Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:08:53.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management practices associated with reproductive performance in Holstein cows on large commercial dairy farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2018

I. Fodor ,
Zs. Abonyi-Tóth  and
L. Ózsvári
I. Fodor*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Forensics, Law and Economics, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, István utca 2, H-1078Budapest, Hungary
Zs. Abonyi-Tóth
Affiliation:
Department of Biomathematics and Informatics, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, István utca 2, H-1078Budapest, Hungary
L. Ózsvári
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Forensics, Law and Economics, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, István utca 2, H-1078Budapest, Hungary
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

As a result of the increase in herd size and the intensification of production, the complexity of reproductive management has been growing in dairy herds. The aim of our study was to examine the associations of management practices and reproductive performance in Holstein cows on large commercial dairy farms. Management practices applied to cows were surveyed between 22 May and 6 November 2015 in 34 large Holstein-Friesian dairy herds in Hungary. Individual data of 23 784 cows that calved between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2014 in the surveyed herds were gathered. Associations between the management practices and the reproductive parameters were analyzed by mixed effects models. Regarding heat abatement we found that ventilation with sprinklers was associated with the shortest breeding interval (P<0.01), the shortest calving to conception interval (P<0.01), and the highest odds of being pregnant by 200 days in milk (P<0.01). Solely ventilation showed similar (P>0.05) results to lack of heat stress protection. It was also revealed, that lack of a well-established voluntary waiting period (VWP) or a VWP shorter than 50 days was associated with less days to first service (P<0.01), shorter breeding interval (P<0.01) and calving to conception interval (P<0.05), as well as higher odds of carrying a calf by 200 days in milk (P<0.01) compared with those using a VWP of at least 50 days. Those farms that applied transrectal ultrasonography were more likely to use ventilation with sprinklers (P<0.05), hormonal synchronization (P<0.01) and to perform early pregnancy diagnosis followed by pregnancy recheck (P<0.05). The application of transrectal ultrasonography with one of the aforementioned practices was associated with reduced days to first service (P<0.05), shorter breeding interval (P<0.05) and higher odds of pregnancy at 200 days in milk (P<0.05). Our study highlights the management practices most closely related to improved reproductive performance, which are, therefore, suggested to be applied on dairy farms, considering the local circumstances of the individual farms.

Keywords

dairy cowHolsteinreproductive performancemanagementassociations
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 11 , November 2018 , pp. 2401 - 2406
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, DM, Machler, M, Bolker, BM and Walker, SC 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.Google Scholar
Box, GEP and Cox, DR 1964. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 26, 211–252.Google Scholar
Chapel, JM, Muiño, R, Pereira, V, Castillo, C, Hernández, J and Benedito, JL 2017. Relationship of BCS prepartum with reproductive performance and lipomobilization in Holstein dairy cows. Pakistan. Veterinary Journal 37, 215–219.Google Scholar
Derks, M, van Werven, T, Hogeveen, H and Kremer, WDJ 2014. Associations between farmer participation in veterinary herd health management programs and farm performance. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 1336–1347.Google Scholar
Dijkhuizen, AA, Stelwagen, J and Renkema, JA 1984. Economic aspects of reproductive failure in dairy cattle. I. Financial loss at farm level. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 3, 251–263.Google Scholar
Fodor, I, Cziger, Zs and Ózsvári, L 2016. Economic analysis of the application of reproductive ultrasound examinations on a large-scale dairy farm (in Hungarian with English abstract). Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja 138, 515–522.Google Scholar
Fricke, PM 2002. Scanning the future – ultrasonography as a reproductive management tool for dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 1918–1926.Google Scholar
Hothorn, T, Bretz, F, Westfall, P and Heiberger, RM 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50, 346–363.Google Scholar
Inchaisri, C, Jorritsma, R, Vos, PLAM, van der Weijden, GC and Hogeveen, H 2011. Analysis of the economically optimal voluntary waiting period for first insemination. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3811–3823.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, S 2010. Assessing the association of the level of milk production with reproductive performance in dairy cattle. The Journal of Reproduction and Development 56 (suppl.), S1–S7.Google Scholar
Lenth, R 2017. emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.0. Retrieved on 4 December 2017 from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans Google Scholar
Lucy, MC 2001. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1277–1293.Google Scholar
McDougall, S, Heuer, C, Morton, J and Brownlie, T 2014. Use of herd management programmes to improve the reproductive performance of dairy cattle. Animal 8 (suppl. 1), 199–210.Google Scholar
Michaelis, I, Burfeind, O and Heuwieser, W 2014. Evaluation of oestrous detection in dairy cattle comparing an automated activity monitoring system to visual observation. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 49, 621–628.Google Scholar
Neves, RC and LeBlanc, SJ 2015. Reproductive management practices and performance of Canadian dairy herds using automated activity-monitoring systems. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 2801–2811.Google Scholar
Ózsvári, L and Kerényi, J 2004. Quantification of losses due to reproductive disorders on a large-scale Holstein-Friesian dairy farm (in Hungarian with English abstract). Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja 126, 523–531.Google Scholar
Pursley, JR, Mee, MO and Wiltbank, MC 1995. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2alpha and GnRH. Theriogenology 44, 915–923.Google Scholar
R Core Team 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Reiczigel, J, Solymosi, N, Könyves, L, Maróti-Agóts, Á, Kern, A and Bartyik, J 2009. Examination of heat stress caused milk production loss by the use of temperature-humidity indices. Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja 131, 137–144.Google Scholar
Schefers, JM, Weigel, KA, Rawson, CL, Zwald, NR and Cook, NB 2010. Management practices associated with conception rate and service rate of lactating Holstein cows in large, commercial dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1459–1467.Google Scholar
Souza, AH, Ayres, H, Ferreira, RM and Wiltbank, MC 2008. A new presynchronization system (Double-Ovsynch) increases fertility at first postpartum timed AI in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 70, 208–215.Google Scholar
Stevenson, JS 2005. Breeding strategies to optimize reproductive efficiency in dairy herds. Veterinary Clinics of North America – Food Animal Practice 21, 349–365.Google Scholar