Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:48:06.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

P and Ca digestibility is increased in broiler diets supplemented with the high-phytase HIGHPHY wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

D. Scholey ,
E. Burton ,
N. Morgan ,
C. Sanni ,
C. K. Madsen ,
G. Dionisio  and
H. Brinch-Pedersen
D. Scholey*
Affiliation:
School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Brackenhurst Campus, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG25 0QF, UK
E. Burton
Affiliation:
School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Brackenhurst Campus, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG25 0QF, UK
N. Morgan
Affiliation:
School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Brackenhurst Campus, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG25 0QF, UK
C. Sanni
Affiliation:
School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Brackenhurst Campus, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG25 0QF, UK
C. K. Madsen
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Research Center Flakkebjerg, Faculty of Science of Technology, Aarhus University, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark
G. Dionisio
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Research Center Flakkebjerg, Faculty of Science of Technology, Aarhus University, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark
H. Brinch-Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Research Center Flakkebjerg, Faculty of Science of Technology, Aarhus University, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Around 70% of total seed phosphorus is represented by phytate which must be hydrolysed to be bioavailable in non-ruminant diets. The limited endogenous phytase activity in non-ruminant animals make it common practice to add an exogenous phytase source to most poultry and pig feeds. The mature grain phytase activity (MGPA) of cereal seeds provides a route for the seeds themselves to contribute to phytate digestion, but MGPA varies considerably between species and most varieties in current use make negligible contributions. Currently, all phytases used for feed supplementation and transgenic improvement of MGPA are derived from microbial enzymes belonging to the group of histidine acid phosphatases (HAP). Cereals contain HAP phytases, but the bulk of MGPA can be attributed to phytases belonging to a completely different group of phosphatases, the purple acid phosphatases (PAPhy). In recent years, increased MGPAs were achieved in cisgenic barley holding extra copies of barley PAPhy and in the wheat HIGHPHY mutant, where MGPA was increased to ~6200 FTU/kg. In the present study, the effect of replacing 33%, 66% and 100% of a standard wheat with HIGHPHY wheat was compared with a control diet with and without 500 FTU of supplemental phytase. Diets were compared by evaluating broiler performance, ileal Ca and P digestibility and tibia development, using nine replicate pens of four birds per diet over 3 weeks from hatch. There were no differences between treatments in any tibia or bird performance parameters, indicating the control diet did not contain sufficiently low levels of phosphorus to distinguish effect of phytase addition. However, in a comparison of the two wheats, the ileal Ca and P digestibility coefficients for the 100% HIGHPHY wheat diets are 22.9% and 35.6% higher, respectively, than for the control diet, indicating the wheat PAPhy is functional in the broiler digestive tract. Furthermore, 33% HIGHPHY replacement of conventional wheat, significantly improved Ca and P digestibility over the diet-supplemented exogenous phytase, probably due to the higher phytase activity in the HIGHPHY diet (1804 v. 1150 FTU). Full replacement by HIGHPHY gave 14.6% and 22.8% higher ileal digestibility coefficients for Ca and P, respectively, than for feed supplemented with exogenous HAP phytase at 500 FTU. This indicates that in planta wheat PAPhys has promising potential for improving P and mineral digestibility in animal feed.

Keywords

phytasewheatbroiler dietP digestibilityCa digestibility
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 9 , September 2017 , pp. 1457 - 1463
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amerah, AM, Ravindran, V, Lentle, RG and Thomas, DG 2007. Feed particle size: implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 63, 439–456.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2000. Method 12: phytase activity in feed: colorimetric enzymatic method. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Brejnholt, SM, Dionisio, G, Glitsoe, V, Skov, LK and Brinch-Pedersen, H 2011. The degradation of phytate by microbial and wheat phytases is dependent on the phytate matrix and the phytase origin. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91, 1398–1405.Google Scholar
Brinch-Pedersen, H, Madsen, CK, Dionisio, G and Holm, PB 2012. New mutant cereal plant, useful for manufacturing composition, which is useful as animal fodder, pp. 1-55, WO2012146597-A1, patent available at https://encrypted.google.com/patents/WO2012146597A1?cl=ru.Google Scholar
Brinch-Pedersen, H, Madsen, CK, Holme, IB and Dionisio, G 2014. Increased understanding of the cereal phytase complement for better mineral bio-availability and resource management. Journal of Cereal Science 59, 373–381.Google Scholar
Brinch-Pedersen, H, Sørensen, LD and Holm, PB 2002. Engineering crop plants: getting a handle on phosphate. Trends in Plant Science 7, 118–125.Google Scholar
Cheryan, M 1980. Phytic acid interaction in food systems. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 13, 297–335.Google Scholar
Denbow, D, Grabau, E, Lacy, G, Kornegay, E, Russell, D and Umbeck, P 1998. Soybeans transformed with a fungal phytase gene improve phosphorus availability for broilers. Poultry Science 77, 878–881.Google Scholar
Dersjant-Li, Y, Awati, A, Schulze, H and Partridge, G 2015. Phytase in non-ruminant animal nutrition: A critical review on phytase activities in the gastrointestinal tract and influencing factors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 95, 878–896.Google Scholar
Dionisio, G, Holm, PB and Brinch-Pedersen, H 2007. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatases (MINPPs) are phytases expressed during grain filling and germination. Plant Biotechnology Journal 5, 325–338.Google Scholar
Dionisio, G, Madsen, CK, Holm, PB, Welinder, KG, Jorgensen, M, Stoger, E, Arcalis, E and Brinch-Pedersen, H 2011. Cloning and characterization of purple acid phosphatase phytases from wheat, barley, maize, and rice. Plant Physiology 156, 1087–1100.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, W and De Paepe, M 1994. Total phosphorus, phytate-phosphorus and phytase activity in plant feedstuffs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 47, 19–29.Google Scholar
Engelen, AJ, Van der Heeft, FC, Randsdorp, PH, Somers, WA, Schaefer, J and Van der Vat, BJ 2001. Determination of phytase activity in feed by colorimetric enzymatic method: collaborative interlaboratory study. Journal of AOAC International 84, 629–633.Google Scholar
Hill, FW and Anderson, DL 1958. Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks. Journal of Nutrition 64, 587–603.Google Scholar
Holme, IB, Dionisio, G, Brinch-Pedersen, H, Wendt, T, Madsen, CK, Vincze, E and Holm, PB 2012. Cisgenic barley with improved phytase activity. Plant Biotechnology Journal 10, 237–247.Google Scholar
Kilkenny, C, Browne, W, Cuthill, IC, Emerson, M and Altman, DG 2010. Animal research: Reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. Journal of Gene Medicine 12, 561–563.Google Scholar
Lei, XG, Porres, JM, Mullaney, EJ and Brinch-Pedersen, H 2007. Phytase: source, structure and application. In Industrial enzymes: structure, function and applications (ed. J Polaina and AP MacCabe), p 25. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Lott, JNA, Ockenden, I, Raboy, V and Batten, GD 2000. Phytic acid and phosphorus in crop seeds and fruits: a global estimate. Seed Science Research 10, 11–33.Google Scholar
Madsen, CK, Dionisio, G, Holme, IB, Holm, PB and Brinch-Pedersen, H 2013. High mature grain phytase activity in the Triticeae has evolved by duplication followed by neofunctionalization of the purple acid phosphatase phytase (PAPhy) gene. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 3111–3123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menezes-Blackburn, D, Gabler, S and Greiner, R 2015. Performance of seven commercial phytases in an in vitro simulation of poultry digestive tract. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 63, 6142–6149.Google Scholar
Morgan, NK, Scholey, DV and Burton, EJ 2014. A comparison of two methods for determining titanium dioxide marker content in broiler digestibility studies. Animal 8, 529–533.Google Scholar
Morgan, NK, Walk, CL, Bedford, MR and Burton, EJ 2015. Contribution of intestinal- and cereal-derived phytase activity on phytate degradation in young broilers. Poultry Science 94, 1577–1583.Google Scholar
Nyannor, EKD, Williams, P, Bedford, MR and Adeola, O 2007. Corn expressing an Escherichia coli-derived phytase gene: a proof-of-concept nutritional study in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1946–1952.Google Scholar
Plumstead, PW, Kwakemaak, C and van der Klis, JD 2012. Use of a slope ratio assay to determine comparative efficacy of E coli v Buttiauxella phytases in broilers. Proceedings of the Poultry Science Association meeting, Athens, Georgia, USA, 9--12 July 2012.Google Scholar
Robbins, DH and Firman, JD 2006. Evaluation of the metabolizable energy of poultry by-product meal for chickens and turkeys by various methods. Japanese Poultry Science 5, 753–758.Google Scholar
Silversides, FG and Bedford, MR 1999. Effect of pelleting temperature on the recovery and efficacy of a xylanase enzyme in wheat-based diets. Poultry Science 78, 1184–1190.Google Scholar
Tran, G and Sauvant, D 2004. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses, fish. In Chemical data and nutritional value (ed. Sauvant D, Pérez JM and Tran G), pp. 17–24. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Association Française de Zootechnie, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Vaintraub, IA and Bulmaga, VP 1991. Effect of phytate on the in vitro activity of digestive proteinases. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 39, 859–861.Google Scholar
Walk, CL, Bedford, MR, Santos, TS, Paiva, D, Bradley, JR, Wladecki, H, Honaker, C and McElroy, AP 2013. Extra-phosphoric effects of superdoses of a novel microbial phytase. Poultry Science 92, 719–725.Google Scholar