Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:19:07.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Daily grazing time as a risk factor for alterations at the hock joint integument in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

E. Burow ,
P. T. Thomsen ,
T. Rousing  and
J. T. Sørensen
E. Burow*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
P. T. Thomsen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
T. Rousing
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
J. T. Sørensen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Structural changes lead to increasing sizes of dairy herds and a reduction in grazing use. Thus, cows spend more time in the barn and become more exposed to the barn environment. The cubicle surface can result in damages of the cows’ hock joint integument. Pasture is generally seen as a beneficial environment for cows. We hypothesized that a higher number of daily grazing hours reduce the probability of hock joint alterations in dairy cows from large herds. In total, 3148 lactating cows from 36 grazing and 20 zero-grazing dairy herds, with an average herd size of 173 cows, were assessed individually on one randomly selected body side for alterations in hock integument (score 0 for no alterations or hairless areas <2 cm, 1 for at least one hairless area of ⩾2 cm, 2 for lesion or swelling). The cows were further assessed for lameness and cleanliness. Information on breed, parity and days in milk per cow was extracted from a national database. Cubicle surface was evaluated for each herd. Daily grazing hours 30 days before herd visits were recorded by the stockmen and later categorized as follows: zero hours (zero-grazing), few hours (3 to 9) and many hours (>9 to 21). The effects of daily grazing hours and other potential cow and herd-level risk factors were evaluated for their impact on hock integument alterations using a logistic analysis with a multi-level model structure. The probability for hock integument alterations such as hair loss, lesions or swellings decreased with increasing amount of grazing hours (odds of 3 to 9 h 2.2 times and odds of >9 to 21 h 4.8 times lower than of zero-grazing). The probability for only lesions or swellings decreased with >9 to 21 grazing hours (odds 2.1 times) but not with 3 to 9 h (odds 1.0 times) compared with zero-grazing. Lameness, hard cubicle surface and Danish Holstein v. other breeds showed an increasing effect on the probability for integument alterations. Increase in days in milk only showed an increasing effect on the probability for lesions and swellings. We concluded that a long daily stay on pasture is most beneficial for the hock joint integument of a dairy cow.

Keywords

grazing timeintegumentinjurylesiondairy cow
Type
Behaviour, welfare and health
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 160 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chapinal, N, de Passillé, AM, Rushen, J 2010. Correlated changes in behavioral indicators of lameness in dairy cows following hoof trimming. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 5758–5763.Google Scholar
Cochran, WG 1977. Sampling techniques, pp. 74–76. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Corrazin, M, Piasentier, E, Dovier, S, Bovolenta, S 2010. Effect of summer grazing on welfare of dairy cows reared in mountain tie-stall barns. Italian Journal of Animal Science 9, 304–312.Google Scholar
Dohoo, I, Wayne, M, Stryhn, H 2009. Veterinary epidemiology research, 2nd edition, p. 38. VER Inc., Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.Google Scholar
Ellis, KA, Billington, K, McNeil, B, McKeegan, DEF 2009. Public opinion on UK milk marketing and dairy cow welfare. Animal Welfare 18, 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskell, MJ, Rennie, LJ, Bowell, VA, Bell, MJ, Lawrence, AB 2006. Housing system, milk production, and zero-grazing effects on lameness and leg injury in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4249–4266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keil, NM, Wiederkehr, TU, Friedli, K, Wechsler, B 2006. Effects of frequency and duration of outdoor exercise on the prevalence of hock lesions in tied Swiss dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 74, 142–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ketelaar-de Lauwere, CC, Ipema, AH, van Ouwerkerk, ENJ, Hendriks, MMWB, Metz, JHM, Noordhuizen, JPTM, Schouten, WGP 1999. Voluntary automatic milking in combination with grazing of dairy cows milking frequency and effects on behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 64, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielland, C, Ruud, LE, Zanella, AJ, Osteras, O 2009. Prevalence and risk factors for skin lesions on legs of dairy cattle housed in freestalls in Norway. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5487–5496.Google Scholar
Lombard, JE, Tucker, CB, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Kopral, CA, Weary, DM 2010. Associations between cow hygiene, hock injuries, and free stall usage on US dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 4668–4676.Google Scholar
Norring, M, Manninen, E, de Passilé, AM, Rushen, J, Munksgaard, L, Saloniemi, H 2008. Effects of sand and straw bedding on the lying behavior, cleanliness, and hoof and hock injuries of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 570–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potterton, SL, Green, MJ, Harris, J, Millar, KM, Whay, HR, Huxley, JN 2011. Risk factors associated with hair loss, ulceration and swelling at the hock in free stall-housed UK dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2952–2963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J, Pobourcq, E, de Passille, AM 2007. Validation of two measures of lameness in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 106, 173–177.Google Scholar
Rutherford, KMD, Langford, FM, Jack, MC, Sherwood, L, Lawrence, AB, Haskell, MJ 2008. Hock injury prevalence and associated risk factors on organic and nonorganic dairy farms in the United Kingdom. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2265–2274.Google Scholar
Welfare Quality ® 2009. Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, The Netherlands, ISBN978-90-78240-04-4.Google Scholar
Winckler, C, Brinkmann, J, Glatz, J 2007. Long-term consistency of selected animal-related welfare parameters in dairy farms. Animal Welfare 16, 197–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar