Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:21:04.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of spray-dried rumen fluid supplementation on performance, blood metabolites and cytokines in suckling Holstein calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2020

F. Rezai Sarteshnizi ,
H. Abdi-benemar ,
J. Seifdavati ,
H. Khalilvandi-Behroozyar ,
R. Seyedsharifi  and
A. Z. M. Salem Open the ORCID record for A. Z. M. Salem [Opens in a new window]
F. Rezai Sarteshnizi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, University Street, PO Box, 179, Ardabil, Iran
H. Abdi-benemar
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, University Street, PO Box, 179, Ardabil, Iran
J. Seifdavati
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, University Street, PO Box, 179, Ardabil, Iran
H. Khalilvandi-Behroozyar
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Urmia University, PO Box 165, Urmia, Iran
R. Seyedsharifi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, University Street, PO Box, 179, Ardabil, Iran
A. Z. M. Salem*
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Estado de México, Toluca, México
*
†E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Rumen fluid from slaughtered animals is one of the wastes of slaughterhouses released to the environment that, due to its high nitrogen and phosphorus contents, can lead to soil and groundwater pollution. Meanwhile, it contains ruminal microbes and some bioactive compounds such as enzymes, minerals, vitamins and organic acids. This study was designed to examine the potential of rumen fluid as a feed additive. Therefore, the effects of spray-dried rumen fluid (SDR) with 1% maltodextrin on the performance, blood metabolites and some cytokines of sucking dairy calves during the pre-weaning phase were investigated. Forty male Holstein calves, with a mean weight of 39.4 ± 3.7 kg and 7 ± 1 days old, were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10 calves per group) in a completely randomized design. Experimental treatments were: control diet with no additive (CON); control diet with 0.5 g/day of SDR (SDR0.5); control diet with 1 g/day of SDR (SDR1); and control diet with 1.5 g/day of SDR (SDR1.5). Daily feed intake and average daily gain of calves were not affected by feeding SDR as a feed additive. Cholesterol concentration was significantly affected by the 20th and 40th days of the experiment and decreased linearly by increasing SDR feeding level. Levels of liver enzymes, including aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, in the blood decreased by feeding SDR at day 40 of the experiment. Serum concentration of interleukin-6 at day 20 was not affected by dried rumen fluid feeding, whereas at day 40, a significant effect was observed among experimental treatments. The lowest value was recorded for SDR1.5 v. control calves. At day 20, the serum concentration of interferon-γ was influenced by supplementing SDR, and the highest value was recorded for SDR1.5 calves. The inclusion of SDR with 1% maltodextrin in suckling dairy calves had beneficial effects on the stimulation of calves’ immune system.

Keywords

abattoir's wastesfeed additiveimmune systeminterleukinsinterferon
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 9 , September 2020 , pp. 1849 - 1856
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdeshahian, P, Lim, JS, Ho, WS, Hashim, H and Lee, CT 2016. Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 60, 714–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abouheif, M, Kraidees, M and AL-Selbood, B 1999. The utilization of rumen content-barley meal in diets of growing lambs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 12, 1234–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afazeli, H, Jafari, A, Rafiee, S and Nosrati, M 2014. An investigation of biogas production potential from livestock and slaughterhouse wastes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 34, 380–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agarwal, N, Agarwal, I, Kamra, D and Chaudhary, L 2000. Diurnal variations in the activities of hydrolytic enzymes in different fractions of rumen contents of murrah buffalo. Journal of Applied Animal Research 18, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alikwe, PCN, Faremi, AY and Egwaikhide, PA 2010. Biochemical evaluation of serum metabolites, enzymes and haematological indices of broiler chicks fed with varying levels of rumen epithelial scraps in place of fish meal proteins. Research Journal of Poultry Sciences 3, 27–31.Google Scholar
Alsayadi, M, Jawfi, YAl, Belarbi, M, Soualem-Mami, Z, Merzouk, HD, Sari, C and Ghalim, M 2014. Evaluation of anti-Hyperglycemic and anti-hyperlipidemic activities of water kefir as probiotic on Streptozotocin-induced diabetic Wistar rats. Journal of Diabetes Mellitus 4, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOAC 1997. Official Methods of Analysis, sixteenth ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Azizi-Shotorkhoft, A, Sharifi, A, Azarfar, A and Kiani, A 2018. Effects of different carbohydrate sources on activity of rumen microbial enzymes and nitrogen retention in sheep fed diet containing recycled poultry bedding. Journal of Applied Animal Research 46, 50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajsic, I and Kranjcevic, E 2001. Automation of industrial spray dryer. Measurement Science and Technology 29, 41–52.Google Scholar
Barnes, AGC, Cerovic, V, Hobson, PS and Klavinskis, LS 2007. Bacillus subtilis spores: A novel microparticle adjuvant which can instruct a balanced Th1 and Th2 immune response to specific antigen. European Journal of Immunology 37, 1538–1547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calabro, S, Guglielmelli, A, Iannaccone, F, Danieli, PP, Tudisco, R, Ruggiero, C and Infascelli, F 2012. Fermentation kinetics of sainfoin hay with and without PEG. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 96, 842–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capitan-Canadas, F, Ortega-Gonzalez, M, Guadix, E, Zarzuelo, A, Suarez, MD, de Medina, FS and Martinez-Augustin, O 2014. Prebiotic oligosaccharides directly modulate proinflammatory cytokine production in onocytes via activation of TLR4. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research 58, 1098–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, LL and Dutton, RW 1996. Type 1 and Type 2: a fundamental dichotomy for all T-cell subsets. Current Opinion in Immunology 8, 336–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cherdthong, A and Wanapat, M 2013. Manipulation of invitro ruminal fermentation and digestibility by dried rumen digesta. Livestock Science 153, 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherdthong, A, Wanapat, M, Saenkamsorn, A, Waraphila, N, Khota, W, Rakwongrit, D, Anantasook, N and Gunum, P 2014. Effects of replacing soybean meal with dried rumen digesta on feed intake, digestibility of nutrients, rumen fermentation and nitrogen use efficiency in thai cattle fed on rice straw. Livestock Science 169, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costerton, JW, Damgaard, HN and Cheng, JK 1974. Cell envelope morphology of rumen bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology 118, 1132–1143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Vos, P, Faas, MM, Spasojevic, M and Sikkema, J 2010. Encapsulation for preservation of functionality and targeted delivery of bioactive food components. International Dairy Journal 20, 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elfaki, MO and Abdelatti, KA 2018. Rumen content as animal feed: a review. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production 7, 80–88.Google Scholar
Gharsallaoui, A, Roudaut, G, Chambin, O, Voilley, A and Saurel, R 2007. Applications of spray-drying in microencapsulation of food ingredients: an overview. Food Research International 40, 1107–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouin, S 2004. Microencapsulation: industrial appraisal of existing technologies and trends. Trends in Food Science and Technology 15, 330–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, F, Morita, H, Kubota, A, Ouwehand, AC, Hosoda, M, Hiramatsu, M and Kurisaki, JI 2005. Effect of orally administered nonviable lactobacillus cells on murine humoral immune responses. Medical Microbiology and Immunology 49, 993–997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jalalipour, M, Gilani, K, Tajerzadeh, H, Najafabadi, AR and Barghi, M 2008. Characterization and aerodynamic evaluation of spray dried recombinant human growth hormone using protein stabilizing agents. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 352, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koike, S and Kobayashi, Y 2001. Development and use of competitive PCR assays for the rumen cellulolytic bacteria: fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens. FEMS Microbiology Letters 204, 361–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosaka, T, Nakada, TY, Yukawa, M and Tanaka, S 1998. Effect of Bacillus subtilis spore administration on activation of macrophages and natural killer cells in mice. Veterinary Microbiology 60, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krajewska, B 2004. Application of chitin-and chitosan-based materials for enzyme immobilizations: a review. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35, 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maury, M, Murphy, K, Kumar, S, Mauerer, A and Lee, G 2005. Spray-drying of proteins: effects of sorbitol and trehalose on aggregation and ft-iramide ispectrum of an immunoglobuling. European Journal Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 59, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuirk, SM 2008. Disease management of dairy calves and heifers. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 24, 139–153.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, GL 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry 31, 426–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muscato, TV, Tedeschi, LO and Russell, JB 2002. The effect of ruminal fluid reparations on the growth and health of newborn, milk-fed dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 8, 648–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namaldi, A, Calik, P and Uludag, Y 2006. Effects of spray drying temperature and additives on the stability of serine alkaline protease powders. Drying Technology 24, 1495–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okpanachi, U, Aribido, SO and Daikwo, IS 2010. Growth and haematological response of growing rabbits to diets containing graded levels of sun-dried bovine rumen content. African Journal of Food, Agriculture Nutrition and Development 10, 4444–4457.Google Scholar
Pounden, WD and Hibbs, JW 1949. Rumen inoculations in young calves. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 114, 33–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Rezai-Sarteshnizi, F, Abdi-Benemar, H, Seifdavati, J, Greiner, R, Salem, AZM and Khalilvandi Behroozyar, H 2018a. Production of an environmentally friendly enzymatic feed additive for agriculture animals by spray drying abattoir's rumen fluid in the presence of different hydrocolloids. Journal of Cleaner Production 197, 70–874.Google Scholar
Rezai-Sarteshnizi, F, Seifdavati, J, Abdi-Benemar, H, Salem, AZM, Seyedsharifi, R and Mlambo, V 2018b. The potential of rumen fluid waste from slaughterhouses as an environmentally friendly source of enzyme additives for ruminant feedstuffs. Journal of Cleaner Production 195, 1026–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitt, I, Brostoff, J and Male, D 1998. Immunology, 5th edition. Mosby Company, London, England.Google Scholar
Samborska, K, Witrowa-Rajchert, D and Gonçalves, A 2005. Spray-drying of α-amylase-The effect of process variables on the enzyme inactivation. Drying Technology 23, 941–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc . 2003. SAS/STAT(r) 9.1 user's guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Shahidi, F and Han, XQ 1993. Encapsulation of food ingredient. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 33, 501–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, P, Wang, JQ and Zhang, HT 2010. Effects of bacillus subtilis natto on performance and immune function of preweaning calves. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 5851–5855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szymanska-Czerwinska, M, Bendarek, D, Zdzisinska, B and Kandefer-Szerszen, M 2009. Effect of tylosin and prebiotics on the level of cytokines and lymphocyte immunophenotyping parameters in calves. Central European Journal of Immunology 34, 1–6.Google Scholar
Tan, LH, Chan, LW and Heng, PW 2005. Effect of oil loading on microspheres produced by spray drying. Journal of Microencapsulation 22, 253–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terebiznik, MR, Buera, MP and Pilosof, AMR 1997. Thermal stability of dehydrated alpha-amylase in trehalose matrices in relation to its phase transitions. LWT-Food Science and Technology 30, 513–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tizard, IR 1996. Immunity at body surfaces. In Veterinary immunology: an introduction, pp. 237–264. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Tritt, WP and Schuchardt, F 1992. Materials flow and possibilities of treating liquid and solid wastes from slaughterhouses in Germany. A review. Bioresource Technology 41, 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar