Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:56:16.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of founders and performance test effects on an autochthonous horse population through pedigree analysis: structure, genetic variability and inbreeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2018

A. Giontella Open the ORCID record for A. Giontella [Opens in a new window] ,
C. Pieramati ,
M. Silvestrelli  and
F. M. Sarti
A. Giontella*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine – Sportive Horse Research Center, University of Perugia, via S. Costanzo 4, 06123 Perugia, Italy
C. Pieramati
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine – Sportive Horse Research Center, University of Perugia, via S. Costanzo 4, 06123 Perugia, Italy
M. Silvestrelli
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine – Sportive Horse Research Center, University of Perugia, via S. Costanzo 4, 06123 Perugia, Italy
F. M. Sarti
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno, 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The Maremmano is an autochthonous Italian horse breed, which probably descended from the native horses of the Etruscans (VI century B.C.); the Studbook was acknowledged in 1980, and it includes 12 368 horses born from that year up to 2015. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the selection program on the genetic variability of the Maremmano population; the analysis was performed using both the ‘Endog v 4.8’ program available at http://webs.ucm.es/info/prodanim/html/JP_Web.htm and in-house software on official pedigree data. Four Reference Populations were considered, and the most important one was the population of the 12 368 Maremmano horses officially registered in the National Studbook. The pedigree completeness of this population was very good because it was more than 90% at the third parental generation and more than 70% at the fifth generation; the pedigree traced back to a maximum of 10.50 generations with an average of 3.30 complete generations and 5.70 equivalent complete generations. The average generation interval was 10.65±4.72 years, with stallions used for longer periods than mares. The intervals ranged from 10.15±4.45 (mother–daughter) to 10.99±4.93 (father–daughter). The effective number of founders (fe) was 74 and the effective number of ancestors (fa) was 30 so that the ratio fe/fa was 2.47. The founder genome equivalents (fg) was 13.72 with a ratio fg/fe equal to 0.18. The mean of the genetic conservation index was 5.55±3.37, and it ranged from 0.81 to 21.32. The average inbreeding coefficient was 2.94%, with an increase of 0.1%/year, and the average relatedness coefficient was 5.52%. The effective population size (Ne) computed by an individual increase in inbreeding was 68.1±13.00; the Ne on equivalent generations was 42.00, and this value slightly increased to 42.20 when computed by Log regression on equivalent generations. The analysis confirmed the presence of seven traditional male lines. The percentage of Thoroughbred blood in the foals born in 2015 was 20.30% and has increased 0.21%/year since 1980; in particular, it increased more than twice (0.51%/year) until 1993 and afterwards slightly fluctuated. The pedigree analysis confirmed the completeness of genealogical information and the traditional importance that breeders gave to the male lines; although the genetic diversity of Maremmano seemed to be not endangered by the selection program, some effects on the population structure were found and a more scientific approach to genetic conservation should be incorporated in the selection plans.

Keywords

maremmano horsefounders analysisgenetic diversityeffective population sizeselection program
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 15 - 24
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achilli, A, Olivieri, A, Soares, P, Lancioni, H, Kashani, BH, Perego, UA, Nergadze, SG, Carossa, V, Santagostino, M, Capomaccio, S, Felicetti, M, Al-Achkar, W, Penedo, MCT, Verini-Supplizi, A, Houshmand, M, Woodward, SR, Semino, O, Silvestrelli, M, Giulotto, E, Pereira, L, Bandelt, HJ and Torroni, A 2012. Mitochondrial genomes from modern horses reveal the major haplogroups that underwent domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 2449–2454.Google Scholar
Alderson, L 1992. A system to maximize the maintenance of genetic variability in small populations. In Genetic conservation of domestic livestock (ed. L Alderson and I Bodó), pp 18–29. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Ballou, JD and Lacy, RC 1995. Identifying genetically important individuals for management of genetic variation in pedigreed populations. In Population management for survival and recovery: analytical methods and strategies in small population management (ed. JD Ballou, M Gilpin and TJ Foose), pp 76–111. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Boichard, D, Maignel, L and Verrier, É 1997. The value of using probabilities of gene origin to measure genetic variability in a population. Genetics Selection Evolution 29, 5–23.Google Scholar
Bonavolontà, G and Silvestrelli, M 1989. Il Maremmano. Bramante edizioni Equestri, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
Caballero, A and Toro, MA 2000. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genetics research 75, 331–343.Google Scholar
Cardinali, I, Lancioni, H, Giontella, A, Capodiferro, MR, Capomaccio, S, Buttazzoni, L, Biggio, GP, Cherchi, R, Albertini, E, Olivieri, A, Cappelli, K, Achilli, A and Silvestrelli, M 2016. An Overview of Ten Italian Horse Breeds through Mitochondrial DNA. Plos One 11, 4.Google Scholar
Cervantes, I, Molina, A, Goyache, F, Gutierrez, JP and Valera, M 2008. Population history and genetic variability in the Spanish Arab Horse assessed via pedigree analysis. Livestock Science. 113, 24–33.Google Scholar
Druml, T, Baumung, R and Sölkner, J 2009. Pedigree analysis in the Austrian Noriker draught horse: genetic diversity and the impact of breeding for coat colour on population structure. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 126, 348–356.Google Scholar
Duru, S 2017. Pedigree analysis of the Turkish Arab horse population: structure, inbreeding and genetic variability. Animal. 9, 1449–1456.Google Scholar
Goyache, F, Gutiérrez, JP, Fernández, I, Gómez, E, Álvarez, I, Díez, J and Royo, LJ 2003. Using pedigree information to monitor genetic variability of endangered populations: the Xalda sheep breed of Asturias as an example. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 120, 95–103.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, JP and Goyache, F 2005. A note on ENDOG: a computer program for analysing pedigree information. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 122, 172–176.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, JP, Altarriba, J, Díaz, C, Quintanilla, AR, Cañón, J and Piedrafita, J 2003. Genetic analysis of eight Spanish beef cattle breeds. Genetics Selection Evolution 35, 43–64.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, JP, Cervantes, I, Molina, A, Valera, M and Goyache, F 2008. Individual increase in inbreeding allows estimating realised effective sizes from pedigrees. Genetics Selection Evolution 40, 359–378.Google Scholar
James, JW 1977. A note on selection differentials and generation length when generations overlap. Animal Production. 24, 109–112.Google Scholar
Lancioni, H, Capomaccio, S, Felicetti, M, Cappelli, K, Silvestrelli, M, Verini Supplizi, A and Achilli, A 2011. Horse Mitochondrial Genome Analyses to Define the Origin of Ancient Human Populations. In Proceeding of the joint AGI-SIBV-SIGA Meeting, 19–22th September 2017, Assisi, Italy, 2A.61.Google Scholar
McManus, C, Santos, SA, Lima Dallago, BS, Rezende Paiva, S, Saraiva Martins, RF, Braccini Neto, J, Rocha Marques, P and Pinto de Abreu, UG 2013. Evaluation of conservation program for the Pantaneiro horse in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 42, 404–413.Google Scholar
Medeiros, BR, Bertoli, CD, Garbade, P and McManus, CM 2014. Brazilian Sport Horse: pedigree analysis of the Brasileiro de Hipismo breed. Italian Journal of Animal Science 13, 3146.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, T and Luo, Z 1992. Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. Genetics Selection Evolution 24, 305–313.Google Scholar
Petersen, JL, Mickelson, JR, Cleary, KD and McCue, ME 2014. The American Quarter Horse: population structure and relationship to the Thoroughbred. Journal of Heredity 105, 148–162.Google Scholar
Petersen, JL, Mickelson, JR, Cothran, EG, Andersson, LS, Axelsson, J, Bailey, E, Bannasch, D, Binns, MM, Borges, AS, Brama, P, da Câmara Machado, A, Distl, O, Felicetti, M, Fox-Clipsham, L, Graves, KT, Guérin, G, Haase, B, Hasegawa, T, Hemmann, K, Hill, EW, Leeb, T, Lindgren, G, Lohi, H, Lopes, MS, McGivney, BS, Mikko, S, Orr, N, Penedo, MCT, Piercy, RJ, Raekallio, M, Rieder, S, Røed, KH, Silvestrelli, M, Swinburne, J, Tozaki, T, Vaudin, M, Wade, CM and McCue, ME 2013. Genetic diversity in the modern horse illustrated from genome-wide SNP Data. Public Library of Science One 8, e54997.Google Scholar
Pjontek, J, Kadlečík, O, Kasarda, R and Horný, M 2012. Pedigree analysis in four Slovak endangered horse breeds. Czech Journal of Animal Science 57, 54–64.Google Scholar
Siderits, M, Baumung, R and Fuerst-Waltl, B 2013. Pedigree analysis in the German Paint Horse: genetic variability and the influence of pedigree quality. Livestock Science. 151, 152–157.Google Scholar
Valera, M, Molina, A, Gutiérrez, JP, Gómez, J and Goyache, F 2005. Pedigree Analysis in the Andalusian horse: population structure, genetic variability and influence of the Carthusian strain. Livestock Production Science 95, 57–66.Google Scholar
Vicente, AA, Carolino, N and Gama, LT 2012. Genetic diversity in the Lusitano horse breed assessed by pedigree analysis. Livestock Science. 148, 16–25.Google Scholar
Vostrá-Vydrová, H, Vostrý, L, Hofmanová, B, Krupa, E and Zavadilová, L 2016. Pedigree analysis of the endangered Old Kladruber horse population. Livestock Science. 185, 17–23.Google Scholar
Wright, S 1931. Evolution in Mendelian population. Genetics 16, 97–159.Google Scholar
Wright, S 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Volume 4: variability within and among natural populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Zechner, P, Sölkner, J, Bodo, I, Druml, T, Baumung, R, Achmann, R, Marti, E, Habe, F and Brem, G 2002. Analysis of diversity and population structure in the Lipizzan horse breed based on pedigree information. Livestock Production Science 77, 137–146.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Giontella et al. supplementary material

Figures S1 and S2

Download Giontella et al. supplementary material(File)
File 6.5 MB