Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:42:03.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards non-invasive methods to determine the effect of treatment of soya-bean meal on lysine availability in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

S. I. Borucki Castro ,
H. Lapierre ,
L. E. Phillip ,
P. W. Jardon  and
R. Berthiaume
S. I. Borucki Castro
Affiliation:
McGill University, Macdonald Campus, Ste Anne de Bellevue, Que., Canada H9X 3V9
H. Lapierre
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Sherbrooke, Que., Canada J1 M 1Z3
L. E. Phillip
Affiliation:
McGill University, Macdonald Campus, Ste Anne de Bellevue, Que., Canada H9X 3V9
P. W. Jardon
Affiliation:
West Central, Ralston, IA 51459, USA
R. Berthiaume*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Sherbrooke, Que., Canada J1 M 1Z3
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Lysine (Lys) availability in three different soya-bean meal (SBM) products was determined using the following techniques: whole body (WB) net flux of Lys, digestible Lys (duodenal flow × intestinal digestibility) and the plasma Lys response curve method of Rulquin and Kowalczyk (2003). Four multiparous Holstein cows (173 days in milk) were equipped with ruminal and duodenal cannulas and used in a 4 × 4 Latin square experiment with 14-day periods. The animals were fed either solvent-extracted SBM (SE), expeller-processed SBM (EP) or lignosulphonate-treated SBM (LS) at 23% of the diet dry matter (DM). The fourth treatment (SE70) consisted of a continuous infusion of Lys (70 g/day) into the omasum of cows fed the SE diet. Chromium(III) oxide was included as a digesta marker in order to determine the duodenal flow of amino acids (AA). On day 12 of each experimental period, six blood samples were collected to determine plasma Lys concentrations. Immediately after that, a pulse dose of L-[2–15N] Lys was administered in the jugular vein. Jugular blood samples were then collected at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 16, 19, 25 and 31 min after the injection to determine 15N Lys enrichment. On each of days 13 and 14, eight digesta samples were collected and pooled by period. Amongst the diets of SBM (SE, EP, LS), no differences were observed for duodenal Lys flow or digestible Lys. Duodenal flow of microbial N with SE was numerically higher, compared with EP and LS, indicating enhanced duodenal supply of microbial Lys for this diet, and this may have compensated for the additional Lys derived from undegradable protein in rumen-protected SBM products (EP and LS). The use of the plasma response curve method as well as the measurement of WB Lys flux also revealed no differences in Lys availability among the SBM products. The WB flux method resulted in 100% post-ruminal recovery of the Lys infused with diet SE70 compared with the control diet SE, which indicates that the method is reliable for determining Lys availability. The Lys flux approach not only allows for the estimation of intestinally available essential AA but also it avoids the use of cannulated animals.

Keywords

amino acid availabilityintestinal digestibilityirreversible loss ratelysine fluxsoya-bean meal
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , February 2008 , pp. 224 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aharoni, Y, Tagari, H 1991. Use of nitrogen-15 determinations of purine nitrogen fraction of digesta to define nitrogen metabolism traits in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 2540–2547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, MJ 1978. Production of branched-chain volatile fatty acids by certain anaerobic bacteria. Applied Environmental Microbiology 35, 872–877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Bequette, BJ, Metcalf, JA, Wray-Cahen, D, Backwell, FR, Sutton, JD, Lomax, MA, MacRae, JC, Lobley, GE 1996. Leucine and protein metabolism in the lactating dairy cow mammary gland: responses to supplemental dietary crude protein intake. Journal of Dairy Research 63, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borucki Castro, SI, Phillip, LE, Lapierre, H, Jardon, P, Berthiaume, R 2007. Ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of protein and amino acids in treated soybean meal products. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 810–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calder, AG, Smith, A 1988. Stable isotope ratio analysis of leucine and ketoisocaproic acid in blood plasma by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Use of tertiary butyldimethylsilyl derivatives. Rapid Communication in Mass Spectrometry 2, 14–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calder, AG, Garden, KE, Anderson, SE, Lobley, GE 1999. Quantification of blood and plasma amino acids using isotope dilution electron impact gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with U-13C amino acids as internal standard. Rapid Communication in Mass Spectrometry 13, 2080–2083.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care 1993. Guidelines to the care and use of experimental animals, 2nd edition, vol. 1 (ed. ED Olfert, BM Cross and AA McWilliam). Ottawa, Ont., Canada.Google Scholar
Clark, JH, Klusmeyer, TH, Cameron, MR 1992. Microbial protein synthesis and flows of nitrogen fractions to the duodenum of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 2304–2323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleale, R, Britton, MRA, Klopfenstein, TJ, Bauer, ML, Harmon, DL, Satterlee, LD 1987. Induced non-enzymatic browning of soybean meal. II. Ruminal escape and net portal absorption of soybean protein treated with xylose. Journal of Animal Science 65, 1319–1326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochran, WG, Cox, GM 1957. Experimental designs, 2nd edition. J Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA.Google Scholar
Cronjé, PB, Nolan, JV, Leng, RA 1992. Amino acid metabolism and whole-body protein turnover in lambs fed roughage-based diets: 1. Lysine and leucine metabolism. South African Journal of Animal Science 22, 194–200.Google Scholar
Erwin, ES, Marco, GJ, Emery, EM 1961. Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. Journal of Dairy Science 44, 1768–1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrard, JA 2002. Protein-protein crosslinking in food: methods, consequences, and applications. Trends in Food Science and Technology 13, 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinard, J, Rulquin, H 1994. Effects of graded amount of duodenal infusions of lysine on the mammary uptake of major milk precursors in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 3565–3576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, CM, Evans, MA, Schultz, TD 1999. Application of the bootstrap procedure provides an alternative to standard statistical procedures in the estimation of the vitamin B-6 requirement. Journal of Nutrition 129, 1915–1919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, PM, Lee, J, Sinclair, BR, Treolar, BP 1994. The effect of whole body cysteine supplementation on cysteine utilization by the skin of a well-fed sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 54, 139–142.Google Scholar
Holtrop, G, Lapierre, H, Lobley, GE 2004. Modelling transport of amino acids into the red blood cells of sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science 142, 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtanen, P, Brotz, PG, Satter, LD 1997. Omasal sampling technique for assessing fermentative digestion in the forestomach of dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1380–1392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ipharraguerre, IR, Clark, JH 2005. Impacts of the source and amount of crude protein on the intestinal supply of nitrogen fractions and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88 (E suppl.), E22–E37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ipharraguerre, IR, Clark, JH, Freeman, DE 2005. Rumen fermentation and intestinal supply of nutrients in dairy cows fed rumen-protected soy products. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2879–2892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, KJ, Bergen, WG, Sniffen, CJ, Grant, AL, Grieve, DB, King, VL, Ames, NK 1991. An assessment of absorbable lysine requirements in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 2530–2539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lapierre, H, Blouin, JP, Bernier, JF, Reynolds, CK, Dubreuil, P, Lobley, GE 2002. Effect of diet quality on whole body and splanchnic protein metabolism in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2631–2641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapierre, H, Berthiaume, R, Raggio, G, Thivierge, MC, Doepel, L, Pacheco, D, Dubreuil, P, Lobley, GE 2005. The route of absorbed nitrogen into milk protein. Animal Science 80, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobley, GE 1993. Protein metabolism and turnover. In Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism (ed. JM Forbes and J France). CAB International, Oxford, UK. Chapter 14.Google Scholar
Lobley, GE, Connell, A, Revell, DK, Bequette, BJ, Brown, DS, Calder, AG 1996. Splanchnic-bed transfers of amino acids in sheep blood and plasma, as monitored through use of a multiple U13-C-labelled amino acid mixture. British Journal of Nutrition 75, 217–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludden, PA, Cecava, MJ 1995. Supplemental protein sources for steers fed corn-based diets: I. Ruminal characteristics and intestinal amino acid flows. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1466–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabjeesh, SJ, Arieli, A, Buckental, I, Zamwell, S, Tagari, H 1996. Effect of type of protein supplementation on duodenal amino acid flow and absorption in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 1792–1801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makkar, HP, Becker, K 1999. Purine quantification in digesta from ruminants by spectrophotometric and HPLC methods. The British Journal of Nutrition 81, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansfield, HR, Stern, MD 1994. Effects of soybean hulls and lignosulfonate-treated soybean meal on ruminal fermentation in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 1070–1083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, JC, JrWebb, KE 1995. Absorption of L-carnosine, L-methionine, and L-methionylglycine by isolated sheep ruminal and omasal epithelial tissue. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3464–3475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mauron, J 1981. The Maillard reaction in food: a critical review from the nutritional standpoint. Progress in Food and Nutritional Science 5, 5–35.Google ScholarPubMed
National Research Council 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Novozamsky, I, van Eck, R, van Schouwenburg, JC, Walinga, I 1974. Total nitrogen determination in plant material by means of the indophenol-blue method. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 22, 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obispo, NE, Dehority, BA 1999. Feasibility of using total purines as a marker for ruminal bacteria. Journal of Animal Science 77, 3084–3095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raggio G 2006. Effets des apports protéique et énergétique sur le métabolisme protéique chez la vache laitière. PhD thesis, Université Laval, Que., Canada.Google Scholar
Raggio, G, Pacheco, D, Berthiaume, R, Lobley, GE, Pellerin, D, Allard, G, Dubreuil, P, Lapierre, H 2004. Effect of level of metabolizable protein on splachnic flux of amino acids in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 3461–3472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rémond, D, Bernard, L, Poncet, C 2000. Amino acid flux in ruminal and gastric veins of sheep: Effects of ruminal and omasal injections of free amino acids and carnosine. Journal of Animal Science 78, 158–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynal, SM, Broderick, GA 2003. Effects of feeding dairy cows protein supplements of varying ruminal degradability. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 835–843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynal, SM, Broderick, GA, Ahvenjarvi, S, Huhtanen, P 2003. Effect of feeding protein supplements of differing degradability on omasal flow of microbial and undegraded protein. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 1292–1305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rulquin, H, Kowalczyk, J 2003. Development of a method for measuring lysine and methionine bioavailability in rumen-protected products for cattle. Journal of the Animal and Feed Sciences 12, 465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rulquin, H, Vérité, R, Guinard-Flament, J, Pisulewski, PM 2001. Acides aminés digestibles dans l’intestin. Origines des variations chez les ruminants et répercussions sur les proéines du lait. INRA Productions Animals 14, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, JB, O’Connor, JD, Fox, DG, Van Soest, PJ, Sniffen, CJ 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I. Ruminal fermentation. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3551–3561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, FAP, Santos, JEP, Theurer, CB, Huber, JT 1998. Effects of rumen-undegradable protein on dairy cows performance: a 12-year literature review. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 3182–3213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 2001. System for Windows release 8.2 (TS2M0). SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Shipley, RA, Clark, RE 1972. Compartment analysis: two-pool open systems. In Tracer methods for in vivo kinetics. Theory and applications. Academy Press Inc., NY, USA. Chapter 2.Google Scholar
Siddons, RC, Paradine, J, Beever, DE, Cornell, PR 1985. Ytterbium acetate as a particulate-phase digesta – flow marker. The British Journal of Nutrition 54, 509–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, MD, Bach, A, Calsamiglia, S 1997. Alternative techniques for measuring nutrient digestion in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2256–2276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson JC 1994. Welfare concerns for farm animals used in agricultural and biomedical research and teaching. Animal Welfare Information Center Newsletter. United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Library. 1994. vol. 5, no. 1. Retrieved November 15, 2006. Online: http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/newsletters/v5n1.htm.Google Scholar
Titgemeyer, EC 1997. Design and interpretation of nutrient digestion studies. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2235–2247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Poel, AFB, Doorenbos, J, Huisman, J, Boer, H 1991. Evaluation of techniques to determine the protein digestibility of heat processed beans for pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 33, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterlow, JC, Garlick, PJ, Millward, DJ 1978. Protein turnover in mammalian tissues and in the whole body. Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam, Holland.Google Scholar
Windschitl, PM, Stern, MD 1988. Evaluation of the calcium lignosulfonate treated soybean meal as a source of rumen protected protein for dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 3310–3322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinn, RA, Owens, FN 1986. A rapid procedure for purine measurement and its use for estimating net ruminal protein synthesis. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 66, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar