Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:07:33.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of inulin supplementation on selected faecal characteristics and health of neonatal Saanen kids sucking milk from their dams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2012

C. Kara*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uludag, 16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
A. Orman
Affiliation:
Department of Zootechnics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uludag, 16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
H. Gencoglu
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uludag, 16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
A. Kovanlıkaya
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uludag, 16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
Y. Meral
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uludag, 16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
I. Cetin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uludag, 16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
A. Yıbar
Affiliation:
Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uludag, 16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
S. Kasap
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uludag, 16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
I. Turkmen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uludag, 16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
G. Deniz
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Uludag, 16059 Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
*
Get access

Abstract

Fifty newborn Saanen kids were used to study the effects of inulin supplementation on faecal score, faecal pH, selected faecal bacterial population, BW, body temperature, haematological traits, selected health parameters and the incidence of diarrhoea. Kids were sorted by parity of their dams and multiple birth (twin or triplet) and assigned to one of the two groups (control: CG, and experimental: EG) at birth. Each group consisted of 25 kids. The groups were similar with regard to sex and birth weight. All kids were fed colostrum for the first 3 days after birth, and then the kids in EG were adapted to inulin supplementation by an increased dosage from day 4 to 7. Each kid in EG was supplemented with 0.2 g, 0.3 g, 0.4 g, 0.5 g and 0.6 g inulin on day 4, 5, 6, 7 and from day 8 to 28, respectively, whereas the kids in CG did not receive inulin. Faecal score and faecal bacterial population were not affected by inulin supplementation (P > 0.05). There were differences in faecal pH on day 14 (P = 0.01) and 28 (P<0.05), whereas no difference in faecal pH on day 21 (P > 0.05) was detected between groups. No differences (P > 0.05) in BW and haematological traits were found between groups. Body temperature did not differ on day 14 and 21 (P > 0.05), whereas there was a difference in body temperature on day 28 (P = 0.01) between groups. The numbers of kids with pneumonia and kids treated for pneumonia and diarrhoea were similar for CG and EG. Kid losses during the study were the same for CG and EG. The incidence of diarrhoea was not affected by inulin supplementation (P > 0.05). Inulin supplemented to kids did not adversely affect faecal score. The effect of inulin on faecal pH was not consistent. The results of our study suggested that daily dose (0.6 g) of inulin might not be enough to observe effects of it. Our data will be useful to determine the dose and timing of inulin supplementation in future studies investigating the effects of inulin on the parameters associated with performance and health status in kids and other young ruminants.

Type
Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apanavicius, CJ, Powell, KL, Vester, BM, Karr-Lilienthal, LK, Pope, LL, Fastinger, ND, Wallig, MA, Tappenden, KA, Swanson, KS 2007. Fructan supplementation and infection affect food intake, fever, and epithelial sloughing from Salmonella challenge in weanling puppies. Journal of Nutrition 137, 19231930.Google Scholar
AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) 1990. Official methods of analysis., vol. 1, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Ayışığı, K, Ataşoğlu, C, Yurtman, İY, Mendeş, M, Pala, A 2005. Effect of probiotic supplementation shortly before and after weaning on growth of Turkish Saanen kids. Archiv Tierzucht 48, 601611.Google Scholar
Bailey, SR, Menzies-Gow, NJ, Harris, PA, Habershon-Butcher, JL, Crawford, C, Berhane, Y, Boston, RC, Elliot, J 2007. Effect of dietary fructans and dexamethasone administration on the insulin response of ponies predisposed to laminitis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 231, 13651373.Google Scholar
Barry, KA, Hernot, DC, Middelbos, IS, Francis, C, Dunsford, B, Swanson, KS, Fahey, GC 2009. Low-level fructan supplementation of dogs enhances nutrient digestion and modifies stool metabolite concentrations, but does not alter fecal microbiota populations. Journal of Animal Science 87, 32443252.Google Scholar
Bosscher, D 2009. Fructan prebiotics derived from inulin. In Prebiotics and probiotics science and technology (ed. D Charalampopoulos and RA Rastall), pp. 163205. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buddington, RK, Kelly-Quagliana, K, Buddington, KK, Kimura, Y 2002. Non-digestible oligosaccharides and defence functions: lessons learned from animal models. British Journal of Nutrition 87 (suppl. 2), 231239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunce, TJ, Howard, MD, Kerley, MS, Allee, GL 1995. Feeding fructooligosaccharide to calves increased bifidobacteria and decreased Escherichia coli. Journal of Animal Science 73 (suppl. 1), 281 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Davis, ME, Maxwell, CV, Erf, GF, Brown, DC, Wistuba, TJ 2004. Dietary supplementation with phosphorylated mannans improves growth response and modulates immune function of weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 18821891.Google Scholar
De Vrese, M, Marteau, PR 2007. Probiotics and prebiotics: effects on diarrhea. Journal of Nutrition 137 (suppl. 2), 803811.Google Scholar
Flickinger, EA, Van Loo, J, Fahey, GC 2003a. Nutritional responses to the presence of inulin and oligofructose in the diets of domesticated animals: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 43, 1960.Google Scholar
Flickinger, EA, Schreijen, EMWC, Patil, AR, Hussein, HS, Grieshop, CM, Merchen, NR, Fahey, GC 2003b. Nutrient digestibilities, microbial populations, and protein catabolites as affected by fructan supplementation of dog diets. Journal of Animal Science 81, 20082018.Google Scholar
Franklin, ST, Newman, MC, Newman, KE, Meek, KI 2005. Immune parameters of dry cows fed mannanoligosaccharide and subsequent transfer of immunity to calves. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 766775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaggìa, F, Mattarelli, P, Biavati, B 2010. Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. International Journal of Food Microbiology 141 (suppl. 1), 1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinrichs, AJ, Jones, CM, Heinrichs, BS 2003. Effects of mannanoligosaccharide or antibiotics in neonatal diets on health and growth of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 40644069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinrichs, AJ, Jones, CM, Elizondo-Salazar, JA, Terrill, SJ 2009. Effects of a prebiotic supplement on health of neonatal dairy calves. Livestock Science 125, 149154.Google Scholar
Hesta, M, Hoornaert, E, Verlinden, A, Janssens, GPJ 2005. The effect of oligofructose on urea metabolism and faecal odour components in cats. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 89, 208214.Google Scholar
Hesta, M, Janssens, GPJ, Debraekeleer, J, De Wilde, R 2001. The effect of oligofructose and inulin on faecal characteristics and nutrient digestibility in healthy cats. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 85, 135141.Google Scholar
Hill, TM, Bateman, HG, Aldrich, JM, Schlotterbeck, RL 2008. Oligosaccharides for dairy calves. Professional Animal Scientist 24, 460464.Google Scholar
İnce, D 2010. Reproduction performance of Saanen goats raised under extensive conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology 48, 82538256.Google Scholar
Jackson, PGG, Cockcroft, PD 2002. Normal physiological values. In Clinical examination of farm animals, p. 301. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Kaufhold, J, Hammon, HM, Blum, JW 2000. Fructo-oligosaccharide supplementation: effects on metabolic, endocrine, and hematological traits in veal calves. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A 47, 1729.Google Scholar
Koşum, N, Alçıçek, A, Taşkın, T, Önenç, A 2003. Fattening performance and carcass characteristics of Saanen and Bornova male kids under an intensive management system. Czech Journal of Animal Science 48, 379386.Google Scholar
Kritas, SK, Burriel, AR, Tzivara, AH, Govaris, A, Kyriakis, SC, Karatzias, H, Vlemmase, J 2003. Prevention of scours in neonatal kids after modification of management and experimental vaccination against Escherichia coli. Small Ruminant Research 50, 5156.Google Scholar
Lynch, MB, Sweeney, T, Callan, JJ, O'Doherty, JV 2007. The effect of dietary crude protein concentration and inulin supplementation on nitrogen excretion and intestinal microflora from finisher pigs. Livestock Science 109, 204207.Google Scholar
Martínéz-Férez, A, Rudolff, S, Guadix, A 2005. Goat's milk as a natural source of lactose-derived oligosaccharides: isolation by membrane technology. International Dairy Journal 6, 173181.Google Scholar
Masanetz, S, Preißinger, W, Meyer, HHD, Pfaff, MW 2011. Effects of the prebiotics inulin and lactulose on intestinal immunology and hematology of preruminant calves. Animal 5, 10991106.Google Scholar
Milewski, S, Sobiech, P, Bednarek, D, Wojcik, R, Malaczewska, J, Zaleska, B, Siwicki, AK 2010. Effect of oligosaccharides supplementation on the meat performance traits and selected indicator of humoral immunity in lambs. The Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy 54, 175179.Google Scholar
Mul, AJ 1997. Application of oligosaccharides in animal feeds. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Non-Digestible Oligosaccharides: healthy food for the colon (ed. R Hartemink), p. 106. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Mwenya, B, Santoso, B, Sar, C, Pen, B, Morikawa, R, Takaura, K, Umetsu, K, Kimura, K, Takahashi, J 2005. Effects of yeast culture and galacto-oligosaccharides on ruminal fermentation in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 14041412.Google Scholar
Ocak, S, Güney, O 2010. Physiological responses and some blood parameters of bucks under Mediterranean climate conditions. Anadolu Journal of Agriculture Science 25, 113119.Google Scholar
Propst, EL, Flickinger, EA, Bauer, LL, Merchen, NR, Fahey, GC 2003. A dose-response experiment evaluating the effects of oligofructose and inulin on nutrient digestibility, stool quality, and fecal protein catabolites in healthy adult dogs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 30573066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saavedra, JM 2005. Prebiotics: diet–bacterial–gut interactions and their impact on health. Clinical Nutrition Highlights 1, 27.Google Scholar
Saavedra, JM, Tschernia, A 2002. Human studies with probiotics and prebiotics: clinical implications. British Journal of Nutrition 87 (suppl. 2), 241246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schley, PD, Field, CJ 2002. The immune-enhancing effects of dietary fibers and prebiotics. British Journal of Nutrition 87 (suppl. 2), 221230.Google Scholar
Smith, MC, Sherman, DM 2009. Digestive system. In Goat medicine, 2nd edition, pp. 472478. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) 2004. Base system user's guide, version 5.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Swanson, KS, Grieshop, CM, Flickinger, EA, Bauer, LL, Healy, HP, Dawson, KA, Merchen, NR, Fahey, GC 2002a. Supplemental fructooligosaccharides and mannanoligosaccharides influence immune function, ileal and total tract nutrient digestibilities, microbial populations and concentrations of protein catabolites in the large bowel of dogs. Journal of Nutrition 132, 980989.Google Scholar
Swanson, KS, Grieshop, CM, Flickinger, EA, Healy, HP, Dawson, KA, Merchen, NR, Fahey, GC 2002b. Effects of supplemental fructooligosaccharides plus mannanoligosaccharides on immune function and ileal and fecal microbial populations in adult dogs. Archives of Animal Nutrition 56, 309318.Google Scholar
Thayne, JT 2007. The effects of Bio-Mos on lamb growth and immune function. Degree of Master of Science Thesis, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Verlinden, A, Hesta, M, Hermans, JM, Janssens, GPJ 2006. The effects of inulin supplementation of diets with or without hydrolyzed protein sources on digestibility, faecal characteristics, haematology, and immunoglobulins in dogs. British Journal of Nutrition 96, 936944.Google Scholar
Xu, ZR, Hu, CH, Xia, MS, Zhan, XA, Wang, MQ 2003. Effects of dietary fructooligosaccharide on digestive enzyme activities, intestinal microflora and morphology of male broilers. Poultry Science 82, 10301036.Google Scholar
Xu, ZR, Zuo, XT, Hu, CH, Xia, MS, Zhan, XA, Wang, MQ 2002. Effects of dietary fructooligosaccharide on digestive enzyme activities, intestinal microflora and morphology of growing pigs. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 15, 17841789.Google Scholar
Yasuda, K, Maiorano, R, Welch, RM, Miller, DD, Lei, XG 2007. Cecum is the major degradation site of ingested inulin in young pigs. Journal of Nutrition 137, 23992404.Google Scholar
Younes, H, Coudray, C, Bellanger, J, Demigne, C, Rayssiguier, Y, Remesy, C 2001. Effects of two fermentable carbohydrates (inulin and resistant starch) and their combination on calcium and magnesium balance in rats. British Journal of Nutrition 86, 479485.Google Scholar