Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:34:52.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of panicle residue from broom sorghum as a feed ingredient in finishing diets for lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2018

A. Estrada-Angulo ,
F. Coronel-Burgos ,
B. I. Castro-Pérez ,
A. Barreras ,
R. A. Zinn ,
L. Corona-Gochi  and
A. Plascencia
A. Estrada-Angulo
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán 1084, Sinaloa, Mexico
F. Coronel-Burgos
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán 1084, Sinaloa, Mexico
B. I. Castro-Pérez
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán 1084, Sinaloa, Mexico
A. Barreras
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21100, Baja California, Mexico
R. A. Zinn
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
L. Corona-Gochi
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México 04510, Mexico
A. Plascencia*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21100, Baja California, Mexico
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Sorghum panicle residue (SPR), a by-product of Sorghum vulgare, obtained in the manufacture of brooms and wisks, has potential as a partial substitute for grain in growing-finishing diets for feedlot lambs. Accordingly, 48 Pelibuey×Katahdin lambs (initial weight=16.2±4.3 kg) were used in an 84-d growth-performance trial to evaluate its comparative feeding value. Lambs were blocked by weight and assigned within weight groupings to 12 pens (4 lambs per pen). The SPR was finely ground before it was incorporated into the diet. The basal diet contained 60% whole grain sorghum (WGS; DM basis). Dietary treatments consisted in the replacement of WGS with 0, 50, or 100% SPR. Replacement of WGS with SPR decreased (linear effect, P=0.04) average daily gain (ADG), and tended to increase (linear effect, P=0.06) dry matter intake (DMI). Replacement of WGS with SPR decreased (linear effect, P<0.01) gain efficiency (ADG : DMI), and observed dietary net energy (NE), as well as hot carcass weight, dressing percentage, kidney–pelvic–heart fat, and back fat thickness (linear effect, P⩽.05) Other carcass characteristics and wholesale cuts as a percentage of cold carcass weight were not affected by dietary treatments. It is concluded that SPR is a palatable feed ingredient for inclusion in finishing diets for feedlot lambs. The comparative NE values for SPR are 1.50 and 0.91 Mcal/kg for maintenance and gain, respectively, 75% the NE value of WGS. These NE values reflect the greater fiber content of SPR. To the extent that dietary energy density limits energy intake (and hence daily weight gain), appropriate constraints on level of SPR incorporation is warranted.

Keywords

whole sorghum grainfinishing lambsenergy valuebroom residuecarcass
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 106 - 111
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 2000. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Cannas, A, Tedeschi, LO, Fox, DG, Pell, AN and Van Soest, PJ 2004. A mechanistic model for predicting the nutrient requirements and feed biological values for sheep. Journal of Animal Science 82, 149–169.Google Scholar
Estrada, A, Dávila, H, Herrera, SR, Robles, JC, La, O, Castro, BI, Portillo, JJ, Ríos, FG and Contreras, G 2012. Carcass characteristics and yield of primary cuts of lambs fed with broom sorghum (Sorghum bicolor var. technicum, jav). Revista Cubana de Ciencias Agrícolas 46, 145–150.Google Scholar
Estrada-Angulo, A, Chávez-Campos, J, Obregón, F, Ríos-Rincón, F and Coronel-Burgos, F 2005. Productive response of growing Pelibuey sheep fed whole or milled broom sorghum. Asociación Latinoamericana de Producción Animal 13 (suppl. 1), 166. (Abstract).Google Scholar
Estrada-Angulo, A, Valdés, YS, Carrillo-Muro, O, Castro-Pérez, BI, Barreras, A, López-Soto, MA, Plascencia, A, Dávila-Ramos, H, Ríos, FG and Zinn, RA 2013. Effects of feeding different levels of chromium-enriched live yeast in hairy lambs fed a corn-based diet: effects on growth performance, dietary energetics, carcass traits and visceral organ mass. Animal Production Science 53, 308–315.Google Scholar
Félix-Bernal, JA, Angulo-Escalante, MA, Estrada-Angulo, A, Heredia, JB, Muy-Rangel, D, López-Soto, MA, Barreras, A and Plascencia, A 2014. Feeding value of nontoxic Jatropha curcas seed cake for partially replacing dry-rolled corn and soybean meal in lambs fed finishing diets. Feed Science and Technology 198, 107–116.Google Scholar
González-García, UA, Corona, L, Castrejón-Pineda, F, Balcells, J, Castelán-Ortega, O and González-Ronquillo, M 2016. A comparison of processed sorghum grain using different digestion techniques. Journal of Applied Animal Research 46, 1–9.Google Scholar
Hernández, PA, Mendoza, GD, Castro, A, Lara, A, Plata, FX, Martínez, JA and Ferraro, S 2017. Effects of grain level on lamb performance, ruminal metabolism and leptin mRNA expression in perirenal adipose tissue. Animal Production Science 57, 2001–2006.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fishing and Food, Mexico 2015. Panorama Agroalimentario: Sorgo 2015. Retrieved on 7 March from https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/61953/Panorama_Agroalimentario_Sorgo_2015.pdf.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 1985. Nutrient requirements for sheep, 6th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants. Sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
National System of Information and Market Integration 2017. México. Retrieved on 7 March from http://www.economia-sniim.gob.mx/2010prueba/AlimentosMes.asp.Google Scholar
North American Meat Processors Association (NAMP) 1997. The meat buyers guide. North American Meat Processor Association, Weimar, TX, USA.Google Scholar
Nikkhah, A, Alikhani, M and Amanlou, H 2004. Effects of feeding ground or steam-flaked broom sorghum and ground barley on performance of dairy cows in midlactation. Journal Dairy Science 87, 122–130.Google Scholar
Pittroff, W, Keisler, DH and Blackburn, HD 2006. Effects of a high-protein, low-energy diet in finishing lambs: 2. Weight change, organ mass, body composition, carcass traits, fatty acid composition of lean and adipose tissue, and taste panel evaluation. Livestock Science 101, 278–293.Google Scholar
Ríos-Rincón, FG, Dávila-Ramos, H, Estrada-Angulo, A, Plascencia, A, López-Soto, MA, Castro-Pérez, BI, Calderón-Cortes, JF, Portillo-Loera, JJ and Robles-Estrada, JC 2014. Influence of protein and energy level on growth performance, dietary energetics and carcass characteristics of feedlot hair lambs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 27, 55–60.Google Scholar
Sousa, WH, Cartaxo, FQ, Costa, RG, Cazar, MF, Cunha, M, das, GG, Pereira Fhilo, JM and dos Santos, NM 2012. Biological and economic performance of feedlot lambs feeding on diets with different energy densities. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 41, 1285–1291.Google Scholar
Srichuwong, S, Curti, D, Austin, S, King, R, Lamothe, L and Gloria-Hernández, H 2017. Physicochemical properties and starch digestibility of whole grain sorghums, millet, quinoa and amaranth flours, as affected by starch and non-starch constituents. Food Chemistry 233, 1–10.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 2004. SAS/STAT: user’s guide, version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 1982. Official United States standards for grades of carcass lambs, yearling mutton and mutton carcasses. Agriculture Marketing Service, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal Animal Science 24, 834–843.Google Scholar
Villarreal-Silva, M, Castrejón-Pineda, F, Plascencia, A, Pujol, LC, Estrada-Angulo, A, Ríos-Rincón, FG, Cortés-Sánchez, JM, Cuca-García, M and Corona, L 2015. Physicochemical characteristics of nine sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) hybrids and their relationship to starch content and ruminal digestion. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias 6, 243–261.Google Scholar
Vinhas-Voltolini, T, Alves de Moraes, S, Garcia Leal de Araújo, G, Ribeiro Pereira, LG, Dantas dos Santos, R and Alves Neves, AL 2011. Carcass traits and meat cuts of lambs receiving increasing levels of concentrate. Revista de Ciências Agronômicas 42, 526–533.Google Scholar
Zinn, RA 1990. Influence of steaming time on site digestion of flaked corn in steers. Journal of Animal Science 68, 776–781.Google Scholar
Zinn, RA, Barreras, A, Owens, FN and Plascencia, A 2008. Performance by feedlot steers and heifers: ADG, mature weight, DMI and dietary energetics. Journal of Animal Science 86, 1–10.Google Scholar
Zinn, RA and Plascencia, A 1993. Interaction of whole cottonseed and supplemental fat on digestive function in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 71, 11–17.Google Scholar
Zinn, RA and Plascencia, A 1996. Effect of forage level on the comparative feeding value of supplemental fat in growing-finishing diets. Journal of Animal Science 74, 1194–1201.Google Scholar