Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:18:48.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Barley and oat cultivars with diverse carbohydrate composition alter ileal and total tract nutrient digestibility and fermentation metabolites in weaned piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

R. Jha ,
B. Rossnagel ,
R. Pieper ,
A. Van Kessel  and
P. Leterme
R. Jha
Affiliation:
Prairie Swine Centre Inc., 2105 8th Street E., Saskatoon, SK, S7H 5N9, Canada Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada
B. Rossnagel
Affiliation:
Crop Development Centre, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada
R. Pieper
Affiliation:
Prairie Swine Centre Inc., 2105 8th Street E., Saskatoon, SK, S7H 5N9, Canada Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada
A. Van Kessel
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada
P. Leterme*
Affiliation:
Prairie Swine Centre Inc., 2105 8th Street E., Saskatoon, SK, S7H 5N9, Canada
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of cereal carbohydrate form (isolated v. cereal matrix) and level, especially mixed-linked β-glucan (hereafter referred to as β-glucan) and starch amylase/amylopectin ratio on nutrient digestibility and fermentation parameters in the intestines of weaned pigs. Four hulless barley cultivars containing varying β-glucan levels (41 to 84 g/kg) were compared with hulled barley, supplemented or not with a β-glucan concentrate (BBG; 270 g/kg β-glucan) and two oat cultivars for digestibility and fermentation metabolites. Seventy-two weaned piglets (BW = 12.8 ± 1.9 kg) were assigned to one of nine diets composed of 815 g/kg cereal, 60 g/kg whey, 90 g/kg soy protein isolate and 35 g/kg minerals. After 15 days, the pigs were killed, and digesta collected from ileum and colon were analyzed for proximate nutrients, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), lactic acid (LA) and ammonia. Ileal and total tract digestibility of proximate nutrients and non-starch polysaccharides (NSPs) were determined using HCl-insoluble ash as a marker. Organic matter (OM) ileal digestibility was greater (P < 0.05) for diets based on hulless barley (77% ± 1.1% on average), as compared with hulled barley (64% ± 1.4%) and oat (58% ± 1.5%). Similar trends were found for total tract OM digestibility, varying from 90% ± 0.3% for hulless barley to 67% ± 0.4% for oat, on average. NSP digestibility differed (P < 0.05) within and between cereal types, ranging from 20% (hulled barley plus 163 g/kg BBG or ∼40 g/kg β-glucan) to 51% (SB94893 hulless barley cultivar with high β-glucan and high amylose ratio) at the ileum and from 44% (hulled barley) to 84% (SB94893 cultivar) at the total tract level. No dietary effect (P > 0.05) was found for SCFA concentration in ileal contents, whereas in colonic contents, SCFA was lower in pigs fed oat (P < 0.001). LA concentration was greater (P < 0.001) in the colon of pigs fed hulless barley than in pigs fed hulled barley and oat. Expressed per kg carbohydrate (NSP + starch) fermented, the ammonia concentration at the colon was lowest for hulled barley diets (supplemented with β-glucan) and the highest for oat diets. In conclusion, the interaction of both form and level of β-glucan impacted nutrient digestibility and fermentation. Hulless barleys with high soluble NSP such as β-glucan and resistant starch yielded, in general higher SCFA and LA and lower ammonia. Hulless barleys may, therefore, have potential for use in feeding strategies designed to improve gut health in pigs.

Keywords

barley, β-glucan, digestibility, fermentation, piglets
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 5 , May 2010 , pp. 724 - 731
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC 2007. Official methods of analysis, 18th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Awati, A, Williams, BA, Bosch, MW, Gerrits, WJJ, Verstegen, MWA 2006. Effect of inclusion of fermentable carbohydrates in the diet on fermentation end-product profile in feces of weanling piglets. Journal of Animal Science 84, 2133–2140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach Knudsen, KE 2001. The nutritional significance of “dietary fibre” analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE, Borgjensen, B, Andersen, JO, Hansen, I 1991. Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions 2. Microbial activity in the gastrointestinal tract. The British Journal of Nutrition 65, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach Knudsen, KE, Canibe, N 2000. Breakdown of plant carbohydrates in the digestive tract of pigs fed on wheat- or oat-based rolls. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 80, 1253–1261.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE, Hansen, I 1991. Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions 1. Digestibility and bulking properties of polysaccharides and other major constituents. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach Knudsen, KE, Jensen, BB, Hansen, I 1993a. Digestion of polysaccharides and other major components in the small and large intestine of pigs fed on diets consisting of oat fractions rich in ß-D-glucan. The British Journal of Nutrition 70, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE, Jensen, BB, Hansen, I 1993b. Oat bran but not a beta-glucan-enriched oat fraction enhances butyrate production in the large intestine of pigs. The Journal of Nutrition 123, 1235–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE, Laerke, HN, Jorgensen, H 2008. The role of fibre in nutrient utilization and animal health. In Proceedings of the 29th Western Nutrition Conference, Edmonton, AB, 93–107.Google Scholar
Bhatty, RS 1999. The Potential of Hull-less Barley. Cereal Chemistry 76, 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouhnik, Y, Raskine, L, Simoneau, G, Vicaut, E, Neut, C, Flourié, B, Brouns, F, Bornet, FR 2004. Capacity of nondigestible carbohydrates to stimulate bifidobacteria in healthy humans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 80, 1658–1664.Google Scholar
Brennan, CS, Cleary, LJ 2005. The potential use of cereal (1/3,1/4)-b-d-glucans as functional food ingredients. Journal of Cereal Science 42, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, I, Warhurst, M, Arcot, J, Playne, M, Illman, RJ, Topping, DL 1997. Fecal numbers of bifidobacteria are higher in pigs fed Bifidobacterium longum with a high amylose cornstarch than with a low amylose cornstarch. The Journal of Nutrition 127, 1822–1827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CCAC 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. Vol. 1, 2nd edition. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, ON, USA.Google Scholar
Charalampopoulos, D, Wang, R, Pandiella, SS, Webb, C 2002. Application of cereals and cereal components in functional foods: a review. International Journal of Food Microbiology 79, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniel, M, Wisker, E, Rave, G, Feldheim, W 1997. Fermentation in human subjects of nonstarch polysaccharides in mixed diets, but not in a barley fiber concentrate, could be predicted by in vitro fermentation using human fecal inocula. The Journal of Nutrition 127, 1981–1988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Lange, CFM, Sauer, WC, Mosenthin, R, Souffrant, WB 1989. The effect of feeding different protein-free diets on the recovery and amino acid composition of endogenous protein collected from the distal ileum and feces in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 67, 746–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dongowski, G, Huth, M, Gebhardt, E, Flamme, W 2002. Dietary fiber-rich barley poducts beneficially affect the intestinal tract of rats. The Journal of Nutrition 132, 3704–3714.Google Scholar
Englyst, HN, Quigley, ME, Hudson, GJ 1994. Determination of dietary fibre as non-starch polysaccharides with gas-liquid chromatographic, high-performance liquid chromatographic or spectrophotometric measurement of constituent sugars. Analyst 119, 1497–1509.Google Scholar
Flint, HJ, Bayer, EA, Rincon, MT, Lamed, R, White, BA 2008. Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6, 121–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gómez, C, Navarro, A, Manzanares, P, Horta, A, Carbonell, JV 1997. Physical and structural properties of barley (1 -->3),(1 -->4)-beta-glucan. Part II. Viscosity, chain stiffness and macromolecular dimensions. Carbohydrate Polymers 32, 17–22.Google Scholar
Holtekjolen, AK, Uhlen, AK, Brathen, E, Sahlstrom, S, Knutsen, SH 2006. Contents of starch and non-starch polysaccharides in barley varieties of different origin. Food Chemistry 94, 348–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izydorczyk, MS, Storsley, J, Labossiere, D, MacGregor, AW, Rossnagel, BG 2000. Variation in total and soluble b-glucan content in hulless barley: effects of thermal, physical, and enzymatic treatments. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48, 982–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, HN, Bach Knudsen, KE, Wood, PJ, Fulcher, RG 1997. Physico-chemical properties and the degradation of oat bran polysaccharides in the gut of pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 73, 81–92.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laerke, HN, Hedemann, MS, Bach Knudsen, KE, Laurinen, P, Lindberg, J-E, Pedersen, C 2007. Association between butyrate and short-chain fatty acid concentrations in gut contents and faeces in weaning piglets. Livestock Science. 10th International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs, Denmark 2006, 108 (Part 1), 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Goff, G, Noblet, J, Cherbut, C 2003. Intrinsic ability of the faecal microbial flora to ferment dietary fibre at different growth stages of pigs. Livestock Production Science 81, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leterme, P, Souffrant, WB, Thewis, A 2000. Effect of barley fibres and barley intake on the ileal endogenous nitrogen losses in piglets. Journal of Cereal Science 31, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, MB, Callan, JJ, O’Doherty, JV 2008. The interaction between lactose level and enzyme supplementation and form of barley processing on performance, digestibility and faecal volatile fatty acid concentration of weanling pigs fed barley-based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 140, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, S, Macfarlane, GT 2003. Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 62, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macfarlane, GT, Gibson, GR, Beatty, E, Cummings, JH 1992. Estimation of short-chain fatty acid production from protein by human intestinal bacteria based on branched-chain fatty acid measurements. FEMS Microbiology Letters 101, 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novozamsky, I, van Eck, R, van Schouwenburg, JC, Walinga, I 1974. Total nitrogen determination in plant material by means of the indophenolblue method. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 22, 3–5.Google Scholar
Oscarsson, M, Andersson, R, Salomonsson, AC, Åman, P 1996. Chemical composition of barley samples focusing on dietary fibre components. Journal of Cereal Science 24, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieper, R, Jha, R, Rossnagel, B, Van Kessel, AG, Souffrant, WB, Leterme, P 2008. Effect of barley and oat cultivars with different carbohydrate compositions on the intestinal bacterial communities in weaned piglets. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 66, 556–566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluske, JR, Black, B, Pethick, DW, Mullan, BP, Hampson, DJ 2003. Effects of different sources and levels of dietary fibre in diets on performance, digesta characteristics and antibiotic treatment of pigs after weaning. Animal Feed Science and Technology 107, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS 2003. SAS user’s guide: Statistics. Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Stanogias, G, Pearce, GR 1985. The digestion of fibre by pigs 3. Effects of the amount and type of fibre on physical characteristics of segments of the gastrointestinal tract. The British Journal of Nutrition 53, 537–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Topping, D 2007. Cereal complex carbohydrates and their contribution to human health. Journal of Cereal Science 46, 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, P, Veldman, A, Boisen, S, Deuring, K, Van Kempen, GJM, Derksen, GB, Verstegen, MWA, Schaafsma, G 1996. Apparent ileal dry matter and crude protein digestibility of rations fed to pigs and determined with the use of chromic oxide (Cr2O3) and acid-insoluble ash as digestive markers. The British Journal of Nutrition 76, 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ 1985. Definition of fibre in animal feeds. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. W Haresign and DJA Cole), pp. 55–70. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, BA, Bosch, MW, Awati, A, Konstantinov, SR, Smidt, H, Akkermans, ADL, Verstegen, MWA, Tamminga, S 2005. In vitro assessment of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) fermentation in pigs: fermentable substrates and microbial activity. Animal Research 54, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, JMW, de Souza, R, Kendall, CWC, Emam, A, Jenkins, DJA 2006. Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 40, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yun, SH, Matheson, NK 1990. Estimation of amylose content of starches after precipitation of amylopectin by concanavalin-A. Starch-Stärke 42, 302–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar