Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:10:25.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Udder quarter milk composition at different levels of somatic cell count in cow composite milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

L. Forsbäck ,
H. Lindmark-Månsson ,
A. Andrén ,
M. Åkerstedt  and
K. Svennersten-Sjaunja
L. Forsbäck*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
H. Lindmark-Månsson
Affiliation:
Swedish Dairy Association, Lund, Sweden
A. Andrén
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
M. Åkerstedt
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
K. Svennersten-Sjaunja
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Automatic milking systems have made possible the separation of high- and low-quality milk at the udder quarter level during the milking process. The aim of this study was to investigate the composition and yield of milk from individual udder quarters to determine whether deteriorated milk composition occurs in udders that are assumed to be healthy and whether quarters with high-quality milk are found in udders with high milk somatic cell count (SCC). Milk samples were collected on one occasion from 90 cows at udder quarter level and cow composite level. The milk was analyzed for content of total protein, whey protein, casein, fat, lactose, citric acid and SCC; milk yield was registered. The cows were divided into three groups depending on the SCC of their composite milk. Cows in group 1, cow composite SCC < 100 000 cells/ml, were assumed to have healthy udders. However, instances of increased SCC and decreased milk quality were discovered in one or more udder quarters of approximately 30% of the group. Cows in group 2, cow composite SCC of 100 000 to 300 000 cells/ml, and group 3, cow composite SCC > 300 000 cells/ml, were assumed to have affected udders. However, the majority of these cows had one or more udder quarters in which increased SCC and deteriorated milk quality were not detected. Calculations of bulk-tank milk values, when separation of milk from affected udder quarters was performed, indicate that SCC changes to a much greater degree compared to the other milk components. These results show that milk from affected udder quarters suffers compositional changes, but calculations of simulated separation indicate that the compositional changes in bulk-tank milk are small. The effect of separation of milk from individual udder quarters on bulk-tank milk needs to be further studied.

Keywords

dairy cowquarter milkSCCmilk compositionmilk quality
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 5 , May 2009 , pp. 710 - 717
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auldist, MJ, Coats, S, Sutherland, BJ, Mayes, JJ, McDowell, GH, Rogers, GL 1996. Effects of somatic cell count and stage of lactation on raw milk composition and the yield and quality of Cheddar cheese. Journal of Dairy Research 63, 269–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkema, HW, Schukken, YH, Lam, TJGM, Galligan, DT, Beiboer, ML, Brand, A 1997. Estimation of interdependence among quarters of the bovine udder with subclinical mastitis and implications for analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1592–1599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berglund, I, Pettersson, G, Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2002. Automatic milking: effects on somatic cell count and teat end-quality. Livestock Production Science 78, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berglund, I, Pettersson, G, Östensson, K, Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2004. Frequency of individual udder quarters with elevated CMT scores in cows’ milk samples with low somatic cell counts. Veterinary Record 155, 213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berglund, I, Pettersson, G, Östensson, K, Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2007. Quarter milking for improved detection of increased SCC. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 42, 427–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brolund, L 1985. Cell counts in bovine milk causes of variation and applicability for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Supplementum 80, 1–123.Google ScholarPubMed
Coulon, J-B, Gasqui, P, Barnouin, J, Ollier, A, Pradel, P, Pomies, D 2002. Effect of mastitis and related-germ on milk yield and composition during naturally-occurring udder infections in dairy cows. Animal Research 51, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, MJ, Oldham, ER, Williams, TJ, Coyle, PA 1991. Quantitative and qualitative of host polymorphonuclear cells during experimentally induced Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in cows. American Journal of Veterinary Research 52, 474–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EC 2004. Regulation No. 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. Official Journal of the European Union L226, 22–82.Google Scholar
Haenlein, GFW, Schultz, LH, Zikakis, JP 1973. Composition of proteins in milk with varying leucocyte contents. Journal of Dairy Science 56, 1017–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, J 2002. Relationships between somatic cell count and milk composition. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 372, 56–59.Google Scholar
Hamann, J 2003. Definition of the physiological cell count threshold based on changes in milk composition. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 381, 9–12.Google Scholar
Harmon, RJ 1994. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2103–2112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hortet, P, Seegers, H 1998. Loss in milk yield and related composition changes resulting from clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 37, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hovinen, M, Aisla, AM, Pyörälä, S 2006. Accuracy and reliability of mastitis detection with electrical conductivity and milk colour measurement in automatic milking. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Sciences 56, 121–127.Google Scholar
Kitchen, BJ 1981. Review of the progress of dairy science: bovine mastitis: milk compositional changes and related diagnostic tests. Journal of Dairy Research 48, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, LB, Rasmussen, MD, Bjerring, M, Nielsen, JH 2004. Proteases and protein degradation in milk from cows infected with Streptococcus uberis. International Dairy Journal 14, 899–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, G, Silanikove, N, Jacobi, S, Weisblit, L, Bernstein, S, Merin, U 2008. The influence of storage on the farm and in dairy silos on milk quality for cheese production. International Dairy Journal 18, 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linzell, JL, Peaker, M 1972. Day-to-day variations in milk composition in the goat and cow as a guide to the detection of subclinical mastitis. British Veterinary Journal 128, 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merle, R, Schröder, A, Hamann, J 2007. Cell function in the bovine mammary gland: a preliminary study on interdependence of healthy and infected udder quarters. Journal of Dairy Research 74, 174–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, GL, Grieve, PA, Kitchen, BJ 1984. Effects of mastitis on milk yield, milk composition, processing properties and yield and quality of milk products. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology 39, 7–16.Google Scholar
Pyörälä, S, Pyörälä, E 1997. Accuracy of methods using somatic cell count and N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase activity in milk to assess the bacteriological cure of bovine clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 2820–2825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spörndly, R 2003. Feed tables for ruminants 2003 (Fodertabeller för idisslare 2003). Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, SLU Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute (SAS) 2004. SAS/STAT® 9.1 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Syrstad, O 1977. Day-to-day variation in milk yield, fat content and protein content. Livestock Production Science 4, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taponen, S, Koort, J, Björkroth, J, Saloniemi, H, Pyörälä, S 2007. Bovine intramammary infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci may persist throughout lactation according to amplified fragment length polymorphism-based analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3301–3307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolle, A, Heeschen, W, Reichmoth, J, Zeidler, H 1971. Counting of somatic cells in milk and possibilities for automation. Dairy Science Abstracts 33, 875–879.Google Scholar
Urech, E, Puhan, Z, Schällibaum, M 1999. Changes in milk protein fraction as affected by subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 2402–2411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed