Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:03:38.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of crude protein concentration and sugar-beet pulp on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, intestinal fermentation and manure ammonia and odour emissions from finisher pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

M. B. Lynch ,
C. J. O’Shea ,
T. Sweeney ,
J. J. Callan  and
J. V. O’Doherty
M. B. Lynch
Affiliation:
UCD, School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
C. J. O’Shea
Affiliation:
UCD, School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
T. Sweeney
Affiliation:
UCD, School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
J. J. Callan
Affiliation:
UCD, School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
J. V. O’Doherty*
Affiliation:
UCD, School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A 2 × 2 factorial experiment was conducted to investigate the interaction between high and low dietary crude protein (CP) (200 v. 150 g/kg) and sugar-beet pulp (SBP) (200 v. 0 g/kg) on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen (N) excretion, intestinal fermentation and manure ammonia and odour emissions from 24 boars (n = 6, 74.0 kg live weight). The diets were formulated to contain similar concentrations of digestible energy (13.6 MJ/kg) and lysine (10.0 g/kg). Pigs offered SBP-containing diets had a reduced (P < 0.05) digestibility of dry matter, ash, N, gross energy and an increased (P < 0.001) digestibility of neutral-detergent fibre compared with pigs offered diets containing no SBP. There was an interaction between CP and SBP on urinary N excretion and the urine : faeces N ratio. Pigs offered the 200 g/kg CP SBP-based diet had reduced urine : faeces N ratio (P < 0.05) and urinary N excretion (P < 0.05) compared with those offered the 200 g/kg CP diet without SBP. However, there was no effect of SBP in pigs offered 150 g/kg CP diets. Manure ammonia emissions were reduced by 33% from 0 to 240 h (P < 0.01); however, odour emissions were increased by 41% (P < 0.05) when pigs were offered SBP diets. Decreasing dietary CP to 150 g/kg reduced total N excretion (P < 0.001) and ammonia emissions from 0 to 240 h (P < 0.05). There was an interaction between dietary CP and SBP on branched-chain fatty acids (P < 0.001) in caecal digesta. Pigs offered the 200 g/kg CP SBP-containing diet reduced branched-chain fatty acids in the caecum compared with pigs offered the 200 g/kg CP diet containing no SBP. However, there was no effect of SBP in the 150 g/kg CP diet. In conclusion, pigs offered SBP-containing diets had a reduced manure ammonia emissions and increased odour emissions compared with diets containing no SBP. Pigs offered the 200 g/kg CP SBP-containing diet had a reduced urine : faeces N ratio and urinary N excretion compared with those offered the 200 g/kg CP diet containing no SBP.

Keywords

ammoniaodourpigsproteinsugar-beet pulp
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , March 2008 , pp. 425 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarnink, AJA, Hoeksma, P, van Ouwerkerk, ENJ 1993. Factor affecting ammonium concentration in slurry from fattening pigs. In Nitrogen flow in pig production and environmental consequences (ed. GJM van Kempen), pp. 413–420. Pudoc Scientific Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1995. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Bertin, C, Rouau, X, Barry, JL, Thibault, JF, De Baynast, R 1988. Structure and properties of sugar-beet fibres. Journal of the Science of Food Agriculture 44, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canh, TT, Aarnink, AJA, Verstegen, MWA, Schrama, JW 1998a. Influence of dietary factors on the pH and ammonia emission of slurry from growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1123–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canh, TT, Aarnink, AJA, Schutte, JB, Sutton, A, Langhout, DJ, Verstegen, MWA 1998b. Dietary protein affects nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission from manure of growing-finishing pigs. Livestock Production Science 56, 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canh, TT, Verstegen, MWA, Aarnink, AJA, Schrama, JW 1997. Influence of dietary factors on nitrogen partitioning and composition of urine and faeces of fattening pigs. Journal of Animal Science 75, 700–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, DA, O’Mara, FP, O’Doherty, JV 2004. The effect of dietary crude protein concentration on growth performance, carcass composition and nitrogen excretion in entire grower-finisher pigs. Irish Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 43, 227–236.Google Scholar
Close, WH 1994. Feeding new genotypes: establishing amino acid/energy requirements. In Principles of pig science (ed. DJA Cole, J Wiseman and MA Varley), pp. 123–140. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Conway, EJ 1957. Microdiffusion analysis and volumetric error. Crosby Lockwood and Son, London.Google Scholar
Curtis, SE 1993. Environmental management in animal agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Decuypere JA, Spriet SM and Van Gils LG 1994. Influence of the water-holding capacity (WHC) of the feed on the precaecal and faecal apparent digestibility in pigs. In Digestive physiology in the pig (ed. WB Souffrant and H Hagemeister), EAAP no. 88, pp. 125–128. Bad Doberan.Google Scholar
Derikx, PJL, Aarnink, AJA 1993. Reduction of ammonia emission from manure by application of liquid top layers. In Nitrogen flow in pig production and environmental consequences (ed. MWA Verstegen, LA den Hartog, GJM van Kempen and JHM Metz), EAAP publication no. 69, pp. 344–349. Purdoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Freire, JPB, Guerreiro, AJG, Cunha, LF, Aumaitre, A 2000. Effect of dietary fibre source on total tract digestibility, caecum volatile fatty acids and digestive transit time in the weaned piglet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 87, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garry, BP, Fogarty, M, Curran, TP, O’Connell, MJ, O’Doherty, JV 2007. The effect of cereal type and enzyme addition on pig performance, intestinal microflora, and ammonia and odour emissions. Animal 1, 751–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, GR, Roberfroid, MB 1995. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. The Journal of Nutrition 125, 1401–1412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillon, F, Auffert, A, Robertson, JA, Thibault, JF, Barry, JL 1998. Relationships between physical characteristics of sugar-beet fibre and its fermentability by human faecal flora. Carbohydrate Polymers 37, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, ET, Leek, ABG, Curran, TP, Dodd, VA, Carton, OT, Beattie, VE, O’Doherty, JV 2004. The influence of diet crude protein level on odour and ammonia emissions from finishing pig houses. Bioresource Technology 91, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbs, PJ, Misslebrook, TH, Pain, BF 1997. Characterisation of odorous components and emissions from slurries produced from weaner pigs fed dry feed and liquid diets. Journal of the Science Food and Agriculture 73, 437–445.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, KJ, Lawler, DF 1989. Acid base reactions in gas transfer: a mathematical approach. Journal of the American Water Works Association 81, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwaki, K, Nimura, N, Hiraga, Y, Kinoshita, T, Takeda, K, Ogura, H 1987. Amino acid analysis by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatographic Science 407, 273–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le, PD, Aarnink, AJA, Ogink, NWM, Becker, PM, Verstegen, MWA 2005. Odour from animal production: its’ relation to diet. Nutrition Research Review 18, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, PD, Aarnink, AJA, Jongbloed, AW, Van der Peet-Schwering, CMC, Ogink, NWM, Verstegen, MWA 2007. Effects of dietary crude protein level on odour from pig manure. Animal 1, 734–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leek, AGB, Hayes, E, Curran, TP, Callan, JJ, Dodd, VA, Beattie, VE, O’Doherty, JV 2007. The influence of manure composition on emissions of odour and ammonia from finishing pigs fed different concentrations of dietary crude protein. Bioresource Technology 98, 3431–3439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leek, ABG, Callan, JJ, Henry, RW, O’Doherty, JV 2005. The application of low crude protein wheat-soyabean diets to growing and finishing pigs. 2. The effects on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, faecal volatile fatty acid concentration and ammonia emission from boars. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 44, 247–260.Google Scholar
Liu QDSB and Hoff SJ 1993. Utilising ammonia concentrations as an odour threshold indicator for swine facilities. Proceedings of the IVth International Symposium on Livestock Environment, pp. 678–685.Google Scholar
Lizardo, R, Peiniau, J, Aumaitre, A 1997. Inclusion of sugar-beet pulp and change of protein source in the diet of the weaned piglet and their effects on digestive performance and enzymatic activities. Animal Feed Science and Technology 66, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch MB, Sweeney T, Callan JJ and O’Doherty JV 2007. The effect of high and low dietary crude protein and inulin supplementation on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, intestinal microflora and manure ammonia emissions from finisher pigs. Animal 1, 1112–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, RI 1994. Microbial production of odour components. In Proceedings of International Round Table on Swine Odor Control, 13–15th June 1994, pp. 18–19. Iowa State University Publication, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Mackie, RI, Stroot, PG, Varel, VH 1998. Biological identification and biological origin of key odour compounds in livestock waste. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1331–1342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connell, JM, Callan, JJ, Byrne, C, Sweeney, T, O’Doherty, JV 2005. The effect of cereal type and exogenous enzyme supplementation in pig diets on nutrient digestibility, intestinal microflora, volatile fatty acid concentration and manure ammonia emissions from pigs. Animal Science 81, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, JM, Callan, JJ, O’Doherty, JV 2006. The effect of dietary crude protein level, cereal type and exogenous enzyme supplementation on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, faecal volatile fatty acid concentration and ammonia emission from pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 127, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, DH, Phillips, VR 1992. Review of the control of odour nuisance from livestock buildings. 3. Properties of the odorous substances which have been identified in livestock wastes and in the air around them. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 53, 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, KM, Sweeney, T, Callan, JJ, Byrne, C, McCarthy, P, O’Doherty, JV 2006. The effect of inclusion of a high lactose supplement in finishing diets on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, volatile fatty acid concentrations and ammonia emission from boars. Animal Feed Science and Technology 125, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilnik, W, Voragen, AGJ 1992. Advances in plant cell biochemistry and biotechnology 1, pp. 219–270. JAI Press, Greenwich.Google Scholar
Porter, MG, Murray, RS 2001. The volatility of components of grass silage on oven drying and the inter-relationship between dry-matter content estimated by different analytical methods. Grass and Forage Science 56, 405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, HS, Holtug, K, Mortensen, PB 1988. Degradation of amino acids to short chain fatty acids in humans. An in-vitro study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 23, 178–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rideout, TC, Fan, MZ, Cant, JP, Wanger-Riddle, C, Stonehouse, P 2004. Excretion of major odour-causing and acidifying compounds in response to dietary supplementation of chicory inulin in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 1678–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, JA, Muirson, SD, Chesson, A 1987. Estimation of the potential digestibility and rate of degradation of water-insoluble dietary fibre in the pig caecum with a modified nylon bag technique. The Journal of Nutrition 117, 1402–1409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauvant, D, Perez, JM, Tran, G 2004. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials. Pigs, Poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses, fish. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 1985. Statistical analysis systems, version 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Sutton, AL, Kephart, KB, Verstegen, MWA, Cahn, TT, Hobbs, PJ 1999. Potential for reduction of odorous compounds in swine manure through diet modification. Journal of Animal Science 77, 430–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Peet-Schwering, CMC, Aarnink, AJA, Rom, HB, Dourmad, JY 1999. Ammonia emissions from pig houses in The Netherlands, Denmark and France. Livestock Production Science 58, 265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verdoes N and Ogink NWM 1997. Odour emission from pig houses with low ammonia emission. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ammonia and Odour Control from Pig Production Facilities, 252–317.Google Scholar
Zhu, J 2000. A review of microbiology in swine manure odor control. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 78, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zonderland, J, De Leeuw, J, Nolten, C, Spoolder, H 2004. Assessing long-term behavioural effects of feeding motivation in group-housed pregnant sows: what, when and how to observe. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87, 15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar