Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:38:48.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of substitution of oat hulls for traditional fiber source on digestion and performance of fattening rabbits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2016

S Liangzhan ,
J Xiang ,
Z Caixia ,
F Zhaohui  and
L Fuchang
S Liangzhan
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, P R China
J Xiang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, P R China
Z Caixia
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, P R China
F Zhaohui
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, P R China
L Fuchang*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, P R China
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of oat hulls (OH) to substitute traditional fiber (a mixture of rice hulls and mugwort (RHM) leaf) in the diets of fattening rabbits by examining on its effect on the growth performance, coefficient of total tract apparent digestibility (CTTAD) of nutrients, gastrointestinal tract development, cecum fermentation and carcass traits. A total of 160 mixed sex Hyla commercial meat rabbits (40/treatment) were used to study the effects of including OH in the diet from 30 to 80 days of age. A control diet based on RHM and containing 175.2 g crude fiber and 169.7 g CP/kg was included. Growth performance and CTTAD of nutrients were recorded from day 35 to day 80 and day 74 to day 80, respectively, whereas gastrointestinal tract development, cecum fermentation and carcass traits were determined at day 80. Increasing concentrations of OH in the diet increased average daily feed intake (P=0.0018), but have no effects on average daily gain and feed conversion ratio (P>0.05). Moreover, the 150 g/kg OH diet decreased the relative weight of full cecum and cecal content (P<0.05), but did not affect other gastrointestinal organs. The CTTAD of NDF and gross energy decreased with the inclusion of OH (P<0.05). No effects of CTTAD of ADF, ADL, dry matter, CP and ether extract were observed (P>0.05). The concentrations of total volatile fatty acid, acetic and butyric acids were greater in rabbits fed the lower levels of OH (0 to 100 g/kg) compared with higher rate (150 g/kg; P<0.05). However, the proportions of acetic, propionic and butyric acids were not affected by treatments (P>0.05). Furthermore, no significant effect on the ratios of acetic/(propionic+butyric) was observed (P>0.05). Hot carcass weight, pH (45 min, 24 h), lightness, redness, yellowness, 24-h drip loss of longissimus lumborum muscles were not affected by diet OH (P>0.05). However, dressing out percentage increased with higher (150 g/kg) inclusion of OH. It is concluded that OH can be included in rabbit diets at levels up to 100 g/kg, but negative effect on digestion and performance were observed with the increasing of OH (150 g/kg).

Keywords

cecum fermentationcarcass traitsgrowth performanceoat hullsrabbit
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , June 2017 , pp. 968 - 974
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

These two authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC) 1995. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Bellier, R and Gidenne, T 1996. Consequence of reduced fibre intake on digestion, rate of passage and caecal microbial activity in the young rabbit. British Journal of Nutrition 75, 353–363.Google Scholar
Carabaño, R, García, J and de Blas, JC 2001. Effect of fiber source on ileal apparent digestibility of non-starch polysaccharides in rabbits. Animal Science Journal 72, 343–350.Google Scholar
Carabaño, R, Motta Ferreira, W, de Blas, JC and Fraga, MJ 1997. Substitution of sugarbeet pulp for alfalfa hay in diets for growing rabbits. Animal Feed Science and Technology 65, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellini, C, Cardinali, R, Rebollar, PG, Dal Bosco, A, Jimeno, V and Cossu, ME 2007. Feeding fresh chicory (Chicoria intybus) to young rabbits: performance, development of gastro-intestinal tract and immune functions of appendix and Peyer’s patch. Animal Feed Science and Technology 134, 56–65.Google Scholar
Chao, HY and Li, FC 2008. Effect of level of fiber on performance and digestion traits in growing rabbits. Animal Feed Science and Technology 144, 279–291.Google Scholar
Chiang, BL, Sheih, YH, Wang, LH and Liao, CK 2000. Enhancing immunity by dietary consumption of a probiotic lactic acid bacterium (Bifidobacterium lactis HN019): optimization and definition of cellular immune responses. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 54, 849–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobos, A, de la Hoz, L, Cambero, MI and Ordoñez, JA 1995. Sugar-beet pulp as an alternative ingredient of barley in rabbit diets and its effect on rabbit meat. Meat Science 39, 113–121.Google Scholar
Dal, B, Mourvaki, E, Cardinali, R, Servili, M, Sebastiani, B, Ruggeri, S, Mattioli, S, Taticchi, A, Esposto, S and Castellini, C 2012. Effect of dietary supplementation with olive pomaces on the performance and meat quality of growing rabbits. Meat Science 92, 783–788.Google Scholar
David, S and John, D 1978. A study of the need for fibre by the growing New Zealand white rabbit. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 29, 640–648.Google Scholar
de Blas, JC, García, J and Carabaño, R 1999. Role of fibre in rabbit diets. A review. Annales De Zootechnie 48, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Blas, JC and Mateos, GG 1998. Feed formulation. In The nutrition of rabbit (ed. C de Blas and J Wiseman), pp. 241–253. CABI Publishing, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
DePeters, EJ, Fadel, JG and Arosamena, A 1997. Digestion kinetics of neutral detergent fiber and chemical composition within selected by-product feedstuffs. Animal Feed Science Technology 67, 127–140.Google Scholar
Escalona, B, Rocha, R, García, J, Carabaño, R and De Blas, JC 1999. Characterization of in situ fibre digestion of several fibrous feedstuffs. Animal Science Journal 68, 217–221.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization 2011. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Fraga, MJ, Pérez de Ayala, P, Carabaño, R and De Blas, JC 1991. Effect of type of fiber on the rate of passage and on the contribution of soft feces to nutrient intake of finishing rabbits. Journal of Animal Science 69, 1566–1574.Google Scholar
Fraser, J and McCartney, D 2004. Fodder oats in North America: chapter III. In Fodder oats: a world overview. FAO plant production and protection series NO°33 (ed. JM Suttie and SG Reynolds), 251 pp. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
García, G, Galvez, JF and de Blas, JC 1993. Effect of substitution of sugar beet pulp for barley in diets for finishing rabbits on growth performance and on energy and nitrogen efficiency. Journal of Animal Science 711, 823–1830.Google Scholar
García, J, Gidenne, T, Falcão-e-Cunha, L and de Blas, JC 2002a. Identification of the main factors that influence caecal fermentation traits in growing rabbits. Animal Research 51, 165–173.Google Scholar
García, J, Nicodemus, N, Carabaño, R and de Blas, JC 2002b. Effect of inclusion of defatted grape seed meal in the diet on digestion and performance of growing rabbits. Journal of Animal Science 80, 162–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gidenne, T 1992. Effect of fiber level, particle size and adaptation period on digestibility and rate of passage as measured at the ileum and in the faeces in the adult rabbit. British Journal of Nutrition 67, 133–146.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T and Perez, JM 1994. Dietary lignin in growing rabbits. I. Consequences on digestibility and rate of passage. Annales De Zootechnie 43, 313–322.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T, Pinheiro, V and Falcao-e-Cunha, L 2000. A comprehensive approach of the rabbit digestion: consequences of a reduction in dietary fibre supply. Livestock Production Science 64, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T, Carabaño, R, García, J and De Blas, JC 2010a. Fiber digestion. In Nutrition of the Rabbit (ed. J Wiseman and C De Blas), pp. 66–82. CABI, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Gidenne, T, Garcia, J, Lebas, F and Licois, D 2010b. Nutrition and feeding strategy: interactions with pathology. In Nutrition of the Rabbit (ed. C De Blas and J Wiseman), pp. 179–199. CABI, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T, Jehl, N, Lapanouse, A and Segura, M 2004. Inter-relationship of microbial activity, digestion and gut health in the rabbit: effect of substituting fiber by starch in diets having a high proportion of rapidly fermentable polysaccharides. British Journal of Nutrition 104, 92–95.Google Scholar
Goering, HK and Van Soest, PJ 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agricultural handbook no. 379. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA. 20 pp.Google Scholar
Gómez-Conde, MS, de Rozas, AP, Badiola, I, Pérez-Alba, L, de Blas, JC and Carabaño, R 2009. Effect of neutral detergent soluble fiber on digestion, intestinal microbiota and performance in twenty-five-day-old weaned rabbits. Livestock Science 8, 125–192.Google Scholar
Hall, MB, Pell, AN and Chase, LE 1998. Characteristics of neutral detergent-soluble fiber fermentation by mixed ruminal microbes. Animal Feed Science and Technology 70, 23–39.Google Scholar
Margüenda, I, Nicodemus, N, Vadillo, S, Sevilla, L, García-Rebollar, P, Villarroel, M, Romero, C and Carabaño, R 2012. Effect of dietary type and level of fiber on rabbit carcass yield and its microbiological characteristics. Livestock Science 145, 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
María, GC, Ana, PR, Ignacio, B, Luis, PA, Carlos, B, Rosa, C and Javier, G 2007. Effect of neutral detergent soluble fibre on digestion, intestinal microbiota and performance in twenty five day old weaned-rabbits. Livestock Science 125, 192–198.Google Scholar
Maríaet, GC, García, J, Chamorro, S, Eiras, P, Rebollar, G, Pérez de, A, Badiola, C, de Blas and Carabaño, R 2007. Neutral detergent-soluble fiber improves gut barrier function in twenty-five-day-old weaned rabbits. Journal of Animal Science 85, 3313–3321.Google Scholar
Martínez, VB, Martínez, PE, Ródenas, L, Moya, VJ, Cervera, C, Pascual, JJ and Blas, E 2013. Partial replacement of starch with acid detergent fibre and/or neutral detergent soluble fibre at two protein levels: effects on ileal apparent digestibility and caecal environment of growing rabbits. Livestock Science 154, 123–130.Google Scholar
National Research Council 1989. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 6th revised edition. The National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Nicodemus, N, Carabaño, R, García, J, Méndez, J and de Blas, C 1999. Performance response of lactating and growing rabbits to dietary lignin content. Animal Feed Science and Technology 80, 43–54.Google Scholar
Partridge, GG, Garthwaite, PH and Findlay, M 1989. Protein and energy retention by growing rabbits offered diets with increasing proportions of fiber. Journal of Agriculture Science 112, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, JM, Lebas, F, Gidenne, T, Maertens, L, Xiccato, G, Parigi-Bini, R, Dalle Zotte, A, Cossu, ME, Carazzolo, A, Villamide, MJ, Carabaño, R, Fraga, MJ, Ramos, MA, Cervera, C, Blas, E, Fernández, J, Falcao e Cunha, L and Bengala Freire, J 1995. European reference method for in vivo determination of diet digestibility in rabbits. World Rabbit Science 3, 41–43.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, V, Guede, CM, Outor-Monteir, D and Mourao, JL 2009. Effects of fibre level and dietary mannanoligosaccharides on digestibility, caecal volatile fatty acids and performances of growing rabbits. Animal Feed Science and Technology 148, 288–300.Google Scholar
Qiao, H, Duffy, LC, Griffiths, E, Dryja, D, Leavens, A, Rossman, J, Rich, G, Riepenhoff-Talty, M and Locniskar, M 2002. Immune responses in rhesus rotavirus-challenged balb/c mice treated with Bifidobacteria and prebiotic supplements. Pediatric Research 51, 750–755.Google Scholar
Tao, ZY and Li, FC 2006. Effects of dietary neutral detergent fiber (NDF) on production performance, nutrient utilization, caecum fermentation and fibrolytic activity in 2–3 month New Zealand rabbits. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 90, 467–473.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, MW 1967. Phenol hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry 39, 971–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar