Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:25:37.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of chito-oligosaccharide on piglet jejunal explants: an histological approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2018

J. R. Gerez ,
L. Y. Buck ,
V. H. B. Marutani ,
C. M. Calliari ,
L. S. Cunha  and
A. P. F. R. Loureiro Bracarense
J. R. Gerez
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Pathology, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Campus Universitário, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, Km 380, Londrina, Paraná 86057-970, Brazil
L. Y. Buck
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Pathology, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Campus Universitário, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, Km 380, Londrina, Paraná 86057-970, Brazil
V. H. B. Marutani
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Pathology, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Campus Universitário, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, Km 380, Londrina, Paraná 86057-970, Brazil
C. M. Calliari
Affiliation:
Academic Department of Food, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Avenida dos Pioneiros, 3131, Londrina, Paraná 86036-370, Brazil
L. S. Cunha
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Campus Universitário, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, Km 380, Londrina, Paraná 86057-970, Brazil
A. P. F. R. Loureiro Bracarense*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Animal Pathology, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Campus Universitário, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, Km 380, Londrina, Paraná 86057-970, Brazil
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Antibiotics have been widely used in piglet diets to promote growth performance and reduce diarrhea incidence. However, the resistance of pathogens to antibiotics and the risk of residues of antibiotics in animal products induced a growing interest in the use of alternatives to in-feed antibiotics. Chito-oligosaccharide (COS), a natural alkaline polymer of glucosamine is currently being tested as a substitute for in-feed antibiotics. In weaned piglets, COS has positive effects on promoting growth, which may be related to its action on intestinal morphology, immune ability and beneficial microbiota. However, previous studies shown variable results with effective doses ranging from 30 mg/kg to 5 g/kg. Therefore, the goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that the use of COS can be an alternative to in-feed antibiotics by improve the intestinal morphology of piglets, using the jejunal explant model. The intestinal explants were exposed for 4 h to following treatments: control – only culture media and culture media with COS in doses of 0.025 mg/ml, 0.05 mg/ml, 0.1 mg/ml and 0.15 mg/ml. After the incubation period the explants were processed for histological and morphometrical analysis. The histological changes were evaluated using an adapted histological score based on the intensity and severity of lesions. Mild histological changes were observed in jejunal explants exposed to different treatments; however, no significant difference in the histological score, villi height, crypt depth or villus : crypt ratio were observed between the COS-groups and the control. In addition, goblet cells density in intestinal explants exposed to COS remained statistically similar to control group. Our results indicate that COS exposure in levels ranging from 0.025 to 0.15 mg/ml induced no effect on intestinal morphology of pig’s explants. The research will provide guidance on the low dosage of COS supplementation on weaning pigs.

Keywords

functional oligosaccharidesswineexplants techniqueintestinal morphologygoblet cells
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , February 2019 , pp. 256 - 261
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthon, GE and Barrett, DM 2002. Determination of reducing sugars with 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolinonehydrazone. Analytical Biochemistry 305, 287–289.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytic Chemists (AOAC) 2005. Official methods of analysis, 18th edition. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Barton, MD 2000. Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human health. Nutrition Research Reviews 13, 279–299.Google Scholar
Chae, SY, Jang, M and Nah, J 2005. Influence of molecular weight on oral absorption of water soluble chitosans. Journal of Controlled Release 102, 383–394.Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Kim, IH, Cho, JH, Yoo, JS, Wang, Y, Huang, Y, Kim, HJ and Shin, SO 2009. Effects of chitooligosaccharide supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and immune responses after lipopolysaccharide challenge in weanling pigs. Livestock Science 124, 255–260.Google Scholar
Fernandes, JC, Spindola, H, de Sousa, V, Santos-Silva, A, Pintado, ME and Malcata, FX 2010. Anti-inflammatory activity of chitooligosaccharides in vivo . Marine Drugs 8, 1763–1768.Google Scholar
Gibson, GR and Roberfroid, MB 1995. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition 125, 1401–1412.Google Scholar
Horn, SJ and Eijsink, VGH 2004. A reliable reducing end assay for chito-oligosaccharides. Carbohydrate Polymers 56, 35–39.Google Scholar
Hu, HC, Xiao, K and Song, J 2013. Early weaning increases intestinal permeability, alters expression of cytokine and tight junction proteins, and activates mitogen-activated protein kinase in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 1094–1101.Google Scholar
Kim, SK and Rajapakse, N 2005. Enzymatic production and biological activities of chitosan oligosaccharides (COS): a review. Carbohydrate Polymers 62, 357–368.Google Scholar
Kong, XF, Zhou, XL, Lian, GQ, Blachier, F, Liu, G, Etan, B, Nyachoti, CM and Yin, YL 2014. Dietary supplementation with chitooligosaccharides alters gut microbiota and modifies intestinal luminal metabolites in weaned Huanjiang mini-piglets. Livestock Science 160, 97–101.Google Scholar
Li, K, Xing, R, Liu, S and Li, P 2016. Advances in preparation, analysis and biological activities of single chitooligosaccharides. Carbohydrate Polymers 139, 178–190.Google Scholar
Liu, P, Piao, XS, Kim, SW, Wang, L, Shen, YB, Lee, HS and Li, SY 2008. Effects of chito-oligosaccharide supplementation on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology, and fecal shedding of Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus in weaning pigs. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2609–2618.Google Scholar
Lucioli, J, Pinton, P, Callu, P, Laffitte, J, Grosjean, F, Kolf-Clauw, M, Oswald, IP and Bracarense, APFRL 2013. The food contaminant deoxynivalenol activates the mitogen activated protein kinases in the intestine: Interest of ex vivo models as an alternative to in vivo experiments. Toxicon 66, 31–36.Google Scholar
Maidana, L, Gerez, JR, El Khoury, R, Pinho, F, Puel, O, Oswald, IP and Bracarense, APFRL 2016. Effects of patulin and ascladiol on porcine intestinal mucosa: an ex vivo approach. Food and Chemical Toxicology 98, 189–194.Google Scholar
Moncada, DM, Kammanadiminti, SJ and Chadee, K 2003. Mucin and toll-like receptors in host defense against intestinal parasites. Trends Parasitology 19, 305–311.Google Scholar
Muzzarelli, RAA and Peters, MG 1997. Chitin handbook. Atec, Grottammare, AP, Italy.Google Scholar
Oliveira, ER, Silva, CA, Castro-Gómez, RJH, Lozano, AP, Gavioli, DF, Frietzen, J, Silva, EO, Novais, AK, Frederico, G and Júnior, MP 2017. Chito-oligosaccharide as growth promoter replacement for weaned piglets: performance, morphometry, and immune system. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 38, 3253–3270.Google Scholar
Pelaseyed, T, Bergström, JH, Gustafsson, JK, Ermund, A, Birchenough, GM, Schütte, A, van der Post, S, Svensson, F, Rodríguez-Piñeiro, AM, Nyström, EE, Wising, C, Johansson, ME and Hansson, GC 2014. The mucus and mucins of the goblet cells and enterocytes provide the first defense line of the gastrointestinal tract and interact with the immune system. Immunological Reviews 260, 8–20.Google Scholar
RStudio Team 2016. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. URL http://www.rstudio.com/.Google Scholar
Russel, WMS and Burch, RL 1959. The principles of human experimental technique. Methuen, London, UK.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Á, Mengíbar, M, Rivera-Rodríguez, G, Moerchbacher, B, Acosta, N and Heras, A 2017. The effect of preparation processes on the physicochemical characteristics and antibacterial activity of chitooligosaccharides. Carbohydrate Polymers 157, 251–257.Google Scholar
Shang, Q, Jiang, H, Cai, C, Hao, J, Li, G and Yu, G 2018. Gut microbiota fermentation of marine polysaccharides and its effects on intestinal ecology: an overview. Carbohydrate Polymers 179, 173–185.Google Scholar
Silva, EO, Gerez, JR, Drape, TC and Bracarense, APFRL 2014. Phytic acid decreases deoxynivalenol and fumonisin B1-induced changes on swine jejunal explants. Toxicology Reports 1, 284–292.Google Scholar
Souza, DM and Garcia-Cruz, CH 2004. Fermentative production of exocellular polysaccharides by bacteria. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 25, 331–340.Google Scholar
Suthongsa, S, Pichyangkura, R, Kalandakanond-Thongsong, S and Thongsong, B 2017. Effects of dietary levels of chito-oligosaccharide on ileal digestibility of nutrients, small intestinal morphology and crypt cell proliferation in weaned pigs. Livestock Science 198, 37–44.Google Scholar
Swiatkiewicz, S, Swiatkiewicz, M, Arczewska-Wlosek, A and Jozefiak, D 2015. Chitosan and its oligosaccharide derivatives (chito-oligosaccharides) as feed supplements in poultry and swine nutrition. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 99, 1–12.Google Scholar
Thacker, AP 2013. Alternatives to antibiotics as growth promoters for use in swine production: a review. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 4, 1–12.Google Scholar
Thongsong, B, Suthongsa, S, Pichyangkura, R and Kalandakanond-Thongsong, S 2018. Effects of chito-oligosaccharide supplementation with low or medium molecular weight and high degree of deacetylation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and small intestinal morphology in weaned pigs. Livestock Science 209, 60–66.Google Scholar
Van der Fels-Klerx, HJ, Puister-Jansen, LF, Van Asselt, ED and Burgers, SL 2011. Farm factors associated with the use of antibiotics in pig production. Journal of Animal Science 89, 1922–1929.Google Scholar
Wang, JP, Yoo, JS, Kim, HJ, Lee, JH and Kim, IH 2009. Nutrient digestibility, blood profiles and fecal microbiota are influenced by chitooligosaccharide supplementation of growing pigs. Livestock Science 125, 298–303.Google Scholar
Xiao, D, Tang, Z, Yin, Y, Zhang, B, Hu, X, Feng, Z and Wang, J 2013. Effects of dietary administering chitosan on growth performance, jejunal morphology, jejunal mucosal sIgA, occludin, claudin-1 and TLR4 expression in weaned piglets challenged by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli . International Immunopharmacology 17, 670–676.Google Scholar
Xiong, X, Yang, HS, Wang, XC, Hu, Q, Liu, CX, Wu, X, Deng, D, Hou, YQ, Nyachoti, CM, Xiao, DF and Yin, YL 2015. Effect of low dosage of chito-oligosaccharide supplementation on intestinal morphology, imune response, antioxidante capacity, and barrier function in weaned piglets. Journal of Animal Science 93, 1089–1097.Google Scholar
Xu, Y, Shi, B, Yan, S, Li, T, Guo, Y and Li, J 2013. Effects of Chitosan on body weight gain, growth hormone and intestinal morphology in weaned pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 26, 1484–1489.Google Scholar
Yang, CM, Ferket, PR, Hong, QH, Zhou, J, Cao, GT, Zhou, L and Chen, AG 2012. Effect of chito-oligosaccharide on growth performance, intestinal barrier function, intestinal morphology and cecal microflora in weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2671–2676.Google Scholar
Zhou, TX, Cho, JH and Kim, IH 2012. Effects of supplementation of chito-oligosaccharide on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and appearance of diarrhea in weanling pigs. Livestock Science 144, 263–268.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gerez et al. supplementary material

Gerez et al. supplementary material 1

Download Gerez et al. supplementary material(File)
File 15.1 KB