Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:01:10.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement and mitigation of methane emissions from beef cattle in tropical grazing systems: a perspective from Australia and Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2013

A. Berndt  and
N. W. Tomkins
A. Berndt*
Affiliation:
Research and Development, EMBRAPA Southeast Livestock, Rod Washington Luiz, km 234, PO Box 339, 13560-970 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
N. W. Tomkins
Affiliation:
CSIRO Animal, Food & Health Sciences, Australian Tropical Sciences and Innovation Precinct, Building 145 James Cook Drive, James Cook University, Douglas Campus, Townsville, QLD 4814, Australia
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The growing global demand for food of animal origin will be the incentive for countries such as Australia and Brazil to increase their beef production and international exports. This increased supply of beef is expected to occur primarily through on-farm productivity increases. The strategies for reducing resultant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions should be evaluated in the context of the production system and should encompass a broader analysis, which would include the emissions of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon sequestration. This paper provides an insight into CH4 measurement techniques applicable to grazing environments and proposed mitigation strategies, with relevance to the production systems that are predominant in grazing systems of Australia and Brazil. Research and technology investment in both Australia and Brazil is aimed at developing measurement techniques and increasing the efficiency of cattle production by improving herd genetics, utilization of the seasonal feed-base and reducing the proportion of metabolizable energy lost as CH4. Concerted efforts in these areas can be expected to reduce the number of unproductive animals, reduce age at slaughter and inevitably reduce emission intensity (EI) from beef production systems. Improving efficiency of livestock production systems in tropical grazing systems for Australia and Brazil will be based on cultivated and existing native pastures and the use of additives and by-products from other agricultural sectors. This approach spares grain-based feed reserves typically used for human consumption, but potentially incurs a heavier EI than current intensive feeding systems. The determination of GHG emissions and the value of mitigation outcomes for entire beef production systems in the extensive grazing systems is complex and require a multidisciplinary approach. It is fortunate that governments in both Australia and Brazil are supporting ongoing research activities. Nevertheless, to achieve an outcome that feeds a growing population while reducing emissions on a global scale continues to be a monumental challenge for ruminant nutritionists.

Keywords

beef cattlegreenhouse gasmethanemitigationtropical grazing systems
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue s2: Greenhouse Gases & Animal Agriculture Conference (GGAA 2013), 23rd ‐ 26th June 2013, Dublin, Ireland , June 2013 , pp. 363 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2009. Agricultural commodities, Australia, 2007–08 – summary of findings: livestock. Retrieved February 25, 2013, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/7121.0.Google Scholar
Australian Greenhouse Emissions Information System 2008. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. Australian Government, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Alexandratos, N 2009. World food and agriculture to 2030/2050: highlights and views from mid-2009. Paper for the Expert Meeting on How to Feed the World in 2050, FAO, Rome, 24–26. Retrieved February 25, 2013, from http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/ECONOMICS/ESD/WorldAgto2050.pdfGoogle Scholar
Anderson, RC, Carstens, GE, Miller, RK, Callaway, TR, Schultz, CL, Edrington, TS, Harvey, RB, Nisbet, DJ 2004. Effect of nitro ethane administration on ruminal VFA production and specific activity of methane production. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 13, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Research Council 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Balieiro Neto, G, Berndt, A, Nogueira, JR, Demarchi, JJA, Nogueira Filho, JCM 2009. Monensin and protein supplements on methane production and rumen protozoa in bovine fed low quality forage. South African Journal of Animal Science 39, 280–283.Google Scholar
Barioni, LG, Lima, MA, Zen, S, Guimarães Júnior, R, Ferreira, AC 2007. A baseline projection of methane emissions by the Brazilian beef sector: preliminary results. Proceedings of the 3rd Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture International Conference, 27–29 November, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, Kreuzer, M, O'Mara, F, McAllister, TA 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 21–27.Google Scholar
Bentley, D, Hegarty, RS, Alford, AR 2008. Managing livestock enterprises in Australia's extensive rangelands for greenhouse gas and environmental outcomes: a pastoral company perspective. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 60–64.Google Scholar
Berchielli, TT, Fiorentini, G, Carvalho, IPC, Berndt, A, Frighetto, RTS, Canesin, RC, Lage, JF 2011. Effects of lipid sources in steers performance and methane emission finished in feedlot. Advances in Animal Biosciences 2 (2), 405–570.Google Scholar
Berndt, A 2010. Impacto da pecuária de corte brasileira sobre os gases do efeito estufa. Paper presented at the III International Symposium of Beef Cattle Production, 3–5 July, Viçosa, Brazil, pp. 122–43.Google Scholar
Boadi, D, Benchaar, C, Chiquette, J, Masse, D 2004. Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: update review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84, 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, AdaS 2012. Avaliação das emissões de gases de efeito estufa em diferentes cenários de intensificação de uso das pastagens no Brasil Central. Master thesis, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Brazil.Google Scholar
Carvalho, IPCDe, Berchielli, TT, Berndt, A, Frighetto, RTS 2011. Effect of lipid sources on methane emission of beef cattle at pasture using the SF6 tracer technique. Advances in Animal Biosciences 2 (2), 405–570.Google Scholar
Charmley, D, Stephens, ML, Kennedy, PM 2008. Predicting livestock productivity and methane emissions in northern Australia: development of a bio-economic modeling approach. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 109–113.Google Scholar
Cottle, DJ, Nolan, JV, Wiedemann, SG 2011. Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review. Animal Production Science 51, 491–514.Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry 2011. Adaptation project summaries. Retrieved February 25, 2013, from http://www.daff.gov.au/climatechange/climate/randdstrategiesGoogle Scholar
Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency 2010. Australian National Greenhouse Accounts, National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Accounting for the Kyoto Target. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency 2012. Australian national greenhouse accounts. Quarterly update of Australia's National GHG Inventory, September quarter 2012. Retrieved February 25, 2013, from http://www.climatechange.gov.au/emissionsGoogle Scholar
Demarchi, JJAA, Lourenço, AJ, Manella, MQ, Alleoni, GF, Friguetto, RS, Primavesi, O, Lima, MA 2003. Preliminary results on methane emission by Nelore cattle in Brazil grazing Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu. Proceedings of the Third International Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation Conference, 17–21 November, Beijing, China, pp. 80–4.Google Scholar
Dixon, RM, Coates, DB 2010. Diet quality estimated with faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy and responses to N supplementation by cattle grazing buffel grass pastures. Animal Feed Science and Technology 158, 115–125.Google Scholar
Dove, H, Mayes, RW 1991. The use of plant wax alkanes as marker substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 913–952.Google Scholar
FAO 2002. World agriculture: towards 2015/2030. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
FAO 2003. World Agriculture: towards 2015/2030. An FAO perspective. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
FAO 2011. World livestock 2011 – livestock in food security. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Fenton, TW, Fenton, M 1979. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and feces. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59, 631–634.Google Scholar
Flesch, TK, Wilson, JD, Harper, LA, Crenna, BP 2005. Estimating gas emissions from a farm using an inverse-dispersion technique. Atmospheric Environment 39, 4863–4874.Google Scholar
Fontes, CAA, Costa, VAC, Berndt, A, Frighetto, RTS, Valente, TNP, Processi, EF 2011. Emissão de metano por bovinos de corte, suplementados ou não, em pastagem de capim mombaça (Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça). Proceedings of the 48th Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 18–21 July 2011, Belém, Brazil.Google Scholar
Fox, DG, Tedeschi, LO, Tylutki, TP, Russell, JB, Van Amburgh, ME, Chase, LE, Pell, AN, Overton, TR 2004. The Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112, 29–78.Google Scholar
Grainger, C, Beauchemin, KA 2011. Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Animal Feed Science and Technology 166-167, 308–320.Google Scholar
Hegarty, RS, Goopy, JP, Herd, RM, McCorkell, B 2007. Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1479–1486.Google Scholar
Hulshof, R, Berndt, A, Gerrits, WJJ, Dijkstra, J, Van Zijderveld, SM, Newbold, JR, Perdok, HB 2012. Dietary nitrate supplementation reduces methane emission in beef cattle fed sugarcane based diets. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2317–2323.Google Scholar
Hunt, LP, Petty, S, Cowley, R, Fisher, A, Ash, AJ, MacDonald, N 2007. Factors affecting the management of cattle grazing distribution in northern Australia: preliminary observations on the effect of paddock size and water points. The Rangeland Journal 29, 169–179.Google Scholar
Hunter, RA 2007. Methane production by cattle in the tropics. British Journal of Nutrition 98, 657.Google Scholar
Hunter, RA, Niethe, GE 2009. Efficiency of feed utilization and methane emission for various cattle breeding and finishing systems. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition 17, 75–79.Google Scholar
IBGE 2006. Censo Agropecuário 2006. Grandes Regiões e Unidades da Federação, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2006. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Vol. 4. Agriculture forestry and other land use. IPCC, Hayama, Japan.Google Scholar
Joblin, KN 1999. Ruminal acetogens and their potential to lower ruminant methane emissions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1307–1313.Google Scholar
Johnson, K, Huyler, M, Westberg, H, Lamb, B, Zimmerman, P 1994. Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a SF6 tracer technique. Environmental Science and Technology 28, 359–362.Google Scholar
Kennedy, PM, Charmley, E 2012. Methane yields from Brahman cattle fed tropical grasses and legumes. Animal Production Science 52, 225–239.Google Scholar
Laubach, J, Kelliher, FM 2005a. Measuring methane emission rates of a dairy cow herd (II): results from a backward-Lagrangian stochastic model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 129, 137–150.Google Scholar
Laubach, J, Kelliher, FM 2005b. Methane emissions from dairy cows: comparing open-path laser measurements to profile-based techniques. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 135, 340–345.Google Scholar
Laubach, J, Kelliher, FM, Knight, TW, Clark, H, Molano, G, Cavanagh, A 2008. Methane emissions from beef cattle – comparison of paddock- and animal-scale measurements. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 132–137.Google Scholar
Leuning, R, Baker, SK, Jamie, IM, Hsu, CH, Klein, L, Denmead, OT, Griffith, DW 1999. Methane emission from free-ranging sheep: a comparison of two measurement methods. Atmospheric Environment 33, 1357–1365.Google Scholar
Loh, Z, Chen, D, Bai, M, Naylor, T, Griffith, D, Hill, J, Denmead, T, McGinn, S, Edis, R 2008. Measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from Australian feedlot beef production using open-path spectroscopy and atmospheric dispersion modeling. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 244–247.Google Scholar
Machmüller, A, Soliva, CR, Kreuzer, M 2003. Methane-suppressing effect of myristic acid in sheep as affected by dietary calcium and forage proportion. The British Journal of Nutrition 90, 529–540.Google Scholar
Magalhães, KA, Reis, RA, Casagrande, DR, Cardozo, MV, Furlan, DA, Miguel, MCV, Berchielli, TT 2009. Utilização da técnica do gás traçador SF6 para medição do metano ruminal em novilhos zebuínos alimentados exclusivamente com forrageiras tropicais. Proceedings of the 46ª Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 14–17 July, Maringá, Brazil.Google Scholar
Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA) 2010. Retrieved February 21, 2012, from http://www.agricultura.gov.br/desenvolvimento-sustentavel/plano-abcGoogle Scholar
Mayes, RW, Dove, H 2000. Measurement of dietary intake in free-ranging mammalian herbivores. Nutrition Research Reviews 13, 107–138.Google Scholar
McCrabb, G, Hunter, R 1999. Prediction of methane emissions from beef cattle in tropical production systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1335–1339.Google Scholar
McCrabb, G, Berger, KT, Magner, T, May, C, Hunter, RA 1997. Inhibiting methane production in Brahman cattle by dietary supplementation with a novel compound and the effects on growth. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 323–329.Google Scholar
McGinn, SM, Flesch, TK, Crenna, BP, Beauchemin, KA, Coates, T 2007. Quantifying ammonia emissions from a cattle feedlot using a dispersion model. Journal of Environmental Quality 36, 1585–1590.Google Scholar
McGinn, SM, Chen, D, Loh, Z, Hill, J, Beauchemin, KA, Denmead, OT 2008. Methane emissions from feedlot cattle in Australia and Canada. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 183–185.Google Scholar
McGinn, SM, Turner, D, Tomkins, N, Charmley, E, Bishop-Hurley, G, Chen, D 2011. Methane emissions from grazing cattle using point-source dispersion. Journal of environmental Quality 40, 22–27.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA) 2011. Meat and livestock Australia fast facts 2011, Australia's beef industry. Retrieved February 25, 2013, from http://www.mla.com.au/Publications-tools-and-events/Publication-details?pubid=5567Google Scholar
Millen, DD, Pacheco, RDL, Arrigoni, MDB, Galyean, ML, Vasconcelos, JT 2009. A snapshot of management practices and nutritional recommendations used by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3427–3439.Google Scholar
Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia (MCT) 2010. Inventário Brasileiro de Emissões Antrópicas por Fontes e Remoções por Sumidouros de Gases de Efeito Estufa não controlados pelo Protocolo de Montreal – Parte II da Segunda Comunicação Nacional do Brasil. Retrieved June 31, 2011, from http://www.mct.gov.br/index.php/content/view/310922.htmlGoogle Scholar
MLA 2012. Meat and livestock Australia fast facts 2012, Australia's beef industry. Retrieved from http://www.mla.com.au/Publications-tools-and-events/Publication-details?pubid=6035Google Scholar
Mohammed, N, Lila, Za, Ajisaka, K, Hara, K, Mikuni, K, Hara, K, Kanda, S, Itabashi, H 2004a. Inhibition of ruminal microbial methane production by b-cyclodextrin iodopropane, malate and their combination in vitro. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 88, 188–195.Google Scholar
Mohammed, N, Ajisaka, N, Lila, Z, Hara, K, Mikuni, K, Hara, K, Kanda, S, Itabashi, H 2004b. Effect of Japanese horseradish oil on methane production and ruminal fermentation in vitro and in steers. Journal of Animal Science 82, 1839–1846.Google Scholar
Monteiro RBNC 2009. Desenvolvimento de um modelo para estimativas da produção de gases de efeito estufa em diferentes sistemas de produção de bovinos de corte. Master thesis, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.Google Scholar
Myers, WD, Ludden, PA, Nayigihugu, V, Hess, BW 2004. Technical note: a procedure for the preparation and quantitative analysis of samples for titanium dioxide. Journal of Animal Science 82, 179–183.Google Scholar
Nascimento CFM 2007. Emissão de metano por bovinos Nelore ingerindo Brachiaria brizantha em diferentes estádios de maturação. Master thesis, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, Brazil.Google Scholar
Nijdam, D, Rood, T, Westhoek, H 2012. The price of protein: review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes. Food Policy 37, 766–770.Google Scholar
Oliveira, SG, Berchielli, TT, Pedreira, MS, Primavesi, O, Frighetto, RTS, Lima, MA 2007. Effect of tannin levels in sorghum silage and concentrate supplementation on apparent digestibility and methane emission in beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135, 236–248.Google Scholar
O'Mara, FP 2011. The significance of livestock as a contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions today and in the future. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 7–15.Google Scholar
O'Reagain, PJ, Turner, JR 1992. An evaluation of the empirical basis for grazing management recommendations for rangeland in Southern Africa. Journal of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa 9, 38–49.Google Scholar
Pedreira, MS 2004. Estimativa da produção de metano de origem ruminal por bovinos tendo como base a utilização de alimentos volumosos: utilização da metodologia do gás traçador hexafluoreto de enxofre (SF6). PhD thesis, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, Brazil.Google Scholar
Pedreira, MS, Primavesi, O, Lima, MA, Frighetto, RTS, Oliveira, SG, Berchielli, TT 2009. Ruminal methane emission by dairy cattle in southeast Brazil. Scientia Agricola 66, 742–750.Google Scholar
Perdok, H, Newbold, J 2009. Reducing the carbon footprint of beef production. Nutrition for Tomorrow, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Possenti, RA, Franzolin, R, Schammass, EA, Demarchi, JJAA, Friguetto, RTS, Lima, MA 2008. Efeitos de dietas contendo Leucaena leucocephala e Saccharomyces cerevisiae sobre a fermentação ruminal e a emissão do gás metano em bovinos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37, 1509–1516.Google Scholar
Smith, P, Martino, D, Cai, Z, Gwary, D, Janzen, H, Kumar, P, McCarl, B, Ogle, S, O'Mara, F, Rice, C, Scholes, B, Sirotenko, O 2007. Agriculture. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. B Metz, OR Davidson, PR Bosch, R Dave and LA Meyer), pp. 497–540. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Tomkins, NW, Colegate, SM, Hunter, RA 2009. A bromochloromethane formulation reduces enteric methanogenesis in cattle fed grain-based diets. Animal Production Science 49, 1053–1058.Google Scholar
Tomkins, NW, McGinn, SM, Turner, DA, Charmley, E 2011. Comparison of open-circuit respiration chambers with a micrometeorological method for determining methane emissions from beef cattle grazing a tropical pasture. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166-167, 240–247.Google Scholar
UN 2012. World population prospects the 2010 revision. New York, USA. Retrieved February 25, 2013, from http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Waghorn, GC, Clark, DA 2006. Greenhouse gas mitigation opportunities with immediate application to pastoral grazing for ruminants. International Congress Series 1293, 107–110.Google Scholar
Wilson, JR 1994. Cell wall characteristics in relation to forage digestion by ruminants. Journal of Agricultural Science 122, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar