Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:34:41.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors influencing heifer survival and fertility on commercial dairy farms*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

D. C. Wathes ,
J. S. Brickell ,
N. E. Bourne ,
A. Swali  and
Z. Cheng
D. C. Wathes*
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Herts AL9 7TA, UK
J. S. Brickell
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Herts AL9 7TA, UK
N. E. Bourne
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Herts AL9 7TA, UK
A. Swali
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Herts AL9 7TA, UK
Z. Cheng
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Herts AL9 7TA, UK
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The average dairy cow survives only three lactations, reducing the availability of replacement heifers. Prenatal losses occur due to early embryonic mortality (about 40%), later embryo loss (up to 20% in high-yielding herds) or abortion (about 5%). A recent survey of 19 UK herds showed that 7.9% of calves were born dead and 3.4% died within 1 month. During the rearing phase, 6.7% of animals were lost before reaching first service at 15 months due to disease or accident and another 2.3% failed to conceive. Many potential replacements therefore never enter the milking herd. This severely limits opportunities for on-farm selection of breeding cows in addition to presenting a welfare issue and causing economic loss. The most profitable animals once lactation is reached combine good milk production with a regular calving pattern. Some aspects of performance are related to age at first calving (AFC), which in turn is influenced by heifer growth rates. Poorly growing animals required more services to conceive, calved later and subsequently performed badly. Optimum fertility and maximum yield in the first lactation were associated with an AFC of 24 to 25 months. However, heifers calving at 22 to 23 months performed best in terms of total milk yield and survival over the first 5 years, partly because good heifer fertility was associated with better fertility later. We have investigated some possible juvenile predictors of future performance. Low-birth-weight calves were more likely to come from either primiparous mothers or older dams (3+ lactations) with higher peak milk yields, suggesting that the uterine environment may limit prenatal calf growth due to competition for nutrients with maternal growth or milk production. Linear trait classification scores for frame size show genetic correlations with longevity. The skeletal measures of height and crown rump length in 1-month-old calves was correlated to subsequent stature, and frame size was correlated to weight at 15 months. It may thus be possible to predict performance from simple size measurements as juveniles. Neither endogenous nor stimulated growth hormone (GH) release in 6-month-old calves were related to milk yield in the first three lactations, but size of a stimulated GH peak was positively related to milk energy values in the first lactation. Cows with delayed ovulation (>45 days) in the first lactation had a higher GH pulse amplitude and lower IGF-I as a juvenile. Cows that partition excess energy into milk in their first lactation may suffer reduced longevity.

Keywords

cattle-heiferslongevityfertilitygrowthsomatotrophic axis
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 8 , August 2008 , pp. 1135 - 1143
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This invited paper was presented at BSAS meeting ‘Fertility in Dairy Cows – bridging the gaps’ 30–31 August 2007, Liverpool Hope University.

References

Barker, DJP 1998. Mothers, babies and health in later life, 2nd edition. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bell, AW 1995. Regulation of organic nutrient metabolism during transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2804–2819.Google Scholar
Blott, S, Kim, JJ, Moisio, S, Schmidt-Kantzel, A, Cornet, A, Berzi, P, Cambisano, N, Ford, C, Grisart, B, Johnson, D, Karim, L, Simon, P, Snell, R, Spelman, R, Wong, J, Vilkki, J, Georges, M, Farnir, F, Coppieters, W 2003. Molecular dissection of a quantitative trait locus: a phenylalanine-to-tyrosine substitution in the transmembrane domain of the bovine growth hormone receptor is associated with a major effect on milk yield and composition. Genetics 163, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blowey, RW 2005. Management of diseases in calves and heifers. In Calf and heifer rearing: principles of rearing the modern dairy heifer from calf to calving (ed. PC Garnsworthy), pp. 191–196. Nottingham University Press, Notingham, UK.Google Scholar
Bourne, N, Swali, A, Jones, AK, Potterton, S, Wathes, DC 2007. The effects of size and age at first calving on subsequent fertility in dairy cows. In Reproduction in domestic ruminants VI (ed. JL Juengel, JF Murray and MF Smith), p. 526. Nottingham University Press, Notingham, UK.Google Scholar
Brickell JS, Bourne N and Wathes DC 2007a. The incidence of calf mortality on dairy farms in southern England. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 107.Google Scholar
Brickell, JS, Bourne, N, Bleach, ECL, Wathes, DC 2007b. Influence of pre-weaning diet and sire on growth rates of replacement dairy heifers. Reproduction in domestic ruminants VI (ed. JL Juengel, JF Murray and MF Smith), p. 493. Nottingham University Press, Notingham, UK.Google Scholar
Brickell, JS, Bourne, N, Cheng, Z, Wathes, DC 2007c. Influence of plasma IGF-I concentrations and body weight at 6 months on age at first calving in dairy heifers on commercial farms. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 42 (Suppl. 2), 77–143.Google Scholar
Brito, LFC, Barth, AD, Rawlings, NC, Wilde, RE, Crews, DH, Mir, PS, Kastelic, JP 2007. Effect of nutrition during calfhood and peripubertal period on serum metabolic hormones, gonadotrophins and testosterone concentrations and on sexual development in bulls. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 33, 1–18.Google Scholar
Buchanan, FC, Van Kessel, AG, Waldner, C, Christensen, DA, Laarveld, B, Schmutz, SM 2003. An association between a leptin single nucleotide polymorphism and milk and protein yield. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3164–3166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulman, DC, Lamming, GE 1979. The use of milk progesterone analysis in the study of oestrous detection, herd fertility and embryonic mortality in dairy cows. British Veterinary Journal 135, 559–567.Google Scholar
Buxton, D, Caldow, GL, Maley, SW, Marks, J, Innes, EA 1997. Neopsporosis and bovine abortion in Scotland. Veterinary Record 141, 649–651.Google Scholar
Carson, AF, Dawson, LER, McCoy, MA, Kilpatrick, DJ, Gordon, FJ 2002. Effects of rearing regime on body size, reproductive performance and milk production during the first lactation in high genetic merit dairy herd replacements. Animal Science 74, 553–565.Google Scholar
Coffey, MP, Hickey, J, Brotherstone, S 2006. Genetic aspects of growth of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows from birth to maturity. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 322–329.Google Scholar
Deas, W 1981. Non-brucella abortion in cattle. In Practice 3, 14–19.Google Scholar
Esslemont, RJ, Kossaibati, MA 1996. Incidence of production disease and other health problems in a group of dairy herds in England. Veterinary Record 139, 486–490.Google Scholar
Esslemont, RJ, Kossaibati, MA 1997. Culling in 50 dairy herds in England. Veterinary Record 140, 36–39.Google Scholar
Ettema, JF, Santos, JE 2004. Impact of age at first calving on lactation, reproduction, health and income in first-parity Holsteins on commercial farms. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 2730–2742.Google Scholar
Frisancho, AR, Matos, J, Leonard, WR, Yaroch, LA 1985. Developmental and nutritional determinants of pregnancy outcome among teenagers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 66, 247–261.Google Scholar
Grisart, B, Coppieters, W, Farnir, F, Karim, L, Ford, C, Berzi, P, Cambisano, N, Mni, M, Reid, S, Simon, P, Spelman, R, Georges, M, Snell, R 2002. Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Research 12, 222–231.Google Scholar
Hansen, LB 2000. Consequences of selection for milk yield from a geneticist’s viewpoint. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 1145–1150.Google Scholar
Hansen M 2004. Quantitative genetic analysis of mortality in Danish Holstein calves. PhD, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Denmark.Google Scholar
Haworth GM, Tranter WP, Chuck J, Cheng Z and Wathes DC 2008. Relationships between age at calving and first lactation milk yield with lifetime productivity and longevity in dairy cows. Veterinary Record 162 (in press).Google Scholar
Heinrichs, AJ, Radostits, OM 2001. Health and production management of dairy calves and replacement heifers. In Herd health food animal production medicine, , 3rd edition , vol. 9 (ed. OM Radostits), pp. 333–395. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, USA.Google Scholar
Hoffman, PC 1997. Optimum body size of Holstein replacement heifers. Journal of Animal Science 75, 836–845.Google Scholar
Johanson, JM, Berger, PJ 2003. Birth weight as a predictor of calving easeand perinatal mortality in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3745–3755.Google Scholar
Keown, JF, Everett, RW 1986. Effects of days carried calf, days dry and weight at first calving on yield. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 1891–1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klassen, DJ, Monardes, HG, Jairath, L, Cue, RI, Hayes, JF 1992. Genetic correlations between lifetime production and linearized type in Canadian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 2272–2282.Google Scholar
Løvendahl, P, Angus, KD, Woolliams, JA 1991. The effect of genetic selection for milk yield on the response to growth hormone secretagogues in immature cattle. Journal of Endocrinology 128, 419–424.Google Scholar
Lucy, MC 2001. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1277–1293.Google Scholar
McCrabb, G, Egan, AR, Hosking, BJ 1992. Maternal undernutrition during mid-pregnancy in sheep: variable effects on placental growth. Journal of Agricultural Science 118, 127–132.Google Scholar
Mellor, DJ, Stafford, KJ 2004. Animal welfare implications of neonatal mortality & morbidity in farm animals. Veterinary Journal 168, 118–133.Google Scholar
Nieuwhof, GJ, Norman, HD, Dickinson, FN 1989. Phenotypic trends in herdlife of dairy cows in the United States. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 726–736.Google Scholar
Ong, KK, Ahmed, ML, Emmett, PM, Preece, MA, Dunger, DB 2000. Association between postnatal catch-up growth and obesity in childhood: prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 320, 967–971.Google Scholar
Ortiz-Pelaez A, Pritchard DG, Pfeiffer DU, Jones E, Honeyman P and Mawdsley JJ 2008. Calf mortality as a welfare indicator on British cattle farms. Veterinary Journal 176, 177–181.Google Scholar
Osgerby, JC, Gadd, TS, Wathes, DC 2003. The effect of maternal nutrition and body condition on placental and foetal growth in the ewe. Placenta 24, 236–247.Google Scholar
Pirlo, G, Miglior, F, Speroni, M 2000. Effect of age at first calving on production traits and on difference between milk yield returns and rearing costs in Italian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 603–608.Google Scholar
Rhind, SM 2004. Effects of maternal nutrition on fetal and neonatal reproductive development and function. Animal Reproduction Science 82–83, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, JHB 1990. The calf, vol 1. Management of health. Butterworths, Boston, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Royal, MD, Darwash, AO, Flint, APF, Webb, R, Woolliams, JA, Lamming, GE 2000. Declining fertility in dairy cattle: changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of fertility. Animal Science 70, 487–501.Google Scholar
Santos, JE, Thatcher, WW, Chebel, RC, Cerri, RL, Galvao, KN 2004. The effect of embryonic death rates in cattle on the efficacy of estrus synchronization programs. Animal Reproduction Science 82–83, 513–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serjsen, K 2005. Mammary Development. In Calf and heifer rearing: principles of rearing the modern dairy heifer from calf to calving (ed. PC Garnsworthy), pp. 237–251. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Svensson, C, Linder, A, Olsson, 2006. Mortality in Swedish dairy calves and replacement heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4769–4777.Google Scholar
Swali A 2004. Early development and subsequent metabolic and reproductive parameters in the Holstein-Friesian dairy calf. PhD, Royal Veterinary College, University of London.Google Scholar
Swali, A, Wathes, DC 2006. Influence of the dam and sire on size at birth and subsequent growth, milk production and fertility in dairy heifers. Theriogenology 66, 1173–1184.Google Scholar
Swali, A, Wathes, DC 2007. Influence of primiparity on size at birth, growth, the somatotrophic axis and fertility in dairy heifers. Animal Reproduction Science 102, 122–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, VJ, Beever, DE, Bryant, MJ, Wathes, DC 2004. First lactation ovarian function in dairy heifers in relation to pre-pubertal metabolic profiles. Journal of Endocrinology 180, 63–75.Google Scholar
Taylor, VJ, Beever, DE, Bryant, MJ, Wathes, DC 2006. Pre-pubertal measurements of the somatotrophic axis as predictors of milk production in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 31, 1–18.Google Scholar
Tsuruta, S, Misztal, I, Lawlor, TJ 2004. Genetic correlations among production, body size, udder, and productive life traits over time in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 1457–1468.Google Scholar
Tsuruta, S, Misztal, I, Lawlor, TJ 2005. Changing the definition of productive life in US Holsteins: effect on genetic correlations. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1156–1165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Amburgh, ME, Galton, DM, Bauman, DE, Everett, RW, Fox, DG, Chase, LE, Erb, HN 1998. Effects of three prepubertal body growth rates on performance of Holstein heifers during first lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 527–538.Google Scholar
Vukasinovic, N, Schleppi, Y, Kunzi, N 2002. Using conformation traits to improve reliability of genetic evaluation for herd life based on survival analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 1556–1562.Google Scholar
Wall, E, Coffey, MP, Brotherstone, S 2007. The relationship between body energy traits and production and fitness traits in first-lactation dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1527–1537.Google Scholar
Wallace, JM, Regnault, TR, Limesand, SW, Hay, WW, Anthony, RV 2005. Investigating the causes of low birthweight in contrasting ovine paradigms. Journal of Physiology 565, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wathes, DC, Taylor, VJ, Cheng, Z, Mann, GE 2003. Follicle growth, corpus luteum function and their effects on embryo development in the postpartum dairy cow. Reproduction Supplement 61, 219–237.Google Scholar
Wathes, DC, Fenwick, M, Cheng, Z, Bourne, N, Llewellyn, S, Morris, DG, Kenny, D, Murphy, J, Fitzpatrick, R 2007. Influence of negative energy balance on cyclicity and fertility in the high producing dairy cow. Theriogenology 68 (Suppl. 1), S232–S241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed