Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:24:44.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic values of rabbit traits in different production systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2020

Z. Krupová Open the ORCID record for Z. Krupová [Opens in a new window] ,
M. Wolfová ,
E. Krupa  and
Z. Volek
Z. Krupová*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, PragueUhříněves10400, Czech Republic
M. Wolfová
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, PragueUhříněves10400, Czech Republic
E. Krupa
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, PragueUhříněves10400, Czech Republic
Z. Volek
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, PragueUhříněves10400, Czech Republic
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In animal breeding, genetic parameters along with economic weights (EWs) of traits are applied. Profit functions currently used to calculate rabbit traits’ EWs do not consider nutrient requirements based on animal weight, growth rate and doe reproductive status. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a flexible bioeconomic model of rabbit-production systems and implement it in a computer programme in order to calculate economic values and relative EWs for rabbit traits. The bioeconomic model includes calculation of the doe age structure in the stationary state of a doe population; calculation of progeny structure; modelling growth, digestible energy, feed and water requirements for does in different reproductive statuses and for all progeny groups using a normative approach; calculation of the total feed and non-feed costs, revenues and profit per doe and per year; calculation of marginal economic values for up to 20 production and functional traits and estimation of the relative EWs of selected traits. The application of the programme is shown through an example calculation of trait economic values for a typical Czech commercial rabbit-production system. The trait economic value expresses the change in profit per doe and per year when the trait mean is increased by one unit. The programme developed is primarily useful for selection purposes in rabbit-breeding systems. Using this programme, some economic analyses of the impact of production, management and economic circumstances on the economic efficiency of various rabbit-production systems can also be performed.

Keywords

bioeconomic modeleconomic weightsgrowthfeed efficiencyfunctional traits
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 9 , September 2020 , pp. 1943 - 1951
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armero, Q and Blasco, A 1992. Economic weight for rabbit selection indices. Journal of Applied Rabbit Research 15, 637–642.Google Scholar
Cartuche, L, Pascual, M, Gómez, EA and Blasco, A 2014. Economic weights in rabbit meat production. World Rabbit Science 22, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Blas, C and Wiseman, J 1998. Nutrition of the rabbit. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
de Blas, C and Wiseman, J 2010. Nutrition of the rabbit, 2nd edition. 238 p. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drouilhet, H, Gilbert, E, Balmisse, E, Ruesche, J, Tircazes, C, Larzul, C and Garreau, H 2013. Genetic parameters for two selection criteria for feed efficiency in rabbits. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3121–3128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eady, SJ and Garreau, H 2008. An enterprise gross margin model to explore the influence of selection criteria for breeding programs and changes to management systems. In Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress, 10–13 June 2008, Verona, Italy.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT database. Retrieved on 6 November 2019 from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QLGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T, Garreau, H, Drouilhet, L, Aubert, C and Maertens, L 2017. Improving feed efficiency in rabbit production, a review on nutritional, technico-economical, genetic and environmental aspects. Animal Feed Science and Technology 225, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T, Lebas, F and Fortun-Lemonthe, L 2010. Feeding behaviour of rabbits. In Nutrition of the rabbit, 2nd edition (ed. de Blas, C and Wiseman, J), pp. 233–252. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korteby, MH 2016. Heritability and correlation of the zootechnical performance of the Algerian local rabbit. International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences 3, 36–41.Google Scholar
Krupa, E, Wolfová, M and Krupová, Z 2019. Userʼs manual for the program package ECOWEIGHT (C programs for calculating economic weights in livestock), version 9.0.0. Part 7: program EWRAB (version 2.0.1) for rabbits. Institute of Animal Science, Prague Uhříněves, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Matics, ZS, Nagy, I, Gerencér, ZS, Radnai, I, Gyovai, P, Donkó, T, Dalle Zotte, A, Curik, I and Szendrő, ZS 2014. Pannon breeding program in rabbit at Kaposvár University. World Rabbit Science 22, 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNitt, JI 2009. Economics and management for commercial meat rabbit production. Southern University Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. Retrieved on 3 June 2019 from https://fdocuments.net/document/economics-and-management-for-commercial-and-management-for-commercial-meat-rabbit.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic 2018. Situační a výhledová zpráva. Králíci (Situation and Outlook Report. Rabbit) Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. Retrieved on 1 November 2019, from http://www.akcr.cz/data_ak/19/k/KraliciSVZ2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, NT, Farcas, J, Szendrő, ZS and Nagy, I 2017. Genetic evaluation of litter size traits in Pannon white rabbits. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 82, 63–67.Google Scholar
Petracci, M, Bianchi, M and Cavani, C 2009. Development of rabbit meat products fortified with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Nutrients 1, 111–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasad, R and Karim, SA 1998. Effect of dietary energy and protein level on performance and digestibility parameters in pregnant and in lactating rabbit does under tropical environment. World Rabbit Science 6, 271–276.Google Scholar
Prayaga, KC and Eady, SJ 2000. Rabbit farming for meat production in Australia: preliminary estimates of economic values for production traits. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 13(suppl. June), 357–359.Google Scholar
Szendrõ, K, Szendrõ, ZS, Gerencsér, ZS, Radnai, I, Horn, P and Matics, ZS 2016. Comparison of productive and carcass trait and economic value of lines selected for different criteria, slaughtered at similar weights. World Rabbit Science 24, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, J, Wolfová, M, Žáková, E, Krupová, Z and Krupa, E 2015. Userʼs manual for the program package ECOWEIGHT (C programs for calculating economic weights in livestock), version 7.3.1. Part 4: program EWPIG (version 1.1.0) for pigs. Institute of Animal Science, Prague Uhříněves, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Wolfová, M, Wolf, J, Krupová, Z, Krupa, E and Žáková, E 2017. Estimation of economic values for traits of pig breeds in different breeding systems. I. MODEL development. Livestock Science 205, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiccato, G and Trocino, A 2010. Energy and protein metabolism and requirements. In Nutrition of the rabbit, 2nd edition (ed. de Blas, C and Wiseman, J), pp. 83–118. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar