Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:31:23.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural measures reflect pain-mitigating effects of meloxicam in combination with Tri-Solfen® in mulesed Merino lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2019

L. Inglis ,
S. Hancock Open the ORCID record for S. Hancock [Opens in a new window] ,
M. Laurence Open the ORCID record for M. Laurence [Opens in a new window]  and
A. Thompson
L. Inglis
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
S. Hancock
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
M. Laurence
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
A. Thompson*
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Flystrike costs the Australian industry $173 to 280 M per annum and 70% to 80% of Merino lambs are currently mulesed to reduce the risk of flystrike. To alleviate welfare concerns there has been widespread adoption of analgesics to mitigate the pain associated with mulesing. The objective of this experiment was to determine the effectiveness of Tri-Solfen® and meloxicam (Metacam® 20) at reducing pain-related behavioural responses to mulesing in Merino lambs. One hundred and forty Merino lambs were allocated to one of seven treatment groups: (1) non-mulesed (Control); (2) mulesed with no pain relief; (3) subcutaneous (s.c.) meloxicam administered 15 min before mulesing; (4) Tri-Solfen® administered at time of mulesing; (5) Tri-Solfen® and saline injection (s.c.) 15 min before mulesing; (6) Tri-Solfen® and meloxicam (s.c.) 15 min before mulesing; and (7) meloxicam (s.c.) at time the of mulesing. Behavioural responses such as standing, walking and lying were measured every 15 min for 6 h on the day of marking and for up to 2 h for 4 days thereafter. Standing (hunched v. normal) and walking (stiff v. normal) behaviours were then categorised into pain- and normal-related behaviours while lying remained in its own category. Mulesed lambs with no pain relief displayed significantly more pain-related behaviours than Control lambs during the 6 h post-mulesing (1.22 v. 0.22 out of a total score of 3; RSD=1.15). Lambs that received a combination of pain relief displayed significantly less pain-related behaviour than mulesed lambs with no pain relief on the day of mulesing (0.85 v. 1.22 out of a total score of 3; RSD=1.15). Administration of meloxicam or Tri-Solfen® on their own had minimal if any significant effect on pain-related behaviours on the day of mulesing. The results of this experiment support the use of pain-related behaviours to measure the efficacy of analgesics and the use of multimodal analgesia during mulesing of lambs.

Keywords

mulesinganalgesiabehavioursheepwelfare
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 11 , November 2019 , pp. 2586 - 2593
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chapman, R, Fell, L and Shutt, D 1994. A comparison of stress in surgically and non-surgically mulesed sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 71, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coetzee, JF, Mosher, R and Allen, PS 2009. Phatmacokentics of intraveous and oral Meloxicam in ruminant calves. Veterinary Therapeutics 10, 1–8.Google Scholar
Coetzee, H and Smith, R 2010. Recommendations for castration and dehorning of cattle. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 19–21 August 2010, pp. 40–45.Google Scholar
Colditz, I, Paull, D, Hervault, G, Aubriot, D and Lee, C 2011. Development of a lameness model in sheep for assessing efficacy of analgesics. Australian Veterinary Journal 89, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, P, Bailey, PJ, Goldenberg, MM and Ford-Hutchinson, AW 1984. The role of arachidonic acid oxygenation products in pain and inflammation. Annual Review of Immunology 2, 335–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fell, L and Shutt, D 1989. Behavioural and hormonal responses to acute surgical stress in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, C 2004. Behavioural responses of lambs to common painful husbandry procedures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87, 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keita, A, Pagot, E, Prunier, A and Guidarini, C 2010. Pre-emptive meloxicam for opst-operative analgesia in piglets undergoing surgical castration. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 37, 367–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, J, Jubb, T, Shephard, R, Webb-Ware, J and Fordyce, G 2015. Priority list of endemic diseases for the red meat industries. Meat & Livestock Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Lee, C and Fisher, AD 2007. Welfare consequences of mulesing of sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 85, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lees, P, McKellar, Q, Foot, R and Gettinby, G 1998. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of tolfenamicacid in ruminating calves: evaluation in models of acute inflammation. The Veterinary Journal 155, 275–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lomax, S, Sheil, M and Windsor, P 2008. Impact of topical anaesthesia on pain alleviation and wound healing in lambs after mulesing. Australian Veterinary Journal 86, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lomax, S, Sheil, M and Windsor, P 2013. Duration of action of a topical anaesthetic formulation for pain management of mulesing in sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 91, 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, KA 2002. Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory analgesics: a review of current practice. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care 12, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, D and Murray, L 1989. Effects of tail docking and castration on behaviour and plasma cortisol concentrations in young lambs. Research of Veterinary Science 46, 387–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molony, V and Kent, J 1997. Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using beahvioural and physiological measurements. Journal of Animal Science 75, 266–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molony, V, Kent, J and McKendrick, I 2002. Validation of a method for assessment of an acute pain in lambs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 76, 215–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paull, D, Lee, C, Atkinson, S and Fisher, A 2008. Effects of meloxicam or tolfenamic acid administration on the pain and stress responses of Merino lambs to mulesing. Australian Veterinary Journal 86, 303–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paull, D, Lee, C, Colditz, I, Atkinson, S and Fisher, A 2007. The effect of a topical anaesthetic formulation, systemic flunixin and carprofen, singly or in combination, on cortisol and behavioural responses of Merino lambs to mulesing. Australian Veterinary Journal 85, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, CJ 2009. A review of mulesing and other methods to control flystrike (cutaneous myiasis) in sheep. Animal Welfare 18, 113–121.Google Scholar
Ricciotti, E and FitzGerald, GA 2011. Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 31, 986–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, D, Holmes, P, Abbott, K, Jephcott, S and Barber, M 2006. Assessing the economic cost of endemic disease on the profitability of Australian beef cattle and sheep producers. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, A, Hasler-Nguyen, N and Zijlstra, J 2009. Preferential uptake of the non steroid anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac into inflamed tissues after a single oral dose in rats. BMC Pharmacology 9, 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheil, ML 2015. Analgesia for surgical husbandry procedures in sheep and other livestock. Animal Ethics Pty Ltd, Associate Sydney University Faculty of Veterinary Science, Sydney, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Shukla, M, Singh, G, Sindhura, B, Telang, A, Rao, G and Malik, J 2007. Comparative plasma pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in sheep and goats following intravenous administration. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology 145, 528–532.Google ScholarPubMed
Shutt, D, Fell, L, Connell, R, Bell, A, Wallace, C and Smith, A 1987. Stress-induced changes in plasma concentrations of immunoreactive ß-endorphin and cortisol in response to routine surgical procedures in lambs. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 40, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, A, Belson, S, Holm, M and Colditz, I 2014. Efficacy of a buccal meloxicam formulation for pain relief in Merino lambs undergoing knife castration and tail docking in a randomised field trial. Australian Veterinary Journal 92, 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, ML, Coetzee, JF, KuKanich, B and Smith, BI 2013. Pharmacokinetics of intravenously and orally administered meloxicam in sheep. American Journal of Veterinary Research 74, 779–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P and Waterman-Pearson, A 1999. Quantification of the pain and distress responses to castration in young lambs. Research of Veterinary Science 66, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VSN International 2017. Genstat Reference Manual. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.Google Scholar
Welsh, E, McKellar, Q and Nolan, A 1993. The pharmacokinetics of flunixin meglumine in the sheep. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 16, 181–188.10.1111/j.1365-2885.1993.tb00162.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zöls, S, Ritzmann, M and Heinritzi, K 2005. Effect of analgesics on the castration of male piglets. Berliner Und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 119, 193–196.Google Scholar