Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:42:08.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of a topical anaesthetic formulation on the cortisol response to surgical castration of unweaned beef calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2015

D. McCarthy ,
S. Lomax ,
P. A. Windsor  and
P. J. White
D. McCarthy*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
S. Lomax
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
P. A. Windsor
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
P. J. White
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Impracticality and cost of existing pain management strategies during surgical castration of beef cattle have limited their widespread implementation on-farm. A farmer-applied topical anaesthetic formulation, originally developed and used commercially to mitigate the pain of mulesing in lambs, was investigated for its potential use for managing pain in surgically castrated calves. This formulation contained lidocaine, bupivacaine, adrenalin and cetrimide. In this study, 24 Angus bull calves were randomly allocated to (1) surgical castration (C, n=8), (2) surgical castration with the post-operative application of topical anaesthetic (CTA, n=8) and (3) sham castration/control (CON, n=8). The experiment was conducted over 2 days, with treatment groups evenly represented across each day. Calves were habituated to handling before the experiment and blood samples were collected for plasma cortisol measurement at defined time periods before, at and post treatment, (at −0.5, 0 h, then +0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4 and 6 h). There was a significant effect of time on cortisol concentrations across all treatment groups (P<0.01), with lowest concentrations at −0.5 and 6 h and peak concentration at 0.5 h being significantly higher than the cortisol response at 0 h. The effect of treatment was not significant (P=0.077), however, there was a trend for CON calves to display lower cortisol concentrations than C and CTA calves and CTA calves to display lower cortisol concentrations than C calves. The mean area under the curve (AUC) of CON calves was significantly lower than those of C and CTA calves (P=0.04), however, there was no significant difference between the AUCs of CTA and C calves. Immediate application of topical anaesthetic after surgical castration did not significantly reduce plasma cortisol concentrations. However, the trend for CTA calves to display lower cortisol concentrations than C calves warrants further investigation into the use of TA for pain relief of surgically castrated beef calves.

Keywords

castrationcattlecortisoltopical anaestheticpain management
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 150 - 156
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alam, MGS and Dobson, H 1986. Effect of various veterinary procedures on plasma concentrations of cortisol, luteinising hormone and prostaglandin F2 alpha metabolite in the cow. Veterinary Record 118, 7–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budzynska, M and Weary, DM 2008. Weaning distress in dairy calves: effects of alternative weaning procedures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 112, 33–39.Google Scholar
Coetzee, JF 2011. A review of pain assessment techniques and pharmacological approaches to pain relief after bovine castration: practical implications for cattle production within the United States. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135, 192–213.Google Scholar
Coetzee, JF 2013. Assessment and management of pain associated with castration in cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America, Food Animal Practice 29, 75–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coetzee, JF, Lubbers, BV, Toerber, SE, Gehring, R, Thomson, DU, White, BJ and Apley, MD 2008. Plasma concentrations of substance P and cortisol in beef calves after castration or simulated castration. American Journal of Veterinary Research 69, 751–762.Google Scholar
Cooke, RF, Arthington, JD, Austin, BR and Yelich, JV 2009. Effects of acclimation to handling on performance, reproductive, and physiological responses of Brahman-crossbred heifers. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3403–3412.Google Scholar
Earley, B and Crowe, MA 2002. Effects of ketoprofen alone or in combination with local anaesthesia during the castration of bull calves on plasma cortisol, immunological, and inflammatory responses. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1044–1052.Google Scholar
Fisher, AD, Crowe, MA, Alonso de la Varga, ME and Enright, WJ 1996. Effect of castration method and the provision of local anesthesia on plasma cortisol, scrotal circumference, growth, and feed intake of bull calves. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2336–2343.Google Scholar
Gann, DS and Egdahl, RH 1965. Responses of adrenal corticosteroid secretion to hypotension and hypovolemia. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 44, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopster, H, van der Werf, JTN, Erkens, JHF and Blokhuis, HJ 1999. Effects of repeated jugular puncture on plasma cortisol concentrations in loose-housed dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 77, 708–714.Google Scholar
Lay, DC Jr, Friend, TH, Bowers, CL, Grissom, KK and Jenkins, OC 1992. A comparative physiological and behavioral study of freeze and hot-iron branding using dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1121–1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lay, DC Jr, Friend, TH, Randel, RD, Bowers, CL, Grissom, KK, Neuendorff, DA and Jenkins, OC 1998. Effects of restricted nursing on physiological and behavioral reactions of Brahman calves to subsequent restraint and weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56, 109–119.Google Scholar
Loberg, JM, Hernandez, CE, Thierfelder, T, Jensen, MB, Berg, C and Lidfors, L 2008. Weaning and separation in two steps – A way to decrease stress in dairy calves suckled by foster cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111, 222–234.Google Scholar
Lomax, S, Dickson, H, Sheil, M and Windsor, PA 2010. Topical anaesthesia alleviates short-term pain of castration and tail docking in lambs. Australian Veterinary Journal 88, 67–74.Google Scholar
Lomax, S, Sheil, M and Windsor, PA 2008. Impact of topical anaesthesia on pain alleviation and wound healing in lambs after mulesing. Australian Veterinary Journal 86, 159–168.Google Scholar
Lomax, S, Sheil, M and Windsor, PA 2013. Duration of action of a topical anaesthetic formulation for pain management of mulesing of sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 91, 160–167.Google Scholar
Lomax, S and Windsor, PA 2013. Topical anesthesia mitigates the pain of castration in beef calves. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4945–4952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, DJ, Cook, CJ and Stafford, KJ 2000. Quantifying some responses to pain as a stressor. In The biology of animal stress: basic principles and implications for animal welfare (ed. GP Moberg and JA Mench), pp 171–198. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Molony, V and Kent, JE 1997. Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using behavioral and physiological measurements. Journal of Animal Science 75, 266–272.Google Scholar
O’Loughlin, A, McGee, M, Doyle, S and Earley, B 2014. Biomarker responses to weaning stress in beef calves. Research in Veterinary Science 97, 458–463.Google Scholar
Paull, DR, Lee, C, Colditz, IG, Atkinson, SJ and Fisher, AD 2007. The effect of a topical anaesthetic formulation, systemic flunixin and carprofen, singly or in combination, on cortisol and behavioural responses of Merino lambs to mulesing. Australian Veterinary Journal 85, 98–106.Google Scholar
Pesenhofer, G, Palme, R, Pesenhofer, RM and Kofler, J 2006. Comparison of two methods of fixation during functional claw trimming – walk-in crush versus tilt table – in dairy cows using faecal cortisol metabolite concentrations and daily milk yield as parameters. Wiener Tierarztliche Monatsschrift 93, 288–294.Google Scholar
Petherick, JC 2005. Animal welfare issues associated with extensive livestock production: the northern Australian beef cattle industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, 211–234.Google Scholar
Puig, CJ, Greiner, R, Huchery, C, Perkins, I, Bowen, L, Collier, N and Garnett, ST 2011. Beyond cattle: potential futures of the pastoral industry in the Northern Territory. The Rangeland Journal 33, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichl, M and Quinton, D 1987. Comparison of 1% lignocaine with 0.5% bupivacaine in digital ring blocks. Journal of Hand Surgery 12, 375–376.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ and Mellor, DJ 2005. The welfare significance of the castration of cattle: a review. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 53, 271–278.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ, Mellor, DJ, Todd, SE, Bruce, RA and Ward, RN 2002. Effects of local anaesthesia or local anaesthesia plus a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug on the acute cortisol response of calves to five different methods of castration. Research in Veterinary Science 73, 61–70.Google Scholar
Stewart, M, Verkerk, GA, Stafford, KJ, Schaefer, AL and Webster, JR 2010. Noninvasive assessment of autonomic activity for evaluation of pain in calves, using surgical castration as a model. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3602–3609.Google Scholar
Stilwell, G, Carvalho, RC, Carolino, N, Lima, MS and Broom, DM 2010. Effect of hot-iron disbudding on behaviour and plasma cortisol of calves sedated with xylazine. Research in Veterinary Science 88, 188–193.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Davis, BL, Brooks, TA and McGlone, JJ 2010. Physiology and behavior of pigs before and after castration: effects of two topical anesthetics. Animal 4, 2071–2079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sylvester, SP, Mellor, DJ, Stafford, KJ, Bruce, RA and Ward, RN 1998. Acute cortisol responses of calves to scoop dehorning using local anaesthesia and/or cautery of the wound. Australian Veterinary Journal 76, 118–122.Google Scholar
Tagawa, M, Okano, S, Sako, T, Orima, H and Steffey, EP 1994. Effect of change in body position on cardiopulmonary function and plasma cortisol in cattle. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 56, 131–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, STL, Earley, B, Hughes, JML and Crowe, MA 2003. Effect of ketoprofen, lidocaine local anesthesia, and combined xylazine and lidocaine caudal epidural anesthesia during castration of beef cattle on stress responses, immunity, growth and behavior. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1281–1293.Google Scholar
Veissier, I and Le Neindre, P 1988. Cortisol responses to physical and pharmacological stimuli in heifers. Reproduction Nutrition Development 28, 553–562.Google Scholar
Webster, HB, Morin, D, Jarrell, V, Shipley, C, Brown, L, Green, A, Wallace, R and Constable, PD 2013. Effects of local anesthesia and flunixin meglumine on the acute cortisol response, behavior, and performance of young dairy calves undergoing surgical castration. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 6285–6300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed