Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:07:32.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic parameters estimation for preweaning traits and their relationship with reproductive, productive and morphological traits in alpaca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2016

A. Cruz ,
I. Cervantes ,
A. Burgos ,
R. Morante  and
J.P. Gutiérrez
A. Cruz
Affiliation:
Fundo Pacomarca – INCA TOPS S.A., Avda. Miguel Forga 348, Arequipa, Perú
I. Cervantes
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Puerta de Hierro s-n. E-28040-Madrid, Spain
A. Burgos
Affiliation:
Fundo Pacomarca – INCA TOPS S.A., Avda. Miguel Forga 348, Arequipa, Perú
R. Morante
Affiliation:
Fundo Pacomarca – INCA TOPS S.A., Avda. Miguel Forga 348, Arequipa, Perú
J.P. Gutiérrez*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Puerta de Hierro s-n. E-28040-Madrid, Spain
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the genetic parameters for preweaning traits and their relationship with reproductive, productive and morphological traits in alpacas. The data were collected from 2001 to 2015 in the Pacomarca experimental farm. The data set contained data from 4330 females and 3788 males corresponding to 6396 and 1722 animals for Huacaya and Suri variants, respectively. The number of records for Huacaya and Suri variants were 5494 and 1461 for birth weight (BW), 5429 and 1431 for birth withers height (BH), 3320 and 896 for both weaning weight (WW) and average daily gain (DG) from birth to weaning, 3317 and 896 for weaning withers height (WH), and 5514 and 1474 for survival to weaning. The reproductive traits analyzed were age at first calving and calving interval. The fiber traits were fiber diameter (FD), standard deviation of FD (SD), comfort factor and coefficient of variation of FD and the morphological traits studied were density, crimp in Huacaya and lock structure in Suri, head, coverage and balance. Regarding preweaning traits, model of analysis included additive, maternal and residual random effects for all traits, with sex, coat color, number of calving, month–year and contemporary group as systematic effects, and age at weaning as linear covariate for WW and WH. The most relevant direct heritabilities for Huacaya and Suri were 0.50 and 0.34 for WW, 0.36 and 0.66 for WH, 0.45 and 0.20 for DG, respectively. Maternal heritabilities were 0.25 and 0.38 for BW, 0.18 and 0.32 for BH, 0.29 and 0.39 for WW, 0.19 and 0.26 for WH, 0.27 and 0.36 for DG, respectively. Direct genetic correlations within preweaning traits were high and favorable and lower between direct and maternal genetic effects. The genetic correlations of preweaning traits with fiber traits were moderate and unfavorable. With morphological traits they were high and positive for Suri but not for Huacaya and favorable for direct genetic effect but unfavorable for maternal genetic effect with reproductive traits. If the selection objective was meat production, the selection would have to be based on the direct genetic effect for WW but not on the maternal genetic effect that has been shown to have less relevance. Other weaning traits such as WH or DG would be indirectly selected.

Keywords

alpacagenetic parameterspreweaning traitsfibergenetic correlations
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , May 2017 , pp. 746 - 754
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boujenane, I, Chikhi, A, Ibnelbachyr, M and Mouh, FZ 2015. Estimation of genetic parameters and maternal effects for body weight at different ages in D’man sheep. Small Ruminant Research 130, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervantes, I, Pérez-Cabal, MA, Morante, R, Burgos, A, Salgado, C, Nieto, B, Goyache, F and Gutiérrez, JP 2010. Genetic parameters and relationship between fibre and type traits in two breeds of Peruvian alpacas. Small Ruminant Research 88, 6–11.Google Scholar
Cristofanelli, S, Antonini, M, Torres, D, Polidori, P and Renieri, C 2005. Carcass characteristics of Peruvian llama (Lama glama) and alpaca (Lama pacos) reared in the andean highlands. Small Ruminant Research 58, 219–222.Google Scholar
Cruz, A, Cervantes, I, Burgos, A, Morante, R and Gutiérrez, JP 2015. Estimation of genetic parameters for reproductive traits in alpacas. Animal Reproduction Science 163, 48–55.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, JP, Cervantes, I, Pérez-Cabal, MA, Burgos, A and Morante, R 2014. Weighting fibre and morphological traits in a genetic index for an alpaca breeding program. Animal 8, 360–369.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, JP, Goyache, F, Burgos, A and Cervantes, I 2009. Genetic analysis of six production traits in Peruvian alpacas. Livestock Science 123, 193–197.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, JP, Goyache, F, Fernández, I, Álvarez, I and Royo, LJ 2007. Genetic relationships among calving ease, calving interval, birth weight and weaning weight in the Asturiana de los Valles beef cattle breed. Journal of Animal Science 85, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutiérrez, JP, Varona, L, Pun, A, Morante, R, Burgos, A, Cervantes, I and Pérez-Cabal, MA 2011. Genetic parameters for growth of fiber diameter in alpacas. Journal of Animal Science 89, 2310–2315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knol, EF, Leenhouwers, JI and Van der Lende, T 2002. Genetics aspect of piglet survival. Livestock Production Science 78, 47–55.Google Scholar
Ligda, Ch, Gabriilidis, G, Papadopoulos, Th and Georgoudis, A 2000. Investigation of direct and maternal genetic effects on birth and weaning weight of Chios lambs. Livestock Production Science 67, 75–80.Google Scholar
Mamani-Linares, LW and Gallo, C 2013. Effects of supplementary feeding on carcass and meat quality traits of young llamas (Lama glama). Small Ruminant Research 114, 233–239.Google Scholar
Matebesi, PA, van Wyk, JB and Cloete, SWP 2009a. Genetic parameters for subjectively assessed and conformation traits in the Tygerhoek Merino flock. South African Journal of Animal Sciences 39, 179–187.Google Scholar
Matebesi, PA, van Wyk, JB and Cloete, SWP 2009b. Relationships of subjectively assessed wool and conformation traits with objectively measured wool and live weight traits in the Tygerhoek Merino flock. South African Journal of Animal Sciences 39, 188–196.Google Scholar
Neumaier, A and Groeneveld, E 1998. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models. Genetics Selection Evolution 30, 3–26.Google Scholar
Paredes, MM, Membrillo, A, Gutiérrez, JP, Cervantes, I, Azor, PJ, Morante, R, Alonso-Moraga, A, Molina, A and Muñoz-Serrano, A 2014. Association of microsatellite markers with fiber diameter trait in Peruvian alpacas (Vicugna pacos). Livestock Science 161, 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, HD and Thompson, R 1971. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58, 545–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presciuttini, S, Valbonesi, A., Apaza, N, Antonini, M, Huanca, T and Renieri, C 2010. Fleece variation in alpaca (Vicugna pacos): a two-locus model for the Suri/Huacaya phenotype. BMC Genetics 11, 70–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quispe, EC, Rodriguez, TC, Iñiguez, LR and Mueller, JP 2009. Producción de fibra de alpaca, llama, vicuña y guanaco en Sudamérica. Animal Genetics Research 45, 1–14.Google Scholar
Roehe, R 1999. Genetic determination of individual birth weight and its association with sow productivity traits using bayesian analyses. Journal of Animal Science 77, 330–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, MA, Bush, RD, Thomson, PC and Hopkins, DL 2015. Carcass traits and saleable meat yield of alpacas (Vicugna pacos) in Australia. Meat Science 107, 1–11.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J 1993. South American camelids: past, present and future. In Proceedings 1st European symposium on South American camelids, 30 September to 1 October, Bonn, Germany, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
Wuliji, T, Davis, GH, Dodds, KG, Turner, PR, Andrews, RN and Bruce, GD 2000. Production performance, repeatability and heritability estimates for live weight, fleece weight and fiber characteristics of alpacas in New Zealand. Small Ruminant Research 37, 189–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wurzinger, M, Delgado, J, Nurnberg, M, Zarate, AV, Stemmer, A, Ugarte, G and Solkner, J 2005. Growth curves and genetic parameters for growth traits in Bolivian llamas. Livestock Production Science 95, 73–81.Google Scholar
Zishiri, OT, Cloete, SWP, Olivier, JJ and Dzama, K 2013. Genetic parameters for growth, reproduction and fitness traits in the South African Dorper sheep breed. Small Ruminant Research 112, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar