Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:37:39.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heritability of body surface temperature in hens estimated by infrared thermography at normal or hot temperatures and genetic correlations with egg and feather quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2016

T. Loyau ,
T. Zerjal ,
T. B. Rodenburg ,
J. Fablet ,
M. Tixier-Boichard ,
M. H. Pinard-van der Laan  and
S. Mignon-Grasteau
T. Loyau
Affiliation:
UR83 Recherches Avicoles, INRA Centre Val de Loire, 37380 Nouzilly, France
T. Zerjal
Affiliation:
GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
T. B. Rodenburg
Affiliation:
WUR Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands WUR Behavioural Ecology Group, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands
J. Fablet
Affiliation:
ISA, 1 Rue Jean Rostand, BP 23, 22440 Zoopôle, Ploufragan, France
M. Tixier-Boichard
Affiliation:
GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
M. H. Pinard-van der Laan
Affiliation:
WUR Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, the Netherlands
S. Mignon-Grasteau*
Affiliation:
UR83 Recherches Avicoles, INRA Centre Val de Loire, 37380 Nouzilly, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Exposure of laying hens to chronic heat stress results in loss of egg production. It should be possible to improve hen resilience to chronic heat stress by genetic selection but measuring their sensitivity through internal temperature is time consuming and is not very precise. In this study we used infrared thermography to measure the hen’s capacity to dissipate heat, in a commercial line of laying hens subjected to cycles of neutral (N, 19.6°C) or high (H, 28.4°C) ambient temperatures. Mean body temperatures (BT) were estimated from 9355 infrared images of wing, comb and shank taken from 1200 hens. Genetic parameters were estimated separately for N and H temperatures. Correlations between BT and plumage condition were also investigated. Wing temperature had low heritability (0.00 to 0.09), consistent with the fact that wing temperature mainly reflects the environmental temperature and is not a zone of heat dissipation. The heritability of comb temperature was higher, from 0.15 to 0.19 in N and H conditions, respectively. Finally, the shank temperature provided the highest heritability estimates, with values of 0.20 to 0.22 in H and N conditions, respectively. Taken together, these results show that heat dissipation is partly under genetic control. Interestingly, the genetic correlation between plumage condition and shank and comb temperatures indicated that birds with poor condition plumage also had the possibility to dissipate heat through featherless areas. Genetic correlations of temperature measurements with egg quality showed that temperatures were correlated with egg width and weight, yolk brightness and yellowness and Haugh units only under H conditions. In contrast, shell colour was correlated with leg temperature only at thermo-neutrality.

Keywords

genotype–environment interactionheat stressadaptationegg qualitylaying hens
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 10 , October 2016 , pp. 1594 - 1601
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, KE and Carter, TA 1993. Hot weather management of poultry. Poultry Science and Technology Guide No. 30. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Bennewitz, J, Bögelein, S, Stratz, P, Rodehutscord, M, Piepho, HP, Kjaer, JB and Bessei, W 2014. Genetic parameters for feather pecking and aggressive behavior in a large F2-cross of laying hens using generalized linear mixed models. Poultry Science 93, 810–817.Google Scholar
COPA/COGECA 2004. Assessment of the impact of the heat wave and drought of the summer 2003 on agriculture and forestry. Committee of professional agricultural organisations in the European Union – General confederation for agricultural cooperatives in the European Union, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
De Haas, EN, Bolhuis, EN, de Jong, JE, Kemp, IC, Janczak, AM and Rodenburg, TB 2014. Predicting father damage in laying hens during the laying period. Is it the past or the present? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 160, 75–85.Google Scholar
Etches, RJ, John, JM and Gibbins, AMV 2008. Behavioural, physiological, neuroendocrine and molecular responses to heat stress. In Poultry production in hot climates (ed NJ Daghir), pp. 48–79. CABI, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, DS and Mackay, TFC 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, (4th edition). Longman Group Ltd, Harlow, UK.Google Scholar
Ferreira, VMOS, Francisco, NS, Belloni, M, Aguirre, GMZ, Caldara, FR, Nääs, IA, Garcia, RG, Almeida Paz, ICL and Polycarpo, GV 2011. Infrared thermography applied to the evaluation of metabolic heat loss of chicks fed with different energy densities. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 13, 113–118.Google Scholar
Franco-Jimenez, DJ, Scheideler, SE, Kittok, RJ, Brown-Brandl, TM, Robeson, LR, Taira, H and Beck, MK 2007. Differential effects of heat stress in three strains of laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16, 628–634.Google Scholar
Giloh, M, Shinder, D and Yahav, S 2012. Skin surface temperature of broiler chickens is correlated to body core temperature and is indicative of their thermoregulatory status. Poultry Science 91, 175–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groeneveld, E, Kovac, M and Mielenz, M 2010. VCE user’s guide and reference manual version 6.0. Available at ftp://ftp.tzv.fal.de/pub/vce6/doc/vce6-manual-3.1-A4.pdf Google Scholar
IPCC 2014. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability (Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Kadono, HE, Besch, L and Usami, E 1981. Body temperature, oviposition and food intake in the hen during continuous light. Journal of Applied Physiology 51, 1145–1149.Google Scholar
Kjaer, JB and Sørensen, P 1997. Feather pecking behaviour in white leghorns, a genetic study. British Poultry Science 38, 333–341.Google Scholar
Klir, JJ and Heath, JE 1992. An infrared thermographic study of surface temperature in relation to thermal stress in three species of foxes: the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), arctic fox (Alopex lagopus), and kit fox (Vulpes macrotis). Physiological Zoology 65, 1011–1021.Google Scholar
Kock, JW 2006. Physical and mechanical properties of chicken feather materials. MSc, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.Google Scholar
Loyau, T, Berri, C, Bedrani, L, Métayer-Coustard, S, Praud, C, Duclos, MJ, Tesseraud, S, Rideau, N, Everaert, N, Yahav, S, Mignon-Grasteau, S and Collin, A 2013. Thermal manipulation of the embryo modifies the physiology and body composition of broiler chickens reared in floor pens without affecting breast meat processing quality. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3674–3685.Google Scholar
Mac Cafferty, DJ 2007. The value of infrared thermography for research on mammals: previous applications and future directions. Mammal Review 37, 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marder, J and Arad, Z 1989. Panting and acid-base regulation in heat stressed birds. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology 94, 395–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mashaly, M, Hendricks, G, Kalama, M, Gehad, A, Abbas, A and Patterson, P 2004. Effect of heat stress on production parameters and immune responses of commercial laying hens. Poultry Science 83, 889–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mignon-Grasteau, S, Moreri, U, Narcy, A, Rousseau, X, Rodenburg, TB, Tixier-Boichard, M and Zerjal, T 2015. Robustness to chronic heat stress in laying hens: a meta-analysis. Poultry Science 94, 586–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mount, LE 1974. The concept of thermal neutrality. In Heat loss from animals and man (ed. JL Monteith and LE Mount ), pp. 425–439. Butterworths, London, UK.Google Scholar
Nääs, IA, Romanini, CEB, Neves, DP, Nascimento, GR and Vercellino, RA 2010. Broiler surface temperature distribution of 42 day old chickens. Scientia Agricola 67, 497–502.Google Scholar
Neumaier, A and Groeneveld, E 1998. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models. Genetics Selection Evolution Journal 1, 3–26.Google Scholar
Richards, SA 1971. The significance of changes in the temperature of the skin and body core of the chicken in regulation of heat loss. Journal of Physiology 216, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodenburg, TB, Buitenhuis, AJ, Ask, B, Uitdehaag, KA, Koene, P, van der Poel, JJ and Bovenhuis, H 2003. Heritability of feather pecking and open-field response of laying hens at two different ages. Poultry Science 82, 861–867.Google Scholar
Saint-Pierre, NR, Cobanov, B and Schnitkey, G 2003. Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. Journal of Dairy Science 86 (suppl.), E52–E77.Google Scholar
SAS 2012. Version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sauveur, B and Picard, M 1987. Environmental effects on egg quality. In Egg quality – current problems and recent advances (ed. RG Wells and CG Belyavin), pp. 219–234. Butterworths, London, UK.Google Scholar
Seymour, RS 1972. Convective heat transfer in the respiratory systems of panting animals. Journal of Theoretical Biology 35, 119–127.Google Scholar
Stewart, M, Webster, JR, Schaefer, AL, Cook, NJ and Scott, SL 2005. Infrared thermography as a non-invasive tool to study animal welfare. Animal Welfare 14, 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tixier-Boichard, M, Boichard, D, Groeneveld, E and Bordas, A 1995. Restricted maximum likelihood estimates of genetic parameters of adult male and female Rhode Island Red chickens divergently selected for residual feed consumption. Poultry Science 74, 1245–1252.Google Scholar
Welfare Quality® 2009. Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for poultry (broilers, laying hens). Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, the Netherlands, ISBN/EAN 978-90-78240-06-8.Google Scholar
Wolfenson, D, Frei, YF, Snapir, N and Berman, A 1981. Heat stress on capillary blood flow and its redistribution in the laying hen. Pflügers Archiv 390, 86–93.Google Scholar
Yahav, S 2009. Alleviating heat stress in domestic fowl – different strategies. World Poultry Science Journal 65, 719–732.Google Scholar
Yahav, S and Giloh, M 2012. Infrared thermography – applications in poultry biological research. In Infrared thermography (ed. RV Prakash), pp. 93–116. InTech, doi:10.5772/27788.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Loyau supplementary material

Table S1

Download Loyau supplementary material(File)
File 14.5 KB