Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:28:25.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The leg strength of two commercial strains of meat chicken subjected to different incubation profiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

W. I. Muir Open the ORCID record for W. I. Muir [Opens in a new window]  and
P.J. Groves
W. I. Muir*
Affiliation:
School of Life and Environmental Science, Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
P.J. Groves
Affiliation:
Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Poultry Research Foundation, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Lower egg shell temperatures (EST) during the first 2 weeks of incubation, notionally known as Slow start incubation, extended the standing time of a 5-week-old fast feathering meat chicken parent line. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of Slow start incubation on the standing ability of commercial meat chickens. Eggs from two strains of meat chickens, Strains 1 and 2, were incubated using either the Slow start incubation, (the initial EST was 36.75°C followed by a gradual increase in EST, reaching 37.8°C at day 16 of incubation), or Control incubation (EST 37.75°C to 38°C from the start of incubation until day 18 of incubation). Eggs were observed every 6 h from 468 h until 516 h of incubation to identify chick hatch window. At 516 h of incubation all chicks were taken out of the incubator (take-off). Chicks from each Strain and incubation treatment were randomly selected for assessment of chick weight, chick length, yolk sac weight, serum Ca and P, and femoral bone ash (BA). All unhatched eggs were inspected to determine the stage of embryo failure. Remaining chicks were grown for 5 weeks in floorpens. Weekly feed intake (FI), chick weight and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were determined. At 35 days of age the standing ability of visibly male birds was assessed in a latency-to-lie test. Compared to the Control, Slow start incubation delayed the average hatch time of both strains by ∼13 h, and reduced hatchability with 4.6% live but unhatched chicks, which was most evident in Strain 2. Significant differences due to main effects only were observed at take-off. Strain 1 chicks were significantly heavier and longer with higher serum Ca but significantly lower BA and serum P than Strain 2. Slow start incubation generated significantly heavier chicks that were shorter, but had significantly heavier yolk sacs, lower serum Ca but higher serum P than Control incubated chicks. During the 1st week post hatch Strain 1 Control incubated chicks had significantly higher FI and higher FCR than all other Strain and incubation treatments. At 35 days of age Slow start incubated birds of both Strains stood significantly longer than those from the Control incubation. This experiment clearly demonstrated the ability of Slow start incubation of commercial meat chickens to improve their leg strength.

Keywords

egg shell temperaturehatch windowbroilerbone ashlatency-to-lie
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 7 , July 2019 , pp. 1489 - 1497
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berg, C and Sanotra, GS 2003. Can a modified latency-to-lie test be used to validate gait scoring results in commercial broiler flocks? Animal Welfare 12, 655–659.Google Scholar
Ballock, T and O’Keefe, RJ 2003. The biology of the growth plate. Journal of Bone Joint Surgery 85, 715–726.Google Scholar
Bizeray, D, Leterrier, C, Constanin, P, Picard, M and Faure, JM 2000. Early locomotor behavior in genetic stocks of chickens with different growth rates. Applied Animal Behaviour 68, 231–242.Google Scholar
Brookes, M and May, KU 1972. The influence of temperature on bone growth in the chick. Journal of Anatomy 111, 351–363.Google Scholar
Groves, PJ and Muir, WI 2013. The use of a modified latency-to-lie test to assess broiler leg strength in controlled experiments. In Proceedings of the IX European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 17–20 June 2013, Uppsala, Sweden, p. 154.Google Scholar
Groves, PJ and Muir, WI 2014. A meta-analysis of experiments linking incubation conditions with subsequent leg weakness in broiler chickens. PLoS One 9, e102682.Google Scholar
Groves, PJ and Muir, WI 2017. Earlier hatching time predisposes Cobb broiler chickens to tibial dyschondroplasia. Animal 11, 112–120.Google Scholar
Hammond, CL, Simbi, BH and Stickland, NC 2007. In-ovo temperature manipulation influences embryonic motility and growth of limb tissues in the chick (Gallus domesticus). The Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2667–2675.Google Scholar
Hill, D 2008. Quality analysis program. In Quality Manual. HatchTech B.V., Veenendall, The Netherlands, pp. 5–23.Google Scholar
Hulet, RM 2007. Managing incubation: where are we and why? Poultry Science 86, 1017–1019.Google Scholar
Ipek, A, Sahan, U, Baycan, SC and Sozcu, A 2014. The effects of different eggshell temperature on embryonic development, hatchability, chick quality and first- week broiler performance. Poultry Science 93, 464–472.Google Scholar
Ipek, A and Sozcu, A 2016. The effects of egg-shell temperature fluctuations during incubation on welfare status and gait score of broilers. Poultry Science 95, 1296–1303.Google Scholar
Kestin, SC, Su, G and Sørensen, P 1999. Different commercial broiler crosses have different susceptibilities to leg weakness. Poultry Science 78, 1085–1090.Google Scholar
Knowles, TG, Kestin, SC, Haslam, SM, Brown, SN, Green, LE, Butterworth, A, Pope, SJ, Pfeiffer, D and Nicol, CJ 2008. Leg disorders in broiler chickens: prevalence, risk factors and prevention. PLoS One 3, e1545.Google Scholar
Lourens, A, van den Brand, H, Heetkamp, MJW, Meijerhof, R and Kemp, B 2007. Effects of eggshell temperature and oxygen concentration on embryo growth and metabolism during incubation. Poultry Science 86, 2194–2199.Google Scholar
Lourens, A, van den Brand, H, Meijerhof, R and Kemp, B 2005. Effect of eggshell temperature during incubation on embryo development, hatchability and posthatch development. Poultry Science 84, 914–920.Google Scholar
Meijerhof, R 2009. The influence of incubation on chick quality and broiler performance. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium, 9–11 February 2009, Sydney, Australia, pp. 167–170.Google Scholar
Muir, WI and Groves, PJ 2018. Incubation and hatch management: consequences for bone mineralization in Cobb 500 meat chickens. Animal 12, 794–801.Google Scholar
Nangsuay, A, Meijerhof, R, van den Anker, I, Heetkamp, MJW, Kemp, B and van den Brand, H 2015. Development and nutrient metabolism of embryos from two modern broiler strains. Poultry Science 94, 2546–2554.Google Scholar
Oviedo-Rondón, EO, Small, J, Wineland, MJ, Christensen, VL, Mozdziak, PS, Koci, MD, Funderburk, SVL, Ort, DT and Mann, KM 2008. Broiler embryo bone development is influenced by incubator temperature, oxygen concentration and eggshell conductance at the plateau stage in oxygen consumption. British Poultry Science 49, 666–676.Google Scholar
Oviedo-Rondón, EO, Wineland, MJ, Funderburk, S, Small, J, Cutchin, H and Mann, M 2009a. Incubation conditions affect leg health in large high-yield broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18, 640–646.Google Scholar
Oviedo-Rondón, EO, Wineland, MJ, Small, J, Cutchin, H, McElroy, A, Barri, A and Martin, S 2009b. Effect of incubation temperatures and chick transportation conditions on bone development and leg health. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18, 671–678.Google Scholar
Reiter, K and Kutritz, B 2001. Behaviour and leg weakness in different broiler breeds. Archiv fur Geflügelkunde 65, 137–141.Google Scholar
Shim, MY and Pesti, GM 2011. Effects of incubation temperature on bone development of broilers. Poultry Science 90, 1867–1877.Google Scholar
Škrbić, Z, Pavlovski, Z, Lukić, M and Petrićević, V 2015. Incidence of footpad dermatitis and hock burns in broilers as affected by genotype, lighting program and litter type. Annals of Animal Science 15, 433–445.Google Scholar
Suarez, ME, Wilson, HR, Mather, FB, Wilcox, CJ and McPherson, BN 1997. Effect of strain and age of the broiler breeder female on incubation time and chick weight. Poultry Science 76, 1029–1036.Google Scholar
Suarez, ME, Wilson, HR, McPherson, BN, Mather, FB and Wilcox, CJ 1996. Low temperature effects on embryonic development and hatch time. Poultry Science 75, 924–932.Google Scholar
Tona, K, Onagbesan, OM, Kamers, B, Everaert, N, Bruggeman, V and Decuypere, E 2010. Comparison of Cobb and Ross strains in embryo physiology and chick juvenile growth. Poultry Science 89, 1677–1683.Google Scholar
van der Pol, CW, van Roovert-Reijrink, IAM, Maatjens, CM, van den Anker, I, Kemp, B and van den Brand, H 2014. Effect of egg shell temperature throughout incubation on broiler hatchling leg bone development. Poultry Science 93, 2878–2883.Google Scholar
Willemsen, H, Kamers, B, Dahlke, F, Han, H, Song, Z, Ansari Pirsaraei, Z, Tona, K, Decuypere, E and Everaert, N 2010. High and low-temperature manipulation during late incubation: effects on embryonic development, the hatching process and metabolism in broilers. Poultry Science 89, 2678–2690.Google Scholar
Yalcin, S and Siegel, PB 2003. Exposure to cold and heat during incubation on developmental stability of broiler embryos. Poultry Science 82, 1388–1392.Google Scholar