Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:17:10.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stimulation of reproductive activity in anovulatory Alpine goats exposed to bucks treated only with artificially long days

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2010

J. A. Delgadillo  and
L. I. Vélez
J. A. Delgadillo*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Caprina, Departamento de Ciencias Médico Veterinarias, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Periférico Raúl López Sánchez y Carretera a Santa Fe, C.P. 27054, Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico
L. I. Vélez
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Caprina, Departamento de Ciencias Médico Veterinarias, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Periférico Raúl López Sánchez y Carretera a Santa Fe, C.P. 27054, Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted in a subtropical latitude to determine the response of Alpine male goats to a treatment with artificially long days (experiment 1), and the response of anovulatory lactating Alpine does exposed to males treated only with artificially long days (experiment 2). In experiment 1, one group of males was kept under natural photoperiod (n = 4) while another was exposed to 2.5 months of artificially long days (16 h of light/day) from 1 December (n = 4). Plasma testosterone concentrations were determined weekly. Intensity of odor of males was determined every 2 weeks. Sexual behavior of bucks was observed during 3 days about 90 days after the end of the long day treatment. A treatment-by-time interaction was detected for testosterone secretion (P < 0.001). In control males, low plasma concentrations of testosterone were observed from March to June. In contrast, in long-day treated males, high levels of testosterone were observed from March to June (P < 0.05). A treatment-by-time interaction was detected for the intensity of male odor (P < 0.01). The male odor was stronger in long-day treated bucks than in untreated ones from March to June (P < 0.05). The number of ano-genital sniffing, nudging and flehmen was greater in long-day treated males than in untreated ones when exposed to anestrous does (P < 0.05). In experiment 2, one group of males was left under natural photoperiod variations (n = 5) and the other (n = 5) was submitted to the same photoperiodic treatment described in experiment 1. On 3 May, three untreated and three long-day treated males were put in contact with anestrous Alpine does left under natural photoperiod. Fertility was higher in does exposed to light-treated males (36/45, 80%) than those in contact with untreated ones (3/45, 7%; P < 0.05). Prolificacy was similar (P > 0.05) in does exposed to treated (1.8 ± 0.1) and untreated males (1.7 ± 0.3). These results indicate that the sexual activity of Alpine male goats raised in subtropical latitudes can be induced using only artificially long days and that such males are effective in stimulating reproductive activity in anovulatory females in late spring.

Keywords

seasonal anestrousphotoperiodmale effectsexual behaviorovulation
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 12 , December 2010 , pp. 2012 - 2016
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amoah, EA, Gelaye, S, Guthrie, P, Rexroad, CE Jr 1996. Breeding season and aspects of reproduction of female goats. Journal of Animal Science 74, 723–728.Google Scholar
Chemineau, P 1983. Effect on œstrus and ovulation of exposing Creole goats to the male at three times of the year. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 67, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemineau, P, Normant, E, Ravault, JP, Thimonier, J 1986. Induction and persistence of pituitary and ovarian activity in the out-of-season lactating dairy goats after a treatment combining a skeleton photoperiod, melatonin and the male effect. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 78, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chemineau, P, Martin, GB, Saumande, J, Normant, E 1988. Seasonal and hormonal control of pulsatil LH secretion in the dairy goat (Capra hircus). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 83, 91–98.Google Scholar
Chemineau, P, Daveau, A, Maurice, F, Delgadillo, JA 1992. Seasonality of estrus and ovulation is not modified by subjecting female Alpine goats to a tropical photoperiod. Small Ruminant Research 8, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemineau, P, Malpaux, B, Brillard, JP, Fostier, A 2007. Seasonality of reproduction and production in farm fishes, birds and mammals. Animal 1, 419–432.Google Scholar
Chemineau, P, Malapux, B, Pelletier, J, Leboeuf, B, Delgadillo, JA, Deletang, F, Pobel, T, Brice, G 1996. Emploi des implants de mélatonine et des traitements photopériodiques pour maîtriser la reproduction saisonniere chez les ovins et caprins. INRA Productions Animales 9, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgadillo, JA, Leboeuf, B, Chemineau, P 1991. Decrease in the seasonality of sexual behavior and sperm production in bucks by exposure to short photoperiodic cycles. Theriogenology 36, 755–770.Google Scholar
Delgadillo, JA, Canedo, GA, Chemineau, P, Guillaume, D, Malpaux, B 1999. Evidence for an annual reproductive rhythm independent of food availability in male creole goats in subtropical northern Mexico. Theriogenology 52, 727–737.Google Scholar
Delgadillo, JA, Cortez, ME, Duarte, G, Chemineau, P, Malpaux, B 2004. Evidence that the photoperiod controls the annual changes in testosterone secretion, testicular and body weight in subtropical male goats. Reproduction, Nutrition and Development 44, 183–193.Google Scholar
Delgadillo, JA, Gelez, H, Ungerfeld, R, Hawken, PAR, Martin, GB 2009. The ‘male effect’ in sheep and goats – revisiting the dogmas. Behavioural Brain Research 200, 304–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delgadillo, JA, Carrillo, E, Morán, J, Duarte, G, Chemineau, P, Malpaux, B 2001. Induction of sexual activity of male creole goats in subtropical northern Mexico using long days and melatonin. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2245–2252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delgadillo, JA, Flores, JA, Véliz, FG, Duarte, G, Vielma, J, Hernandez, H, Fernandez, IG 2006. Importance of the signals provided by the buck for the success of the male effect in goats. Reproduction, Nutrition and Development 46, 391–400.Google Scholar
Delgadillo, JA, Flores, JA, Véliz, FG, Hernández, HF, Duarte, G, Vielma, J, Poindron, P, Chemineau, P, Malpaux, B 2002. Induction of sexual activity of lactating anovulatory female goats using male goats treated only with artificial long days. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2780–2786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, A, Boland, MP, Roche, JF, O’Callaghan, D 1994. The effect of supplementary long days, a subcutaneous melatonin implant and exposure to a ram on the onset of the breeding season in ewes. Animal Reproduction Science 34, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, G, Flores, JA, Malpaux, B, Delgadillo, JA 2008. Reproductive seasonality in female goats adapted to a subtropical environment persists independently of food availability. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 35, 362–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitz-Rodríguez, G, De Santiago-Miramontes, MA, Scaramuzzi, RJ, Malpaux, B, Delgadillo, JA 2009. Nutritional supplementation improves ovulation and pregnancy rates in female goats managed under natural grazing conditions and exposed to the male effect. Animal Reproduction Science 116, 85–94.Google Scholar
Flores, JA, Véliz, FG, Pérez-Villanueva, JA, Martínez de la Escalera, G, Chemineau, P, Poindron, P, Malpaux, B, Delgadillo, JA 2000. Male reproductive condition is the limiting factor of efficiency in the male effect during seasonal anestrus in female goats. Biology of Reproduction 62, 1409–1414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnier, DH, Cotta, Y, Terqui, M 1978. Androgen radioimmunoassay in the ram: results of direct plasma testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone measurement and physiological evaluation. Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochemie et Biophysique 18, 265–281.Google Scholar
Mohammad, WA, Grossman, M, Vatthauer, JL 1984. Seasonal breeding in the United States dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 1813–1822.Google Scholar
Pellicer-Rubio, MT, Leboeuf, B, Bernelas, D, Forgerit, Y, Pougnard, JL, Bonné, JL, Senty, E, Chemineau, P 2007. Highly synchronous and fertile reproductive activity induced by the male effect during deep anoestrus in lactating goats subjected to treatment with artificially long days followed by natural photoperiod. Animal Reproduction Science 98, 241–258.Google Scholar
Restall, BJ 1992. Seasonal variation in reproductive activity in Australian goats. Animal Reproduction Science 27, 305–318.Google Scholar
Rivas-Muñoz, R, Fitz-Rodríguez, G, Poindron, P, Malpaux, B, Delgadillo, JA 2007. Stimulation of estrous behavior in grazing female goats by continuous or discontinuous exposure to males. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1257–1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saumande, J, Tamboura, D, Chupin, D 1985. Changes in milk and plasma concentrations of progesterone in cows after treatment to induce superovulation and their relationships with number of ovulations and embryos collected. Theriogenology 23, 719–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schanbacher, BD 1988. Responses of market lambs and Suffolk rams to a stimulatory skeleton photoperiod. Reproduction, Nutrition and Development 28, 431–441.Google Scholar
Walkden-Brown, SW, Martin, GB, Restall, BJ 1999. Role of male-female interaction in regulating reproduction in sheep and goats. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement 52, 243–257.Google Scholar
Walkden-Brown, SW, Restall, BJ, Norton, BW, Scaramuzzi, RJ, Martin, GB 1994. Effect of nutrition on seasonal pattern of LH, FSH and testosterone concentration, testicular mass, sebaceous gland volume and odour in Australian cashmere goats. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 102, 351–360.Google Scholar
Walkden-Brown, SW, Restall, BJ, Scaramuzzi, RJ, Martin, GB, Blackberry, MA 1997. Seasonality in male Australian cashmere goats: long term effects of castration and testosterone or oestradiol treatment on changes in LH, FSH and prolactin concentrations, and body growth. Small Ruminant Research 26, 239–252.Google Scholar