Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:38:12.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-energy forage feeding diets and body condition on the finishing of cull dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

T. Moreno ,
A. Botana ,
E. Bispo ,
L. González ,
C. García  and
J. Mesas
T. Moreno*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Centro de Investigaciones Agrarias de Mabegondo (INGACAL), Apdo 10, 15080 A Coruña, Spain
A. Botana
Affiliation:
Unidad de Tecnología de Alimentos, Departamento de Química Analítica, Nutrición and Bromatología, Facultad of Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
E. Bispo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Centro de Investigaciones Agrarias de Mabegondo (INGACAL), Apdo 10, 15080 A Coruña, Spain
L. González
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Centro de Investigaciones Agrarias de Mabegondo (INGACAL), Apdo 10, 15080 A Coruña, Spain
C. García
Affiliation:
Centro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia n°4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrán das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain
J. Mesas
Affiliation:
Unidad de Tecnología de Alimentos, Departamento de Química Analítica, Nutrición and Bromatología, Facultad of Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Combinations of two high-energy forage finishing diets and two initial body condition scores (BCSs) in a 2 × 2 factorial experimental design were evaluated on cull Holstein–Friesian (HF) cows to improve animal performance and carcass characteristics, aimed at achieving proper fatness and conformation scores (a minimum of ‘4’ and ‘O’, respectively) required for the marketing of high-value loin steaks. The two finishing diets were (i) conventional maize silage complemented with concentrate diet and (ii) wet maize ear silage (pastone) complemented with dry-herbage diet. The two initial body condition levels were (i) low BCS < 5 (LBCS) and (ii) high BCS > 5 (HBCS). The HBCS animals had the greatest potential to respond to the finishing diets. They needed a smaller total feed intake (TFI) and a shorter finishing period (FP) to meet the marketing requirements. The average feed budgets necessary to finish cull dairy cows and to achieve the minimum scores ‘4’ and ‘O’ of carcass classification were 2.31 and 3.61 t of dry matter (DM)/cow for HBCS and LBCS animals, respectively, while the FP lasted an average of 143 and 224 days for HBCS and LBCS animals, respectively. With regard to the two feeding diets, we found no differences for TFI, carcass characteristics and loin muscle features, such as weight, diameter and intramuscular fat.

Keywords

animal performancecarcass characteristicscull dairy cowsfinishing feeding
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 10 , October 2012 , pp. 1634 - 1641
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AEA 2005. Anuario de Estadística Agraria 2005. Xunta de Galicia, Consellería do Medio Rural, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.Google Scholar
Bispo, E 2007. Vacas de deshecho Holstein–Friesian: efecto del acabado sobre las características de la canal, de la carne y la grasa. Memoria del trabajo de investigación tutelado correspondiente a la Suficiencia Investigadora. University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.Google Scholar
Bispo, E, Franco, D, Monserrat, L, González, L, Pérez, N, Moreno, T 2007. Economic considerations of cull dairy cows fattened for a special market. Proceedings of the 53rd International Congress of Meat Science and Technology. Beijing, China, 581–582pp.Google Scholar
Brethour, JR 1992. The repeatability and accuracy of ultrasound in measuring backfat in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1039–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, KD, Bertrand, JK, Benyshek, LL, Williams, SE, Lust, DG 1991. Comparison of real-time ultrasound and other live measures to carcass measures as predictors of beef cow energy stores. Journal of Animal Science 69, 3908–3916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carballo, JA, Moreno, T 2006. Características cuantitativas de las canales de vacas de desecho en Galicia. Archivos de Zootecnia 55 (212), 339–350.Google Scholar
Cranwell, CD, Unruh, JA, Brethour, JR, Simms, DD 1996. Influence of steroid implants and concentrate feeding on carcass and longisimus muscle sensory and collagen characteristics of cull beef cow. Journal of Animal Science 74, 1777–1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Directive 2003/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2003 amending Council Directive 86/609/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union L 230, 32–33.Google Scholar
De Boer, H, Dumont, BL, Pomeroy, RW, Weniger, JH 1974. Manual on EEAP reference methods for the assessment of carcass characteristics in cattle. Livestock Production Science 1, 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, D, Bispo, E, González, L, Vázquez, JA, Moreno, T 2009. Effect of finishing and ageing time on quality attributes of loin from the meat of Holstein–Fresian cull cows. Meat Science 83, 484–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freetly, HC, Nienaber, JA 1998. Efficiency of energy and nitrogen loss and gain in mature cows. Journal of Animal Science 76, 896–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greiner, SP, Rouse, GH, Wilson, DE, Cundiff, LV, Wheeler, TL 2003. Prediction of retail product weight and percentage using ultrasound and carcass measurements in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1736–1742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Indurain, G, Carr, TR, Goñi, MV, Insausti, K, Beriain, MJ 2009. The relationship of carcass measurements to carcasss composition and intramuscular fat in Spanish beef. Meat Science 82 (2), 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Organisation for Standardization (ISO) 1443:1973. International Organisation for Standardization of meat and meat products: determination of total fat content. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 6492:1999. International Organisation for Standardization of animal feeding stuffs: determination of fat content. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 6865:2000. International Organisation for Standardization of animal feeding stuffs: determination of crude fibre content. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 6869:2000. International Organisation for Standardization of animal feeding stuffs: determination of the contents of calcium, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, potassium, sodium and zinc. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 5984:2002. International Organisation for Standardization of animal feeding stuffs: determination of crude ash. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 5983-1:2005. International Organisation for Standardization of animal feeding stuffs: determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 13906:2008. International Organisation for Standardization of animal feeding stuffs: determination of acid detergent fibre and acid detergent lignin. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 16472:2006. International Organisation for Standardization of animal feeding stuffs: determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fibre content. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Jones, SDM, Macleod, GK 1981. The feedlot performance and carcass composition of young and mature cull Holstein cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61, 593–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juniper, DT, Aikman, PC, Green, C, Phipps, RH 2006. Finishing cull dairy cows for beef production report: Project no. 7278. Report no. 243, August 2006. The Animal Science Research Group (ASRG), University of Reading, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
Keane, MG, Allen, P 1998. Effects of production system intensity on performance, carcass composition and meat quality of beef cattle. Livestock Production Science 56, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, AH, Johnson, DL 1979. Interrelationships between GR and other lamb fatness measurements. Proceeding of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 39, 194–201.Google Scholar
Malterre, C, Robelin, J, Agabriel, J, Bordes, P 1989. Engraissement des vaches de réforme de race Limousine. INRA Productions Animales 2 (5), 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandell, IB, Campell, CP, Quinton, VM, Wilton, JW 2006. Effects of skeletal separation method and postmortem ageing on carcass traits and shear force in cull cow beef. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 86, 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matulis, RJ, McKeith, FK, Faulkner, DB, Berger, LL, George, P 1987. Growth and carcass characteristics of cull cows after different times on feed. Journal of Animal Science 65, 669–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minchin, W, Buckley, F, Kenny, DA, Monahan, FJ, Shalloo, L, O'Donovan, M 2009. Effect of grass silage and concentrate based finishing strategies on cull dairy cow performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics. Meat Science 81 (1), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minchin, W, Buckley, F, Kenny, DA, Monahan, FJ, Shalloo, L, O'Donovan, M 2010. An evaluation of over-wintering feeding strategies prior to finishing at pasture for cull dairy cows on live animal performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics. Meat Science 85 (3), 385–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, T 2008. Nuevas alternativas en la alimentación del ganado vacuno lechero. Albéitar: Publicación para veterinarios y técnicos del sector de animales de producción 120 (November 2008), 4.Google Scholar
Regulation 103/2006. Commission Regulation of 20 January 2006, adopting additional provisions for the application of the Community scale for the classification of carcasses of adult bovine animals. Official Journal of the European Union L17, 6–8.Google Scholar
Renand, G, Fisher, AV 1997. Comparison of methods for estimating carcass fat content of young Charolais bulls in performance testing station. Livestock Production Science 51, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, MW, Spitzer, JC, Warner, MB 1986. Effect of varying levels of postpartum nutrition and body condition at calving on subsequent reproductive performance in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 62, 300–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, JE, Mathis, CP, Davis, B 2004. Effects of feeding strategy and age on live animal performance, carcass characteristics, and economics of short-term feeding programs for culled beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1195–1202.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 2006. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Therkildsen, M, Stolzenbach, S, Byrne, DV 2011. Sensory profiling of textural properties of meat from dairy cows exposed to a compensatory finishing strategy. Meat Science 87, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermorel, M, Coulon, JB, Journet, M 1987. Révision du système des unités fourragères (UF). Bulletin Technique du CRZV de Theix INRA 70, 9–18.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, M, Madsen, NT, Bligaard, HB, Bredahl, L, Rasmussen, PT, Andersen, HR 2007. Consequences of two or four months of finishing feeding of culled dry dairy cows on carcass characteristics and technological and sensory meat quality. Meat Science 76, 635–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed