Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-8cg97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-08T20:18:50.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between handling, behaviour and stress in lambs at abattoirs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2018

P. H. Hemsworth Open the ORCID record for P. H. Hemsworth [Opens in a new window] ,
M. Rice ,
S. Borg ,
L. E. Edwards ,
E. N. Ponnampalam Open the ORCID record for E. N. Ponnampalam [Opens in a new window]  and
G. J. Coleman
P. H. Hemsworth*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
M. Rice
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
S. Borg
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
L. E. Edwards
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
E. N. Ponnampalam
Affiliation:
Agriculture Victoria Research, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
G. J. Coleman
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

There is community concern about the treatment of farm animals post-farm gate, particularly animal transport and slaughter. Relationships between lamb behavioural and physiological variables on farm, stockperson, dog and lamb behavioural variables pre-slaughter and plasma cortisol, glucose and lactate in lambs post-slaughter were studied in 400 lambs. The lambs were observed in three behavioural tests, novel arena, flight distance to a human and temperament tests, before transport for slaughter. Closed-circuit television video footage was used to record stockperson, dog and lamb behaviour immediately before slaughter. Blood samples for cortisol, glucose and lactate analyses were collected on farm following the three behavioural tests and immediately post-slaughter. The regression models that best predicted plasma cortisol, glucose and lactate concentrations post-slaughter included a mixture of stockperson and dog behavioural variables as well as lamb variables both on-farm and pre-slaughter. These regression models accounted for 33%, 34% and 44% of the variance in plasma cortisol, glucose and lactate concentrations post-slaughter, respectively. Some of the stockperson and dog behaviours pre-slaughter that were predictive of the stress and metabolic variables post-slaughter included the duration of negative stockperson behaviours such as fast locomotion and lifting/pulling lambs, and the duration of dog behaviours such as lunging and barking at the lamb, while some of the predictive lamb behaviour variables included the durations of jumping and fleeing. Some of the physiological and behavioural responses to the behavioural tests on farm were also predictive of the stress and metabolic variables post-slaughter. These relationships support the well-demonstrated effect of handling on fear and stress responses in livestock, and although not direct evidence of causal relationships, highlight the potential benefits of training stockpeople to reduce fear and stress in sheep at abattoirs.

Keywords

human–animal interactionsheepstockpersonphysiologyslaughter
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , June 2019 , pp. 1287 - 1296
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Australian Meat Industry Council 2009. Industry animal welfare standards – livestock processing establishments, 2nd edition. Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA) Ltd, Crows Nest, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Beausoleil, NJ, Stafford, KJ and Mellor, DJ 2005. Sheep show more aversion to a dog than to a human in an arena test. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 91, 219–232.Google Scholar
Boissy, A, Fisher, AD, Bouix, J, Hinch, GN and Le Neindre, P 2005a. Genetics of fear in ruminant livestock. Livestock Production Science 93, 23–32.Google Scholar
Boissy, A, Bouix, J, Orgeur, P, Poindron, P, Bibé, B and Le Neindre, P 2005b. Genetic analysis of emotional reactivity in sheep: effects of the genotypes of the lambs and their dams. Genetic Selection Evolution 37, 387–401.Google Scholar
Coleman, GJ, Rice, M and Hemsworth, PH 2012. Human-animal relationships at sheep and cattle abattoirs. Animal Welfare 21, 15–21.Google Scholar
de Jonge, J and van Trijp, HCM 2013. Meeting heterogeneity in consumer demand for animal welfare: a reflection on existing knowledge and implications for the meat sector. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26, 629–661.Google Scholar
Deiss, V, Temple, D, Ligout, S, Racine, C, Bouix, J, Terlouw, C and Boissy, A 2009. Can emotional reactivity predict stress responses at slaughter in sheep? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 119, 193–202.Google Scholar
Ferguson, DM and Warner, RD 2008. Have we underestimated the effect of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Science 80, 12–19.Google Scholar
Ferguson, DM, Schreurs, NM, Kenyon, PR and Jacob, RH 2014. Balancing consumer and societal requirements for sheep meat production: an Australasian perspective. Meat Science 98, 477–483.Google Scholar
Fisher, AD, Niemeyer, DO, Lea, JM, Lee, C, Paull, DR, Reed, MT and Ferguson, DM 2010. The effects of 12, 30, or 48 hours of road transport on the physiological and behavioural responses of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2144–2152.Google Scholar
Forkman, B, Boissy, A, Meunier-Salaün, M-C, Canali, E and Jones, RB 2007. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiology and Behavior 92, 340–374.Google Scholar
Grandin, T 2007a. Introduction: effect of consumer requirements, international standards and marketing structure on the handling and transport of livestock poultry. In Livestock handling and transport (ed. T Grandin), pp. 1–18. CAB International, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Grandin, T 2007b. Handling and welfare of livestock in slaughter plants. In Livestock handling and transport (ed. T Grandin), pp. 329–354. CAB International, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Gruber, SL, Tatum, JD, Engle, TE, Chapman, PL, Belk, KE and Smith, GC 2010. Relationships of behavioural and physiological symptoms of preslaughter stress to beef longissimus muscle tenderness. Journal of Animal Science 88, 1148–1159.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH and Coleman, GJ 2011. Human–livestock interactions: the stockperson and the productivity and welfare of farmed animals, 2nd edition. CAB International, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Rice, M, Karlen, MG, Calleja, L, Barnett, JL, Nash, J and Coleman, GJ 2011. Human- animal interactions at abattoirs: relationships between handling and animal stress in sheep and cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135, 24–33.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Rice, M, Borg, S, Edwards, LE, Ponnampalam, EN and Coleman, GJ 2016. Relationship between handling, behaviour and stress in lambs at abattoirs. In Animal Production in Australia, Proceedings of 31st Biennial Conference of the Australasian Society of Animal Production, 4–7 July 2016, Glenelg, SA, Australia, p. 79. Retrieved from http://www.asap.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2016-Proceedings-Booklet_web.pdf. Accessed 14th September 2018Google Scholar
Kaltas, GA and Chrousos, GP 2007. The neuroendorinology of stress. In Handbook of psychophysiology (ed. JT Cacioppo, LG Tassinary and GG Berntson), pp. 303–318. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Kuchel, O 1991. Stress and catecholamines. In Stress revisited 1. Neuroendocrinolgy of stress (ed. G Jasmin and M Cantin), pp. 80–103. Karger, Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Moberg, GP 2000. Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In Biology of animal stress (ed. JA Mench and G Moberg), pp. 1–21. CAB International, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Murphy PM, Purvis IW, Lindsay DR, Le Neindre P, Orgeur P and Poindron P, 1994. Measures of temperament are highly repeatable in Merino sheep and some are related to maternal behaviour. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 20, 247–250. Google Scholar
Pallant, J 2013. SPSS survival manual. McGraw-Hill Education, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
Ponnampalam, EN, Hopkins, DL, Bruce, H, Li, D, Baldi, G and Bekhit, AE 2017. Causes and contributing factors to ‘dark cutting’ meat: current trends and future directions: a review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 16, 400–430.Google Scholar
Romeyer, A and Bouissou, MF 1992. Assessment of fear reactions in domestic sheep, and influence of breed and rearing conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34, 93–119.Google Scholar
Rooyackers, OE and Nair, KS 1997. Hormonal regulation of human muscle protein metabolism. Annual Reviews in Nutrition 17, 457–485.10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.457Google Scholar
Roussel S, Hemsworth PH, Leruste H, White C, DuvauxPonter C, Nowak R and Boissy A, 2006. Repeated transport and isolation during pregnancy in ewes: effects on the reactivity to humans and to their offspring after lambing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97, 172–189. Google Scholar
Rice, M, Jongman, EC, Borg, S, Butler, KL and Hemsworth, PH 2016. Characterisation of shy-feeding and feeding lambs in the first week in a feedlot. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 179, 39–45.Google Scholar
Sapolsky, RM 2002. Endocrinology of the stress-response. In Behavioral Endocrinology (ed. JB Becker et al.), pp. 409–450. MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU 2000 How Do Glucocorticoids Influence Stress Responses? Integrating Permissive, Suppressive, Stimulatory, and Preparative Actions. Endocrine Reviews 21, 55–89. Google Scholar
Savage, RD and Eysenck, HJ 1964. The definition and measurement of emotionality. In Experiments in motivation (ed. HJ Eysenck), pp. 292–314. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Turner, Al, Hemsworth, PH and Tilbrook, AJ 2002. The susceptibility of reproduction in female pigs to impairment by stress and the role of the hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal axis. Reproduction Fertility and Development 14, 377–391.Google Scholar
Waiblinger, S, Boivin, X, Pedersen, V, Tosi, M-V, Janczak, AM, Visser, EK and Jones, RB 2006. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101, 185–242.Google Scholar
Warner, RD, Greenwood, PL, Pethick, DW and Ferguson, DM 2010. Genetic and environmental effects on meat quality. Meat Science 86, 171–183.Google Scholar