Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:50:48.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Group lactation from 7 or 14 days of age reduces piglet aggression at weaning compared to farrowing crate housing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2019

M. Verdon Open the ORCID record for M. Verdon [Opens in a new window] ,
R. S. Morrison  and
J.-L. Rault
M. Verdon
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
R. S. Morrison
Affiliation:
Rivalea Australia, Corowa, NSW 2646, Australia
J.-L. Rault
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Early life experiences can affect social behaviour in later life, but opportunities for socio-behavioural development are often overlooked in current husbandry practices. This experiment investigated the effects of rearing piglets in two-stage group lactation (GL) system from 7 or 14 days of age on piglet aggression at weaning. Three lactation housing treatments were applied to a total of 198 piglets from 30 litters of multiparous sows. All dams farrowed in standard farrowing crates (FCs). Group lactation litters were transferred with their dam at 7 (GL7) or 14 days (GL14) postpartum to GL pens (one pen of five sows at 8.4 m2/sow and one pen of seven sows at 8.1 m2/sow, per GL treatment). Farrowing crate litters remained with their dam in a single litter until weaning. At weaning, 10 to 14 piglets from two unfamiliar litters from the same housing treatment were mixed into pens (n=5 pens/treatment) and their behaviour was continuously recorded for 3.5 h. For each pen, the frequency of aggressive bouts (reciprocal and non-reciprocal aggression lasting <5 s), the frequency and duration of fights (reciprocal aggression lasting ⩾5 s) and bullying events (non-reciprocal aggression lasting ⩾5 s) were recorded, along with whether interactions involved familiar or unfamiliar piglets. Aggressive bouts delivered by FC piglets were approximately 1.5 and 3.0 times more frequent than that delivered by GL7 and GL14 piglets, respectively (40.5, 16.7 and 9.9 bouts/pig, respectively; P<0.05). Fighting was more frequent (1.6, 0.3 and 0.4 fights/pig, respectively; P<0.001) and fights were longer (83, 15 and 32 s fight/pig, respectively; P<0.001) between FC piglets than between GL7 or GL14 piglets. Bullying did not differ between housing treatments (P>0.05). GL7 and GL14 piglets engaged in a similar number of fights with unfamiliar as familiar piglets, but FC piglets had almost three times as many fights with unfamiliar than with familiar piglets (P<0.05). This experiment confirms the benefits of GL housing for pig social development. Further investigation is required to determine whether mixing before 14 days postpartum has implications for other indicators of animal welfare and productivity in a two-stage GL housing system.

Keywords

animal welfarebehavioural developmentearly lifeontogenysocialisation
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 10 , October 2019 , pp. 2327 - 2335
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

Present address: Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna 1210, Austria.

†

Present address: Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of Tasmania, Tasmania 7320, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

References

Bohnenkamp, A-L, Traulsen, I, Meyer, C, Müller, K and Krieter, J 2013. Comparison of growth performance and agonistic interaction in weaned piglets of different weight classes from farrowing systems with group or single housing. Animal 7, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolhuis, JE, Schouten, WG, Schrama, JW and Wiegant, VM 2006. Effects of rearing and housing environment on behaviour and performance of pigs with different coping characteristics. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101, 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourjade, M, Moulinot, M, Henry, S, Richard‐Yris, MA and Hausberger, M 2008. Could adults be used to improve social skills of young horses, Equus caballus? Developmental Psychobiology 50, 408–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branchi, I, Curley, JP, D’Andrea, I, Cirulli, F, Champagne, FA and Alleva, E 2013. Early interactions with mother and peers independently build adult social skills and shape BDNF and oxytocin receptor brain levels. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38, 522–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bukhari, SA, Saul, MC, Seward, CH, Zhang, H, Bensky, M, James, N, Zhao, SD, Chandrasekaran, S, Stubbs, L and Bell, AM 2017. Temporal dynamics of neurogenomic plasticity in response to social interactions in male threespined sticklebacks. PLoS Genetics 13, e1006840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camerlink, I, Turner, SP, Farish, M and Arnott, G 2017. The influence of experience on contest assessment strategies. Scientific Reports 7, 14492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaloupková, H, Illmann, G, Bartoš, L and Špinka, M 2007. The effect of pre-weaning housing on the play and agonistic behaviour of domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 103, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y-J and Hsu, Y 2016. Contest experience and body size affect different types of contest decisions. Animal Cognition 19, 1183–1193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, CC and D’Eath, RB 2013. Age over experience: consistency of aggression and mounting behaviour in male and female pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 147, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutellier, L, Arnould, C, Boissy, A, Orgeur, P, Prunier, A, Veissier, I and Meunier-Salaün, M-C 2007. Pig’s responses to repeated social regrouping and relocation during the growing-finishing period. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 105, 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, JP and Champagne, FA 2016. Influence of maternal care on the developing brain: mechanisms, temporal dynamics and sensitive periods. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 40, 52–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Eath, RB 2005. Socialising piglets before weaning improves social hierarchy formation when pigs are mixed post-weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, TW and Johnstone, RA 2010. Learning your own strength: winner and loser effects should change with age and experience. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 277, 1427–1434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsworth, P, Rice, M, Nash, J, Giri, K, Butler, K, Tilbrook, A and Morrison, R 2013. Effects of group size and floor space allowance on grouped sows: aggression, stress, skin injuries, and reproductive performance. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4953–4964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, Y, Earley, RL and Wolf, LL 2006. Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biological Reviews 81, 33–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, P and Redbo, I 1987. Behaviour during nest leaving in free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutzer, T, Bünger, B, Kjaer, JB and Schrader, L 2009. Effects of early contact between non-littermate piglets and of the complexity of farrowing conditions on social behaviour and weight gain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 121, 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledergerber, K, Bennett, B, Diefenbacher, N, Shilling, C and Whitaker, BD 2015. The effects of socializing and environmental enrichments on sow and piglet behavior and performance. The Ohio Journal of Science 115, 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehner, SR, Rutte, C and Taborsky, M 2011. Rats benefit from winner and loser effects. Ethology 117, 949–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y and Wang, L 2011. Effects of previous housing system on agonistic behaviors of growing pigs at mixing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 132, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, R 2017. Cross-fostering: elucidating the effects of gene× environment interactions on phenotypic development. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 73, 219–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NHMRC 2013. Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes. Retrieved on 6 March 2019 from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/ea28_code_care_use_animals_131209.pdf.Google Scholar
Oostindjer, M, van den Brand, H, Kemp, B and Bolhuis, JE 2011. Effects of environmental enrichment and loose housing of lactating sows on piglet behaviour before and after weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 134, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietropaolo, S, Branchi, I, Cirulli, F, Chiarotti, F, Aloe, L and Alleva, E 2004. Long-term effects of the periadolescent environment on exploratory activity and aggressive behaviour in mice: social versus physical enrichment. Physiology and Behavior 81, 443–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puppe, B 1998. Effects of familiarity and relatedness on agonistic pair relationships in newly mixed domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58, 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachser, N, Kaiser, S and Hennessy, MB 2013. Behavioural profiles are shaped by social experience: when, how and why. Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368, 20120344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salazar, LC, Ko, H-L, Yang, C-H, Llonch, L, Manteca, X, Camerlink, I and Llonch, P 2018. Early socialisation as a strategy to increase piglets’ social skills in intensive farming conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 206, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samarakone, TS and Gonyou, HW 2009. Domestic pigs alter their social strategy in response to social group size. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 121, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, C, Verdon, M, Cronin, G and Hemsworth, P 2017. The behaviour and welfare of sows and piglets in farrowing crates or lactation pens. Animal 11, 1210–1221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taborsky, B 2016. Opening the black box of developmental experiments: behavioural mechanisms underlying long‐term effects of early social experience. Ethology 122, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telkänranta, H and Edwards, SA 2018. Lifetime consequences of the early physical and social environment of piglets. In Advances in pig welfare (ed. M Špinka), pp. 101–136. Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Nieuwamerongen, S, Bolhuis, J, van der Peet-Schwering, C and Soede, N 2014. A review of sow and piglet behaviour and performance in group housing systems for lactating sows. Animal 8, 448–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verdon, M, Morrison, R and Rault, J-L 2017. Group-lactation housing from 7 or 14 days post partum: effects on sow behaviour. Animal Production Science 57, 2461–2461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdon, M, Morrison, RS and Hemsworth, PH 2016. Rearing piglets in multi-litter group lactation systems: effects on piglet aggression and injuries post-weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 183, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdon, M and Rault, J-L 2018. Aggression in group housed sows and fattening pigs. In Advances in pig welfare (ed. M Špinka), pp. 235–260. Woodhead Publishing, Duxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattanakul, W, Sinclair, A, Stewart, A, Edwards, S and English, P 1997. Performance and behaviour of lactating sows and piglets in crate and multisuckling systems: a study involving European White and Manor Meishan genotypes. Animal Science 64, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar