Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:24:32.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of the thermal environment and other early life events on growth rate of piglets during lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2015

L. J. Pedersen ,
S.-L. Aa. Schild  and
J. Malmkvist
L. J. Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
S.-L. Aa. Schild*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
J. Malmkvist
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effects of early life events on average daily weight gain from birth to day 21 (ADG) of suckling pigs kept at different room temperatures (15°C, 20°C and 25°C) from birth to weaning were investigated. Data were collected from litters born by 61 sows in a loose housing system. The ADG for piglets with low birth weight (estimated for birth weights below the 10% percentile) was estimated to be 20 to 30 g higher per day at room temperature 20°C to 25°C compared with 15°C. In contrast, the ADG during the lactation period decreased for larger piglets (estimated for birth weights above the 10% percentile) by 28 g/day at room temperature 25°C compared with 15°C. Thus, high ambient temperatures (20°C to 25°C) are favourable for the growth in smaller piglets during lactation. Neither latency to first suckle nor birth-induced hypoxia, measured as concentration of umbilical cord lactate, affected the growth rate of the piglets. Lowest rectal temperature during the first 24 h after birth had a long-term negative effect on ADG (P<0.05), so that piglets with a lowest rectal temperature of 32.8°C (10% percentile) had an ADG which was on average 19 g lower per day than piglets with a rectal temperature of 37.3°C (90% percentile). Our results showed that hypothermia at birth, low birth weight and high number of suckling piglets lead to reduced ADG during the suckling period. The results suggest that keeping the room temperature at 20°C during lactation to some extent could compensate for the otherwise negative effects of low birth weight on ADG in piglets without decreasing the ADG of high birth weight piglets. However, to avoid hypothermia in the smallest piglets it may be beneficial to increase the room temperature above 20°C during the farrowing period of loose housed sows.

Keywords

pigletshypothermiabirth weightADG: average daily weigth gainloose housing
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 9 , September 2015 , pp. 1529 - 1535
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, IL, Nævdal, E and Bøe, KE 2011. Maternal investment, sibling competition, and offspring survival with increasing litter size and parity in pigs (Sus scrofa). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65, 1159–1167.Google Scholar
Baxter, EM, Lawrence, AB and Edwards, SA 2011. Alternative farrowing systems: design criteria for farrowing systems based on the biological needs of sows and piglets. Animal 5, 580–600.Google Scholar
Baxter, EM, Jarvis, S, Sherwood, L, Robson, SK, Ormandy, E, Farish, M, Smurthwaite, KM, Roehe, R, Lawrance, AB and Edwards, SA 2009. Indicators of piglet survival in an outdoor farrowing system. Livestock Science 124, 266–276.Google Scholar
Baxter, EM, Rutherford, KMD, D’Eath, RB, Arnott, G, Turner, SP, Sandøe, P, Moustsen, VA, Thorup, F, Edwards, SA and Lawrence, AB 2013. The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig II: management factors. Animal Welfare 22, 219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, VF, Bernardi, ML, Bortolozzo, FP and Wentz, I 2005. Risk factors for stillbirth and foetal mummification in four Brazilian swine herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 70, 165–176.Google Scholar
Cabrera, RA, Boyd, RD, Jungst, SB, Wilson, ER, Johnston, ME, Vignes, JL and Odle, J 2010. Impact of lactation length and piglet weaning weight on long-term growth and viability of progeny. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2265–2276.Google Scholar
Fraser, D, Kramer, DL, Pajor, EA and Weary, DM 1995. Conflict and cooperation: sociobiological principles and the behaviour of pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44, 139–157.Google Scholar
Hakkarainen, J 1975. Developmental changes of protein, RNA, DNA, lipid, and glycogen in the liver, skeletal muscle, and brain of the piglet. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 59, 1–198.Google Scholar
Herpin, P, Le Dividich, J, Hulin, JC, Fillaut, M, De Marco, F and Bertin, R 1996. Effects of the level of asphyxia during delivery on viability at birth and early postnatal vitality of newborn pigs. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2067–2075.Google Scholar
KilBride, AL, Mendl, M, Statham, P, Held, S, Harris, M, Cooper, S and Green, LE 2012. A cohort study of preweaning piglet mortality and farrowing accommodation on 112 commercial pig farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 104, 281–291.Google Scholar
Lay, DC Jr, Matteri, RL, Carroll, JA, Fangman, TJ and Safranski, TJ 2002. Preweaning survival in swine. Journal of Animal Science 80, 74–86.Google Scholar
Littell, RC, Miliken, GA, Stroup, WW and Wolfinger, RD 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Malmkvist, J, Pedersen, LJ, Kammersgaard, TS and Jørgensen, E 2012. Influence of thermal environment on sows around farrowing and during the lactation period. Journal of Animal Science 90, 3186–3199.Google Scholar
Malmkvist, J, Pedersen, LJ, Damgaard, BM, Thodberg, K, Jørgensen, E and Labouriau, R 2006. Does floor heating around parturition affect the vitality of piglets born to loose housed sows? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99, 88–105.Google Scholar
Marchant, JN, Rudd, AR, Mendl, MT, Broom, DM, Meredith, MJ, Corning, S and Simmins, PH 2000. Timing and causes of piglet mortality in alternative and conventional farrowing systems. Veterinary Record 147, 209–214.Google Scholar
Milligan, BN, Dewey, CE and de Grau, AF 2002. Neonatal-piglet weight variation and its relation to pre-weaning mortality and weight gain on commercial farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 56, 119–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, R, Pluske, J, Smits, R, Henman, D and Collins, C 2009. The use of high cost weaner diets to improve post weaning growth performance. Retrieved October 6, 2014, from http://www.porkcrc.com.au/2B-103-_Final_Research_Report-Hign_Cost_Weaner_diets_.pdf Google Scholar
Panzardi, A, Bernardi, ML, Mellagi, AP, Bierhals, T, Bortolozzo, FP and Wentz, I 2013. Newborn piglet traits associated with survival and growth performance until weaning. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 110, 206–213.Google Scholar
Pedersen, LJ, Berg, P, Jørgensen, G and Andersen, IL 2011. Neonatal piglet traits of importance for survival in crates and indoor pens. Journal of Animal Science 89, 1207–1218.Google Scholar
Pedersen, LJ, Damm, BI, Marchant-Forde, JN and Jensen, KH 2003. Effects of feed-back from the nest on maternal responsiveness and postural changes in primiparous sows during the first 24 h after farrowing onset. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 83, 109–124.Google Scholar
Pedersen, LJ, Malmkvist, J, Kammersgaard, T and Jørgensen, E 2013. Avoiding hypothermia in neonatal pigs: effect of duration of floor heating at different room temperatures. Journal of Animal Science 91, 425–432.Google Scholar
Prunier, A, Messias de Braganca, M and Le Dividich, J 1997. Influence of high ambient temperature on performance of reproductive sows. Livestock Production Science 52, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiniou, N and Noblet, J 1999. Influence of high ambient temperatures on performance of multiparous lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2124–2134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quiniou, N, Dagorn, J and Gaudré, D 2002. Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance. Livestock Production Science 78, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quiniou, N, Brossard, L and Quesnel, H 2007. Impact of some sow’s characteristics on birth weight variability. Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Dublin, Ireland, session 9, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Renaudeau, D and Noblet, J 2001. Effects of exposure to high ambient temperature and dietary protein level on sow milk production and performance of piglets. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1540–1548.Google Scholar
Rutherford, KMD, Baxter, EM, D’Eath, RB, Turner, SP, Arnott, G, Roehe, R, Ask, B, Sandøe, P, Moustsen, VA, Thorup, F, Edwards, SA, Berg, P and Lawrence, AB 2013. The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig I: biological factors. Animal Welfare 22, 199–218.Google Scholar
Thodberg, K, Jensen, KH and Herskin, MS 2002. Nest building and farrowing in sows: relation to the reaction pattern during stress, farrowing environment and experiences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 77, 21–42.Google Scholar
Thorup, F 2010. 11, 13 eller 15 diende grise hos soen. The Danish Pig Research Centre. Retrieved October 6, 2014, from http://vsp.lf.dk/Publikationer/Kilder/lu_medd/2010/872.aspx?full=1 Google Scholar
Tuchscherer, M, Puppe, B, Tuchscherer, A and Tiemann, U 2000. Early identification of neonates at risk: traits of newborn piglets with respect to survival. Theriogenology 54, 371–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Václavková, E, Daněk, P and Rozkot, M 2012. The influence of piglet birth weight on growth performance. Research in Pig Breeding 6, 59–61.Google Scholar
Vanderhaeghe, C, Dewulf, J, Ribbens, S, de Kruif, A and Maes, D 2010. A cross-sectional study to collect risk factors associated with stillbirths in pig herds. Animal Reproduction Science 118, 62–68.Google Scholar