Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:22:57.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Significant differences in fertility between dairy cows selected for one QTL located on bovine chromosome 3 are not attributable to energy balance, although eating behaviour is affected

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2012

S. Coyral-Castel ,
P. Faverdin ,
C. Ramé ,
S. Fréret ,
D. Guillaume ,
S. Fritz  and
J. Dupont
S. Coyral-Castel
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR85 Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, F-37380 Nouzilly, France CNRS, UMR6175 Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, F-37380 Nouzilly, France Université François Rabelais de Tours, F-37041 Tours, France IFCE, F-37380 Nouzilly, France Institut de l'Elevage, Département GIPSIE, 149 rue de Bercy, 75595 Paris cedex 12, France
P. Faverdin
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1080 Production du lait, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1080 Production du lait, F-35000 Rennes, France
C. Ramé
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR85 Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, F-37380 Nouzilly, France CNRS, UMR6175 Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, F-37380 Nouzilly, France Université François Rabelais de Tours, F-37041 Tours, France IFCE, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
S. Fréret
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR85 Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, F-37380 Nouzilly, France CNRS, UMR6175 Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, F-37380 Nouzilly, France Université François Rabelais de Tours, F-37041 Tours, France IFCE, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
D. Guillaume
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR85 Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, F-37380 Nouzilly, France CNRS, UMR6175 Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, F-37380 Nouzilly, France Université François Rabelais de Tours, F-37041 Tours, France IFCE, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
S. Fritz
Affiliation:
UNCEIA, 149 rue de Bercy, 75595 Paris cedex 12, France
J. Dupont*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR85 Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, F-37380 Nouzilly, France CNRS, UMR6175 Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, F-37380 Nouzilly, France Université François Rabelais de Tours, F-37041 Tours, France IFCE, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Improvement of reproduction in dairy cows has become a major challenge in dairy production. We have recently shown that dairy cows carrying the ‘fertil−’ haplotype for one quantitative trait locus (QTL), affecting female fertility and located on the bovine chromosome 3, had a significantly lower conception rate after the first artificial insemination than cows carrying the ‘fertil+’ haplotype. The objective of this paper was to study other phenotypic modifications linked to this QTL. In the present study, 23 ‘fertil+’ and 18 ‘fertil−’ cows were characterized for live weight, milk production, food intake, eating behaviour and plasma metabolites. These parameters were measured during the first lactation, from calving to 40 weeks postpartum (wkpp). In the first 7 weeks of lactation, ‘fertil+’ primiparous cows had a significantly higher live BW and milk production than ‘fertil−’ cows. Dry matter intake tended to be slightly higher for ‘fertil+’ than for ‘fertil−’ primiparous cows in this period. However, energy balance was similar for the two haplotypes in the whole lactation, except in the first wkpp, and consequently, could not explain their different fertility. The major observation concerned the eating behaviour. ‘Fertil+’ primiparous cows had a significantly lower eating rate than ‘fertil−’ cows during the 40 weeks of lactation. In parallel, ‘fertil+’ cows spent significantly more time at the feeder for a similar number of visits than ‘fertil−’ cows. Furthermore, no differences in plasma concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids and insulin were observed between the two haplotypes. Plasma glucose was significantly lower in ‘fertil+’ than in ‘fertil−’ cows in the second wkpp. Taken together, our results show that ‘fertil+’ and ‘fertil−’ dairy cows, with different fertility, have also different eating behaviour without any variation in energy balance, except in the first week of lactation.

Keywords

dairy coweating ratequantitative trait locusmetabolite
Type
Physiology and functional biology of systems
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , April 2013 , pp. 610 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamse, PA, Vlaeminck, B, Tamminga, S, Dijkstra, J 2008. The effect of silage and concentrate type on intake behavior, rumen function, and milk production in dairy cows in early and late lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4778–4792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accorsi, PA, Govoni, N, Gaiani, R, Pezzi, C, Seren, E, Tamanini, C 2005. Leptin, GH, PRL, insulin and metabolic parameters throughout the dry period and lactation in dairy cows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 40, 217–223.Google Scholar
Aeberhard, K, Bruckmaier, RM, Blum, JW 2001. Metabolic, enzymatic and endocrine status in high-yielding dairy cows – part 2. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A 48, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AFNOR 1997. Aliments des animaux-Dosage de l'azote-Méthode par combustion (DUMAS)-NF V18-120. Saint-Denis-La-Plaine, France.Google Scholar
Aufrère, J, Michalet-Doreau, B 1988. Comparison of methods for predicting digestibility of feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azizi, O, Hasselmann, L, Kaufmann, O 2010. Variations in feeding behaviour of high-yielding dairy cows in relation to parity during early to peak lactation. Archiv Fur Tierzucht – Archives of Animal Breeding 53, 130–140.Google Scholar
Azizi, O, Kaufmann, O, Hasselmann, L 2009. Relationship between feeding behaviour and feed intake of dairy cows depending on their parity and milk yield. Livestock Science 122, 156–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbat, A, Le Mézec, P, Ducrocq, V, Mattalia, S, Fritz, S, Boichard, D, Ponsart, C, Humblot, P 2010. Female fertility in French dairy breeds: current situation and strategies for improvement. Journal of Reproduction and Development 56, S15–S21.Google Scholar
Baumont, R 1996. Palatability and feeding behaviour in ruminants: a review. Annales de zootechnie 45, 385–400.Google Scholar
Beam, SW, Butler, WR 1998. Energy balance, metabolic hormones, and early postpartum follicular development in dairy cows fed prilled lipid. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 121–131.Google Scholar
Ben Jemaa, S, Fritz, S, Guillaume, F, Druet, T, Denis, C, Eggen, A, Gautier, M 2008. Detection of quantitative trait loci affecting non-return rate in French dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125, 280–288.Google Scholar
Boichard, D, Grohs, C, Bourgeois, F, Cerqueira, F, Faugeras, R, Neau, A, Rupp, R, Amigues, Y, Boscher, MY, Leveziel, H 2003. Detection of genes influencing economic traits in three French dairy cattle breeds. Genetics Selection Evolution 35, 77–101.Google Scholar
Busato, A, Faissler, D, Küpfer, U, Blum, JW 2002. Body condition scores in dairy cows: associations with metabolic and endocrine changes in healthy dairy cows. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A 49, 455–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, WR 2003. Energy balance relationships with follicular development, ovulation and fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 83, 211–218.Google Scholar
Butler, WR 2005. Relationships of negative energy balance with fertility. In Advances in dairy technology, vol. 17 (ed. K Beauchemin), pp. 35–46.Google Scholar
Chagas, LM, Bass, JJ, Blache, D, Burke, CR, Kay, JK, Lindsay, DR, Lucy, MC, Martin, GB, Meier, S, Rhodes, FM, Roche, JR, Thatcher, WW, Webb, R 2007. New perspectives on the roles of nutrition and metabolic priorities in the subfertility of high-producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4022–4032.Google Scholar
Clapp, H 1937. A Factor in breeding efficiency of dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 1937, 259–265.Google Scholar
Coyral-Castel, S, Brisard, D, Touze, JL, Dupont, M, Ramé, C, Uzbekova, S, Dupont, J 2012. Analysis of in vivo oocyte maturation, in vitro embryo development and gene expression in cumulus cells of dairy cows and heifers selected for one fertility QTL located on BTA3. Theriogenology 77, 1822–1833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyral-Castel, S, Ramé, C, Monniaux, D, Fréret, S, Fabre-Nys, C, Fritz, S, Monget, P, Dupont, F, Dupont, J 2011. Ovarian parameters and fertility of dairy cows selected for one QTL located on BTA3. Theriogenology 75, 1239–1250.Google Scholar
Darwash, AO, Lamming, GE, Woolliams, JA 1999. The potential for identifying heritable endocrine parameters associated with fertility in post-partum dairy cows. Animal Science 68, 333–347.Google Scholar
Dickinson, RL 1942. Techniques of conception control, 2nd edition. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
Druet, T, Fritz, S, Boussaha, M, Ben-Jemaa, S, Guillaume, F, Derbala, D, Zelenika, D, Lechner, D, Charon, C, Boichard, D, Gut, IG, Eggen, A, Gautier, M 2008. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting female fertility in dairy cattle on BTA03 using a dense single-nucleotide polymorphism map. Genetics 178, 2227–2235.Google Scholar
Espe, D 1946. Secretion of milk, 3rd edition. The Collegiate Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Friggens, NC, Nielsen, BL, Kyriazakis, I, Tolkamp, BJ, Emmans, GC 1998. Effects of feed composition and stage of lactation on the short-term feeding behavior of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 3268–3277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnsworthy, PC, Sinclair, KD, Webb, R 2008. Integration of physiological mechanisms that influence fertility in dairy cows. Animal 2, 1144–1152.Google Scholar
Guillaume, F, Gautier, M, Ben Jemaa, S, Fritz, S, Eggen, A, Boichard, D, Druet, T 2007. Refinement of two female fertility QTL using alternative phenotypes in French Holstein dairy cattle. Animal Genetics 38, 72–74.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, CG, Gong, JG, Bramley, TA, Webb, R 2006. Selection on predicted breeding value for milk production delays ovulation independently of changes in follicular development, milk production and body weight. Animal Reproduction Science 95, 193–205.Google Scholar
Ingvartsen, KL, Andersen, JB 2000. Integration of metabolism and intake regulation: a review focusing on periparturient animals. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 1573–1597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
INRA 2007. Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins: Besoins des animaux – Valeurs des aliments (in French). editions QUAE c/o INRA, RD 10, 78026 Versailles cedex, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Jorritsma, R, Wensing, T, Kruip, TAM, Vos, PLAM, Noordhuizen, JPTM 2003. Metabolic changes in early lactation and impaired reproductive performance in dairy cows. Veterinary Research 34, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerestes, M, Faigl, V, Kulcsár, M, Balogh, O, Földi, J, Fébel, H, Chilliard, Y, Huszenicza, G 2009. Periparturient insulin secretion and whole-body insulin responsiveness in dairy cows showing various forms of ketone pattern with or without puerperal metritis. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 37, 250–261.Google Scholar
Leroy, J, Vanholder, T, Van Knegsel, ATM, Garcia-Ispierto, I, Bols, PEJ 2008. Nutrient prioritization in dairy cows early postpartum: mismatch between metabolism and fertility? Reproduction in Domestic Animals 43, 96–103.Google Scholar
López-Gatius, F, García-Ispierto, I, Santolaria, P, Yániz, J, Nogareda, C, López-Béjar, M 2006. Screening for high fertility in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 65, 1678–1689.Google Scholar
Lucy, MC 2001. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1277–1293.Google Scholar
Lucy, MC 2003. Mechanisms linking nutrition and reproduction in postpartum cows. Reproduction Supplement 61, 415–427.Google Scholar
Oikonomou, G, Arsenos, G, Valergakis, GE, Tsiaras, A, Zygoyiannis, D, Banos, G 2008. Genetic relationship of body energy and blood metabolites with reproduction in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4323–4332.Google Scholar
Ospina, PA, Nydam, DV, Stokol, T, Overton, TR 2010. Associations of elevated nonesterified fatty acids and [beta]-hydroxybutyrate concentrations with early lactation reproductive performance and milk production in transition dairy cattle in the northeastern United States. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1596–1603.Google Scholar
Pryce, JE, Royal, MD, Garnsworthy, PC, Mao, IL 2004. Fertility in the high-producing dairy cow. Livestock Production Science 86, 125–135.Google Scholar
Rémond, B 1988. Changes in rumen contents over the 1st months of lactation in dairy cows. Reproduction Nutrition Development 28, 109–110.Google Scholar
Roche, JF, Mackey, D, Diskin, MD 2000. Reproductive management of postpartum cows. Animal Reproduction Science 60–61, 703–712.Google Scholar
Salazar-Ortiz, J, Camous, S, Briant, C, Lardic, L, Chesneau, D, Guillaume, D 2011. Effects of nutritional cues on the duration of the winter anovulatory phase and on associated 3 hormone levels in adult female Welsh pony horses (Equus caballus). Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 9, 130.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2009. SAS/STAT 9.2 user's guide, 2nd edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tolkamp, BJ, Schweitzer, DPN, Kyriazakis, I 2000. The biologically relevant unit for the analysis of short-term feeding behavior of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 2057–2068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, RF, Koenen, EPC, De Jong, G 2001. Genetic correlations among body condition score, yield, and fertility in first-parity cows estimated by random regression models. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 2327–2335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veerkamp, RF, Oldenbroek, JK, Van Der Gaast, HJ, Werf, JHJVD 2000. Genetic correlation between days until start of luteal activity and milk yield, energy balance, and live weights. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 577–583.Google Scholar
Webb, R, Garnsworthy, PC, Gong, JG, Armstrong, DG 2004. Control of follicular growth: local interactions and nutritional influences. Journal of Animal Science 82, E63–E74.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Coyral-castel Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Coyral-castel Supplementary Material(File)
File 46.6 KB