Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:15:49.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sow environment during gestation: part II. Influence on piglet physiology and tissue maturity at birth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

H. Quesnel ,
M.-C. Père ,
I. Louveau ,
L. Lefaucheur ,
M.-H. Perruchot ,
A. Prunier ,
H. Pastorelli ,
M. C. Meunier-Salaün ,
D. Gardan-Salmon  and
E. Merlot
...Show all authors
H. Quesnel*
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
M.-C. Père
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
I. Louveau
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
L. Lefaucheur
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
M.-H. Perruchot
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
A. Prunier
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
H. Pastorelli
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
M. C. Meunier-Salaün
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
D. Gardan-Salmon
Affiliation:
Deltavit CCPA Group, 35150 Janzé, France
E. Merlot
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
F. Gondret
Affiliation:
PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Sow environment during gestation can generate maternal stress which could alter foetal development. The effects of two group-housing systems for gestating sows on piglet morphological and physiological traits at birth were investigated. During gestation, sows were reared in a conventional system on a slatted floor (C, 18 sows), demonstrated as being stressful for sows or in an enriched system in larger pens and on deep straw bedding (E, 19 sows). On gestation day 105, sows were transferred into identical individual farrowing crates on a slatted floor. Farrowing was supervised to allow sampling from piglets at birth. In each litter, one male piglet of average birth weight was euthanized immediately after birth to study organ development and tissue traits. Blood samples were collected from 6 or 7 piglets per litter at birth and 2 piglets per litter at 4 days of lactation (DL4). At birth, mean piglet BW did not differ between groups (P > 0.10); however, the percentage of light (<1.2 kg) and heavy (⩾2 kg) piglets was greater and lower, respectively, in C than in E litters (P < 0.01). Plasma concentrations of cortisol, IGF-I, T4, T3, lactate, NEFA, fructose and albumin did not differ (P > 0.10) between C and E piglets, but the insulin to glucose ratio was greater (P = 0.02) in C than in E piglets. Compared with E piglets, C piglets had a lighter gut at birth (P = 0.01) and their glycogen content in longissimus muscle was lower (P < 0.01). In this muscle, messenger RNA levels of PAX7, a marker of satellite cells and of PPARGC1A, a transcriptional coactivator involved in mitochondriogenesis and mitochondrial energy metabolism, were greater (P < 0.05), whereas the expression level of PRDX6, a gene playing a role in antioxidant pathway, was lower (P = 0.03) in C than in E piglets. Other studied genes involved in myogenesis did not differ between C and E piglets. No system effect was observed on target genes in liver and subcutaneous adipose tissue. On DL4, C piglets exhibited a lower plasma antioxidant capacity than E piglets (P = 0.002). In conclusion, exposure of sows to a stressful environment during gestation had mild negative effects on the maturity of piglets at birth.

Keywords

gestation environmentnewborn pigletphysiologymaturitymaternal stress
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 7 , July 2019 , pp. 1440 - 1447
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baxter, EM, Jarvis, S, D’Eath, RB, Ross, DW, Robson, SK, Farish, M, Nevison, IM, Lawrence, AB and Edwards, SA 2008. Investigating the behavioural and physiological indicators of neonatal survival in pigs. Theriogenology 69, 773–783.Google Scholar
Berg, F, Gustafson, U and Andersson, L 2006. The uncoupling protein 1 gene (UCP1) is disrupted in the pig lineage: a genetic explanation for poor thermoregulation in piglets. PLoS Genetics 2, e129.Google Scholar
Devillers, N, Van Milgen, J, Prunier, A and Le Dividich, J 2004. Estimation of colostrum intake in the neonatal pig. Animal Science 78, 305–313.Google Scholar
Friel, JK, Friesen, RW, Harding, SV and Roberts, LJ 2004. Evidence of oxidative stress in full-term healthy infants. Pediatric Research 56, 878–882.Google Scholar
Good, CA, Kramer, H and Somogyi, M 1933. The determination of glycogen. Journal of Biological Chemistry 100, 485–491.Google Scholar
Gondret, F, Père, MC, Tacher, S, Daré, S, Trefeu, C, Le Huërou-Luron, I and Louveau, I 2013. Spontaneous intra-uterine growth restriction modulates the endocrine status and the developmental expression of genes in porcine fetal and neonatal adipose tissue. General and Comparative Endocrinology 194, 208–216.Google Scholar
Kranendonk, G, Hopster, H, Fillerup, M, Ekkel, ED, Mulder, EJ, Wiegant, VM and Taverne, MA 2006. Lower birth weight and attenuated adrenocortical response to ACTH in offspring from sows that orally received cortisol during gestation. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 30, 218–238.Google Scholar
Kubasova, T, Davidova-Gerzova, L, Merlot, E, Medvecky, M, Polansky, O, Gardan-Salmon, D, Quesnel, H and Rychlik, I 2017. Housing systems influence gut microbiota composition of sows but not of their piglets. PLoS ONE 12, e0170051.Google Scholar
Lane, RH, Maclennan, NK, Daood, MJ, Hsu, JL, Janke, SM, Pham, TD, Puri, AR and Watchko, JF 2003. IUGR alters postnatal rat skeletal muscle peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1 gene expression in a fiber specific manner. Pediatric Research 53, 994–1000.Google Scholar
Le Dividich, J, Noblet, J, Herpin, P, van Milgen, J and Quiniou, N 1998. Thermoregulation. In Progress in pig science (ed. J Wiseman, MA Varley and JP Charlick), pp 229–263. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Leenhouwers, JI, Knol, EF, de Groot, PN, Vos, H and van der Lende, T 2002. Fetal development in the pig in relation to genetic merit for piglet survival. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1759–1770.Google Scholar
Mach, N, Berri, M, Estellé, J, Levenez, F, Lemonnier, G, Denis, C, Leplat, JJ, Chevaleyre, C, Billon, Y, Doré, J, Rogel-Gaillard, C and Lepage, P 2015. Early-life establishment of the swine gut microbiome and impact on host phenotypes. Environmental Microbiology Reports 7, 554–569.Google Scholar
Merlot, E, Calvar, C and Prunier, A 2017. Influence of the housing environment during gestation on maternal health, offspring immunity and survival. Animal Production Science 57, 1751–1758.Google Scholar
Merlot, E, Pastorelli, H, Prunier, A, Père, M-C, Louveau, I, Lefaucheur, L, Perruchot, M-H, Meunier-Salaün, M-C, Robert, F, Gondret, F and Quesnel, H 2018. Influence of sow environment during gestation: part I. Maternal physiology and lacteal secretions in relation with neonatal survival. Animal, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002987.Google Scholar
Merlot, E, Quesnel, H and Prunier, A 2013. Prenatal stress, immunity and neonatal health in farm animal species. Animal 7, 2016–2025.Google Scholar
Perruchot, MH, Lefaucheur, L, Louveau, I, Mobuchon, L, Palin, MF, Farmer, C and Gondret, F 2015. Delayed muscle development in small pig fetuses around birth cannot be rectified by maternal early feed restriction and subsequent overfeeding during gestation. Animal 9, 1996–2005.Google Scholar
Rehfeldt, C, Lefaucheur, L, Block, J, Stabenow, B, Pfuhl, R, Otten, W, Metges, CC and Kalbe, C 2012. Limited and excess protein intake of pregnant gilts differently affects body composition and cellularity of skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue of newborn and weanling piglets. European Journal of Nutrition 51, 151–165.Google Scholar
Singh, RR, Cuffe, JS and Moritz, KM 2012. Short- and long-term effects of exposure to natural and synthetic glucocorticoids during development. Clinical Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 39, 979–989.Google Scholar
Slivka, DR, Dumke, CL, Tucker, TJ, Cuddy, JS and Ruby, B 2012. Human mRNA response to exercise and temperature. International Journal of Sports and Medicine 33, 94–100.Google Scholar
Theil, PK, Lauridsen, C and Quesnel, H 2014. Neonatal piglet survival: impact of sow nutrition around parturition on fetal glycogen deposition and production and composition of colostrum and transient milk. Animal 8, 1021–1030.Google Scholar
Tuchscherer, M, Puppe, B, Tuchschere, A and Tiemann, U 2000. Early identification of neonate at risk: traits of newborn piglets with respect to survival. Theriogenology 54, 371–388.Google Scholar
van der Lende, T, Knol, EF and Leenhouwers, JI 2001. Prenatal development as a predisposing factor for perinatal losses in pigs. Reproduction Supplement 58, 247–261.Google Scholar
Wu, Z, Puigserver, P, Andersson, U, Zhang, C, Adelmant, G, Mootha, V, Troy, A, Cinti, S, Lowell, B, Scarpulla, RC and Spiegelman, BM 1999. Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1. Cell 98, 115–124.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Quesnel et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Quesnel et al. supplementary material(File)
File 229.9 KB