Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:26:29.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of subclinical and clinical mastitis on sensitivity to pain of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2015

M. D. P. Peters ,
I. D. B. Silveira  and
V. Fischer
M. D. P. Peters
Affiliation:
Instituto Federal Sul-Rio-Grandense, Campus Pelotas Visconde Da Graça. Av. Ildefonso Simões Lopes 2791, 96060-290, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
I. D. B. Silveira
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Agronomia, Rua Gomes Carneiro 1, 96010-610, Pelotas, Brazil
V. Fischer*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenida Bento Gonçalves 7712, 91540-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A total of 90 cows from three commercial farms were used to evaluate the relationship between subclinical mastitis and clinical mastitis and thermal nociceptive threshold. Milk strips from all udder quarters were tested for clinical mastitis with visual inspection of milk and udder alterations and for subclinical mastitis using California Mastitis Test. Milk yield was recorded, milk was sampled and further analyzed for somatic cells count (SCC). Cows were considered healthy when SCC<200 000 cells/ml and no visual alterations in milk and/or udder, with mild subclinical mastitis when SCC>200 000 cells/ml and no visual alterations in milk and/or udder, with moderate subclinical mastitis when SCC>500 000 cells/ml and no visual alterations in milk and/or udder and with clinical mastitis when visual alterations in milk and/or udder were detected. Nociceptive threshold was evaluated with the thermal threshold meter apparatus applied to the rear legs. Thermal threshold (TT) decreased when we compared healthy cows with cows presenting clinical mastitis and tended to decrease when we compare healthy cows with those with moderate subclinical mastitis. TT was lower at the ipsilateral rear leg compared with the contralateral leg to the infected mammary gland. TT linearly decreases as log10SCC increased and it showed sharp decrease as log10SCC exceed the value of 6.4. Increase in one unit of log10SCC increased the odds of low thermal threshold (lower than 55.8°C). Subclinical mastitis might be a welfare issue as it tended to decrease nociceptive thermal threshold.

Keywords

lactating cowsnociceptive thresholdclinical mastitissubclinical mastitisthermal threshold meter
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 12 , December 2015 , pp. 2024 - 2028
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broom, DM and Fraser, AF 2010. Comportamento e bem-estar de animais domésticos. Manole, Barueri, SP, Brasil.Google Scholar
Calamari, L, Soriani, N, Panella, G, Petrera, F, Minuti, A and Trevisi, E 2014. Rumination time around calving: an early signal to detect cows at greater risk of disease. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coderre, TJ and Melzack, R 1987. Cutaneous hyperalgesia: contributions of the peripheral and central nervous systems to the increase in pain sensitivity after injury. Brain Research 404, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, EM, Vinson, WE and Pearson, RE 1986. Potential of somatic cell concentration in milk as a sire selection criterion to reduce mastitis in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 2163–2172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eshraghi, HR, Zeitlin, IJ, Fitzpatrick, JL, Ternent, H and Logue, D 1999. The release of bradykinin in bovine mastitis. Life Sciences 64, 1675–1687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzpatrick, CE, Chapinal, N, Petersson-Wolfe, CS, Devries, TJ, Kelton, DF, Duffield, TF and Leslie, KE 2013. The effect of meloxiicam on pain sensitivity, rumination time, and clinical signs in dairy cows with endotoxin-induced clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 2847–2856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzpatrick, JL, Scott, M and Nolan, A 2006. Assessment of pain and welfare in sheep. Small Ruminant Research 62, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 2012. Dados production of leche in Brazil. Retrieved March 9, 2012, from http://faostat.fao.org Google Scholar
Gougoulis, DA, Kyriazakis, I, Papaioannou, N, Papadopoulos, E, Taitzoglou, IA and Fthenakis, GC 2008. Subclinical mastitis changes the patterns of maternal–offspring behaviour in dairy sheep. The Veterinary Journal 176, 378–384.Google ScholarPubMed
Hellebrekers, LJ 2002. Dor em animais. Manole, Barueri, SP, Brazil.Google Scholar
Hogeveen, H, Huijps, K and TJGM, Lam 2011. Economic aspects of mastitis: new developments. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 59, 16–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Kemp, MH, Nolan, AM, Cripps, PJ and Fitzpatrick, JL 2008. Animal-based measurements of the severity of mastitis in dairy cows. Veterinary Records 163, 175–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kielland, C, Skjerve, E, Osteras, O and Zanella, AJ 2010. Dairy farmer attitudes and empathy toward animals are associated with animal welfare indicators. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 2998–3006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, KE and Petersson-Wolfe, CS 2012. Assessment and management of pain in dairy cows with clinical mastitis. Veterinary Clinical North America Food Animal Practices 28, 289–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medrano-Galarza, C, Gibbons, J, Wagner, S, De Passillé, AM and Rushen, J 2012. Behavioral changes in dairy cows with mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6994–7002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muir, III WM 2009. Fisiologia e fisiopatologia da dor. In Manual de Controle da dor em Medicina Veterinária (ed. JS Gaynor and WM Muir III), pp. 13–41. Editora MedVet, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Philpot, W and Nickerson, SC 2002. Vencendo a luta contra a mastite. Westfalia Landtechnik do Brasil Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Pinheiro Machado Filho, LC, Hurnik, JF and Ewing, KK 1998. A thermal threshold assay to measure the nociceptive response to morphine sulphate in cattle. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 62, 218–223.Google Scholar
Potter, L, Mccarthy, C and Oldham, J 2006. Algometer reliability in measuring pain pressure threshold over normal spinal muscles to allow quantification of anti-nociceptive treatment effects. International Journal of Osteopathology Medicine 9, 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupp, R and Boichard, D 2000. Relationship of early first lactation somatic cell count with risk of subsequent first clinical mastitis. Livestock Production Science 62, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, MV and Fonseca, LFL 2007. Estratégias para controle de mastite e melhoria da qualidade do leite. Manole, Barueri, SP, Brazil.Google Scholar
Seegers, H, Fourichon, C and Beaudeau, F 2003. Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds. Veterinary Research 34, 475–491.Google ScholarPubMed
Sepúlveda-Varas, P, Proudfoot, KL, Weary, DM and von Keyserlingk, MG 2014. Changes in behaviour of dairy cows with clinical mastitis. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97, 2953–2958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siivonen, J, Taponen, S, Hovinen, M, Pastell, M, Lensink, BJ, Pyörälä, S and Hänninen, L 2011. Impact of acute clinical mastitis on cow behavior. Applied Animal Behavior Science 132, 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadich, N, Tejeda, C, Bastias, S, Rosenfeld, C and Green, LE 2013. Nociceptive threshold, blood constituents and physiological values in 213 cows with locomotion scores ranging from normal to severely lame. The Veterinary Journal 197, 401–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed