Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:02:15.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of the methane emission factor for the Italian Mediterranean buffalo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

R. D. Cóndor*
Affiliation:
Agenzia per la protezione dell’ambiente e per i servizi tecnici, Via V. Brancati, 48, 00144 Rome, Italy
L. Valli
Affiliation:
Centro Ricerche Produzioni Animali, Cso. Garibaldi, 42, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy
G. De Rosa
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze del Suolo, della Pianta, dell’Ambiente e delle Produzioni animali, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici (Napoli), Italy
A. Di Francia
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze del Suolo, della Pianta, dell’Ambiente e delle Produzioni animali, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici (Napoli), Italy
R. De Lauretis
Affiliation:
Agenzia per la protezione dell’ambiente e per i servizi tecnici, Via V. Brancati, 48, 00144 Rome, Italy
Get access

Abstract

In order to contribute to the improvement of the national greenhouse gas emission inventory, this work aimed at estimating a country-specific enteric methane (CH4) emission factor for the Italian Mediterranean buffalo. For this purpose, national agriculture statistics, and information on animal production and farming conditions were analysed, and the emission factor was estimated using the Tier 2 model of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Country-specific CH4 emission factors for buffalo cows (630 kg body weight, BW) and other buffalo (313 kg BW) categories were estimated for the period 1990–2004. In 2004, the estimated enteric CH4 emission factor for the buffalo cows was 73 kg/head per year, whereas that for other buffalo categories it was 56 kg/head per year. Research in order to determine specific CH4 conversion rates at the predominant production system is suggested.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Associazione Italiana Allevatori (AIA) 2006. Italy: milk recording activity – official statistics year 2005. Mediterranean buffaloes. AIA, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Agenzia per la protezione dell’Ambiente e per i servizi tecnici (APAT) 2006. National Inventory Report 2006. Italian Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2004. APAT Technical report 70/2006. APAT, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Barile, VL 2005. Improving reproductive efficiency in female buffaloes. Livestock Production Science 92, 183194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartocci, S, Tripaldi, C, Terramoccia, S 2002. Characteristics of foodstuffs and diets, and the quanti-qualitative milk parameters of Mediterranean buffaloes bred in Italy using the intensive system. An estimate of the nutritional requirements of buffalo herds lactating or dry. Livestock Production Science 77, 4558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cóndor R, Vitullo M and De lauretis R 2005. Contribution of ISTAT statistics to the National Air Emission Inventory of the Agriculture sector. Proceedings of the Convegno “AGRISTAT – Statistiche Agricole”, Florence, Italy, pp. 141–151.Google Scholar
Consorzio per la tutela del formaggio mozarella di bufala campana 2002. Modello di Regolamento per la gestione igienica ed alimentare dell’allevamento bufalino in relazione alla produzione della mozarella di bufala campana DOP. Ed. Consorzio Tutela Mozarella di Bufala Campana, Salerno, Italy.Google Scholar
Crutzen, PJ, Aselmann, I, Seiler, W 1986. Methane production by domestic animals, wild ruminants, other herbivorous fauna, and humans. Tellus 38B, 271284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutrignelli M, Bovera F, Calabrò S, Piccolo V, Zicarelli F, Pacelli C and Infascelli F 2003. Influenza dell’età di svezzamento sulle dinamiche di accrescimento di vitelli bufalini nel periodo 90-210 d. Proceedings of the II Congresso Nazionale sull’Allevamento del Bufalo, Rome, Italy, pp. 81–85.Google Scholar
De Rosa, M, Trabalzi, F 2004. Technological innovation among buffalo breeders of southern Lazio, Italy. Agricoltura Mediterranea 134, 5867.Google Scholar
EUROSTAT 2007. EUROSTAT Agriculture and Fisheries. Data. Retrieved 19 November 2007 from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.euGoogle Scholar
Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) 2007. FAOSTAT Agriculture Data. Retrieved 19 November 2007 from http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspxGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, MJ, Johnson, DE 1993. Livestock Emissions. In International Methane Emissions (ed. EPA). US Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change Division, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Greco M and Martino L 2001. The agricultural statistical system in Italy. Proceedings of the Conference on Agricultural and Environmental Application, Rome, Italy, pp. 456–461.Google Scholar
Infascelli F 2003. Nuove acquisizioni sulla nutrizione e sull’alimentazione della bufala. Proceedings of the II Congresso Nazionale sull’Allevamento del Bufalo, Rome, Italy, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2000. Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Technical Support Unit. Hayama. Kanagawa, Japan.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2002. Background papers. IPCC expert meetings on Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Technical Support Unit, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC) 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. General guidance and reporting. In IPCC national greenhouse gas inventories programme (ed. HS Eggleston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara and K Tanabe), vol. 1 . Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan.Google Scholar
Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT) 2007. Dati su agricoltura e zootecnia. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. Rome, Italy. Retrieved 15 January 2007 from http://www.istat.it/agricoltura/datiagri/Google Scholar
Masucci F, Di Francia A and Proto V 1997. In vivo digestibility, rate of particulate passage and dry matter rumen degradability in buffaloes and sheep. Proceedings of the V World Buffalo Congress, Caserta, Italy, pp. 296–301.Google Scholar
Masucci F, Di Francia A, Gioffrè F, Zullo A and Proto V 1999. Prediction of digestibility in buffalo. Proceedings of the XIII ASPA Congress, Piacenza, Italy, pp. 345–347.Google Scholar
OSSLATTE 2001. Capitolo 3: La produzione di latte secondo l’ISTAT e l’AIA. In Annuario del latte, Edizione 2001 (ed. Osservatorio sul mercato dei prodotti lattiero-caseari), pp. 4966. Edizioni Franco Angeli, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
OSSLATTE/ISMEA 2003. Capitolo 3: La struttura degli allevamenti e la produzione di latte secondo l’ISTAT. In Il mercato del latte, rapporto 2003 (ed. Osservatorio sul mercato dei prodotti lattiero-caseari e Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo ed Alimentare), pp. 5984. Edizioni Franco Angeli, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 2006. Updated UNFCCC reporting guidelines on annual inventories following incorporation of the provisions of decision 14/CP.11. Note by the secretariat. Document code FCCC/SBSTA/2006/9, 18 August 2006. United Nations Office at Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Zicarelli, L 1997. Reproductive seasonality in buffalo. Proceedings of the 3rd Course on biotechnology of reproduction in buffaloes, Caserta, Italy. Bubalus Bubalis 3(Suppl. 4), 2952.Google Scholar
Zicarelli L 2001. Evoluzione dell’allevamento bufalino in Italia. Proceedings of the I Congresso Nazionale sull’Allevamento del Bufalo, Eboli, Salerno, Italy, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar