Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:37:23.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of fermented soybean meal on carbon and nitrogen metabolisms in large intestine of piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2018

Y. T. Zhang ,
D. D. Lu ,
J. Y. Chen ,
B. Yu ,
J. B. Liang ,
J. D. Mi ,
S. C. L. Candyrine  and
X. D. Liao
Y. T. Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
D. D. Lu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
J. Y. Chen
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
B. Yu
Affiliation:
Shenzhen Agro-Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd, Shenzhen 518023, China
J. B. Liang
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
J. D. Mi
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
S. C. L. Candyrine
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
X. D. Liao*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China College of Animal Science and National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Fermented soybean meal (FSM), which has lower anti-nutritional factors and higher active enzyme, probiotic and oligosaccharide contents than its unfermented form, has been reported to improve the feeding value of soybean meal, and hence, the growth performance of piglets. However, whether FSM can affect the bacterial and metabolites in the large intestine of piglets remains unknown. This study supplemented wet-FSM (WFSM) or dry-FSM (DFSM) (5% dry matter basis) in the diet of piglets and investigated its effects on carbon and nitrogen metabolism in the piglets’ large intestines. A total of 75 41-day-old Duroc×Landrace×Yorkshire piglets with an initial BW of 13.14±0.22 kg were used in a 4-week feeding trial. Our results showed that the average daily gain of piglets in the WFSM and DFSM groups increased by 27.08% and 14.58% and that the feed conversion ratio improved by 18.18% and 7.27%, respectively, compared with the control group. Data from the prediction gene function of Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) based on 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing showed that carbohydrate metabolism function families in the WFSM and DFSM groups increased by 3.46% and 2.68% and that the amino acid metabolism function families decreased by 1.74% and 0.82%, respectively, compared with the control group. These results were consistent with those of other metabolism studies, which showed that dietary supplementation with WFSM and DFSM increased the level of carbohydrate-related metabolites (e.g. 4-aminobutanoate, 5-aminopentanoate, lactic acid, mannitol, threitol and β-alanine) and decreased the levels of those related to protein catabolism (e.g. 1,3-diaminopropane, creatine, glycine and inosine). In conclusion, supplementation with the two forms of FSM improved growth performance, increased metabolites of carbohydrate and reduced metabolites of protein in the large intestine of piglets, and WFSM exhibited a stronger effect than DFSM.

Keywords

fermented soybean mealpigletlarge intestinemetabolismmicrofloral
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 10 , October 2018 , pp. 2056 - 2064
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel, MAA 2012. Effect of using organic acids on performance of Japanese quail fed optimal and sub-optimal energy and protein levels 2. Butyric acid. Egyptian Poultry Science 32, 625–644.Google Scholar
Arias, M, Chevallier, OP, Graham, SF, Gasull, GA, Fodey, T, Cooper, KM, Crooks, SRH, Danaher, M and Elliott, CT 2016. Metabolomics reveals novel biomarkers of illegal 5-nitromimidazole treatment in pigs. Further evidence of drug toxicity uncovered. Food Chemistry 199, 876–884.Google Scholar
Dai, ZL, Wu, G and Zhu, WY 2011. Amino acid metabolism in intestinal bacteria: links between gut ecology and host health. Frontiers in Bioscience 16, 1768–1786.Google Scholar
Davila, AM, Blachier, F, Gotteland, M, Andriamihaja, M, Benetti, PH, Sanz, Y and Tomé, D 2013. Intestinal luminal nitrogen metabolism: role of the gut microbiota and consequences for the host. Pharmacological Research 68, 95–107.Google Scholar
De, LCFM, Pluske, J, Gong, J and Nyachoti, CM 2010. Strategic use of feed ingredients and feed additives to stimulate gut health and development in young pigs. Livestock Science 134, 124–134.Google Scholar
Deng, YF, Liao, XD, Wang, Y, Liang, JB and Tufarelli, V 2015. Prebiotics mitigate in vitro sulfur-containing odour generation in caecal content of pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science 14, 132–137.Google Scholar
Dhruw, K, Verma, AK, Agarwal, N, Patel, BHM and Singh, P 2016. Evaluation of live Lactobacillus acidophilus NCDC 15 and curd as probiotic on growth performance and nutrient utilization in early weaned crossbred (Landrace × Desi) piglets. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 16, 355–362.Google Scholar
Duncan, SH, Louis, P and Flint, HJ 2004. Lactate-utilizing bacteria, isolated from human feces, that produce butyrate as a major fermentation product. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70, 5810–5817.Google Scholar
Foditsch, C, Santos, TMA, Teixeira, AGV, Pereira, RVV, Dias, JM and Gaeta, N 2014. Isolation and characterization of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii from calves and piglets. PloS One 9, e116465.Google Scholar
González, VJC, Kim, BG, Htoo, JK, Lemme, A and Stein, HH 2011. Amino acid digestibility in heated soybean meal fed to growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 89, 3617–3625.Google Scholar
Guilloteau, P, Martin, L, Eeckhaut, V, Ducatelle, R, Zabielski, R and Immerseel, FV 2010. From the gut to the peripheral tissues: the multiple effects of butyrate. Nutrition Research Reviews 23, 366–384.Google Scholar
Jeong, JS, Park, JW, Lee, SI and Kim, IH 2016. Apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients and amino acids in soybean meal, fish meal, spray-dried plasma protein and fermented soybean meal to weaned pigs. Animal Science Journal 87, 697–702.Google Scholar
Jha, R and Berrocoso, JFD 2016. Dietary fiber and protein fermentation in the intestine of swine and their interactive effects on gut health and on the environment: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 212, 18–26.Google Scholar
Kraler, M, Ghanbari, M, Domig, KJ, Schedle, K and Kneifel, W 2016. The intestinal microbiota of piglets fed with wheat bran variants as characterised by 16S rRNA next-generation amplicon sequencing. Archives of Animal Nutrition 70, 173–189.Google Scholar
Langille, MGI, Zaneveld, J, Caporaso, JG, McDonald, D, Knights, D, Reyes, JA, Clemente, JC, Burkepile, DE, Thurber, RLV, Knight, R, Beiko, RG and Huttenhower, C 2013. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nature Biotechnology 31, 814–821.Google Scholar
Le, PD, Aarnink, AJA, Ogink, NWM, Becker, PM and Verstegen, MWA 2005. Odour from animal production facilities: its relationship to diet. Nutrition Research Reviews 18, 3–30.Google Scholar
Lee, SH, Ingale, SL, Kim, JS, Kim, KH, Lokhande, A, Kim, EK, Kwon, IK, Kim, YH and Chae, BJ 2014. Effects of dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis LS 1-2 fermentation biomass on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, cecal microbiota and intestinal morphology of weanling pig. Animal Feed Science and Technology 188, 102–110.Google Scholar
Metzler, ZBU, Zijlstra, RT, Mosenthin, R and Gänzle, MG 2011. Dietary calcium phosphate content and oat β-glucan influence gastrointestinal microbiota, butyrate-producing bacteria and butyrate fermentation in weaned pigs. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 75, 402–413.Google Scholar
Ricci, V, Giannouli, M, Romano, M and Zarrilli, R 2014. Helicobacter pylori gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and its pathogenic role. World Journal of Gastroenterology 20, 630–638.Google Scholar
Seo, SH and Cho, SJ 2016. Changes in allergenic and antinutritional protein profiles of soybean meal during solid-state fermentation with Bacillus subtilis . LWT-Food Science and Technology 70, 208–212.Google Scholar
Singh, N, Gurav, A, Sivaprakasam, S, Brady, B, Padia, R, Shi, H, Thangaraju, M, Prasad, PD, Manicassamy, S, Munn, DH, Lee, JR, Offermanns, S and Ganapathy, V 2014. Activation of Gpr109a, receptor for niacin and the commensal metabolite butyrate, suppresses colonic inflammation and carcinogenesis. Immunity 40, 128–139.Google Scholar
Sun, XH, Zhu, AD, Liu, SZ, Sheng, L, Ma, QL, Zhang, L, Nishawy, EME, Zeng, YL, Xu, J, Ma, ZC, Cheng, YJ and Deng, XX 2013. Integration of metabolomics and subcellular organelle expression microarray to increase understanding the organic acid changes in post-harvest citrus fruit. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 55, 1038–1053.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S, Tomita, J, Nishioka, K, Hisada, T and Nishijima, M 2014. Development of a prokaryotic universal primer for simultaneous analysis of Bacteria and Archaea using next-generation sequencing. PloS One 9, e105592.Google Scholar
Tao, X, Xu, Z and Wan, J 2015. Intestinal microbiota diversity and expression of pattern recognition receptors in newly weaned piglets. Anaerobe 32, 51–56.Google Scholar
Teng, D, Gao, MY, Yang, YL, Liu, B, Tian, ZG and Wang, JH 2012. Bio-modification of soybean meal with Bacillus subtilis or Aspergillus oryzae . Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 1, 32–38.Google Scholar
Velayudhan, J, Jones, MA, Barrow, PA and Kelly, DJ 2004. L-serine catabolism via an oxygen-labile L-serine dehydratase is essential for colonization of the avian gut by Campylobacter jejuni . Infection and immunity 72, 260–268.Google Scholar
Wang, P, Fan, CG, Chang, J and Lu, FS 2016. Study on effects of microbial fermented soyabean meal on production performances of sows and suckling piglets and its acting mechanism. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 25, 12–19.Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Liu, XT, Wang, HL, Li, DF, Piao, XS and Lu, WQ 2014. Optimization of processing conditions for solid-state fermented soybean meal and its effects on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of weanling pigs. Livestock Science 170, 91–99.Google Scholar
Willing, BP and Van, KAG 2010. Host pathways for recognition: establishing gastrointestinal microbiota as relevant in animal health and nutrition. Livestock Science 133, 82–91.Google Scholar
Yan, L, Wang, JP and Kim, IH 2012. Effects of different fermented soy protein and apparent ileal digestible lysine levels on weaning pigs fed fermented soy protein-amended diets. Animal Science Journal 83, 403–410.Google Scholar
Yeoman, CJ and White, BA 2014. Gastrointestinal tract microbiota and probiotics in production animals. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences 2, 469–486.Google Scholar
Zhang, YT, Yu, B, Lu, YH, Wang, J, Liang, JB, Tufarelli, V, Laudadio, V and Liao, XD 2016. Optimization of the fermentation conditions to reduce anti-nutritive factors in soybean meal. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13114.Google Scholar
Zhao, F, Ren, LQ, Mi, BM, Tan, HZ, Zhao, JT, Li, H, Zhang, HF and Zhang, ZY 2014. Developing a computer-controlled simulated digestion system to predict the concentration of metabolizable energy of feedstuffs for rooster. Journal of Animal Science 92, 1537–1547.Google Scholar
Zhou, XL, Kong, XF, Lian, GQ, Blachier, F, Geng, MM and Yin, YL 2014. Dietary supplementation with soybean oligosaccharides increases short-chain fatty acids but decreases protein-derived catabolites in the intestinal luminal content of weaned Huanjiang mini-piglets. Nutrition Research 34, 780–788.Google Scholar
Zocco, MA, Ainora, ME, Gasbarrini, G and Gasbarrini, A 2007. Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron in the gut: molecular aspects of their interaction. Digestive and Liver Disease 39, 707–712.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Zhang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 75.6 KB