Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:07:13.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensory evaluation and its relationship to physical meat quality attributes of beef from Nguni and Bonsmara steers raised on natural pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

V. Muchenje ,
K. Dzama ,
M. Chimonyo ,
P. E. Strydom ,
A. Hugo  and
J. G. Raats
V. Muchenje
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare, P. Bag X1314, Alice 5700, Republic of South Africa
K. Dzama
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Stellenbosch University, P. Bag X1, Matieland 7602, Republic of South Africa
M. Chimonyo*
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare, P. Bag X1314, Alice 5700, Republic of South Africa
P. E. Strydom
Affiliation:
Meat Industry Centre, Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Agricultural Research Council, Private Bag X2, Irene, 0062, Republic of South Africa
A. Hugo
Affiliation:
Department of Microbial, Biochemical and Food Biotechnology, University of Free State, P.O. Box 339 Bloemfontein, 9300, Republic of South Africa
J. G. Raats
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare, P. Bag X1314, Alice 5700, Republic of South Africa
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The current study compared sensory characteristics and their relationships with physical meat characteristics of beef from Nguni and Bonsmara steers. Nguni beef was more (P < 0.05) tender than Bonsmara beef after ageing for 2 and 21 days, and had higher (P < 0.05) intramuscular fat (IMF; 1.12%) than Bonsmara beef (1.07%). Nguni beef had higher (P < 0.05) sensory scores than Bonsmara beef after ageing for 2 days. There were no (P > 0.05) relationships between IMF and sensory characteristics. Aroma intensity, impression on juiciness and tenderness-related scores were affected (P < 0.05) by pH. There were significant (P < 0.05) correlations between most physical meat characteristics and sensory characteristics. Nguni beef had better sensory scores than Bonsmara beef for beef aged for 2 days. While most physical meat characteristics were correlated to sensory scores, all sensory scores were not significantly correlated to IMF.

Keywords

African breedscorrelationsflavourjuicinesstenderness
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 11 , November 2008 , pp. 1700 - 1706
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AMSA ( American Meat Science Association) 1978. Guidelines for cookery and sensory evaluation of meat. AMSA, National Livestock and Meat Board, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Calkins, CR, Hodgen, JM 2007. A fresh look at meat flavor. Meat Science 77, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, ND, Enser, M, Nute, GR, Whittington, FM, Penman, JC, Fisken, AC 2000. Genotype with nutrition interaction on fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat and the relationship with flavour of pig meat. Meat Science 55, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campo, MM, Sañudo, C, Panea, B, Alberti, P, Santolaria, P 1999. Breed type and ageing time effects on sensory characteristics of beef strip loin steaks. Meat Science 51, 383–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culler, RD, Parrish, FC, Smith, GC, Cross, HR 1978. Relationships of myofibril fragmentation index to certain chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of bovine longissimus muscle. Journal of Food Science 43, 1177–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Plessis, I, Hoffman, LC 2007. Effect of slaughter age and breed on the carcass traits and meat quality of beef steers finished on natural pastures in the arid subtropics of South Africa. South African Journal of Animal Science 37, 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, LJ, Patterson, LS 1991. Compounds contributing to meat flavour. Food Chemistry 40, 201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folch, J, Lees, M, Sloane-Stanley, GH 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissue. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grau, R, Hamm, R 1957. Über das Wasserbindungsvermögen des Säugetiermuskels. II Mitteilung Über die Bestimmung der Wasserbindung des Muskels. Zeitschrift für Lebensmitteluntersuchung und -Forschung A 105, 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, PH, Bruggemann, D 1994. Ageing of beef: influence of two ageing methods on sensory properties and myofibrillar proteins. Science des Aliments 14, 387–399.Google Scholar
Hoffman, LC, Kroucamp, M, Manley, M 2007. Meat quality characteristics of springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis). 4. Sensory meat evaluation as influenced by age, gender and production region. Meat Science 76, 774–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ISO ( International Organisation for Standardisation) 1993. Sensory analysis; general guidance for selection, training and monitoring of assessors. Part I. Selected assessors. ISO 8586-1:1993. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 26p.Google Scholar
Kazala, ECH, Lozeman, FJ, Mir, PS, Laroche, A, Bailey, DRC, Weselake, RJ 1999. Relationship of fatty acid composition to intramuscular fat content in beef from crossbred Wagyu cattle. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1717–1725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maga, JA 1976. The role of sulfur compounds in food flavor, Part 3. Thiols. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 7, 147–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, SL 1990. Effect of feeds on flavour of red meat: a review. Journal of Animal Science 68, 4421–4435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monsón, F, Sañudo, C, Sierra, I 2005. Influence of breed and ageing time on the sensory meat quality and consumer acceptability in intensively reared beef. Meat Science 71, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muchenje V, Dzama K, Chimonyo M, Raats JG, Strydom PE, Hugo A and Ndlovu T 2007. Comparisons of fatty acid profiles of beef from Nguni, Bonsmara and Angus steers raised on veld. In Proceedings 53rd International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, 5–10 August 2007, Beijing, China, pp. 351–352.Google Scholar
Muchenje, V, Dzama, K, Chimonyo, M, Raats, JG, Strydom, PE 2008a. Meat quality of Nguni, Bonsmara and Aberdeen Angus steers raised on natural pasture in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Meat Science 79, 20–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muchenje, V, Dzama, K, Chimonyo, M, Raats, JG, Strydom, PE 2008b. Tick susceptibility and its effects on growth performance and carcass characteristics of Nguni, Bonsmara and Angus steers raised on natural pasture. Animal 2, 298–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muir, PD, Wallace, GJ, Dobbie, PM, Bown, MD 2000. A comparison of animal performance and carcass and meat quality characteristics in Hereford, Hereford x Friesian, and Friesian steers grazed together at pasture. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndlovu T, Chimonyo M, Okoh AI, Muchenje V, Dzama K, Dube S and Raats JG 2007. A comparison of nutritionally-related blood metabolites among Nguni, Bonsmara and Angus steers raised on sweetveld. Veterinary Journal (in press) doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl/.2007.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndlovu, T, Chimonyo, M, Okoh, AI, Muchenje, V 2008. A comparison of stress hormone concentrations at slaughter in Nguni, Bonsmara and Angus steers. African Journal of Agricultural Research 3, 96–100.Google Scholar
Sañudo, C, Macie, ES, Olleta, JL, Villarroel, M, Panea, B, Alberti, P 2004. The effects of slaughter weight, breed type and ageing time on beef meat quality using two different texture devices. Meat Science 66, 925–932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS (Statistical Analysis Systems Institute) 2000. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics (Version 6 Ed.). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Silva, JA, Patarata, L, Martins, C 1999. Influence of ultimate pH on bovine meat tenderness during ageing. Meat Science 52, 453–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spanier, AM, Flores, M, McMillin, KW, Bidner, TD 1997. The effect of post-mortem aging on meat flavor quality in Brangus beef: correlation of treatments, sensory, instrumental and chemical descriptors. Food Chemistry 59, 531–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strydom, PE, Naude, RT, Smith, MF, Scholtz, MM, van Wyk, JB 2000. Characterisation of indigenous African cattle breeds in relation to meat quality traits. Meat Science 55, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strydom, PE, Naude, RT, Smith, MF, Kotze, A, Scholtz, MM, van Wyk, JB 2001. Relationships between production and product traits in subpopulations of Bonsmara and Nguni cattle. South African Journal of Animal Science 31, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, TL, Koohmaraie, M 1991. A modified procedure of simultaneous extraction and subsequent assay of calcium-dependent and lysosomal protease systems from a skeletal muscle biopsy. Journal of Animal Science 69, 1559–1565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, JD, Enser, M 1997. Factors influencing fatty acids in meat and the role of antioxidants in improving meat quality. British Journal of Nutrition 78 (Suppl. 1), S49–S60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed