Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:59:55.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of long-term supplementation of chestnut and valonea extracts on methane release, digestibility and nitrogen excretion in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

G. Wischer ,
A. M. Greiling ,
J. Boguhn ,
H. Steingass ,
M. Schollenberger ,
K. Hartung  and
M. Rodehutscord
G. Wischer
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierernährung, Universität Hohenheim, Emil-Wolff-Str. 10, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
A. M. Greiling
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierernährung, Universität Hohenheim, Emil-Wolff-Str. 10, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
J. Boguhn
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierernährung, Universität Hohenheim, Emil-Wolff-Str. 10, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
H. Steingass
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierernährung, Universität Hohenheim, Emil-Wolff-Str. 10, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
M. Schollenberger
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierernährung, Universität Hohenheim, Emil-Wolff-Str. 10, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
K. Hartung
Affiliation:
Institut für Kulturpflanzenwissenschaften, Fachgebiet Bioinformatik, Universität Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
M. Rodehutscord*
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierernährung, Universität Hohenheim, Emil-Wolff-Str. 10, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The long-term effects of adding chestnut (CHE; Castanea sativa) and valonea (VAL; Quercus valonea) tannin-rich extracts to sheep feed were investigated. In Experiment 1, sheep (65 kg BW) were fed 842 g/day of a ryegrass-based hay. The control-treated animals (CON) received 464 g/day of concentrate, and tannin-treated animals received the same amount of concentrate additionally containing 20 g of the respective tannin-rich extract. Hay and concentrates were offered together in one meal. After the onset of treatment, methane release was measured in respiration chambers for 23.5-h intervals (nine times) in a 190-days period. Faeces and urine were collected three times (including once before the onset of the tannin treatment) to assess digestibility and urinary excretion of purine derivatives. Based on the results obtained from Experiment 1, a second experiment (Experiment 2) was initiated, in which the daily tannin dosage was almost doubled (from 0.9 (Experiment 1) to 1.7 g/kg BW0.75). With the exception of the dosage and duration of the treatment (85 days), Experiment 2 followed the same design as Experiment 1, with the same measurements. In an attempt to compare in vitro and in vivo effects of tannin supplementation, the same substrates and tannin treatments were examined in the Hohenheim gas test. In vitro methane production was not significantly different between treatments. None of the tannin-rich extract doses induced a reduction in methane in the sheep experiments. On the 1st day of tannin feeding in both experiments, tannin inclusion tended to decrease methane release, but this trend disappeared by day 14 in both experiments. In balance period 3 of Experiment 1, lower dry matter and organic matter digestibility was noted for tannin treatments. The digestibility of CP, but not NDF or ADF, was reduced in both experiments. A significant shift in N excretion from urine to faeces was observed for both tannin-rich extracts in both experiments, particularly in Experiment 2. In balance period 2 of Experiment 2, an increased intake of metabolisable energy for VAL was observed. The urinary excretion of purine derivatives was not significantly different between treatments, indicating that microbial protein synthesis was equal for all treatments. Thus, we concluded that both tannin-rich extracts temporary affect processes in the rumen but did not alter methane release over a longer period.

Keywords

tannin-rich extractrespiration measurementmethane releasenitrogenmicrobial protein synthesis
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 6 , June 2014 , pp. 938 - 948
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Society of Nutrition Physiology, Göttingen, Germany, March 20-23, 2012. Wischer, G., Greiling, A.M., Boguhn, J., Steingass, H., Schollenberger, M. Hartung, K., Rodehutscord, M. (2012): Long-term effects of feeding tannin extracts on methane release, digestibility and urinary excretion of purine derivatives in sheep. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 21:44.

References

Balcells, J, Guada, JA, Peiro, JM and Parker, DS 1992. Simultaneous determination of allantoin and oxypurines in biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography – Biomedical Applications 575, 153–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchemin, KA, McAllister, TA and McGinn, SM 2009. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane from cattle. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 4, 1–18.Google Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, McGinn, SM, Martinez, TF and McAllister, TA 2007. Use of condensed tannin extract from quebracho trees to reduce methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1990–1996.Google Scholar
Bhatta, R, Krishnamoorthy, U and Mohammed, F 2001. Effect of tamarind (Tamarindus indica) seed husk tannins on in vitro rumen fermentation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 143–152.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E 1965. Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Energy metabolism (ed. KL Blaxter), pp. 441–443. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Carulla, JE, Kreuzer, M, Machmüller, A and Hess, HD 2005. Supplementation of Acacia mearnsii tannins decreases methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage-fed sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 961–970.Google Scholar
Chen, XB, Kyle, DJ and Orskov, ER 1993. Measurement of allantoin in urine and plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with pre-column derivatization. Journal of Chromatography – Biomedical Applications 617, 241–247.Google Scholar
Chen, XB, Chen, YK, Franklin, MF, Orskov, ER and Shand, WJ 1992. The effect of feed intake and body weight on purine derivative excretion and microbial protein supply in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1534–1542.Google Scholar
de Oliveira, SG, Berchielli, TT, MdS, Pedreira, Primavesi, O, Frighetto, R and Lima, MA 2007. Effect of tannin levels in sorghum silage and concentrate supplementation on apparent digestibility and methane emission in beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135, 236–248.Google Scholar
Deutsche Landwirtschafts – Gesellschaft 1997. Futterwerttabellen Wiederkäuer. DLG – Verlag, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
Frutos, P, Raso, M, Hervás, G, Mantecón, ÁR, Pérez, V and Giráldez, FJ 2004. Is there any detrimental effect when a chestnut hydrolysable tannin extract is included in the diet of finishing lambs? Animal Research 53, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie 1991. Leitlinien für die Bestimmung der Verdaulichkeit von Rohnährstoffen an Wiederkäuern. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 65, 229–234.Google Scholar
Goel, G and Makkar, HPS 2011. Methane mitigation from ruminants using tannins and saponins. Tropical Animal Health and Production 44, 729–739.Google Scholar
Grainger, C, Clarke, T, Auldist, MJ, Beauchemin, KA, McGinn, SM, Waghorn, GC and Eckard, RJ 2009. Potential use of Acacia mearnsii condensed tannins to reduce methane emissions and nitrogen excretion from grazing dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 89, 241–251.Google Scholar
Hervás, G, Pérez, V, Giráldez, FJ, Mantecón, AR, Almar, MM and Frutos, P 2003. Intoxication of sheep with quebracho tannin extract. Journal of Comparative Pathology 129, 44–54.Google Scholar
Hook, SE, Wright, ADG and McBride, BW 2010. Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies. Archaea 2010, 1–11.Google Scholar
Jayanegara, A, Wina, E, Soliva, CR, Marquardt, S, Kreuzer, M and Leiber, F 2011. Dependence of forage quality and methanogenic potential of tropical plants on their phenolic fractions as determined by principal component analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 163, 231–243.Google Scholar
Johnson, KA and Johnson, DE 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2483–2492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lima, R, Díaz, RF, Castro, A and Fievez, V 2011. Digestibility, methane production and nitrogen balance in sheep fed ensiled or fresh mixtures of sorghum-soybean forage. Livestock Science 141, 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkar, HP, Blummel, M and Becker, K 1995. In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins in the rumen. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 69, 481–493.Google Scholar
Makkar, HPS 2003. Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Ruminant Research 49, 241–256.Google Scholar
Martin, C, Morgavi, DP and Doreau, M 2010. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4, 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, TA and Newbold, CJ 2008. Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McSweeney, CS, Palmer, B, McNeill, DM and Krause, DO 2001. Microbial interactions with tannins: nutritional consequences for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 91, 83–93.Google Scholar
Menke, KH, Raab, L, Salewski, A, Steingass, H, Fritz, D and Schneider, W 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. The Journal of Agricultural Science 93, 217–222.Google Scholar
Mueller-Harvey, I 2006. Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86, 2010–2037.Google Scholar
Murdiati, TB, McSweeney, CS and Lowry, JB 1992. Metabolism in sheep of gallic acid, tannic acid and hydrolysable tannin from Terminalia oblongata. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 1307–1319.Google Scholar
Patra, AK and Saxena, J 2011. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91, 24–37.Google Scholar
Reed, JD 1995. Nutritional toxicology of tannins and related polyphenols in forage legumes. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1516–1528.Google Scholar
Roth, S 2003. Reducing methane emission and optimising N-supply in ruminants by treating feeds with tannins. Doctoral thesis, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
Schiemann, R, Nehring, K, Hoffmann, L, Jentsch, W and Chudy, A 1971. Energetische Futterbewertung und Energienormen. VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Smith, AH, Zoetendal, E and Mackie, RI 2005. Bacterial mechanisms to overcome inhibitory effects of dietary tannins. Microbial Ecology 50, 197–205.Google Scholar
Tavendale, MH, Meagher, LP, Pacheco, D, Walker, N, Attwood, GT and Sivakumaran, S 2005. Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Medicago sativa, and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123–124 (Part 1), 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Nevel, CJ 1996. Control of rumen methanogenesis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 42, 73–97.Google Scholar
Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten (VDLUFA) 2006. Handbuch der Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs- und Untersuchungsmethodik (VDLUFA-Methodenbuch), Bd. III Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.Google Scholar
Wischer, G, Boguhn, J, Steingaß, H, Schollenberger, M and Rodehutscord, M 2013. Effects of different tannin rich extracts and rapeseed tannin monomers on methane formation and microbial protein synthesis in vitro . Animal 7, 1796–1805.Google Scholar
Zimmer, N and Cordesse, R 1996. Digestibility and ruminal digestion of non-nitrogenous compounds in adult sheep and goats: effects of chestnut tannins. Animal Feed Science and Technology 61, 259–273.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Wischer Supplementary Material

Figure S1

Download Wischer Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 214.8 KB