Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:32:14.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic correlations of fighting ability with somatic cells and longevity in cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2019

C. Sartori Open the ORCID record for C. Sartori [Opens in a new window] ,
N. Guzzo Open the ORCID record for N. Guzzo [Opens in a new window]  and
R. Mantovani Open the ORCID record for R. Mantovani [Opens in a new window]
C. Sartori*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università, 16, 35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy
N. Guzzo
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università, 16, 35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy
R. Mantovani
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università, 16, 35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The success in competitions may be stressful for animals and costly in terms of immune functions and longevity. Focusing on Aosta Chestnut and Aosta Black Pied cattle, selected for their fighting ability in traditional competitions, this study investigated the genetic relationships of fighting ability with udder health traits (somatic cell score and two threshold traits for somatic cells), longevity (length of productive life and number of calvings) and test-day milk, fat and protein yield. Herdbook information and phenotypic records that have been routinely collected for breeding programs in 16 years were used for the abovementioned traits. Data belonged to 9328 cows and 19 283 animals in pedigree. Single-trait animal model analyses were run using a Gibbs sampling algorithm to estimate the variance components of traits, and bivariate analyses were then performed to estimate the genetic correlations. Moderate positive genetic correlations (ra) were found for fighting ability with somatic cell score (ra=0.255), suggesting that greater fighting ability is genetically related to a detriment in udder health, in agreement with the theory. The high positive genetic correlation between fighting ability and longevity (average ra=0.669) suggests that the economic importance of fighting ability (the winning cows get an higher price at selling) had probably masked the true genetic covariances. The genetic correlation between milk yield traits and fighting ability showed large intervals, but the negative values (average ra=−0.121) agreed with previous research. This study is one of the few empirical studies on genetic correlations for the competitive success v. immune functions and longevity traits. The knowledge of the genetic correlations among productive and functional traits of interest, including fighting ability, is important in animal breeding for a sustainable genetic improvement.

Keywords

social dominancefunctional traitsquantitative geneticsantagonistic traitslife history
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 13 - 21
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arango, J, Misztal, I, Tsuruta, S, Culbertson, M and Herring, W 2005. Study of codes of disposal at different calving of Large White sows using a linear censored model. Journal of Animal Science 83, 2052–2057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Careau, V, Wolak, ME, Carter, PA and Garland, T 2013. Limits to behavioral evolution: the quantitative genetics of a complex trait under directional selection. Evolution 67, 3102–3119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catton, HA and Michener, GR 2016. Cohort effects and proximal versus distal metrics for lifetime reproductive success in Richardson’s ground squirrels. Journal of Mammalogy 97, 774–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haas, Y, Ouweltjes, W, Ten Napel, J, Windig, JJ and De Jong, G 2008. Alternative somatic cell count traits as mastitis indicators for genetic selection. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2501–2511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denholm, SJ, McNeilly, TN, Banos, G, Coffey, MP, Russell, GC, Bagnall, A, Mitchell Mairi, C and Wall, E 2017. Estimating genetic and phenotypic parameters of cellular immune-associated traits in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 2850–2862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Community 2004. Regulation EC No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules on the hygiene of foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union, L 139, 55, 30 April 2004, European Union.Google Scholar
Falconer, DS and Mackay, TFC 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edition. Longman Group Ltd., Harlow, Essex, UK.Google Scholar
Fedorka, KM 2014. Reproductive and immune system interactions in the context of life-history and sexual selection theory. In Eco-immunology: evolutive aspects and future perspectives (ed. Ottaviani, E and Malagoli, D), pp. 49–72. Springer, Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerster, K, Coulson, T, Sheldon, BC, Pemberton, JM, Clutton-Brock, TH and Kruuk, LE 2007. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 447, 1107–1111.Google ScholarPubMed
Frigo, E, Samorè, AB, Vicario, D, Bagnato, A and Pedron, O 2013. Heritabilities and genetic correlations of body condition score and muscularity with productive traits and their trend functions in Italian Simmental cattle. Italian Journal of Animal Science 12, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuerst-Waltl, B, Fuerst, C, Obritzhauser, W and Egger-Danner, C 2016. Sustainable breeding objectives and possible selection response: finding the balance between economics and breeders’ preferences. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 9796–9809.Google ScholarPubMed
Geburt, K, Piechotta, M, von Borstel, UK and Gauly, M 2015. Influence of testosterone on the docility of German Simmental and Charolais heifers during behavior tests. Physiology Behavior 141, 164–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Govignon-Gion, A, Dassonneville, R, Baloche, G and Ducrocq, V 2016. Multiple trait genetic evaluation of clinical mastitis in three dairy cattle breeds. Animal 10, 558–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guzzo, N, Sartori, C and Mantovani, R 2018. Genetic parameters of different measures of somatic cell counts in Rendena breed. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 8054–8062.Google ScholarPubMed
Hanford, KJ, Van Vleck, LD and Snowder, GD 2002. Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Columbia sheep. Journal of Animal Science 80, 3086–3098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jamrozik, J and Schaeffer, LR 2012. Test‐day somatic cell score, fat‐to‐protein ratio and milk yield as indicator traits for sub‐clinical mastitis in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 129, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, SE, Gratten, J, Berenos, C, Pilkington, JG, Clutton-Brock, TH, Pemberton, JM and Slate, J 2013. Life-history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation. Nature 502, 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruuk, LE, Slate, J, Pemberton, JM, Brotherstone, S, Guinness, F and Clutton-Brock, T 2002. Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution 56, 1683–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaître, JF, Gaillard, JM, Pemberton, JM, Clutton-Brock, TH and Nussey, DH 2014. Early life expenditure in sexual competition is associated with increased reproductive senescence in male red deer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 281, 20140792.Google ScholarPubMed
Mazza, S, Guzzo, N, Sartori, C and Mantovani, R 2016. Genetic correlations between type and test-day milk yield in small dual-purpose cattle populations: the Aosta Red Pied breed as a case study. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 8127–8136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, SC, Grapputo, A, Jokinen, I, Koskela, E, Mappes, T, Oksanen, TA and Poikonen, T 2009. Testosterone-mediated effects on fitness-related phenotypic traits and fitness. The American Naturalist 173, 475–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misztal, I 2008. Reliable computing in estimation of variance components. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125, 363–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Negussie, E, Strandén, I and Mäntysaari, EA 2008. Genetic association of clinical mastitis with test-day somatic cell score and milk yield during first lactation of Finnish Ayrshire cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 1189–1197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oltenacu, PA and Broom, DM 2010. The impact of genetic selection for increased milk yield on the welfare of dairy cows. Animal Welfare 19, 39–49.Google Scholar
Pfister, P, Kaufmann, T, Fellay, E and Hirsbrunner, G 2011. Reproductive performance in Herens cows from 2003 to 2007. Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde 153, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phocas, F, Boivin, X, Sapa, J, Trillat, G, Boissy, A and Le Neindre, P 2006. Genetic correlations between temperament and breeding traits in Limousin heifers. Animal Science 82, 805–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roff, DA 2002. Life-history evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, England.Google Scholar
Sartori, C, Guzzo, N, Mazza, S and Mantovani, R 2018. Genetic correlations among milk yield, morphology, performance test traits and somatic cells in dual-purpose Rendena breed. Animal 12, 906–914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartori, C and Mantovani, R 2012. Effects of inbreeding on fighting ability measured in Aosta Chestnut and Aosta Black Pied cattle. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2907–2915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartori, C, Mazza, S, Guzzo, N and Mantovani, R 2015. Evolution of increased competitiveness in cows trades off with reduced milk yield, fertility and more masculine morphology. Evolution 69, 2235–2245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seppälä, O 2015. Natural selection on quantitative immune defence traits: a comparison between theory and data. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 28, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shook, GE and Schutz, MM 1994. Selection on somatic cell score to improve resistance to mastitis in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 648–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urioste, JI, Franzén, J and Strandberg, E 2010. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of novel somatic cell count traits from weekly or monthly observations. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 5930–5941.Google ScholarPubMed
Wikelski, M and Ricklefs, RE 2001. The physiology of life histories. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 479–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windig, JJ, Ouweltjes, W, Ten Napel, J, De Jong, G, Veerkamp, RF and De Haas, Y 2010. Combining somatic cell count traits for optimal selection against mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1690–1701.Google ScholarPubMed