Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:36:45.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of para-aminohippuric acid analysis on net portal-drained viscera flux of nutrients in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

I. Fernández-Fígares ,
M. Lachica ,
M. L. Rojas-Cano  and
A. González-Casado
I. Fernández-Fígares*
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Animal Nutrition, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, CSIC, Profesor Albareda 1, 18008 Granada, Spain
M. Lachica
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Animal Nutrition, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, CSIC, Profesor Albareda 1, 18008 Granada, Spain
M. L. Rojas-Cano
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Biochemistry of Animal Nutrition, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, CSIC, Profesor Albareda 1, 18008 Granada, Spain
A. González-Casado
Affiliation:
Department of Analytical Chemistry, School of Qualimetrics, University of Granada, Fuentenueva s/n, E-18071, Granada, Spain
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In nutrition studies, para-aminohippuric acid (PAH) is a marker frequently used to measure blood flow in pigs, which is essential for estimating portal-drained viscera (PDV) flux of nutrients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the PAH analytical method by means of qualimetric statistical procedures to estimate the matrix effect and the accuracy and limits of quantitation of the method. Net PDV flux of nutrients was determined in five multi-catheterized pigs using water, plasma or commercial serum as standard matrix. A proportional systematic error due to matrix effect was found for plasma and serum. Mean recovery was 99.4%, and intra- and inter-day precision of the method was 2.4% and 3.8% relative standard deviation, respectively. The limit of quantification was 0.22 mg PAH/l. Use of water for the PAH standard curves underestimated portal blood flow compared with PAH standards prepared with plasma or commercial serum (706, 954 and 927 ml/min; P<0.05, respectively). Consequently, PDV O2 consumption, glucose and amino acids fluxes were underestimated by 33% (P<0.001). In conclusion, our results stress the importance of using plasma from pigs not infused with PAH or alternatively commercial pig serum to prepare PAH standards to determine blood flow in pigs to avoid underestimation of blood flow.

Keywords

para-aminohippuric acidblood flownutrient fluxportal-drained viscerapig
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , February 2018 , pp. 232 - 238
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagur, MG, Gazquez, D and SanchezVinas, M 1996. The standard addition methodology for evaluation of results in chromatographic analysis. Analusis 24, 374–380.Google Scholar
Bergman, EN, Havel, RJ, Wolfe, BM and Bohmer, T 1971. Quantitative studies of metabolism of chylomicron triglycerides and cholesterol by liver and extrahepatic tissues of sheep and dogs. Journal of Clinical Investigation 50, 1831–1839.Google Scholar
Bratton, AC and Marshall, EK 1939. A new coupling component for sulfanilamide determination. Journal of Biological Chemistry 128, 537–550.Google Scholar
Cardone, MJ 1987. Comments on a new technique in chemical assay calculations: reply. Analytical Chemistry 59, 2818–2822.Google Scholar
Deutz, NEP, Reijven, PLM, Athanasas, G and Soeters, PB 1992. Postoperative changes in hepatic, intestinal, splenic and muscle fluxes of amino-acids and ammonia in pigs. Clinical Science 83, 607–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández-Fígares, I, Cuadros Rodríguez, L and González-Casado, A 2004. Effect of different matrices on physiological amino acids analysis by HPLC: evaluation and correction of the matrix effect. Journal of Chromatography, B 799, 73–79.Google Scholar
González-Valero, L, Rodríguez-López, JM, Lachica, M and Fernández-Fígares, I 2016. Contribution of portal-drained viscera to heat production in Iberian gilts fed a low-protein diet: comparison to Landrace. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 96, 1202–1208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntington, GB, Eisemann, JH and Whitt, JM 1990. Portal blood flow in beef steers: comparison of techniques and relation to hepatic blood flow, cardiac output and oxygen uptake. Journal of Animal Science 68, 1666–1673.Google Scholar
Isserty, A and Ortigues, I 1994. Methods of analysis relating to blood flow measurement of the viscera and aorta in sheep. Reproduction Nutrition Development 34, 399–413.Google Scholar
Isserty, A, Ortigues, I and Remond, D 1998. Measurement of splanchnic blood flows by marker dilution: comparison of four analytical methods of para-amino-hippuric acid. Reproduction Nutrition Development 38, 93–106.Google Scholar
Katz, ML and Bergman, EN 1969. Simultaneous measurements of hepatic and portal venous blood flow in the sheep and dog. American Journal of Physiology 216, 946–952.Google Scholar
Matuszewski, BK, Constanzer, ML and Chavez-Eng, CM 2003. Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC-MS/MS. Analytical Chemistry 75, 3019–3030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieto, R, Miranda, A, García, MA and Aguilera, JF 2002. The effect of dietary protein content and feeding level on the rate of protein deposition and energy utilization in growing Iberian pigs from 15 to 50 kg body weight. British Journal of Nutrition 88, 39–49.Google Scholar
Olivieri, AC 2015. Practical guidelines for reporting results in single- and multi-component analytical calibration: a tutorial. Analytica Chimica Acta 868, 10–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodríguez-Lopez, JM, Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G, Durand, D, Isserty-Thomas, A and Ortigues-Marty, I 2014. Influence of the para-aminohippuric acid analysis method on the net hepatic flux of nutrients in lactating cows. Journal of Animal Science 92, 1074–1082.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-López, JM, Lachica, M, González-Valero, L and Fernández-Fígares, I 2010. Energy expenditure of splanchnic tissues in Iberian and Landrace growing gilts. Livestock Science 133, 61–63.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Lopez, JM, Lachica, M, Gonzalez-Valero, L and Fernandez-Figares, I 2013. Approaches for quantifying gastrointestinal nutrient absorption and metabolism in a native and a modern pig breed. Journal of Agricultural Science 151, 434–443.Google Scholar
Smith, HW, Finkelstein, N, Aliminosa, L, Crawford, B and Graber, M 1945. The renal clearances of substituted hippuric acid derivatives and other aromatic acids in dogs and man. Journal of Clinical Investigation 24, 388–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M, Brown, DW, Fearn, T, Gardner, MJ, Greenhow, EJ, Howarth, R, qMiller, JN, Newman, EJ, Ripley, BD, Swan, KJ, Williams, A, Wood, R and Wilson, JJ 1994. Is my calibration linear? Analyst 119, 2363–2366.Google Scholar
Yen, JT and Killefer, J 1987. A method for chronically quantifying net absorption of nutrients and gut metabolites into hepatic portal vein in conscious swine. Journal of Animal Science 64, 923–934.Google Scholar
Youden, WJ 1947. Technique for testing accuracy of analytical data. Analytical Chemistry 19, 946–950.Google Scholar
Zierler, KL 1961. Theory of the use of arteriovenous concentration differences for measuring metabolism in steady and non-steady states. Journal of Clinical Investigation 40, 2111–2125.Google Scholar