Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:12:19.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Light lamb meat quality packed under modified atmospheres: effect of stunning systems (electrically v. gas)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2009

M. B. Linares  and
H. Vergara
M. B. Linares
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología Agroforestal y Genética, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Campus Universitario, 02071 Albacete, Spain Sección de Calidad Alimentaria, Instituto de Desarrollo Regional, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Campus Universitario, 02071 Albacete, Spain
H. Vergara*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología Agroforestal y Genética, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Campus Universitario, 02071 Albacete, Spain Sección de Calidad Alimentaria, Instituto de Desarrollo Regional, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Campus Universitario, 02071 Albacete, Spain
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In the present study, the effect of type of stunning (electrical v. gas) and the gas mixtures in a modified atmosphere (MA) packing system (MA-A: 30% CO2 + 70% O2; MA-B: 30% CO2 + 69.3% N2 + 0.7% CO; MA-C: 40% CO2 + 60% N2) on light lamb meat quality, obtained by 20 males of Manchego Spanish breed, was evaluated at 7, 14 and 21 days post packing. For all ageing times, gas-stunned groups reached the highest pH (P < 0.001) and shear force (SF) values (P < 0.05), and at 21 days, water losses were highest; in contrast, meat colour coordinates were lower (P < 0.001). In general, MA-B showed the highest stability for colour coordinates whereas the lowest tenderness (high SF) was found on MA-A. In this study, the gas mixture with a low carbon monoxide level (MA-B) promoted a higher colour stability and good tenderness, in comparison to the other two blends. In contrast, the conventional packaging system (type A, high oxygen levels) had a reduced tenderness and major colour instability.

Keywords

stunningmeatlight lambmodified atmospherecarbon monoxide
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 12 , December 2009 , pp. 1763 - 1771
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernabeu, R, Tendero, A 2005. Preference structure for lamb meat consumers. A Spanish case study. Meat Science 71, 464–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berruga, MI, Vergara, H, Gallego, L 2005. Influence of packaging conditions on microbial and lipid oxidation in lamb meat. Small Ruminant Research 57, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bórnez, R, Linares, MB, Vergara, H 2009. Haematological, hormonal and biochemical blood parameters in lamb: effect of age and blood sampling time. Livestock Science 121, 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channon, HA, Payne, AM, Warner, RD 2000. Halothane genotype pre-slaughter handling and stunning method all influence pork quality. Meat Science 56, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Channon, HA, Payne, AM, Warner, RD 2002. Comparison of CO2 stunning with manual electrical stunning (50 Hz) of pigs on carcass and meat quality. Meat Science 60, 63–68.Google Scholar
Directive 2003/65/EC 2003. Protection of animals designated for experimentation and scientific experiments.Google Scholar
Doherty, AM, Sheridan, JJ, Allen, P, McDowell, DA, Blair, IS 1996. Physical characteristics of lamb primals packaged under vacuum or modified atmospheres. Meat Science 42, 315–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EU Council Directive 93/119/EC 1993. Protection of animals at the time of slaughter or killing. Official Journal of European Communities L 340, 21–34.Google Scholar
Gill, CO 1990. Controlled atmosphere packaging of chilled meat. Food Control, 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grau, R, Ham, R 1953. Muscle as food. In Food Science and Technology. A series of monographs (1985) (ed. PJ Bechtel). Academic Press, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Gregory, NG 2005. Recent concerns about stunning and slaughter: a review. Meat Science 70, 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, M, Bertelsen, G 2000. Colour stability and lipid oxidation of fresh beef. Development of a response surface model for predicting the effects of temperature, storage time, and modified atmosphere composition. Meat Science 54, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayasingh, P, Cornforth, DP, Carpenter, CE, Whittier, D 2001. Evaluation of carbon monoxide treatment in modified atmosphere packaging or vacuum packaging to increase color stability of fresh beef. Meat Science 59, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, TR, Sebranek, JG, Rust, RE, Honeyman, MS 2003. Use of carbon monoxide packaging for improving the shelf life of pork. Journal of Food Science 68, 2596–2603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambertini, L, Vignola, G, Badiani, A, Zaghini, G, Formigoni, A 2006. The effect of journey time and stocking density during transport on carcass and meat quality in rabbits. Meat Science 72, 641–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linares, MB, Berruga, MI, Bórnez, R, Vergara, H 2007b. Lipid oxidation in lamb meat: effect of weight, handling previous slaughter and modified atmospheres. Meat Science 76, 715–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linares, MB, Bórnez, R, Vergara, H 2007a. Effect of different stunning systems on meat quality of light lamb. Meat Science 76, 675–681.Google Scholar
Linares, MB, Bórnez, R, Vergara, H 2008. Effect of stunning systems on meat quality of Manchego suckling lamb packed under modified atmosphere. Meat Science 78, 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, G, Lundström, K, Tornberg, E 2001. Contribution of pigment content, myoglobin forms and internal reflectance to the colour of pork loin and ham from pure breed pigs. Meat Science 59, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, MN, Lametsch, R, Marchen, SH, Jensen, ON, Skibsted, LH 2007. High-oxygen packaging atmosphere influences protein oxidation and tenderness of porcine longissimus dorsi during chill storage. Meat Science 77, 295–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Cerezo, S, Sañudo, C, Panea, B, Medel, I, Delfa, R, Sierra, I, Beltrán, JA, Cerero, R, Olleta, JL 2005. Breed, slaughter weight and ageing time effects on physico-chemical characteristics of lamb meat. Meat Science 69, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, J, Gill, CO 1987. The pH and display life of chilled lamb after prolonged storage under vacuum or under CO2. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture Research 30, 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, EM, Gomide, LAM, Fontes, PR, Ramos, ALS, Peternelli, LA 2005. Meat color evaluation and pigment levels in bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) slaughtered by different methods. Aquaculture 245, 175–182.Google Scholar
Roça, RO, Padovani, CR, Filipi, MC, Schwach, E, Uemi, A, Shinkai, RT, Biondi, GF 2001. Efeitos dos métodos de abate de bovinos na eficiência da sangria. Ciência e Tecnología de Alimentos 21, 244–248.Google Scholar
Rosenvold, K, Petersen, JS, Lwerke, HN, Jensen, SK, Therkildsen, M, Karlsson, AH, Moller, HS, Andersen, HJ 2001. Muscle glycogen stores and meat quality as affected by strategic finishing feeding of slaughter pigs. Journal of Animal Science 79, 382–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sañudo, C, Sánchez, A, Alfonso, M 1998. Small ruminant production systems and factors affecting lamb meat quality. Meat Science 49 (suppl. 1), S29–S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, A, Roselvold, K, Purslow, P, Andersen, HJ, Henckel, P 2002. Physiological and structural events post-mortem of importance for drip loss in pork. Meat Science 61, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sekar, A, Dushyanthan, K, Radhakrishnan, R, Narendra Babu, R 2006. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on structural and physical changes in buffalo meat. Meat Science 72, 211–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorheim, O, Kropf, DH, Hunt, MC, Karwoski, MT, Warren, KE 1996. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on pork loin colour, display life and drip loss. Meat Science 43, 203–212.Google Scholar
Spanish Animal Welfare Act 32/2007 2007. Caring of animals during the production time, transport, experimentation and slaughter time (BOE 268, 8 November 2007. Number 19321). Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/11/08/pdfs/A45914-45920.pdfGoogle Scholar
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 2005. SPSS for Windows 14.0. User’s guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Stoier, S, Aaslyng, MD, Olsen, EV, Henckel, P 2001. The effect of stress during lairage and stunning on muscle metabolism and drip loss in Danish pork. Meat Science 59, 127–131.Google Scholar
Vergara, H, Berruga, MI, Linares, MB 2005. Effect of gas composition on rabbit meat quality in modified atmosphere packaging. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85, 1981–1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergara, H, Gallego, L 2000. Effect of electrical stunning on meat quality of lamb. Meat Science 56, 345–349.Google Scholar
Vergara, H, Gallego, L 2001. Effects of gas composition in modified atmosphere packaging on the meat quality of Spanish Manchega lamb. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 81, 1353–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergara, H, Gallego, L, García, A, Landete-Castillejos, T 2003. Conservation of Cervus elaphus meat in modified atmospheres. Meat Science 65, 779–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viana, ES, Gomide, LAM, Vanetti, MCD 2005. Effect of modified atmospheres on microbiological, color, and sensory properties of refrigerated pork. Meat Science 71, 696–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiklund, E, Stevenson-Barry, JM, Duncan, SJ, Littlejohn, RP 2001. Electrical stimulation of red deer (Cervus elaphus) carcasses: effects on rate of pH decline, meat tenderness, colour stability and water-holding capacity. Meat Science 59, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar