Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:25:15.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maternal backfat depth in gestating sows has a greater influence on offspring growth and carcass lean yield than maternal feed allocation during gestation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2013

Charlotte Amdi ,
Linda Giblin ,
Tomas Ryan ,
Neil C. Stickland  and
Peadar G. Lawlor
Charlotte Amdi
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland The Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK
Linda Giblin
Affiliation:
Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
Tomas Ryan
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
Neil C. Stickland
Affiliation:
The Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK
Peadar G. Lawlor*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A commercial pig spends nearly half of its life in utero and its nutrition during this time can influence birth weight and postnatal growth. We hypothesised that postnatal growth is increased in pigs raised by sows with a high backfat depth and high level of energy intake during gestation compared with sows with a low backfat depth and low level of energy intake during gestation. This was tested in a 2×3 factorial design experiment with 2 factors for gilt backfat depth (Thin and Fat) and 3 factors for gestation feed allowance (Restricted, Control and High). Between d 25 and d 90 of gestation, Thin gilts (n=68; 12±0.6 mm P2 backfat) and Fat gilts (n=72; 19±0.6 mm P2 backfat) were randomly allocated, as individuals, to a gestation diet (6.19 g/kg lysine, 13.0 MJ DE/kg) at the following feed allowances: 1.8 kg/day (Restricted); 2.5 kg/day (Control) and 3.5 kg/day (High). For the remainder of gestation and during lactation all gilts were treated similarly. At weaning (day 28), 155 piglets were sacrificed and 272 were individually housed and followed through to slaughter (day 158). At day 80 of gestation, fasted Thin Restricted gilts had lower serum IGF-1 concentrations than Thin High or Thin Control fed gilts (P<0.001). Pigs born from Fat gilts had greater backfat depths (P<0.05), a lower lean meat yield (P<0.05) and were heavier (P<0.05) at slaughter than pigs born from Thin gilts. Gilt gestation feed allowance had only transitory effects on average daily gain and feed conversion efficiency and had no effect on pig weight at slaughter (P>0.05) or lean meat yield (P>0.05). In conclusion, gilts with a backfat depth of ~19 mm at insemination produced pigs that were heavier and fatter at ~158 days of age than those born from gilts with ~12 mm backfat depth at insemination. Maternal body condition during gestation had a more predominant influence on growth parameters of the offspring, such as weight at slaughter and backfat depth, than did feed level during gestation.

Keywords

IGF-1cortisolgestation feedingfoetal programminggrowth of pigs
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , February 2014 , pp. 236 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akyol, A, McMullen, S and Langley-Evans, SC 2012. Glucose intolerance associated with early-life exposure to maternal cafeteria feeding is dependent upon post-weaning diet. British Journal of Nutrition 107, 964–978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amdi, C, Giblin, L, Hennessy, AA, Ryan, T, Stanton, C, Stickland, NC and Lawlor, PG 2013. Feed allowance and maternal backfat levels during gestation influence maternal cortisol levels, milk fat composition and offspring growth. Journal of Nutritional Science 2, e1, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, DJ 1998. In utero programming of chronic disease. Clinical Science 95, 115–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bee, G 2004. Effect of early gestation feeding, birth weight, and gender of progeny on muscle fiber characteristics of pigs at slaughter. Journal of Animal Science 82, 826–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catalano, PM, Presley, L, Minium, J and Hauguel-de Mouzon, S 2009. Fetuses of obese mothers develop insulin resistance in utero. Diabetes Care 32, 1076–1080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clemmons, DR 2007. Modifying IGF1 activity: an approach to treat endocrine disorders, atherosclerosis and cancer. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery 6, 821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, ML, Clemmons, DR, Miles, MV, Camacho-Hubner, C, D'Ercole, AJ and Underwood, LE 1990. Regulation of serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF binding proteins during rat pregnancy. Endocrinology 127, 1278–1286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Agriculture and Food (Ireland) 2001. European Communities (pig carcase grading; amendment) Regulations SI 413, Dublin.Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture and Food (Ireland) 2008. European communities (welfare of farmed animals) Regulations SI 14, Dublin.Google Scholar
Diego, MA, Field, T, Hernandez-Reif, M, Schanberg, S, Kuhn, C and Gonzalez-Quintero, VH 2009. Prenatal depression restricts fetal growth. Early Human Development 85, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, C, Madgwick, A, Ward, S and Stickland, N 1995. Effect of maternal undernutrition in early gestation on the development of fetal myofibres in the guinea-pig. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 7, 1285–1292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, CM and Stickland, NC 1992. The effects of maternal undernutrition on maternal and fetal serum insulin-like growth factors, thyroid hormones and cortisol in the guinea pig. Journal of Developmental Physiology 18, 303–313.Google ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, CM, Stickland, NC and Fletcher, JM 1994. The influence of maternal nutrition on muscle fiber number development in the porcine fetus and on subsequent postnatal growth. Journal of Animal Science 72, 911–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estívariz, C and Ziegler, T 1997. Nutrition and the insulin-like growth factor system. Endocrine 7, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallaher, B, Breier, B, Keven, C, Harding, J and Gluckman, P 1998. Fetal programming of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3: evidence for an altered response to undernutrition in late gestation following exposure to periconceptual undernutrition in the sheep. Journal of Endocrinology 159, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, R, Porter, H, Newcomb, P, Holly, JM and Soothill, P 1999. An immunohistochemical study of type I insulin-like growth factor receptors in the placentae of pregnancies with appropriately grown or growth restricted fetuses. Placenta 20, 325–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howie, GJ, Sloboda, DM, Kamal, T and Vickers, MH 2009. Maternal nutritional history predicts obesity in adult offspring independent of postnatal diet. Journal of Physiology 587, 905–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hull, HR, Dinger, MK, Knehans, AW, Thompson, DM and Fields, DA 2008. Impact of maternal body mass index on neonate birthweight and body composition. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 198, 411–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanitz, E, Otten, W and Tuchscherer, M 2006. Changes in endocrine and neurochemical profiles in neonatal pigs prenatally exposed to increased maternal cortisol. Journal of Endocrinology 191, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kind, KL, Roberts, CT, Sohlstrom, AI, Katsman, A, Clifton, PM, Robinson, JS and Owens, JA 2005. Chronic maternal feed restriction impairs growth but increases adiposity of the fetal guinea pig. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 288, R119–R126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koupil, I and Toivanen, P 2007. Social and early-life determinants of overweight and obesity in 18-year-old Swedish men. International Journal of Obesity 32, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kranendonk, G, Hopster, H, Fillerup, M, Ekkel, ED, Mulder, EJH, Wiegant, VM and Taverne, MAM 2006. Lower birth weight and attenuated adrenocortical response to ACTH in offspring from sows that orally received cortisol during gestation. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 30, 218–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawlor, PG and Lynch, PB 2007. A review of factors influencing litter size in Irish sows. Irish Veterinary Journal 60, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawlor, PG, Lynch, PB, Caffrey, JV and OD, J 2002. Effect of cooking wheat and maize on the performance of newly weaned pigs. 1. Age and weight at weaning. Animal Science 76, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, CRG and Bunter, KL 2011. Body development in sows, feed intake and maternal capacity. Part 2: gilt body condition before and after lactation, reproductive performance and correlations with lactation feed intake. Animal 5, 1855–1867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J, Forhead, AJ, Dauncey, MJ, Gilmour, RS and Fowden, AL 2002. Control of growth hormone receptor and insulin-like growth factor-I expression by cortisol in ovine fetal skeletal muscle. The Journal of Physiology 541, 581–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J-P, Baker, J, Perkins, AS, Robertson, EJ and Efstratiadis, A 1993. Mice carrying null mutations of the genes encoding insulin-like growth factor I (Igf-1) and type 1 IGF receptor (Igf1r). Cell 75, 59–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Long, NM, George, LA, Uthlaut, AB, Smith, DT, Nijland, MJ, Nathanielsz, PW and Ford, SP 2010. Maternal obesity and increased nutrient intake before and during gestation in the ewe results in altered growth, adiposity, and glucose tolerance in adult offspring. Journal of Animal Science 88, 3546–3553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNamara, LB, Giblin, L, Markham, T, Stickland, NC, Berry, DP, O'Reilly, JJ, Lynch, PB, Kerry, JP and Lawlor, PG 2011. Nutritional intervention during gestation alters growth, body composition and gene expression patterns in skeletal muscle of pig offspring. Animal 5, 1195–1206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissen, PM, Sørensen, IL, Vestergaard, M and Oksbjerg, N 2005. Effects of sow nutrition on maternal and foetal serum growth factors and on foetal myogenesis. Animal Science 80, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oster, MH, Fielder, PJ, Levin, N and Cronin, MJ 1995. Adaptation of the growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I axis to chronic and severe calorie or protein malnutrition. Journal of Clinical Investigation 95, 2258–2265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randhawa, R and Cohen, P 2005. The role of the insulin-like growth factor system in prenatal growth. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 86, 84–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redmer, DA, Wallace, JM and Reynolds, LP 2004. Effect of nutrient intake during pregnancy on fetal and placental growth and vascular development. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 27, 199–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, LP, Borowicz, PP, Caton, JS, Vonnahme, KA, Luther, JS, Buchanan, DS, Hafez, SA, Grazul-Bilska, AT and Redmer, DA 2010. Uteroplacental vascular development and placental function: an update. The International Journal of Developmental Biology 54, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shankar, K, Harrell, A, Liu, X, Gilchrist, JM, Ronis, MJ and Badger, TM 2008. Maternal obesity at conception programs obesity in the offspring. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 294, R528–R538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsukahara, H, Gordienko, DV, Tonshoff, B, Gelato, MC and Goligorsky, MS 1994. Direct demonstration of insulin-like growth factor-I-induced nitric oxide production by endothelial cells. Kidney International 45, 598–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitaker, RC 2004. Predicting preschooler obesity at birth: the role of maternal obesity in early pregnancy. Pediatrics 114, e29–e36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed