (ed. PN Hobson and CS Stewart), pp. 523–632. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbold, CJ, Rode, LM 2006. Dietary additives to control methanogenesis in the rumen. In Greenhouse gases and animal agriculture: an update (ed. CR Soliva, J Takahashi and M Kreuzer), Elsevier International Congress Series 1293, pp. 138–147. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Newbold, CJ, Lassalas, B, Jouany, JP 1995. The importance of methanogens associated with ciliate protozoa in ruminal methane production in vitro. Letters in Applied Microbiology 21, 230–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newbold, CJ, Moss, AR, Mollinson, GS 1996. The effect of dietary fat on methane production in sheep and cattle. In Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 18–20 March 1996, Scarborough, UK, p. 182.Google Scholar
Newbold, CJ, Lopez, S, Nelson, N, Ouda, JO, Wallace, RJ, Moss, AR 2005. Propionate precursors and other metabolic intermediates as possible alternative electron acceptors to methanogenesis in ruminal fermentation in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition 94, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nkrumah, JD, Okine, EK, Mathison, JW, Schmid, K, Li, C, Basarab, JA, Price, MA, Wang, Z, Moore, SS 2006. Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 84, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nollet, L, Mbanzamihigo, L, Demeyer, D, Verstraete, W 1998. Effect of the addition of Peptostreptococcus productus ATCC 35244 on reductive acetogenesis in the ruminal ecosystem after inhibition of methanogenesis by cell-free supernatant of Lactobacillus plantarum 80. Animal Feed Science and Technology 71, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odongo, NE, Bagg, R, Vessie, G, Dick, P, Or-Rashid, MM, Hook, SE, Gray, JT, Kebreab, E, France, J, McBride, BW 2007a. Long-term effects of feeding monensin on methane production in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1781–1788.Google Scholar
Odongo, NE, Bagg, R, Or-Rashid, MM, Kebreab, E, France, J, McBride, BW 2007b. Effect of supplementing myristic acid in dairy cow rations on ruminal methanogenesis and fatty acid profile in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1851–1858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogino, A, Kaku, K, Osada, T, Shimada, K 2004. Environmental impacts of the Japanese beef-fattening system with different feeding lengths as evaluated by a life-cycle assessment method. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2115–2122.Google Scholar
Ogino, A, Orito, H, Shimadad, K, Hirooka, H 2007. Evaluating environmental impacts of the Japanese beef cow–calf system by the life cycle assessment method. Animal Science Journal 78, 424–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olesen, JE, Schelde, K, Weiske, A, Weisbjerg, MR, Asman, WAH, Djurhuus, J 2006. Modelling greenhouse gas emissions from European conventional and organic dairy farms. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 112, 207–220.Google Scholar
Pearson, W, Boermans, HJ, Bettger, WJ, McBride, BW, Lindinger, MI 2005. Association of maximum voluntary dietary intake of freeze-dried garlic with Heinz body anemia in horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 66, 457–465.Google Scholar
Pen, B, Sar, C, Mwenya, B, Kuwaki, K, Morikawa, R, Takahashi, J 2006. Effects of Yucca schidigera and Quillaja saponaria extracts on in vitro ruminal fermentation and methane emission. Animal Feed Science and Technology 129, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phetteplace, HW, Johnson, DE, Seidl, AF 2001. Greenhouse gas emissions from simulated beef and dairy livestock systems in the United States. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 60, 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinares-Patiño, CS, Baumont, R, Martin, C 2003a. Methane emissions by Charolais cows grazing a monospecific pasture of timothy at four stages of maturity. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83, 769–777.Google Scholar
Pinares-Patiño, CS, Ulyatt, MJ, Lassey, KR, Barry, TN, Holmes, CW 2003b. Rumen function and digestion parameters associated with differences between sheep in methane emissions when fed chaffed lucerne hay. Journal of Agricultural Science 140, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinares-Patiño, CS, Ulyatt, MJ, Waghorn, GC, Lassey, KR, Barry, TN, Holmes, CW, Johnson, DE 2003c. Methane emission by alpaca and sheep fed on lucerne hay or grazed on pastures of perennial ryegrass/white clover or birdsfoot trefoil. Journal of Agricultural Science 140, 215–226.Google Scholar
Pinares-Patiño, CS, D’Hour, P, Jouany, JP, Martin, C 2007a. Effects of stocking rate on methane and carbon dioxide emissions from grazing cattle. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121, 30–46.Google Scholar
Pinares-Patiño, CS, Waghorn, GC, Machmüller, A, Vlaming, B, Molano, G, Cavanagh, A, Clark, H 2007b. Methane emissions and digestive physiology of non-lactating dairy cows fed pasture forage. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 87, 601–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puchala, R, Min, BR, Goetsch, AL, Sahlu, T 2005. The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats. Journal of Animal Science 83, 182–186.Google Scholar
Rae, HA 1999. Onion toxicosis in a herd of beef cows. The Canadian Veterinary Journal (La Revue Vétérinaire Canadienne) 40, 55–57.Google Scholar
Robertson, LJ, Waghorn, GC 2002. Dairy industry perspectives on methane emissions and production from cattle fed pasture or total mixed rations in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society Animal Production 62, 213–218.Google Scholar
Rumpler, WV, Johnson, DE, Bates, DB 1986. The effect of high dietary cation concentration on methanogenesis by steers fed diets with and without ionophores. Journal of Animal Science 62, 1737–1741.Google Scholar
Russell, JB, Mantovani, HC 2002. The bacteriocins of ruminal bacteria and their potential as an alternative to antibiotics. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology 4, 347–355.Google ScholarPubMed
Santoso, B, Mwenya, B, Sar, C, Gamo, Y, Kobayashi, T, Morikawa, R, Kimura, K, Mizukoshi, H, Takahashi, J 2004. Effects of supplementing galacto-oligosaccharides, Yucca schidigera or nisin on rumen methanogenesis, nitrogen and energy metabolism in sheep. Livestock Production Science 91, 209–217.Google Scholar
Santoso, B, Mwenya, B, Sar, C, Takahashi, J 2006. Ruminal fermentation and nitrogen metabolism in sheep fed a silage-based diet supplemented with Yucca schidigera or Y. Schidigera and nisin. Animal Feed Science and Technology 129, 187–195.Google Scholar
Sauer, FD, Fellner, V, Kinsman, R, Kramer, JKG, Jackson, HA, Lee, AJ, Chen, S 1998. Methane output and lactation response in Holstein cattle with monensin or unsaturated fat added to the diet. Journal of Animal Science 76, 906–914.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D 2005. Rumen acidosis: modeling ruminant response to yeast culture. In Nutritional biotechnology in the feed and food industries (ed. TP Lyons and KA Jacques), pp. 221–228. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Giger-Reverdin, S 2007. Empirical modelling meta-analysis of digestive interactions and CH4 production in ruminants. In Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition (ed. I Ortigues-Marty, N Miraux and W Brand-Williams), EAAP publication no. 124, p. 561. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Schiemann, R, Jentsch, W, Wittenburg, H 1972. Die Verwertung der Futterenergie für die Milchproduktion. Archiv Tierernährung 10, 675–695.Google Scholar
Schils, RLM, Verhagen, A, Aarts, HFM, Sebek, LBJ 2005. A farm level approach to define successful strategies for GHG emissions from ruminant livestock systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 71, 163–175.Google Scholar
Schils, RLM, Verhagen, A, Aarts, HFM, Kuikman, PJ, Sebek, LBJ 2006. Effect of improved nitrogen management on greenhouse gas emissions from intensive dairy systems in the Netherlands. Global Change Biology 12, 382–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schils, RLM, Olesen, JE, del Prado, A, Soussana, JF 2007. A review of farm level modelling approaches for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant livestock systems. Livestock Science 112, 240–251.Google Scholar
Sheu, CW, Freese, E 1973. Lipopolysaccharide layer protection of gram-negative bacteria against inhibition by long chain fatty acids. Journal of Bacteriology 115, 869–875.Google Scholar
Soliva, CR, Meile, L, Cieslak, A, Kreuzer, M, Machmuller, A 2004. Rumen simulation technique study on the interactions of dietary lauric and myristic acid supplementation in suppressing ruminal methanogenesis. British Journal of Nutrition 92, 689–700.Google Scholar
Steinfeld, H, Gerber, P, Wassenaar, T, Castel, V, Rosales, M, de Haan, C 2006. Livestock’s role in climate change and air pollution. In Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options (ed. H Steinfeld, P Gerber, T Wassenaar, V Castel, M Rosales and C de Haan), pp. 79–123. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Tavendale, MH, Meagher, LP, Pacheco, D, Walker, N, Attwood, GT, Sivakumaran, S 2005. Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Medicago sativa, and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123–124, 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomassen, MA, van Calker, KJ, Smits, MCJ, Iepema, GL, de Boer, IJM 2008. Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands. Agricultural Systems 96, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiemann, TT, Lascano, CE, Wettstein, HR, Mayer, AC, Kreuzer, M, Hess, HD 2008. Effect of the tropical tannin-rich shrub legumes Calliandra calothyrsus and Flemingia macrophylla on methane emission and nitrogen and energy balance in growing lambs. Animal 2, 790–799.Google Scholar
UNFCCC 2008. Challenges and opportunities for mitigation in the agricultural sector. Retrieved November 21, 2008 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/tp/08.pdf.Google Scholar
Ungerfeld, EM, Rust, SR, Burnett, RJ, Yokoyama, MT, Wang, JK 2005. Effects of two lipids on in vitro ruminal methane production. Animal Feed Science and Technology 119, 179–185.Google Scholar
Van der Honing, Y, Wieman, BJ, Steg, A, van Donselaar, B 1981. The effect of fat supplementation of concentrates on digestion and utilization of energy by productive dairy cows. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 29, 79–92.Google Scholar
Van der Honing, Y, Tamminga, S, Wieman, BJ, Steg, A, van Donselaar, B, van Gils, LGM 1983. Further studies on the effect of fat supplementation of concentrates fed to lactating cows. 2. Total digestion and energy utilization. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 31, 27–36.Google Scholar
Van Dorland, HA, Wettstein, HR, Leuenberger, H, Kreuzer, M 2007. Effect of supplementation of fresh and ensiled clovers to ryegrass on nitrogen loss and methane emissions of dairy cows. Livestock Science 111, 57–69.Google Scholar
Vermorel, M 1995. Emissions annuelles de méthane d’origine digestive par les bovins en France. Variations selon le type d’animal et le niveau de production. INRA Productions Animales 8, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergé, XPC, Dyer, JA, Desjardins, RL, Worth, D 2007. Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian dairy industry in 2001. Agricultural Systems 94, 683–693.Google Scholar
Vlaming, JB, Lopez-Villalobos, N, Brookes, IM, Hoskin, SO, Clark, H 2008. Within- and between-animal variance in methane emissions in non-lactating dairy cows. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 124–127.Google Scholar
Waghorn, GC 2007. Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production: progress and challenges. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147, 116–139.Google Scholar
Wallace, RJ, Wood, TA, Rowe, A, Price, J, Yanez, DR, Williams, SP, Newbold, CJ 2006. Encapsulated fumaric acid as a means of decreasing ruminal methane emissions. In Greenhouse gases and animal agriculture: an update (ed. CR Soliva, J Takahashi and M Kreuzer), Elsevier International Congress Series 1293, pp. 148–151. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Weimer, PJ 1998. Manipulating ruminal fermentation: a microbial ecological perspective. Journal of Animal Science 76, 3114–3122.Google Scholar
Weiske, A, Vabitsch, A, Olesen, JE, Schelde, K, Michel, J, Friedrich, R, Kaltschmitt, M 2006. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in European conventional and organic dairy farming. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 112, 221–232.Google Scholar
Williams, YJ, Popovski, S, Rea, SM, Skillman, LC, Toovey, AF, Northwood, KS, Wright, AD 2009. A vaccine against rumen methanogens can alter the composition of archaeal populations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75, 1860–1866.Google Scholar
Woodward, SL, Waghorn, GC, Thomson, NA 2006. Supplementing dairy cows with oils to improve performance and reduce methane – does it work? Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 66, 176–181.Google Scholar
Wright, AD, Auckland, CH, Lynn, DH 2007. Molecular diversity of methanogens in feedlot cattle from Ontario and Prince Edward Island, Canada. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73, 4206–4210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, AD, Kennedy, P, O’Neill, CJ, Toovey, AF, Popovski, S, Rea, SM, Pimm, CL, Klein, L 2004. Reducing methane emissions in sheep by immunization against rumen methanogens. Vaccine 22, 3976–3985.Google Scholar