Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:08:05.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward better estimates of the real-time individual amino acid requirements of growing-finishing pigs showing deviations from their typical feeding patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2020

L. Hauschild Open the ORCID record for L. Hauschild [Opens in a new window] ,
A. R. Kristensen ,
I. Andretta ,
A. Remus ,
L. S. Santos  and
C. Pomar
L. Hauschild*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal14883-108, Brazil
A. R. Kristensen
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 2, Frederiksberg C1870, Denmark
I. Andretta
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agronomy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul91540-000, Brazil
A. Remus
Affiliation:
Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2000 College Street, Sherbrooke, QuebecJ1M 1Z3, Canada
L. S. Santos
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Pastures, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro23897-000, Brazil
C. Pomar
Affiliation:
Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2000 College Street, Sherbrooke, QuebecJ1M 1Z3, Canada
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Pigs exposed to stressors might change their daily typical feeding intake pattern. The objective of this study was to develop a method for the early identification of deviations from an individual pig’s typical feeding patterns. In addition, a general approach was proposed to model feed intake and real-time individual nutrient requirements for pigs with atypical feeding patterns. First, a dynamic linear model (DLM) was proposed to model the typical daily feed intake (DFI) and daily gain (DG) patterns of pigs. Individual DFI and DG dynamics are described by a univariate DLM in conjunction with Kalman filtering. A standardized tabular cumulative sum (CUMSUM) control chart was applied to the forecast errors generated by DLM to activate an alarm when a pig showed deviations from its typical feeding patterns. The relative feed intake (RFI) during a challenge period was calculated. For that, the forecasted individual pig DFI is expressed as its highest DFI relative to the intake during pre-challenge period. Finally, the DLM and RFI approaches were integrated into the actual precision-feeding model (original model) to estimate real-time individual nutrient requirements for pigs with atypical feeding patterns. This general approach was evaluated with data from two studies (130 pigs, at 35.25 ± 3.9 kg of initial BW) that investigated during 84 days the effect of precision-feeding systems for growing-finishing pigs. The proposed general approach to estimating real-time individual nutrient requirements (updated model) was evaluated by comparing its estimates with those generated by the original model. For 11 individuals out of 130, the DLM did not fit the observed data well in a specific period, resulting in an increase in the sum of standardized forecast errors and in the number of time steps that the model needed to adapt to the new patterns. This poor fit can be identified by the increase in the CUMSUM with a consequent alarm generated. The results of this study show that the updated model made it possible to reduce intra-individual variation for the estimated lysine requirements in comparison with the original model, especially for individuals with atypical feeding patterns. In conclusion, the DLM in conjunction with CUMSUM could be used as a tool for the online monitoring of DFI for growing-finishing pigs. Moreover, the proposed general approach allows the estimation of real-time amino acid requirements and accounts for the reduced feed intake and growth potential of pigs with atypical feeding patterns.

Keywords

feeding behaviorprecision feedingmathematical modelsnutrient requirementschallenged pigs
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue S2: 9th Workshop on Modelling Nutrient Digestion and Utilization in Farm Animals (MODNUT) , August 2020 , pp. s371 - s381
Copyright
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Animal Consortium

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 1993. Recommended code of practice for the care and handling of farm animals: pigs. Publication 1898/E. AAFC, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
Andretta, I, Pomar, C, Kipper, M, Hauschild, L and Rivest, J 2016a. Feeding behavior of growing–finishing pigs reared under precision feeding strategies. Journal of Animal Science 94, 3042–3050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andretta, I, Pomar, C, Rivest, J, Pomar, J and Radünz, J 2016b. Precision feeding can significantly reduce lysine intake and nitrogen excretion without compromising the performance of growing pigs. Animal 10, 1137–1147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andretta, I, Pomar, C, Rivest, J, Pomar, J, Lovatto, PA and Radünz Neto, J 2014. The impact of feeding growing–finishing pigs with daily tailored diets using precision feeding techniques on animal performance, nutrient utilization, and body and carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science 92, 3925–3936.10.2527/jas.2014-7643CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canadian Council on Animal Care 2009. CCAC guidelines on: the care and use of farm animals in research, teaching and testing. CCAC, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
Cornou, C, Vinther, J and Kristensen, AR 2008. Automatic detection of oestrus and health disorders using data from electronic sow feeders. Livestock Science 118, 262–271.10.1016/j.livsci.2008.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Haer, LCM and de Vries, AG 1993. Feed intake patterns of and feed digestibility in growing pigs housed individually or in groups. Livestock Production Science 33, 277–292.10.1016/0301-6226(93)90008-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethlefsen, C 2002. Space time problems and applications. PhD thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
Garcia-Launay, F, Dusart, L, Espagnol, S, Laisse-Redoux, S, Gaudré, D, Méda, B and Wilfart, A 2018. Multiobjective formulation is an effective method to reduce environmental impacts of livestock feeds. British Journal of Nutrition 120, 1298–1309.10.1017/S0007114518002672CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González, LA, Tolkamp, BJ, Coffey, MP, Ferret, A and Kyriazakis, I 2008. Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 1017–1028.10.3168/jds.2007-0530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauschild, L, Kristensen, AR, Andretta, I, Remus, A, Santos, LS and Pomar, C 2019. Dynamic monitoring and real-time estimation of individual lysine requirements of growing-finishing pigs with deviation from its typical feeding patterns. Advances in Animal Biosciences 10, 357.Google Scholar
Hauschild, L, Lovatto, PA, Pomar, J and Pomar, C 2012. Development of sustainable precision farming systems for swine: estimating real-time individual amino acid requirements in growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2255–2263.10.2527/jas.2011-4252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyun, Y, Ellis, M, McKeith, FK and Wilson, ER 1997. Feed intake pattern of group-housed growing-finishing pigs monitored using a computerized feed intake recording system. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1443–1451.10.2527/1997.7561443xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyriazakis, I 2010. Is anorexia during infection in animals affected by food composition?. Animal Feed Science and Technology 156, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyriazakis, I and Doeschl-Wilson, A 2009. Anorexia during infection in mammals: variation and its sources. In Voluntary feed intake in pigs (ed. Torrallardona, D and Roura, E), pp. 307–321. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I, Oldham, JD, Coop, RL and Jackson, F 1994. The effect of subclinical intestinal nematode infection on the diet selection of growing sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 72, 665–677.10.1079/BJN19940070CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyriazakis, I, Sandberg, FB, Brindle, W 2008. The prediction of the consequences of pathogen challenges on the performance of growing pigs. In Mathematical modelling in animal nutrition (ed. France, J and Kebreab, E), pp. 398–418, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Floc’h, N, Wessels, A, Corrent, E, Wu, G and Bosi, P 2018. The relevance of functional amino acids to support the health of growing pigs. Animal Feed Science Technology 245, 104–116.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Q and Patience, JF 2017. Factors involved in the regulation of feed and energy intake of pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 233, 22–33.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, TN, Andersen, S and Kristensen, AR 2005. Modelling the drinking patterns of young pigs using a state space model. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 48, 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, TN Tools for monitoring growing pigs. 2001. PhD thesis, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Matthews, SG, Miller, AL, Clapp, J, Plötz, T and Kyriazakis, I 2016. Early detection of health and welfare compromises through automated detection of behavioural changes in pigs. The Veterinary Journal 217, 43–51.10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.09.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, DC 2005. Introduction to statistical quality control, 5th edition. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
Nyachoti, CM, Zijlstra, RT, de Lange, CFM and Patience, JF 2004. Voluntary feed intake in growing-finishing pigs: A review of the main determining factors and potential approaches for accurate predictions. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84, 549–566.10.4141/A04-001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastorelli, H, van Milgen, J, Lovatto, P and Montagne, L 2012. Meta-analysis of feed intake and growth responses of growing pigs after a sanitary challenge. Animal 6, 952–961.10.1017/S175173111100228XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomar, C, Andretta, I and Hauschild, L 2017. Meeting individual nutrient requirements to improve nutrient efficiency and the sustainability of growing pig production systems. In Achieving sustainable production of pig meat, volume 2 (ed. Wiseman, J), pp. 287–301. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, Sawston, UK.10.19103/AS.2017.0013.31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomar, J, López, V and Pomar, C 2011. Agent-based simulation framework for virtual prototyping of advanced livestock precision feeding systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 78, 88–97.10.1016/j.compag.2011.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Sandberg, FB, Emmans, GC and Kyriazakis, I 2006. A model for predicting feed intake of growing animals during exposure to pathogens. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1552–1566.10.2527/2006.8461552xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, FB, Emmans, GC and Kyriazakis, I 2007. The effects of pathogen challenges on the performance of naïve and immune animals: the problem of prediction. Animal 1, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, LS, Pomar, C, Campos, PHRF, da Silva, WC, Gobi, JP, Veira, AM, Fraga, AZ and Hauschild, L 2018. Precision feeding strategy for growing pigs under heat stress conditions. Journal of Animal Science 96, 4789–4801.10.1093/jas/sky343CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toft, N and Madsen, TN 1999. Modeling eating patterns of growing pigs using dynamic linear models. Dina Research Report No. 69. Dina KVL, Department of Animal Science and Animal Health, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.Google Scholar
Wellock, IJ, Emmans, GC and Kyriazakis, I 2004. Modeling the effects of stressors on the performance of populations of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2442–2450.10.2527/2004.8282442xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, M and Harrison, J 1997. Bayesian forecasting and dynamic models, 2nd edition. Springer, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Whittemore, EC, Emmans, GC and Kyriazakis, I 2007. The problem of predicting food intake during the period of adaptation to a new food: A model. British Journal of Nutrition 89, 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hauschild et al. supplementary material

Hauschild et al. supplementary material

Download Hauschild et al. supplementary material(File)
File 19.1 KB