Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:32:18.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Increasing levels of rapeseed expeller meal in diets for pigs: effects on protein and energy metabolism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2018

M. Pérez de Nanclares
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
C. Marcussen
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C., Denmark
A.-H. Tauson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C., Denmark
J. Ø. Hansen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
N. P. Kjos
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
L. T. Mydland
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
K. E. Bach Knudsen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
M. Øverland*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway
*
Get access

Abstract

The heavy reliance on imported soybean meal (SBM) as a protein source makes it necessary for the European pig industry to search for alternatives and to develop pigs that perform efficiently when fed such ingredients. Digestion and metabolism are major physiological processes contributing to variation in feed efficiency. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to assess the effects of replacing SBM with increasing levels of rapeseed meal (RSM) in diets for young pigs on apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of energy and nutrients, nitrogen (N) balance, energy metabolism and carbohydrate, protein and fat oxidation. Four diets were fed to 32 pigs (22.7±4.1 kg initial BW) for three weeks. The diets consisted of a control cereal grain-SBM basal diet and three test diets where SBM and wheat were partially replaced with 10%, 20%, and 30% of expeller RSM. Increasing level of RSM in the diets linearly reduced ATTD of organic matter, CP, total carbohydrates, dietary fiber and energy. Utilization of digested nitrogen (DN) for N retention and total N excretion were not affected by RSM inclusion, however, RSM inclusion induced a shift in N excretion from urine to feces. Despite a linear increase in liver to metabolic BW ratio, heat production and utilization of metabolizable energy (ME) for retention were not affected by increasing RSM inclusion. In conclusion, replacing SBM with up to 30% of expeller RSM in nutritionally balanced diets for young pigs reduced the ATTD of most nutrients and energy, but did not affect N and energy retention in the body or efficiency of utilization of DN or ME for retention.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach Knudsen, KE 1997. Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67, 319338.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE 2014. Fiber and nonstarch polysaccharide content and variation in common crops used in broiler diets. Poultry Science 93, 23802393.Google Scholar
Bindelle, J, Buldgen, A, Delacollette, M, Wavreille, J, Agneessens, R, Destain, JP and Leterme, P 2009. Influence of source and concentrations of dietary fiber on in vivo nitrogen excretion pathways in pigs as reflected by in vivo fermentation and nitrogen incorporation by fecal bacteria. Journal of Animal Science 87, 583593.Google Scholar
Blok, MC 2006. Development of a new NE formula by CVB using the database by INRA. Pre-symposium Workshop, Net energy systems for growing and fattening pigs, 24 May 2006. Munkebjerg Hotel, Vejle, Denmark.Google Scholar
Brouwer, E 1965. Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Energy Metabolism Troon, Scotland, May 1964. European Association for Animal Production publication no. 11 (ed. KL Blaxter), pp. 441–443. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Buchmann, N and Wenk, C 1989. Effects of feeding low and high glucosinolate rapeseed meal on metabolism and thyroid function of growing pig. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Energy metabolism of farm animals, 18–24 September 1988, Lunteren, Netherlands. European Association for Animal Production publication no. 43 (ed. Y van der Honing and WH Close), pp. 135–138. Lunteren, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Busato, A., Bestetti, GE, Rossi, GL, Gerber, H, Peter, HJ and Blum, JW 1991. Effects of feeding rapeseed-meal on liver and thyroid gland function and histomorphology in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 66, 1227.Google Scholar
Carré, P and Pouzet, A 2014. Rapeseed market, worldwide and in Europe. Oilseeds & fats Crops and Lipids 21, D102.Google Scholar
Choi, HB, Jeong, JH, Kim, DH, Lee, Y, Kwon, H and Kim, Y-Y 2015. Influence of rapeseed meal on growth performance, blood profiles, nutrient digestibility and economic benefit of growing-finishing pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 28, 13451353.Google Scholar
Chwalibog, A, Jakobsen, K, Henckel, S and Thorbek, G 1992. Estimation of quantitative oxidation and fat retention from carbohydrate, protein and fat in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 68, 123135.Google Scholar
Chwalibog, A, Tauson, A-H and Thorbek, G 2004. Energy metabolism and substrate oxidation in pigs during feeding, starvation and re-feeding. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 88, 101112.Google Scholar
Chwalibog, A and Thorbek, G 1995. Quantitative partition of protein, carbohydrate and fat pools in growing pigs. Archives of Animal Nutrition 48, 5361.Google Scholar
Fandrejewski, H, Katarzyna, C, Kotarbinska, M and Stanislawa, R 1994. Heat production in growing pigs fed rapeseed meal with various glucosinolate contents. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 3, 287296.Google Scholar
Gilbert, H, Billon, Y, Brossard, L, Faure, J, Gatellier, P, Gondret, F, Labussière, E, Lebret, B, Lefaucheur, L, Le Floch, N, Louveau, I, Merlot, E, Meunier-Salaün, MC, Montage, L, Mormede, P, Renaudeau, D, Riquet, J, Rogel-Gaillard, C, van Milgen, J, Vincent, A and Noblet, J 2017. Review: divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig. Animal 11, 14271439.Google Scholar
Hansen, MJ, Chwalibog, A, Tauson, A-H and Sawosz, E 2006. Influence of different fibre sources on digestibility and nitrogen and energy balances in growing pigs. Archives of Animal Nutrition 60, 390401.Google Scholar
Hocquette, JF, Ortigues-Marty, I, Pethick, D, Herpin, P and Fernández, X 1998. Nutritional and hormonal regulation of energy metabolism in skeletal muscles of meat-producing animals. Livestock Production Science 56, 115143.Google Scholar
Jensen, SK, Olesen, HS and Sørensen, H 1990. Aqueous enzymatic processing of rapeseed for production of high quality products. In Rapeseed/canola: chemistry, nutrition and processing technology (ed. F Shahidi), pp. 331343. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, H, Serena, A, Hedemann, MS and Bach Knudsen, KE 2007. The fermentative capacity of growing pigs and adult sows fed diets with contrasting type and level of dietary fibre. Livestock Science 109, 111114.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, H, Zhao, XQ and Eggum, BO 1996. The influence of dietary fibre and environmental temperature on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hind-gut and energy metabolism in pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 75, 365378.Google Scholar
Kim, B 2008. Thyroid hormone as a determinant of energy expenditure and the basal metabolic rate. Thyroid 18, 141144.Google Scholar
Le Goff, G and Noblet, J 2001. Comparative total tract digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. Journal of Animal Science 79, 24182427.Google Scholar
Len, NT, Lindberg, JE and Ogle, B 2007. Digestibility and nitrogen retention of diets containing different levels of fibre in local (Mong Cai), F1 (Mong Cai × Yorkshire) and exotic (Landrace × Yorkshire) growing pigs in Vietnam. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 91, 297303.Google Scholar
Mejicanos, G, Sanjayan, N, Kim, IH and Nyachoti, CM 2016. Recent advances in canola meal utilization in swine nutrition. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 58, 719.Google Scholar
Morgan, CA and Whittemore, CT 1988. Dietary fibre and nitrogen excretion and retention by pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19, 185189.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th revised edition. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Karege, C and Dubois, S 1989. Influence of sex and genotype on energy utilization in growing pigs. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Energy metabolism of farm animals, 18-24 September 1988, Lunteren, Netherlands. European Association for Animal Production publication no. 43 (ed. Y van der Honing and WH Close), pp. 57–60. Lunteren, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Noblet, J and Le Goff, GI 2001. Effect of dietary fibre on the energy value of feeds for pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 3552.Google Scholar
Parr, CK, Liu, Y, Parsons, CM and Stein, HH 2015. Effects of high protein or conventional canola meal on growth performance, organ weights, bone ash, and blood characteristics of weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 93, 21652173.Google Scholar
Pérez de Nanclares, M, Trudeau, MP, Hansen, , Mydland, LT, Urriola, PE, Shurson, GC, Piercey Åkesson, C, Kjos, NP, Arntzen, and Øverland, M 2017. High-fiber rapeseed co-product diet for Norwegian Landrace pigs: Effect on digestibility. Livestock Science 203, 19.Google Scholar
SAS 1990. SAS users guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Pérez, J-M and Tran, G 2004. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses and fish. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Theander, O, Åman, P, Westerlund, E and Graham, H 1994. Enzymatic/chemical analysis of dietary fiber. Journal of AOAC International 77, 703709.Google Scholar
Thorbek, G, Chwalibog, A and Henckel, S 1984. Nitrogen and energy metabolism in pigs of Danish Landrace from 20 to 120 kg live weight. Norm for protein and energy requirements for maintenance and growth. 563. Beretning fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg. Landhusholdningsselskabets forlag, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
van Milgen, J, Bernier, JF, Lecozler, Y, Dubois, S and Noblet, J 1998. Major determinants of fasting heat production and energetic cost of activity in growing pigs of different body weight and breed/castration combination. British Journal of Nutrition 79, 509517.Google Scholar
van Milgen, J, Noblet, J and Dubois, S 2001. Energetic efficiency of starch, protein and lipid utilization in growing pigs. Journal of Nutrition 131, 13091318.Google Scholar
Zervas, S and Zijlstra, RT 2002. Effects of dietary protein and oathull fiber on nitrogen excretion patterns and postprandial plasma urea profiles in grower pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80, 32383246.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pérez de Nanclares et al. supplementary material

Pérez de Nanclares et al. supplementary material 1

Download Pérez de Nanclares et al. supplementary material(File)
File 17.5 KB