Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:03:11.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The importance of grasslands for animal production and other functions: a review on management and methodological progress in the tropics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2012

M. Boval  and
R. M. Dixon
M. Boval*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR143, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, 97170 Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe (FWI), France
R. M. Dixon
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, PO Box 6014, Rockhampton, Queensland 4701, Australia
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The global importance of grasslands is indicated by their extent; they comprise some 26% of total land area and 80% of agriculturally productive land. The majority of grasslands are located in tropical developing countries where they are particularly important to the livelihoods of some one billion poor peoples. Grasslands clearly provide the feed base for grazing livestock and thus numerous high-quality foods, but such livestock also provide products such as fertilizer, transport, traction, fibre and leather. In addition, grasslands provide important services and roles including as water catchments, biodiversity reserves, for cultural and recreational needs, and potentially a carbon sink to alleviate greenhouse gas emissions. Inevitably, such functions may conflict with management for production of livestock products. Much of the increasing global demand for meat and milk, particularly from developing countries, will have to be supplied from grassland ecosystems, and this will provide difficult challenges. Increased production of meat and milk generally requires increased intake of metabolizable energy, and thus increased voluntary intake and/or digestibility of diets selected by grazing animals. These will require more widespread and effective application of improved management. Strategies to improve productivity include fertilizer application, grazing management, greater use of crop by-products, legumes and supplements and manipulation of stocking rate and herbage allowance. However, it is often difficult to predict the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of such strategies, particularly in tropical developing country production systems. Evaluation and on-going adjustment of grazing systems require appropriate and reliable assessment criteria, but these are often lacking. A number of emerging technologies may contribute to timely low-cost acquisition of quantitative information to better understand the soil–pasture–animal interactions and animal management in grassland systems. Development of remote imaging of vegetation, global positioning technology, improved diet markers, near IR spectroscopy and modelling provide improved tools for knowledge-based decisions on the productivity constraints of grazing animals. Individual electronic identification of animals offers opportunities for precision management on an individual animal basis for improved productivity. Improved outcomes in the form of livestock products, services and/or other outcomes from grasslands should be possible, but clearly a diversity of solutions are needed for the vast range of environments and social circumstances of global grasslands.

Keywords

pasturesstrategiestechnologyindicatorgrazing
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Special Issue 5: Symposium “Sustainable animal production in the tropics” (SAPT), Guadeloupe, France, November 15–18, 2010 , May 2012 , pp. 748 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, BH 2004. Effect of composition and quality of diet and feeding time on the kinetics and efficacy of some anthelmintic drugs: a mini-review. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 52, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ali, HAM, Mayes, RW, Hector, BL, Verma, AK, Orskov, ER 2005. The possible use of n-alkanes, long-chain fatty alcohols and long-chain fatty acids as markers in studies of the botanical composition of the diet of free-ranging herbivores. Journal of Agricultural Science 143, 85–95.Google Scholar
Allard, V, Soussana, JF, Falcimagne, R, Berbigier, P, Bonnefond, JM, Ceschia, E, D'Hour, P, Henault, C, Laville, P, Martin, C, Pinares-Patino, C 2007. The role of grazing management for the net biome productivity and greenhouse gas budget (CO2, N2O and CH4) of semi-natural grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 121, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, VG, Batello, C, Berretta, EJ, Hodgson, J, Kothmann, M, Li, X, McLvor, J, Milne, J, Morris, C, Peeters, A, Sanderson, M 2011and The Forage Grazing Terminology CAn international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science 66, 2–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammann, C, Flechard, CR, Leifeld, J, Neftel, A, Fuhrer, J 2007. The carbon budget of newly established temperate grassland depends on management intensity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 121, 5–20.Google Scholar
Amthor, JS, Huston, MA (ed.) 1998. Terrestrial ecosystem responses to global change: a research strategy. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN37pp.Google Scholar
Anderson, DM, Frederickson, EL, Nachman, P, Estell, RE, Havstad, KM, Murray, LW 1998. Laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) spectra of herbaceous and woody pre- and post-digested plant material. Animal Feed Science and Technology 70, 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andres, S, Murray, I, Calleja, A, Giraldez, FJ 2005. Nutritive evaluation of forages by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 13, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archimede, H, Boval, M, Alexandre, G, Xande, A, Aumont, G, Poncet, C 2000. Effect of regrowth age on intake and digestion of Digitaria decumbens consumed by Black-belly sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 87, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthington, JD, Brown, WF 2005. Estimation of feeding value of four tropical forage species at two stages of maturity. Journal of Animal Science 83, 1726–1731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ash, AJ, Corfield, JP, McIvor, JG, Ksiksi, TS 2011. Grazing management in tropical savannas: utilization and rest strategies to manipulate rangeland condition. Rangeland Ecology & Management 64, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, MD, Jervis, AP, Trueman, IC 1996. The potential of near infrared spectroscopy for monitoring species diversity in grassland. Aspects of Applied Biology 44, 431–436.Google Scholar
Ayantunde, AA, de Leeuw, J, Turner, MD, Said, M 2011. Challenges of assessing the sustainability of (agro)-pastoral systems. Livestock Science 139, 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagchi, S, Ritchie, ME 2010. Introduced grazers can restrict potential soil carbon sequestration through impacts on plant community composition. Ecology Letters 13, 959–968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumont, R, Cohen-Salmon, D, Prache, S, Sauvant, D 2004. A mechanistic model of intake and grazing behaviour in sheep integrating sward architecture and animal decisions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavin, TK, Griffis, TJ, Baker, JM, Venterea, RT 2009. Impact of reduced tillage and cover cropping on the greenhouse gas budget of a maize/soybean rotation ecosystem. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 134, 234–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Salem, H, Priolo, A, Morand-Fehr, P 2008. Shrubby vegetation and agro-industrial by-products as alternative feed resources for sheep and goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenutti, MA, Gordon, IJ, Poppi, DP, Crowther, R, Spinks, W, Moreno, FC 2009. The horizontal barrier effect of stems on the foraging behaviour of cattle grazing five tropical grasses. Livestock Science 126, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, WJ 2008. What limits trees in C4 grasslands and savannas? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, WJ, Parr, CL 2010. Beyond the forest edge: ecology, diversity and conservation of the grassy biomes. Biological Conservation 143, 2395–2404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, DT, Tueller, PT 2003. Rangeland monitoting using remote sensing. Arid Land Research and Management 17, 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwman, AF, van der Hoek, KW, Eickhout, B, Soenario, I 2005. Exploring changes in world ruminant production systems. Agricultural Systems 84, 121–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boval, M, Cruz, P, Peyraud, JL, Penning, P 2000. The effect of herbage allowance on daily intake by Creole heifers tethered on natural Dichanthium spp. pasture. Grass and Forage Science 55, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boval, M, Archimede, H, Cruz, P, Duru, M 2007a. Intake and digestibility in heifers grazing a Dichanthium spp. dominated pasture, at 14 and 28 days of regrowth. Animal Feed Science and Technology 134, 18–31.Google Scholar
Boval, M, Fanchone, A, Archimède, H, Gibb, MJ 2007b. Effect of structure of a tropical pasture on ingestive behaviour, digestibility of diet and daily intake by grazing cattle. Grass and Forage Science 62, 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boval, M, Ortega-Jimenez, E, Fanchone, A, Alexandre, G 2010. Diet attributes of lactating ewes at pasture using faecal NIRS and relationship to pasture characteristics and milk production. Journal of Agricultural Science 148, 477–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boval, M, Cruz, P, Ledet, JE, Coppry, O, Archimede, H 2002. Effect of nitrogen on intake and digestibility of a tropical grass grazed by Creole heifers. Journal of Agricultural Science 138, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boval, M, Coates, DB, Lecomte, P, Decruyenaere, V, Archimede, H 2004. Faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to assess chemical composition, in vivo digestibility and intake of tropical grass by Creole cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 114, 19–29.Google Scholar
Braga, GJ, Pedreira, CGS, Herling, VR, Luz, PHD, Marchesin, WA, Macedo, FB 2009. Quantifying herbage mass on rotationally stocked palisadegrass pastures using indirect methods. Scientia Agricola 66, 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbridge, RE, Mayle, FE, Killeen, TJ 2004. Fifty-thousand-year vegetation and climate history of Noel Kempff Mercado National Park, Bolivian Amazon. Quaternary Research 61, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, JC, Sollenberger, LE 2002. Grazing behaviour of ruminants and daily performance from warm-season grasses. Crop Science 42, 873–881.Google Scholar
Byrne, KA, Kiely, G, Leahy, P 2007. Carbon sequestration determined using farm scale carbon balance and eddy covariance. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 121, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilibroste, P, Gibb, MJ, Tamminga, S 2005. Pasture characteristics and animal performance. In Quantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism (ed. J Dijkstra, JM Forbes and J France), pp. 681–706. Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Chilibroste, P, Soca, P, Mattiauda, DA, Bentancur, O, Robinson, PH 2007. Short term fasting as a tool to design effective grazing strategies for lactating dairy cattle: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1075–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, DB, Dixon, RM 2007. Faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (F.NIRS) measurements of non-grass proportions in the diet of cattle grazing tropical rangelands. Rangeland Journal 29, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, DB, Dixon, RM 2008. Faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy estimates of diet quality and responses to nitrogen supplements by cattle grazing Bothriochloa pertusa pastures. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 829–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, SW, Christiansen, S, Shenk, JS 1990. Prediction of botanical composition using NIRS calibrations developed from botanically pure samples. Crop Science 30, 202–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, SW 2006. Challenges to assessing forage intake by grazing ruminants. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 13–18 August, 2006, pp. 14–06.Google Scholar
Cruz, P, Boval, M 2000. Effect of nitrogen on some morphogenetic traits of temperate and tropical perennial forage grasses. In Grassland ecophysiology and grazing ecology (ed. G Lemaire, J Hodgson, A De Moraes, PC Carvalho and C Nabinger), pp. 151–168. University of Cambrigde, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, JP 1994. Grassland invertebrates: ecology, influence on soil fertility and effects on plant growth. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
da Mata, R, McGeoch, M, Tidon, R 2008. Drosophilid assemblages as a bioindicator system of human disturbance in the Brazilian Savanna. Biodiversity and Conservation 17, 2899–2916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Alexis, S, Loranger-Merciris, G, Mahieu, M, Boval, M 2009. Influence of earthworms on development of the free-living stages of gastrointestinal nematodes in goat faeces. Veterinary Parasitology 163, 171–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Decruyenaere, V, Lecomte, P, Demarquilly, C, Auffere, J, Dardenne, P, Stilmant, D, Buldgen, A 2009. Evaluation of green forage intake and digestibility in ruminants using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS): developing a global calibration. Animal Feed Science and Technology 148, 138–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R, Rosenzweig, C 2010. Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 19627–19632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delagarde, R, Faverdin, P, Baratte, C, Peyraud, JL 2011. GrazeIn: a model of herbage intake and milk production for grazing dairy cows. 2. Prediction of intake under rotational and continuously stocked grazing management. Grass and Forage Science 66, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, CL, Narrod, CA, Tiongco, MM, Barros, GSdeC, Catelo, MA, Costales, A, Mehta, R, Naranong, V, Poapongsakorn, N, Sharma, VP, Zen, Sde 2008. Determinants and implications of the growing scale of livestock farms in four fast-growing developing countries. Research Report – International Food Policy Research Institute, xiii+131pp.Google Scholar
Deresz, F, Paim-Costa, ML, Coser, AC, Martins, CE, de Abreu, JB 2006. Chemical composition, in vitro dry matter digestibility and forage mass of elephantgrass cv. Napier pasture managed in a rotational grazing system. Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia – Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 35, 863–869.Google Scholar
Devendra, C, Leng, RA 2011. Feed resources for animals in Asia: issues, strategies for use, intensification and integration for increased productivity. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 24, 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, RM, Smith, DR, Coates, DB 2007. Using faecal NIRS to improve nutritional management of breeders in the seasonally dry tropics. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 16, 135–145.Google Scholar
Dixon, RM, Stockdale, CR 1999. Associative effects between forages and grains: consequences for feed utilization. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 757–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, RM, Egan, AR 2000. Response of lambs fed low quality roughage to supplements based on urea, cereal grain, or protein meals. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 811–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, RM 2008. Utilizing faecal NIRS measurements to improve prediction of grower and breeder cattle performance and supplement management. Final Report of Project NBP.302. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney.Google Scholar
Dixon, RM, Coates, DB 2009. Review: near infrared spectroscopy of faeces to evaluate the nutrition and physiology of herbivores. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 17, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, RM, Coates, DB 2010. Diet quality estimated with faecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy and responses to N supplementation by cattle grazing buffel grass pastures. Animal Feed Science and Technology 158, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, RM, Playford, C, Coates, DB 2011. Nutrition of beef breeder cows in the dry tropics. 1. Effects of nitrogen supplementation and weaning on breeder performance. Animal Production Science 51, 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, GE, Gherardi, SG, Edirsinghe, A, Gittins, SP, Henry, DA, Mata, G 2010. Using MODIS imagery, climate and soil data to estimate pasture growth rates on farms in the south-west of Western Australia. Animal Production Science 50, 611–615.Google Scholar
Doreau, M, Bauchart, D, Chilliard, Y 2011. Enhancing fatty acid composition of milk and meat through animal feeding. Animal Production Science 51, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H 2010. Balancing nutrient supply and nutrient requirements in grazing sheep. Small Ruminant Research 92, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H, Mayes, RW 2005. Using n-alkanes and other plant wax components to estimate intake, digestibility and diet composition of grazing/browsing sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research 59, 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, PT, Dixon, RM, Egan, AR 1991. Treatment of roughages and their relevance to animal production in the tropics. In Recent advances on nutrition of herbivores (ed. YW Ho, HK Wong, N Abdullah and ZA Tajuddin), pp. 45–53. Malaysian Society of Animal Production, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Doyle, PT, Stockdale, CR, Wales, WJ, Walker, GP, Heard, JW 2001. Limits to and optimising milk production and composition from pastures. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition 13, 9–17.Google Scholar
Dunne, PG, Monahan, FJ, O'Mara, FP, Moloney, AP 2009. Colour of bovine subcutaneous adipose tissue: a review of contributory factors, associations with carcass and meat quality and its potential utility in authentication of dietary history. Meat Science 81, 28–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durant, D, Tichit, M, Kerneis, E, Fritz, H 2008. Management of agricultural wet grasslands for breeding waders: integrating ecological and livestock system perspectives – a review. Biodiversity and Conservation 17, 2275–2295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanchone, A, Archimede, H, Boval, M 2008. Comparison of fecal crude protein and fecal near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict digestibility of fresh grass consumed by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 87, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanchone, A, Boval, M, Lecomte, P, Archimède, H 2007. Faecal indices based on near infrared spectroscopy to assess intake, in vivo digestibility and chemical composition of the herbage ingested by sheep (crude protein, fibres and lignin content). Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 15, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanchone, A, Archimede, H, Baumont, R, Boval, M 2010. Intake and digestibility of fresh grass fed to sheep indoors or at pasture, at two herbage allowances. Animal Feed Science and Technology 157, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 2009. The state of food and agriculture 2009: livestock in the balance. State of Food and Agriculture, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome, Italy, 166pp.Google Scholar
Follett, RF, Schuman, GE 2005. Grazing land contributions to carbon sequestration. In Grassland: a global resource. Plenary and invited papers from the XX International Grassland Congress (ed. DA McGilloway), Wageningen Academic Publishers, Dublin, Ireland, 26 June–1 July 2005, pp. 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukumoto, NM, Damasceno, JC, Deresz, F, Martins, CE, Coser, AC, dos Santos, GT 2010. Milk yield and composition, feed intake and stocking rate of crossbread cows in tropical grasses managed in a rotational grazing system. Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia – Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 39, 1548–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garay, AH, Sollenberger, LE, McDonald, DC, Ruegsegger, GJ, Kalmbacher, RS, Mislevy, P 2004. Nitrogen fertilization and stocking rate affect stargrass pasture and cattle performance. Crop Science 44, 1348–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Criado, B, Garcia-Cuidad, A, Perwz-Corona, ME 1991. Prediction of botanical composition in grassland herbage samples by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 57, 507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, MJ, Huckle, CA, Nuthall, R, Rook, AJ 1999. The effect of physiological state (lactating or dry) and sward surface height on grazing behaviour and intake by dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63, 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, HCJ, Beddington, JR, Crute, IR, Haddad, L, Lawrence, D, Muir, JF, Pretty, J, Robinson, S, Thomas, SM, Toulmin, C 2010. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327, 812–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfree, R, Lepschi, B, Reside, A, Bolger, T, Robertson, B, Marshall, D, Carnegie, M 2011. Multiscale topoedaphic heterogeneity increases resilience and resistance of a dominant grassland species to extreme drought and climate change. Global Change Biology 17, 943–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetsch, AL, Gipson, TA, Askar, AR, Puchala, R 2010. Invited review: feeding behaviour of goats. Journal of Animal Science 88, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gourley, CJP, McGowan, AA 1991. Assessing differences in pasture mass with an automated rising plate meter and a direct harvesting technique. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 337–339.Google Scholar
Gracia, A, Zeballos, G 2011. Animal welfare concern and attitudes towards more animal welfare friendly meat products: characterization and segmentation. Itea-Informacion Tecnica Economica Agraria 107, 33–47.Google Scholar
Gulsen, N, Coskun, B, Umucalilar, HD, Dural, H 2004. Prediction of nutritive value of a native forage, Prangos uechritzii, using of in situ and in vitro measurements. Journal of Arid Environments 56, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrero, M, Thornton, PK, Notenbaert, AM, Wood, S, Msangi, S, Freeman, HA, Bossio, D, Dixon, J, Peters, M, van de Steeg, J, Lynam, J, Parthasarathy Rao, P, MacMillan, S, Gerard, B, McDermott, J, Sere, C, Rosegrant, M 2010. Smart investments in sustainable food production: revisiting mixed crop-livestock production. Science 327, 822–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, MJ, Donald, GE, Hyder, MW, Smith, RCG 2004. Estimation of pasture growth rate in the south west of Western Australia from AVHRR NDVI and climate data. Remote Sensing of Environment 93, 528–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirata, M, Yamamoto, K, Tobisa, M 2010. Selection of feeding areas by cattle in a spatially heterogeneous environment: selection between two tropical grasses differing in accessibility and abiotic environment. Journal of Ethology 28, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, KW, Krebs, GL, McCafferty, P, van Wyngaarden, SP, Addison, J 2010. Using faecal DNA to determine consumption by kangaroos of plants considered palatable to sheep. Animal 4, 282–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbs, NT 1987. Fecal indices to dietary quality: a critique. Journal of Wildlife Management 51, 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoste, H, Torres-Acosta, JF, Paolini, V, Aguilar-Caballero, A, Etter, E, Lefrileux, Y, Chartier, C, Broqua, C 2005. Interactions between nutrition and gastrointestinal infections with parasitic nematodes in goats. Small Ruminant Research 60, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, LR 1991. Tropical pasture utilisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, ER Jr, Kelly, RD, Smith, WK, Fahnestock, JT, Welker, JM, Reiners, WA 2004. Estimation of carbon sequestration by combining remote sensing and net ecosystem exchange data for northern mixed-grass prairie and sagebrush-steppe ecosystems. Environmental Management 33 (Suppl 1), S432–S441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, LP, Petty, S, Cowley, R, Fisher, A, Ash, AJ, MacDonald, N 2007. Factors affecting the management of cattle grazing distribution in northern Australia: preliminary observations on the effect of paddock size and water points. Rangeland Journal 29, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iiyama, M, Kaitibie, S, Kariuki, P, Morimoto, Y 2007. The status of crop-livestock systems and evolution toward integration. Annals of Arid Zone 46, 301–323.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007. Climate change 2007: the scientific basis (contribution of Working Group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp.Google Scholar
Inyang, U, Vendramini, JMB, Sollenberger, LE, Sellers, B, Adesogan, A, Paiva, L, Lunpha, A 2010. Forage species and stocking rate effects on animal performance and herbage responses of ‘Mulato’ and bahiagrass pastures. Crop Science 50, 1079–1085.Google Scholar
Jepson, W 2005. A disappearing biome? Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna. Geographical Journal 171, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, RJ 1990. Nitrogen rate and stocking rate effects on steer gains from grazed irrigated pangola grass in the Ord valley, Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, RJ 2003. Effects of sown grasses and stocking rates on pasture and animal production from legume-based pastures in the seasonally dry tropics. Tropical Grasslands 37, 129–150.Google Scholar
Jones, RJ, LeFeuvre, RP 2006. Pasture production, pasture quality and their relationships with steer gains on irrigated, N-fertilised pangola grass at a range of stocking rates in the Ord Valley, Western Australia. Tropical Grasslands 40, 1–13.Google Scholar
Jones, RM, McDonald, CK, Clements, RJ, Bunch, GA 2000. Sown pastures in subcoastal south-eastern Queensland: pasture composition, legume persistence and cattle weight gain over 10 years. Tropical Grasslands 34, 21–37.Google Scholar
Jouquet, EP, Bloquel, E, Doan, TT, Ricoy, M, Orange, D, Rumpel, C, Duc, TT 2011. Do compost and vermicompost improve macronutrient retention and plant growth in degraded tropical soils? Compost Science & Utilization 19, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karfs, RA, Abbott, BN, Scarth, PF, Wallace, JF 2009. Land condition monitoring information for reef catchments: a new era. The Rangeland Journal 31, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, DR, Michalk, DL 2007. Towards sustainable grassland and livestock management. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitessa, S, Flinn, PC, Irish, GG 1999. Comparison of methods used to predict the in vivo digestibility of feeds in ruminants. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 825–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, S 2011. Recent progress in the study of behaviour and management in grazing cattle. Animal Science Journal 82, 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosgey, IS, Van Arendonk, JAM, Baker, RL 2004. Economic values for traits in breeding objectives for sheep in the tropics: impact of tangible and intangible benefits. Livestock Production Science 88, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruska, RL, Reid, RS, Thornton, PK, Henninger, N, Kristjanson, PM 2003. Mapping livestock-oriented agricultural production systems for the developing world. Agricultural Systems 77, 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, L, Schmidt, K, Dury, S, Skidmore, A 2001. Imaging spectrometry and vegetation science. In Imaging spectrometry (ed. FD van der Meer and SM de Jong), pp. 111–155. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Laca, EA 2009. New approaches and tools for grazing management. Rangeland Ecology & Management 62, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacher, TE, Alho, CJR 2001. Terrestrial small mammal richness and habitat associations in an Amazon Forest-Cerrado contact zone. Biotropica 33, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R 2005. Soil carbon sequestration in natural and managed tropical forest ecosystems. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21, 1–30.Google Scholar
Landau, S, Glasser, T, Dvash, L 2006. Monitoring nutrition in small ruminants with the aid of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) technology: a review. Small Ruminant Research 61, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laredo, MA, Simpson, GD, Minson, DJ, Orpin, CG 1991. The potential for using n-alkanes in tropical forages as a marker for the determination of dry matter [intake] by grazing ruminants. Journal of Agricultural Science 117, 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemaire, G, Da Silva, SC, Agnusdei, M, Wade, M, Hodgson, J 2009. Interactions between leaf lifespan and defoliation frequency in temperate and tropical pastures: a review. Grass and Forage Science 64, 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, RA 1990. Factors affecting the utilization of poor quality forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutrition Research Reviews 3, 277–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lippke, H 2002. Estimation of Forage Intake by Ruminants on Pasture. Crop Science 42, 869–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Guerrero, I, Fontenot, JP, Beatriz Garcia-Peniche, T 2011. Comparison of four biomass estimation methods in Tall Fescue pastures. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias 2, 209–220.Google Scholar
Lunt, ID, Eldridge, DJ, Morgan, JW, Witt, GB 2007. A framework to predict the effects of livestock grazing and grazing exclusion on conservation values in natural ecosystems in Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 55, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, RK 2010. A locally adapted method for improving fecal NIRS and NutBal-PRO predictions of cattle performance. In Shining light on manure improves livestock and land management (ed. J Walker and D Tolleson), pp. 43–51. AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
Lyons, RK, Stuth, JW 1992. Fecal NIRS equations for predicting diet quality of free-ranging cattle. The Journal of Range Management 45, 238–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahieu, M, Aumont, G 2009. Effects of sheep and cattle alternate grazing on sheep parasitism and production. Tropical Animal Health Production 41, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, RC, Astatkie, T, Cooper, JM, Fredeen, AH 2005. A comparison of methods used to determine biomass on naturalized swards. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 191, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matose, F 2009. Knowledge, power, livelihoods and commons practices in Dwesa-Cwebe, South Africa. Development Southern Africa 26, 627–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayes, RW, Dove, H 2000. Measurement of dietary nutrient intake in free-ranging mammalian herbivores. Nutrition Research Reviews 13, 107–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayle, FE, Langstroth, RP, Fisher, RA, Meir, P 2007. Long-term forest–savannah dynamics in the Bolivian Amazon: implications for conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 362, 291–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCosker, T 2000. Cell grazing – the first 10 years in Australia. Tropical Grasslands 34, 207–218.Google Scholar
McDermott, JJ, Staal, SJ, Freeman, HA, Herrero, M, Van de Steeg, JA 2010. Sustaining intensification of smallholder livestock systems in the tropics. Livestock Science 130, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayes, RW, Dove, H, Chen, XB, Guada, JA 1995. Advances in the use of faecal and urinary markers for measuring diet composition, herbage intake and nutrient utilization in herbivores. In Recent developments in the nutrition of herbivores. Proceedings of the IVth International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores (ed. M Journet, E Grenet, M-H Farce, M Theriez and C Dematquilly), pp. 381–406. INRA Editions, Paris.Google Scholar
McDowell, L 1997. Minerals for grazing ruminants in tropical regions, 3rd edition. University of Florida, USA.Google Scholar
McIvor, JG 2007. Pasture management in semiarid tropical woodlands: improving the herbage quality of stylos and grasses. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1359–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, RW, McCown, RL, Little, DA, Winter, WH, Dance, RA 1983. An analysis of cattle liveweight changes on tropical grass pastures during the dry and early wet seasons in northern Australia. 1. The nature of weight changes. Journal of Agricultural Science 101, 17–24.Google Scholar
Metera, E, Sakowski, T, Sloniewski, K, Romanowicz, B 2010. Grazing as a tool to maintain biodiversity of grassland – a review. Animal Science Papers and Reports 28, 315–334.Google Scholar
Miller, CP, Rains, JP, Shaw, KA, Middleton, CH 1997. Commercial development of Stylosanthes pastures in northern Australia. II. Stylosanthes in the northern Australian beef industry. Tropical Grasslands 31, 509–514.Google Scholar
Milton, EJ, Schaepman, ME, Anderson, K, Kneubuhler, M, Fox, N 2009. Progress in field spectroscopy. Remote Sensing of Environment 113, S92–S109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, DJ 1973. Effect of fertilizer nitrogen on digestibility and voluntary intake of Chloris gayana, Digitaria decumbens and Pennisetum clandestinum. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 13, 153–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, DJ 1990. Forage in Ruminant Nutrition. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Molina, DO, Matamoros, I, Almeida, Z, Tedeschi, L, Pell, AN 2004. Evaluation of the dry matter intake predictions of the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System with Holstein and dual-purpose lactating cattle in the tropics. Animal Feed Science and Technology 114, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monson, WG, Burton, GW 1982. Harvest frequency and ferilizer effects on yield, quality, and persistence of eight bermudagrasses. Agronomy Journal 74, 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morais, JAS, Berchielli, TT, de Vega, A, Queiroz, MFS, Keli, A, Reis, RA, Bertipaglia, LMA, Souza, SF 2011. The validity of n-alkanes to estimate intake and digestibility in Nellore beef cattle fed a tropical grass (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu). Livestock Science 135, 184–192.Google Scholar
Muir, PD, Deaker, JM, Bown, MD 1998. Effects of forage and grain based feeding systems on beef quality: a review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 623–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, WM, Silman, JP, Barreto, ADM 1995. A comparison of quadrat, capacitance meter, HFRO sward stick, and rising plate for estimating herbage mass in a smooth-stalked, meadowgrass-dominant white clover sward. Grass and Forage Science 50, 452–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutanga, O, Skidmore, AK, Prins, HHT 2004. Predicting in situ pasture quality in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, using continuum-removed absorption features. Remote Sensing of Environment 89, 393–408.Google Scholar
Mwebe, R, Ejobi, F, Laker, CD 2011. Assessment of the economic viability of goat management systems in Goma Sub County and Mukono Town Council in Mukono District, Uganda. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43, 825–831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norton, BW 1984. Differences between species in forage quality. In Nutritional limits to animal production from pastures (ed. JB Hacker), pp. 89–110. CAB, Farnham Royal, UK.Google Scholar
Norton, BW, Poppi, DP 1995. Composition and nutritional attributes of pasture legumes. In Tropical legumes in animal nutrition (ed. JPF d'Mello and C Devendra), pp. 23–47. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Norton, BW, Gutteridge, RC, Johnson, PW, Beale, IF, Oldham, CM, McNeill, DM 1996. Beyond the herb layer – shrubs and trees as drought reserves. In A users guide to drought feeding alternatives (ed. J Rowe and N Cossins), pp. 99–109. The University of New England, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Obeidat, SM, Glasser, T, Landau, SY, Anderson, DM, Rayson, GD 2007. Application of multi-way analysis on excitation-emission spectra for plant identification. Talanta 72, 682–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliván, M, Ferreira, LMM, Celaya, R, Osoro, K 2007. Accuracy of the n-alkane technique for intake estimates in beef cattle using different sampling procedures and feeding levels. Livestock Science 106, 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Reagain, P, Bushell, J, Holmes, B 2011. Managing for rainfall variability: long-term profitability of different grazing strategies in a northern Australian tropical savanna. Animal Production Science 51, 210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Reagain, P, Bushell, J, Holloway, C, Reid, A 2009. Managing for rainfall variability: effect of grazing strategy on cattle production in a dry tropical savanna. Animal Production Science 49, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, DM, O'Reagain, PJ 2011. Managing for rainfall variability: impacts of grazing strategies on perennial grass dynamics in a dry tropical savanna. Rangeland Journal 33, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, FN, Sapienza, DA, Hassen, AT 2010. Effect of nutrient composition of feeds on digestibility of organic matter by cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 88, E151–E169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pautasso, M, Dehnen-Schmutz, K, Holdenrieder, O, Pietravalle, S, Salama, N, Jeger, MJ, Lange, E, Hehl-Lange, S 2010. Plant health and global change – some implications for landscape management. Biological Reviews 85, 729–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilon, R, Klumpp, K, Carrere, P, Picon-Cochard, C 2010. Determination of aboveground net primary productivity and plant traits in grasslands with near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Ecosystems 13, 851–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, CE, Carvalho, PCD, Frizzo, A, da Fontoura, JAS, Nabinger, C, Rocha, R 2007. Ingestive behaviour of steers on natural grasslands of Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Brasileira De Zootecnia – Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 36, 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piratelli, A, Blake, JG 2006. Bird communities of the southeastern Cerrado region, Brazil. Ornitologia Neotropical 17, 213–225.Google Scholar
Poppi, DP, McLennan, SR 1995. Protein and energy utilization by ruminants at pasture. Journal of Animal Science 73, 278–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poppi, DP, McLennan, SR, Bediye, S, de Vega, A, Zorrilla-Rios, J 1997. Forage quality: strategies for increasing nutritive value of forages. Proceedings of the 18th International Grassland Congress, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, pp. 307–322.Google Scholar
Powers, JS, Corre, MD, Twine, TE, Veldkamp, E 2011. Geographic bias of field observations of soil carbon stocks with tropical land-use changes precludes spatial extrapolation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 6318–6322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasad, CS, Gowda, NKS 2005. Importance of trace minerals and relevance of their supplementation in tropical animal feeding system: a review. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 75, 92–100.Google Scholar
Preston, TR, Leng, RA 1987. Matching ruminant production systems with available resources in the tropics and sub-tropics. Penambul Books, Armidale.Google Scholar
Prober, SM, Smith, FP 2009. Enhancing biodiversity persistence in intensively used agricultural landscapes: a synthesis of 30 years of research in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 132, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, RJ 1984. Facts from faeces. Mammal Reviews 14, 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, M 2000. Understanding grazing lands for better management: are we making progress? Tropical Grasslands 34, 182–191.Google Scholar
Ratter, JA, Ribeiro, JF, Bridgewater, S 1997. The Brazilian cerrado vegetation and threats to its biodiversity. Annals of Botany 80, 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, SG, Batello, C, Baas, S, Mack, S 2005. Grassland and forage to improve livelihoods and reduce poverty. 20th International Grassland Congress, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, AJ, Everitt, JH, Gausman, HW 1983. Radiometric estimation of biomass and nitrogen content of Alicia grass. Remote Sensing of Environment 13, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, MM 2009. Free range grazing in India: present status and policy suggestions. Range Management and Agroforestry 30, 88–97.Google Scholar
Sansoucy, R 1997. Livestock – a driving force for food security and sustainable development. World Animal Review, 84/85(4–5), 1995, 5–17.Google Scholar
Sansoucy, R, Jabbar, MA, Ehui, S, Fitzhugh, H 1995. The contribution of livestock to food security and sustainable development. In Livestock development strategies for low income countries. Proceedings of the Joint FAO/ILRI Roundtable on Livestock Development Strategies for Low Income Countries, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 27 February–2 March 1995, pp. 9–21.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Schmidely, P, Daudin, JJ, St-Pierre, NR 2008. Meta-analyses of experimental data in animal nutrition. Animal 2, 1203–1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schellberg, J, Hill, MJ, Gerhards, R, Rothmund, M, Braun, M 2008. Precision agriculture on grasslands: applications, perspectives and constraints. European Journal of Agronomy 29, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlecht, E, Sangare, M, Becker, K 2003. Seasonal variations in the gastrointestinal tract fill of grazing Zebu cattle in the Sahel. Journal of Agricultural Science 140, 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreurs, NM, Lane, GA, Tavendale, MH, Barry, TN, McNabb, WC 2008. Pastoral flavour in meat products from ruminants fed fresh forages and its amelioration by forage condensed tannins. Animal Feed Science and Technology 146, 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sere, C, Steinfeld, H, Groenewold, J 1996. World livestock production systems: current status, issues and trends. FAO Animal Production and Health Papers 127. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Shelton, M, Dalzell, S 2007. Production, economic and environmental benefits of leucaena pastures. Tropical Grasslands 41, 174–190.Google Scholar
Sidahmed, A 2008. Livestock and climate change: coping and risk management strategies for a sustainable future. In Proceedings of an International Conference. Livestock and global change (ed. P Rowlinson, M Steele and A Nefzaoui), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Smith, DG, Mayes, RW, Raats, JG 2001. Effect of species, plant part, and season of harvest on n-alkane concentrations in the cuticular wax of common rangeland grasses from southern Africa. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 875–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollenberger, LE, Vanzant, ES 2011. Interrelationships among forage nutritive value and quantity and individual animal performance. Crop Science 51, 420–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollenberger, LE, Moore, JE, Allen, VG, Pedreira, CGS 2005. Reporting forage allowance in grazing experiments. Crop Science 45, 896–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soussana, JF, Tallec, T, Blanfort, V 2010. Mitigating the greenhouse gas balance of ruminant production systems through carbon sequestration in grasslands. Animal 4, 334–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soussana, JF, Allard, V, Pilegaard, K, Ambus, P, Amman, C, Campbell, C, Ceschia, E, Clifton-Brown, J, Czobel, S, Domingues, R, Flechard, C, Fuhrer, J, Hensen, A, Horvath, L, Jones, M, Kasper, G, Martin, C, Nagy, Z, Neftel, A, Raschi, A, Baronti, S, Rees, RM, Skiba, U, Stefani, P, Manca, G, Sutton, M 2007. Full accounting of the greenhouse gas (CO2, N2O, CH4) budget of nine European grassland sites. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 121, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starks, PJ, Coleman, SW, Phillips, WA 2004. Determination of forage composition using remote sensing. Journal of Range Management 57, 635–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinfeld, H, Gerber, P, Wassenaar, T, Castel, V, Rosales, M, de Haan, C 2006. Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Stobbs, TH 1975. Effect of plant structure on intake of tropical pasture. 3. Influence of fertilizer nitrogen on size of bite harvested by Jersey cows grazing Setaria. Anceps Cv Kazungula Swards. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 997–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stobbs, TH 1977. Short-term effects of herbage allowance on milk-production, milk-composition and grazing time of cows grazing nitrogen-fertilized tropical grass pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 17, 892–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stobbs, TH 1978. Milk production, milk composition, rate of milking and grazing behaviour of dairy cows grazing two tropical grass pastures under a leader and follower system. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 18, 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumberg, J 2002. The logic of fodder legumes in Africa. Food Policy 27, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstol, F 1991. Large scale utilization of straw for ruminant production systems. In Recent advances on the nutrition of herbivores (ed. YW Ho, HK Wong, N Abdullah, ZA Tajuddin), Malaysian Society of Animal Production, Malaysia, pp. 55–60.Google Scholar
Suttie, JM, Reynolds, SG, Batello, C 2005. Grasslands of the world. In Grasslands of the world (ed. FAO), p. xxii+514 pp, Lavoisier Publishing Inc., New York, USA.Google Scholar
Suyker, AE, Verma, SB 2001. Year-round observations of the net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in a native tallgrass prairie. Global Change Biology 7, 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, DL, Friend, MA, Bishop-Hurley, GJ, Handcock, RN, Wark, T 2011. Tracking livestock using global positioning systems – are we still lost? Animal Production Science 51, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarr, AB, Moore, KJ, Dixon, PM 2005. Spectral reflectance as a covariate for estimating pasture productivity and composition. Crop Science 45, 996–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D, Rangnekar, D 2004. Responding to the increasing global demand for animal products: implications for the livelihoods of livestock producers in developing countries. Responding to the Livestock Revolution: The role of globalisation and implications for poverty alleviation. British Society of Animal Science. Occasional Publication 33, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, PK, Herrero, M 2010. Potential for reduced methane and carbon dioxide emissions from livestock and pasture management in the tropics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 19667–19672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomkins, N, O'Reagain, P 2007. Global positioning systems indicate landscape preferences of cattle in the subtropical savannas. The Rangelands Journal 29, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran, H, Salgado, P, Lecomte, P 2009. Species, climate and fertilizer effects on grass fibre and protein in tropical environments. Journal of Agricultural Science 147, 555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotter, MG, Lamb, DW, Hinch, GN, Guppy, CN 2010. Global navigation satellite system livestock tracking: system development and data interpretation. Animal Production Science 50, 616–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanSoest, PJ 1996. Allometry and ecology of feeding behaviour and digestive capacity in herbivores: a review. Zoo Biology 15, 455–479.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, F 1983. The vegetation of Africa. Natural Resources Research. UNESCO, Paris, 20, 356pp.Google Scholar
Wilson, JR, Deinum, B, Engels, FM 1991. Temperature effects on anatomy and digestibility of leaf and stem of tropical and temperate forage species. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 39, 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winks, L 1990. Phosphorus and beef production in northern Australia. 2. Responses to phosphorus by ruminants – a review. Tropical Grasslands 24, 140–158.Google Scholar
Wright, IA, Jones, JR, Davies, DA, Davidson, GR, Vale, JE 2006. The effect of sward surface height on the response to mixed grazing by cattle and sheep. Animal Science 82, 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar