Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T16:25:46.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The interrelationships between clinical signs and their effect on involuntary culling among pregnant sows in group-housing systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2010

T. B. Jensen ,
M. K. Bonde ,
A. G. Kongsted ,
N. Toft  and
J. T. Sørensen
T. B. Jensen*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Large Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 2, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
M. K. Bonde
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Bioscience, University of Aarhus, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
A. G. Kongsted
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agroecology and Environment, University of Aarhus, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
N. Toft
Affiliation:
Faculty of Life Sciences, Department of Large Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 2, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
J. T. Sørensen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Bioscience, University of Aarhus, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Sows suffering from clinical signs of disease (e.g. lameness, wounds and shoulder ulcers) are often involuntarily culled, affecting the farmer’s economy and the welfare of the animals. In order to investigate the interrelationships between clinical signs of individual pregnant group-housed sows, we performed an explanatory factor analysis to identify factors describing the patterns of variation of clinical signs. Moreover, we investigated how these emerging factors affected the probability of a sow to be either (i) euthanized, (ii) suddenly dead, (iii) sent to slaughter due to clinical signs of disease such as claw lesions or wounds or (iv) involuntarily culled (representing a pool of sows that were either euthanized, dead or sent to slaughter due to disease). Data from 2.989 pregnant sows in group-housing systems from 33 sow herds were included in the study. A thorough clinical examination was performed for each sow by using a protocol including 16 different clinical signs. Farmers recorded all cullings and deaths and the reasons for these actions in a 3-month period after the clinical examination. Among the observed sows, 4.2% were involuntarily culled during the 3-month period. From the explanatory factor analysis, we identified three factors describing the underlying structure of the 16 clinical variables. We interpreted the factors as ‘pressure marks’, ‘wounds’ and ‘lameness’ Logistic analyses were performed to investigate the effect of the three factors and the parity number of each sow on the four outcomes: (i) euthanized, (ii) suddenly dead, (iii) sent to slaughter due to clinical signs of disease and (iv) involuntarily culled. The analyses showed that ‘lameness’ significantly increased the risk of sows to be involuntarily culled (P = 0.016) or sent to slaughter due to clinical signs of disease (P = 0.026). Lameness is generally considered to be an important welfare problem in sows, which could explain the increased risk seen in this study. By contrast, ‘pressure marks’ and ‘wounds’ did not have any significant effect on the four outcomes (P > 0.05).

Keywords

sowsclinical signsinvoluntary cullingfactor analysis
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 11 , November 2010 , pp. 1922 - 1928
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anil, L, Bhend, KMG, Baidoo, SM, Morrison, R, Deen, J 2003. Comparison of injuries in sows housed in gestation stalls versus group pens with electronic sow feeders. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 223, 1334–1338.Google Scholar
Boyle, L, Leonard, FC, Lynch, B, Brophy, P 1998. Sow culling patterns and sow welfare. Irish Veterinary Journal 51, 354–357.Google Scholar
D’Allaire, S, Stein, TE, Leman, AD 1986. Culling patterns in selected Minnesota swine breeding herds. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 51, 506–512.Google Scholar
Dohoo, I, Martin, W, Stryhn, H 2009. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research, 2nd edition. VER Inc., Charlottetown, Canada.Google Scholar
Engblom, L, Lundeheim, N, Dalin, AM, Andersson, K 2007. Sow removal in Swedish commercial herds. Livestock Science 106, 76–86.Google Scholar
Engblom, L, Eliasson-Selling, L, Lundeheim, N, Belak, K, Andersson, K, Dalin, AM 2008. Post mortem findings in sows and gilts euthanized or found dead in a large Swedish herd. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica (open access) 50, 25 (pp. 1–10).Google Scholar
Friendship, RM, Wilson, MR, Almond, GW, McMillan, I, Hacker, RR, Pieper, R, Swaminathan, SS 1986. Sow wastage: reason for an effect on productivity. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 50, 205–208.Google Scholar
Heinonen, M, Oravainen, J, Orro, T, Seprä-Lessila, L, Ala-kurikka, E, Virolainen, J, Tast, A, Peltoniemi, OAT 2006. Lameness and fertility of sows and gilts in randomly selected loose-house herds in Finland. Veterinary Record 159, 383–387.Google Scholar
Kilbride, AL, Gillman, CE, Green, LE 2009. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of lameness in finishing pigs, gilt and pregnant sows and associations with limb lesions and floor types on commercial farms in England. Animal Welfare 18, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, RK, Svensmark, B, Ellegaard, LP, Jensen, HE 2005. Locomotive disorders associated with sow mortality in Danish pig herds. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A – Physiology Pathology Clinical Medicine 52, 423–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Rourke, N, Hatcher, L, Stepanski, EJ (ed.) 2003. Using SAS for univariate and multivariate statistics, 2nd edition. SAS Institute Inc., NC, USA.Google Scholar
SAS 2002. SAS/STATS software (version 9.1). SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sato, K, Barlett, PC, Alban, L, Agger, JA, Houe, H 2008. Managerial and environmental determinants of clinical mastitis in Danish dairy herds. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica (open access) 50, 4 (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
Sharma, S (ed.) 1996. Applied multivariate techniques. Wiley, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Stein, TE, Dijkhuizen, A, D’Allaire, SD, Morris, RS 1990. Sow culling and mortality in commercial swine breeding herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 9, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoefner, MB, Ersbøll, AK, Jensen, AL, Hesselholt, M 2001. Factor analysis of the interrelationships between clinical variables in horses with colic. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 48, 201–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vestergaard, K, Bækbo, P, Svensmark, B 2006. Sow mortality and causes for culling of sows in Danish pig herds. In Proceedings of the 19th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress. Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar